+1 (binding),
Agreeing with Chris, looks awesome !
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 5:39 AM, arv...@cloudera.com arv...@cloudera.com wrote:
As there are no active discussions on the [PROPOSAL] thread for a few
days now, I will like to initiate the vote to accept Sqoop as an
Apache Incubator project. The
+1 (binding)
Ralph
On Jun 7, 2011, at 9:38 PM, Jonathan Hsieh wrote:
Hi all,
Since there have been no new conversations on this Flume [PROPOSAL] thread,
I'd like to call a vote.
At the end of this mail, I've put a copy of the current proposal. Here is a
link to the document in the
Hi,
My name is Dennis Hamilton. I am a semi-retired software system architect
living in Seattle, Washington.
My profile of profiles is already up at
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/orcmid. The orcmid handle goes back to
DecWars on a PDP-10 and the early CompuServe CB chat rooms.
My
+1
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 10:08 AM, Jonathan Hsieh j...@cloudera.com wrote:
Hi all,
Since there have been no new conversations on this Flume [PROPOSAL] thread,
I'd like to call a vote.
At the end of this mail, I've put a copy of the current proposal. Here is
a
link to the document in
Here is my +1 (non binding)
--
*Ioannis Canellos*
*
http://iocanel.blogspot.com
Apache Karaf http://karaf.apache.org/ Committer PMC
Apache ServiceMix http://servicemix.apache.org/ Committer
*
+1 (non binding)
--
*Ioannis Canellos*
*
http://iocanel.blogspot.com
Apache Karaf http://karaf.apache.org/ Committer PMC
Apache ServiceMix http://servicemix.apache.org/ Committer
*
+1
-Nigel
On Jun 7, 2011, at 8:39 PM, arv...@cloudera.com wrote:
As there are no active discussions on the [PROPOSAL] thread for a few
days now, I will like to initiate the vote to accept Sqoop as an
Apache Incubator project. The proposal discussion thread and full text
of the proposal can
Christian Grobmeier wrote on Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 09:24:45 +0200:
Hello,
I sent this to infra, but I have been told the incubator chair should
handle this.
Can the people below be added to the incubator group so they can
update the ONGL website? I have hear our inc-chair is ooo (wow, that
+1 (binding)
LieGrue,
strub
--- On Wed, 6/8/11, Julien Vermillard jvermill...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Julien Vermillard jvermill...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Accept Sqoop for Incubation
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Date: Wednesday, June 8, 2011, 5:59 AM
+1 (binding),
Agreeing with
Can the people below be added to the incubator group so they can
update the ONGL website? I have hear our inc-chair is ooo (wow, that
acronym got somehow hijiacked in this list) - do we have a deputy
handling it?
Thirty-six other people on the Incubator PMC have sufficient karma:
Thanks.
+1 (binding)
Tommaso
2011/6/8 Jonathan Hsieh j...@cloudera.com
Hi all,
Since there have been no new conversations on this Flume [PROPOSAL] thread,
I'd like to call a vote.
At the end of this mail, I've put a copy of the current proposal. Here is
a
link to the document in the wiki:
+1 (binding)
Tommaso
2011/6/8 arv...@cloudera.com arv...@cloudera.com
As there are no active discussions on the [PROPOSAL] thread for a few
days now, I will like to initiate the vote to accept Sqoop as an
Apache Incubator project. The proposal discussion thread and full text
of the proposal
+1 (non-binding)
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 3:51 PM, Tommaso Teofili
tommaso.teof...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 (binding)
Tommaso
2011/6/8 arv...@cloudera.com arv...@cloudera.com
As there are no active discussions on the [PROPOSAL] thread for a few
days now, I will like to initiate the vote to accept
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 6:51 AM, Norbert Thiebaud nthieb...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 9:43 PM, Noel J. Bergman n...@devtech.com wrote:
[...] their downstream code cannot be used. Hence, the best outcome
under the current licensing regime is for all core development to be
done
+1 and welcome on board.
cheers,
Leo
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 5:38 AM, Jonathan Hsieh j...@cloudera.com wrote:
[ ] +1 Accept Flume for incubation
[ ] +0 Indifferent to Flume incubation
[ ] -1 Reject Flume for incubation
...
