+1 (non binding)
Regards
Felix
Am Dienstag, den 30.10.2007, 22:03 + schrieb Robert Burrell Donkin:
i'd like to propose that the IPMC sponsors the entry of RAT into the incubator
- robert
--8-
[X ] +1 Allow RAT to enter incubator, sponsored by IPMC
-Bertrand
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+1 (non-binding)
Gilles
2007/10/30, Robert Burrell Donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
i'd like to propose that the IPMC sponsors the entry of RAT into the
incubator
- robert
--8-
[ ] +1 Allow RAT to enter
+1!
Paul
On 10/31/07, Bertrand Delacretaz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[X ] +1 Allow RAT to enter incubator, sponsored by IPMC
-Bertrand
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
+1
On 10/30/07, Robert Burrell Donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i'd like to propose that the IPMC sponsors the entry of RAT into the
incubator
- robert
--8-
[ ] +1 Allow RAT to enter incubator,
On Oct 30, 2007, at 10:03 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
--8--
---
[ ] +1 Allow RAT to enter incubator, sponsored by IPMC
[ ] +0
[ ] -0
[ ] -1 Do no allow RAT to enter incubator
On Wednesday 31 October 2007 06:03, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
After a lot of talks... FINALLY ;o)
[x] +1 Allow RAT to enter incubator, sponsored by IPMC
[ ] +0
[ ] -0
[ ] -1 Do no allow RAT to enter incubator
Cheers
--
Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
I live here;
On Wednesday 31 October 2007 16:42, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Another thing that worries me a bit is projects coming in with a large
(N=more than 3 or 5?) number of committers from the same organization,
especially people who have no previous Apache or open source committer
experience.
I
On Wednesday 31 October 2007 12:30, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
I know on Geronimo, and i suspect other projects as well,
that there have been many times that people that worked for the same
company voted differently so I don't think its totally pointless but I
understand the concern.
I would
Another thing that worries me a bit is projects coming in with a large
(N=more than 3 or 5?) number of committers from the same organization,
especially people who have no previous Apache or open source committer
experience. Do we want to set a limit on N, to give the project more
chances to
On 10/31/07, Paul Fremantle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...if
we explicitly try to *limit* participation in a project then we are doing
two things:
1. Discouraging involvement - the opposite of the aim of the incubator
2. Ruling out meritocracy - making it harder for some people to become
Hi,
I am really sorry.
Our server is currently down. We will make it work as soon as possible.
On Oct 31, 2007 9:04 AM, Carl Trieloff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
J Aaron Farr wrote:
Ting Peng [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Now, we are going to move our project BlueSky (Blue Sky Distance
Bertrand
Sorry - I misunderstood your point. I would be very happy to limit the
number of INITIAL committers! Yes +1.
I just don't think that placing limits on new committers who are nominated
by merit during incubation is right.
Paul
On 10/31/07, Bertrand Delacretaz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thank you for your interest.
I am sorry that our server is temporarily down. We will fix it as soon
as possible.
The license of the source is an open source one. It is Apache License
, but we didn't sate it in the proposal.
Currently, we are not paid programmer. Most of us are post-graduated
On Oct 30, 2007, at 6:03 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
i'd like to propose that the IPMC sponsors the entry of RAT into
the incubator
- robert
--8--
---
[X] +1 Allow RAT to enter incubator,
On Oct 31, 2007, at 8:38 AM, Paul Fremantle wrote:
Bertrand
Sorry - I misunderstood your point. I would be very happy to limit the
number of INITIAL committers! Yes +1.
If it makes sense to do so, then +1. But to do so just to
create a mistaken impression that the podling is, *at this
+1 Allow RAT to enter incubator, sponsored by IPMC
Ross
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+1!
Eddie
On 10/31/07, Ross Gardler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 Allow RAT to enter incubator, sponsored by IPMC
Ross
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 10/30/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matthieu Riou wrote:
On 10/30/07, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 30, 2007, at 11:58 PM, Matthieu Riou wrote:
there are at least 3 legally independent committers and there is no
single
company or entity that is
On 10/31/07, Paul Fremantle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...I just don't think that placing limits on new committers who are nominated
by merit during incubation is right
Totally agreed, committers nominated during incubation are subject to
the normal ASF filters so there's no problem with
+1 !
-jean
On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 22:03:16 +, Robert Burrell Donkin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
i'd like to propose that the IPMC sponsors the entry of RAT into the
incubator
- robert
--8-
[ ] +1
Hi,
On Oct 31, 2007, at 1:42 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Another thing that worries me a bit is projects coming in with a large
(N=more than 3 or 5?) number of committers from the same organization,
especially people who have no previous Apache or open source committer
experience. Do we
Matthieu Riou wrote:
IMHO 3 legally independent committers can be very hard requirement,
especially for small sized project.
How hard is it for users when the company paying them all abandons the
project, and we don't have enough mass and diversity for it to continue?
And that is just one
On 10/31/07, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 30, 2007, at 11:58 PM, Matthieu Riou wrote:
there are at least 3 legally independent committers and there is no
single
company or entity that is vital to the success of the project
What does legally independent mean? Not paid
On Oct 31, 2007 2:45 PM, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matthieu Riou wrote:
IMHO 3 legally independent committers can be very hard requirement,
especially for small sized project.
How hard is it for users when the company paying them all abandons the
project, and we don't have
On Thursday 01 November 2007 01:26, Craig L Russell wrote:
And I certainly wouldn't want to see an arbitrary cutoff of
prospective Apache committers just because of their affiliation.
Agree, especially if there has been a large set of folks working on the
codebase that is on the way in. So,
26 matches
Mail list logo
