Re: photo gallery software (previously called Caitrin)

2008-06-30 Thread Luciano Resende
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 4:10 AM, Angela Cymbalak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There has been a lot of going back and forth. Originally there seemed to be > little interest at the Incubator so I was talking to the Roller folks. > There is some interest over there but a disagreement on how to write

Re: photo gallery software (previously called Caitrin)

2008-06-30 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 10:00 PM, Angela Cymbalak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >...I just haven't figured out how Sling may play into that > and what that means for the actual storage mechanism. Does anyone from the > Sling project have any thoughts on this?... Sling should make it very easy to cre

Re: [VOTE] Accept Empire-db for Incubation

2008-06-30 Thread Martijn Dashorst
+1 On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 11:49 PM, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +1 > > There are never enough open source persistence solutions. > > Craig > > On Jun 30, 2008, at 1:32 PM, Henning Schmiedehausen wrote: > >> This vote will run until Monday, July 7th, 2008. >> >> [ ] +1 Accept Empi

Re: [VOTE] Accept Empire-db for Incubation

2008-06-30 Thread Craig L Russell
+1 There are never enough open source persistence solutions. Craig On Jun 30, 2008, at 1:32 PM, Henning Schmiedehausen wrote: This vote will run until Monday, July 7th, 2008. [ ] +1 Accept Empire-DB for incubation [ ] 0 Don't care [ ] -1 Reject for the following reason: --- = Empire-db

Re: [VOTE] Accept Empire-db for Incubation

2008-06-30 Thread Niall Pemberton
[X] +1 Accept Empire-DB for incubation Niall - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bluesky project document

2008-06-30 Thread Robert Burrell Donkin
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/bluesky.html seems to be in conflict on people.apache.org after an update. i haven't tried to resolved it (yet). anyone know anything about it? - robert - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTE

RE: photo gallery software (previously called Caitrin)

2008-06-30 Thread Angela Cymbalak
At 04:32 PM 6/30/2008, Noel wrote: > I am convinced that Jackrabbit is the direction to go for the > mid-tier of the application. My only question is whether or not we lose anything from that decision, but if I didn't think that the JCR was the right way to go, I wouldn't have brought it up.

Re: [VOTE] Accept Empire-db for Incubation

2008-06-30 Thread Eelco Hillenius
[ x ] +1 Accept Empire-DB for incubation [ ] 0 Don't care [ ] -1 Reject for the following reason: I sympathize with Martijn's hesitations. However, incubation is a try-out period, so if the Empire-DB people think they can build a functioning community during their incubation, I'd say go for it

Re: [VOTE] Accept Empire-db for Incubation

2008-06-30 Thread Henning Schmiedehausen
Oh, and obviously I vote +1. :-) Ciao Henning On Mon, 2008-06-30 at 22:32 +0200, Henning Schmiedehausen wrote: > This vote will run until Monday, July 7th, 2008. > > [ ] +1 Accept Empire-DB for incubation > [ ] 0 Don't care > [ ] -1 Reject for the following reason: >

[VOTE] Accept Empire-db for Incubation

2008-06-30 Thread Henning Schmiedehausen
This vote will run until Monday, July 7th, 2008. [ ] +1 Accept Empire-DB for incubation [ ] 0 Don't care [ ] -1 Reject for the following reason: --- = Empire-db Proposal = This proposal is an application for the Empire-db Open Source component to become a new top-level project within the Ap

RE: photo gallery software (previously called Caitrin)

2008-06-30 Thread Noel J. Bergman
Angela Cymbalak wrote: > I am convinced that Jackrabbit is the direction to go for the > mid-tier of the application. My only question is whether or not we lose anything from that decision, but if I didn't think that the JCR was the right way to go, I wouldn't have brought it up. > I just haven'

Re: photo gallery software (previously called Caitrin)

2008-06-30 Thread Angela Cymbalak
These are all great suggestions. Of course, I have my favorites but I am interested in seeing what others who may be interested have to say. I have also updated the proposal a bit. Any ideas would be great to hear! I am convinced that Jackrabbit is the direction to go for the mid-tier of th

[VOTE] Release Apache UIMA-AS 2.2.2-incubating

2008-06-30 Thread Marshall Schor
Hi Everyone, Please review and vote on approving the 1st release of Apache UIMA-AS, an add-on to base UIMA. The release artifacts and the annotated RAT reports can be found here: http://people.apache.org/~schor/uima-release-candidates/uima-as/08 UIMA-AS originally came to Apache under a sof

Re: Gummit crypto for UIMA-AS

2008-06-30 Thread Marshall Schor
Santiago Gala wrote: FYI, according to "git log --stat -p --color-words -M -C -- docs/licenses xdocs/licenses", the words UIMA or uima do not appear in the whole revision control log (including messages and diffs) of the docs/licenses and xdocs/licenses directories. I don't think the update of th

Re: photo gallery software (previously called Caitrin)

2008-06-30 Thread Roland Weber
sebb wrote: BiblioPic? Biblimage already seems to be used for similar software. BiblioImage seems to be a name for an international festival. PicAndMix ;-) PhoGal PhoGa Foga SnapLib SnapStore PicStore SnapShow PicShow You missed "PicLib" :-) cheers, Roland

AW: [PROPOSAL] Empire-db

2008-06-30 Thread Manuel.Gamerdinger
I'm agreeing with Rainer. I often debate with my colleagues of the achitecture unit about the benefits of Empire-db. Mostly they agree with me, but they also mention the lack of some features and integration with other frameworks. E.g. they're asking for Spring support (transaction management),

Re: [VOTE] 72-hour lazy consensus for podling committer + PPMC member votes (was: INCUBATOR-57 aka IPMC votes...)

2008-06-30 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Noel J. Bergman wrote: William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Noel J. Bergman wrote: we should remember and capture that Roy raised valid points about having the *vote* be public, albeit after private discussion. It seemed that the idea was to discuss it in private, and only vote in public if it was clea

RE: [VOTE] 72-hour lazy consensus for podling committer + PPMC member votes (was: INCUBATOR-57 aka IPMC votes...)

2008-06-30 Thread Noel J. Bergman
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Noel J. Bergman wrote: > > we should remember and capture that Roy raised valid points about > > having the *vote* be public, albeit after private discussion. It > > seemed that the idea was to discuss it in private, and only vote > > in public if it was clear that the