= Flume - A Distributed Log Collection System =
== Abstract ==
+1!
cheers,
Leo
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 4:39 AM, arv...@cloudera.com arv...@cloudera.com wrote:
As there are no active discussions on the [PROPOSAL] thread for a few
days now, I will like to initiate the vote to accept Sqoop as an
Apache Incubator project. The proposal discussion thread and
+1 (binding)
cool project, if everything turns out well, I will surely need it in
future. Go go go! ;-)
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 5:39 AM, arv...@cloudera.com arv...@cloudera.com wrote:
As there are no active discussions on the [PROPOSAL] thread for a few
days now, I will like to initiate the
+1 and welcome !
2011/6/8 arv...@cloudera.com arv...@cloudera.com:
As there are no active discussions on the [PROPOSAL] thread for a few
days now, I will like to initiate the vote to accept Sqoop as an
Apache Incubator project. The proposal discussion thread and full text
of the proposal
My name is Yegor Kozlov. I'm a Java developer, committer and a PMC in
the Apache POI project. I've been hacking Microsoft Office formats
since 2005 and got pretty solid knowledge of the internals of MS Excel
and PowerPoint.
I'm interested in bringing the ODF Toolkit to Apache and integrating
this
Hi,
Von: Yegor Kozlov ye...@apache.org
I'm interested in bringing the ODF Toolkit to Apache and integrating
this API with Apache POI. With ODF, POI will become a universal API
for Office documents covering most of popular office formats.
As I see this the second time in an introduction
Hello,
My name is Eric Bachard. In the real life, I'm Professor of Applied
Physics at UTBM (see [1]).
In my spare time, I'm contributing to free software, as core
developer. Contributing to OpenOffice.org since 2004, my skills are C
++ / C, objective C, shell and Perl. I know well
On 08.06.2011 00:37, robert_w...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Greg Steingst...@gmail.com wrote on 06/07/2011 05:50:49 PM:
Besides the content Oracle owns, it seems we could just ask the other
owners
to give the CWS's to the ASF. I mean, really... *somebody* out there
holds
the copyright. We just
On 06/08/2011 04:16 AM, Christian Lippka wrote:
Moin Moin [1],
my name is Christian Lippka and I work on the donnated code base since
1998
when I was hired by StarDivision which was then consumed by Sun and later
bought by Oracle. Oracle is also my current employer. I am here as an
On 07.06.2011 17:13, Danese Cooper wrote:
It's a lot of code as well. When we launched it took a day (as in 24
hours) to build. I'd imagine that situation will have improved
somewhat
Indeed, fortunately. And before the 24 hours build is quoted out of
the context that these number originates
+1
Niall
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 5:38 AM, Jonathan Hsieh j...@cloudera.com wrote:
Hi all,
Since there have been no new conversations on this Flume [PROPOSAL] thread,
I'd like to call a vote.
At the end of this mail, I've put a copy of the current proposal. Here is a
link to the document
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 12:40 PM, Andre Schnabel andre.schna...@gmx.net wrote:
Hi,
Von: Yegor Kozlov ye...@apache.org
I'm interested in bringing the ODF Toolkit to Apache and integrating
this API with Apache POI. With ODF, POI will become a universal API
for Office documents covering most
+1
Niall
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 4:39 AM, arv...@cloudera.com arv...@cloudera.com wrote:
As there are no active discussions on the [PROPOSAL] thread for a few
days now, I will like to initiate the vote to accept Sqoop as an
Apache Incubator project. The proposal discussion thread and full text
El 08/06/11 10:43, eric b escribió:
Hello,
My name is Eric Bachard. In the real life, I'm Professor of Applied
Physics at UTBM (see [1]).
