Ralph Goers wrote:
In general, Java code at Apache should reside under a package of org.apache.
In this case, I would expect org.apache.subversion.javahl. Of course, this
will create compatibility problems. I don't know if it is completely possible
to create a separate jar containing the
Hi David;
I learn new rules/things every day :)
Thanks for poking. I am going to change it in the evening
--Gurkan
2009/11/17 David Crossley cross...@apache.org
The OpenWebBeans Status page links directly to apache.org /dist
Please see the ASF mirror guidelines, which emphatically say
to
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Branko Čibej br...@xbc.nu wrote:
I don't quite understand the point of this. Here we are with a Java
wrapper library for the Subversion APIs. The versioning rules that apply
to it are the same as for the rest of Subversion -- in other words, we
*must* keep the
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Branko Čibej br...@xbc.nu wrote:
I don't quite understand the point of this. Here we are with a Java
wrapper library for the Subversion APIs. The versioning rules that apply
to it are the same as for the rest of Subversion -- in other
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 5:54 PM, Branko Čibej br...@xbc.nu wrote:
Must is just a result of what our API versioning policy promises to
our users. Any number of compatibility layers won't change that.
Yes, but your versioning policy for sure allows incompatible changes
thru some mechanism,
Gaël Lalire wrote:
Hello,
Hi !
Today if you want to do syntax analysis, you have to use a compiler of compiler
(bison, yacc, javaCC ...) which generates source code.
After generation, you need to compile your generated source code and then you
can parse some input.
I dislike this method
On Nov 17, 2009, at 3:11 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
Ralph Goers wrote:
In general, Java code at Apache should reside under a package of org.apache.
In this case, I would expect org.apache.subversion.javahl. Of course, this
will create compatibility problems. I don't know if it is completely
On Nov 17, 2009, at 1:25 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
Java coding standard(s) makes very strong assertions that package
names should be 'owned' domain names, to ensure avoidance of name
collisions. Apache has maintained such for practically all projects,
incl all incoming projects, and I am
On Nov 17, 2009, at 6:27 AM, Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
On Nov 17, 2009, at 3:11 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
Ralph Goers wrote:
In general, Java code at Apache should reside under a package of
org.apache. In this case, I would expect org.apache.subversion.javahl. Of
course, this will create
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 2:57 PM, Ralph Goers ralph.go...@dslextreme.com wrote:
There is a more practical reason for this. If I have a need to debug a
package or get further documentation, the package name gives me a pointer as
to where to look. If tigris.org disappeared users would get very
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 3:48 PM, Branko Čibej br...@xbc.nu wrote:
Is there any way to make RAT slightly smarter so that it doesn't require
license headers in README files and such?
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/rat/main/trunk/
*duck*
Does policy dictate these
files must have
Hi all,
The Apache Pivot community feels that it is ready to graduate into the
Apache Pivot top-level project.
Please place your votes within the next 72 hours -- to serve as
recommendations to the Board at the December Board meeting.
[ ] +1, Graduate Apache Pivot
[ ] 0, I don't care
[ ] -1,
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 5:47 PM, Todd Volkert tvolk...@gmail.com wrote:
The Apache Pivot community feels that it is ready to graduate into the
Apache Pivot top-level project.
+1 from me!
cheers,
Leo
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
+1
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 8:51 PM, Leo Simons m...@leosimons.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 5:47 PM, Todd Volkert tvolk...@gmail.com wrote:
The Apache Pivot community feels that it is ready to graduate into the
Apache Pivot top-level project.
+1 from me!
cheers,
Leo
[X ] +1, Graduate Apache Pivot
Congrats!
-Bertrand
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Hi,
[x] +1, Graduate Apache Pivot
BR,
Jukka Zitting
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
+1
Niall
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 5:47 PM, Todd Volkert tvolk...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
The Apache Pivot community feels that it is ready to graduate into the
Apache Pivot top-level project.
Please place your votes within the next 72 hours -- to serve as
recommendations to the Board at
Branko ??ibej wrote:
Niall Pemberton wrote:
I ran a RAT report (0.6 version) on subversion trunk but theres alot
of *noise* from it. I have opened a bug ticket for license header
review here:
http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3529
Very helpful, thanks.
It would
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 11:01 PM, David Crossley cross...@apache.org wrote:
Branko ??ibej wrote:
Niall Pemberton wrote:
I ran a RAT report (0.6 version) on subversion trunk but theres alot
of *noise* from it. I have opened a bug ticket for license header
review here:
Niall Pemberton wrote:
David Crossley wrote:
Branko ??ibej wrote:
Niall Pemberton wrote:
I ran a RAT report (0.6 version) ?on subversion trunk but theres alot
of *noise* from it. I have opened a bug ticket for license header
review here:
On Nov 17, 2009, at 9:47 AM, Todd Volkert wrote:
Hi all,
The Apache Pivot community feels that it is ready to graduate into the
Apache Pivot top-level project.
Please place your votes within the next 72 hours -- to serve as
recommendations to the Board at the December Board meeting.
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 11:28 PM, David Crossley cross...@apache.org wrote:
Niall Pemberton wrote:
David Crossley wrote:
Branko ??ibej wrote:
Niall Pemberton wrote:
I ran a RAT report (0.6 version) ?on subversion trunk but theres alot
of *noise* from it. I have opened a bug ticket for
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 12:06 AM, Justin Erenkrantz
jus...@erenkrantz.com wrote:
As Hyrum suggests, we can use org.apache.subversion.* if we want to
create a new (better) Java interface within our versioning rules - but
that isn't necessary nor should it be a pre-req for graduation.
IMNSHO,
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 1:47 AM, Todd Volkert tvolk...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
The Apache Pivot community feels that it is ready to graduate into the
Apache Pivot top-level project.
Please place your votes within the next 72 hours -- to serve as
recommendations to the Board at the December
On 18/11/2009, at 3:40 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 12:06 AM, Justin Erenkrantz
jus...@erenkrantz.com wrote:
As Hyrum suggests, we can use org.apache.subversion.* if we want to
create a new (better) Java interface within our versioning rules - but
that isn't necessary
On Nov 17, 2009, at 8:40 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 12:06 AM, Justin Erenkrantz
jus...@erenkrantz.com wrote:
As Hyrum suggests, we can use org.apache.subversion.* if we want to
create a new (better) Java interface within our versioning rules - but
that isn't
26 matches
Mail list logo