In my spare time, I'm contributing to free software, as core
developer. Contributing to OpenOffice.org since 2004, my skills are
C++ / C, objective C,
On 8 June 2011 08:43, Jochen Wiedmann jochen.wiedm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 6:51 AM, Norbert Thiebaud nthieb...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 9:43 PM, Noel J. Bergman n...@devtech.com
wrote:
[...] their downstream code cannot be used. Hence, the best outcome
On 06/07/2011 06:08 PM, Andrew Rist wrote:
It is Oracle's intent to provide to ASF the files needed to build OOo,
taking into account licensing and ownership issues.
This includes binary artifacts such as the OOo artwork and translation
databases. I am following the discussions here closely,
and
On 6/8/11 6:38 AM, Jonathan Hsieh wrote:
[X] +1 Accept Flume for incubation (binding)
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For
On 06/08/2011 04:39 AM, arv...@cloudera.com wrote:
As there are no active discussions on the [PROPOSAL] thread for a few
days now, I will like to initiate the vote to accept Sqoop as an
Apache Incubator project. The proposal discussion thread and full text
of the proposal can be found at the
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 6:53 AM, Steve Loughran ste...@apache.org wrote:
Now, the database with OOo is hsqldb, Java based, so assuming we want to run
this on Apache Harmony, does the Java TCK becomes a test dependency of OOo?
No
- Sam Ruby
On 06/08/2011 05:38 AM, Jonathan Hsieh wrote:
Hi all,
Since there have been no new conversations on this Flume [PROPOSAL] thread,
I'd like to call a vote.
At the end of this mail, I've put a copy of the current proposal. Here is a
link to the document in the wiki:
+1 (non-binding).
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 10:08 AM, Jonathan Hsieh j...@cloudera.com wrote:
Hi all,
Since there have been no new conversations on this Flume [PROPOSAL] thread,
I'd like to call a vote.
At the end of this mail, I've put a copy of the current proposal. Here is
a
link to the
+1 (binding)
and good luck :)
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Sanjiva Weerawarana
sanj...@opensource.lk wrote:
+1 (non-binding).
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 10:08 AM, Jonathan Hsieh j...@cloudera.com wrote:
Hi all,
Since there have been no new conversations on this Flume [PROPOSAL] thread,
I'd
On Jun 7, 2011, at 2:43 PM, Simos Xenitellis wrote:
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 6:17 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
Guys, if we are going to argue over the mistakes of the pasts
and the slights of the past, quite frankly, we aren't going to
get very far.
This is supposed to be a
On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 09:43:45AM +0200, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 6:51 AM, Norbert Thiebaud nthieb...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 9:43 PM, Noel J. Bergman n...@devtech.com wrote:
[...] their downstream code cannot be used. Hence, the best outcome
under
Hello Marvin,
Le Wed, 8 Jun 2011 06:04:42 -0700,
Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com a écrit :
On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 09:43:45AM +0200, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 6:51 AM, Norbert Thiebaud
nthieb...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 9:43 PM, Noel J. Bergman
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 11:39 PM, arv...@cloudera.com arv...@cloudera.comwrote:
As there are no active discussions on the [PROPOSAL] thread for a few
days now, I will like to initiate the vote to accept Sqoop as an
Apache Incubator project. The proposal discussion thread and full text
of the
300.000 downloads/day * 180 MB = 5400 MB / 1024 = roundabout 53.000 Gigs.
Source: http://marketing.openoffice.org/marketing_bouncer.html
Presumably we would distrubute through the usual *mirror* system - so
the load should mostly by on other peoples hardware, no?
Leo Simons explained
Hello Leo,
thanks for your interesting mail. It relaxes me and consider this one closed
Cheers,
Christian
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 8:22 PM, Leo Simons m...@leosimons.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 6:35 PM, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com
wrote:
30 downloads per day or per
Andre Schnabel andre.schna...@gmx.net wrote on 06/08/2011 04:40:56 AM:
Von: Yegor Kozlov ye...@apache.org
I'm interested in bringing the ODF Toolkit to Apache and integrating
this API with Apache POI. With ODF, POI will become a universal API
for Office documents covering most of
Dear -Rob, all,
2011/6/7 robert_w...@us.ibm.com:
[...]
We should be able to check the math from another direction. Microsoft
claims something like 400 million Office users. Studies looking at OOo
install share show approximately 10%. Pick some random number between 6
and 12 months.
I am pleased that we have been asked to introduce ourselves. I am excited by
what I have been reading this morning.
I consider myself to be handicapped as an American native-language English
speaker. It is very easy to say something in a very complex way and not notice.
With so many
Hi Christian.
What a great positive attitude. I'm excited to see you here.
And moin moin to you too (it is 06:56 here in Seattle). I did not know the
relationship with moien auf Deutsch. Now I know why Svante Schubert says it.
Ciao,
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Christian
Hi -Rob
2011/6/7 robert_w...@us.ibm.com:
Danese Cooper dan...@gmail.com wrote on 06/07/2011 03:43:56 PM:
robert_w...@us.ibm.com:
Not surprisingly, you missed my point (or chose to ignore it). We at
Honestly, your insult does surprise me.
Apache don't think that money is evil, but we
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 3:58 PM, robert_w...@us.ibm.com wrote:
A sufficiently complex business application based on OpenOffice is going
to involve document manipulations at both tiers. For example, we recently
(at IBM) made an insurance solution that involved using Symphony, extended
with a
Manfred A. Reiter ma.rei...@gmail.com wrote on 06/08/2011 10:17:02 AM:
2011/6/7 robert_w...@us.ibm.com:
[...]
We should be able to check the math from another direction. Microsoft
claims something like 400 million Office users. Studies looking at
OOo
install share show
On 6/8/2011 10:06 AM, Ross Gardler wrote:
On 08/06/2011 16:33, Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
1. find a proper coherence and relevance between Apache OOo
LibreOffice on a technological level and on a distribution level
2. find a proper coherence with IBM's business requirements (Symphony).
I
Khirano,
I just noticed your mail never received a response. Sorry for that, reply
online...
Sent from my mobile device (so please excuse typos)
On 6 Jun 2011, at 18:02, Kazunari Hirano khir...@gmail.com wrote:
It has been familiar with us to file issues and comment on them.in the
I think it would be good if the proposed committers who have not yet done
so, could post a quick note to the list, to introduce yourself and your
interest in this project. Think of this as an opportunity to introduce
yourself to your future collaborators on Apache OpenOffice.
Ian Lynch,
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 11:17 AM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
On 6/8/2011 10:06 AM, Ross Gardler wrote:
On 08/06/2011 16:33, Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
1. find a proper coherence and relevance between Apache OOo
LibreOffice on a technological level and on a distribution level
Is that a copyleft swallow or an ALv2 swallow?
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 8:38 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
On Jun 7, 2011, at 2:43 PM, Simos Xenitellis wrote:
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 6:17 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
Guys, if we are going to argue over the mistakes of
dsh daniel.hais...@googlemail.com wrote on 06/08/2011 10:37:46 AM:
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 3:58 PM, robert_w...@us.ibm.com wrote:
A sufficiently complex business application based on OpenOffice is
going
to involve document manipulations at both tiers. For example, we
recently
(at IBM)
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 5:45 PM, Donald Whytock dwhyt...@gmail.com wrote:
Is that a copyleft swallow or an ALv2 swallow?
No definitive indicator for the latter, but if it consumes parts of
the other, then it must be the former ...
--
Capitalism is the astounding belief that the most wickedest
+1
Tom
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 9:38 PM, Jonathan Hsieh j...@cloudera.com wrote:
Hi all,
Since there have been no new conversations on this Flume [PROPOSAL] thread,
I'd like to call a vote.
At the end of this mail, I've put a copy of the current proposal. Here is a
link to the document in
Ian Lynch wrote:
It's no good saying if this or if that because we are
where we are. If my aunt had balls she'd be my uncle :-).
Exactly.
This is really the crux of all the discussions. Is it better to maximise
the
development resource through cooperation or is it better to have two
Marvin Humphrey wrote:
The code bases are already divergent and it would be very difficult to
reconcile them. To make Apache OOo upstream from LO would mean one
of two things
OK, let's clarify for sensibility: Apache would be upstream (licensing
acting as a diode), but not THE upstream.
As
On 6/8/2011 11:12 AM, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 5:45 PM, Donald Whytock dwhyt...@gmail.com wrote:
Is that a copyleft swallow or an ALv2 swallow?
No definitive indicator for the latter, but if it consumes parts of
the other, then it must be the former ...
I believe the
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 11:27, Ross Gardler rgard...@apache.org wrote:
Khirano,
I just noticed your mail never received a response. Sorry for that, reply
online...
Sent from my mobile device (so please excuse typos)
On 6 Jun 2011, at 18:02, Kazunari Hirano khir...@gmail.com wrote:
It
dsh daniel.hais...@googlemail.com wrote on 06/08/2011 12:15:52 PM:
Of course we had been using ODFDOM but the issue is how do you get ODF
transformed accordingly to other formats such as RTF, AFP or PDF and
make those formats look consistent with what you would get if doing
the
On 8 June 2011 07:47, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
Can the people below be added to the incubator group so they can
update the ONGL website? I have hear our inc-chair is ooo (wow, that
acronym got somehow hijiacked in this list) - do we have a deputy
handling it?
Hi,
can we please just end this futile discussion?
I agree, that water flows one direction only. But there needs to be
water first to flow in any direction.
If there will be enough to establish a flow, can only be seen, once the
podling is in place. The risk estimation (will the podling run
Actually I evaluated XSL-FO rendering engines quite excessively
including Apache FOP. At that point in time (2009) Apache FOP still
had performance issues in scenarios where you would generate thousands
of business correspondence documents to be sent to clients on a daily
basis. In the end we
+1
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 9:32 AM, Tom White tomwh...@apache.org wrote:
+1
Tom
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 8:39 PM, arv...@cloudera.com arv...@cloudera.com
wrote:
As there are no active discussions on the [PROPOSAL] thread for a few
days now, I will like to initiate the vote to accept Sqoop
+1
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 9:38 PM, Jonathan Hsieh j...@cloudera.com wrote:
Hi all,
Since there have been no new conversations on this Flume [PROPOSAL] thread,
I'd like to call a vote.
At the end of this mail, I've put a copy of the current proposal. Here is
a
link to the document in the
Of course we had been using ODFDOM but the issue is how do you get ODF
transformed accordingly to other formats such as RTF, AFP or PDF and
make those formats look consistent with what you would get if doing
the transformation natively during design time in OO or Symphony.
I think your
Christian Grobmeier wrote:
I sent this to infra, but I have been told the incubator chair should
handle this.
I've made the changes via the command line interface.
I wish there were some consistency on this when accounts are setup, but that's
something we can discuss with infra. Oft-times
I sent this to infra, but I have been told the incubator chair should
handle this.
I've made the changes via the command line interface.
Thank you very much Noel!
I have hear our inc-chair is ooo
Out of Office? Naw. As long as I have decent Internet access (and no
firewall keeping me
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 4:49 PM, Volker Merschmann merschm...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/6/7 Ian Lynch ianrly...@gmail.com:
On 7 June 2011 16:27, Volker Merschmann merschm...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/6/7 Ian Lynch ianrly...@gmail.com:
On 7 June 2011 16:08, Volker Merschmann merschm...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello, Niall,
On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 10:11:02AM +0100, Niall Pemberton wrote:
If you're right about the costs, they not going to hit from day one -
as the initial effort will be in building the community and building
something that can be released and very little needed in terms of end
users
Christian Grobmeier wrote:
Out of Office? Naw. As long as I have decent Internet access (and no
firewall
keeping me from SSH), I'm in the office.
And I was even pretty sure somebody said you were on honeymoon -
No, we actually haven't had time for other than a couple of get-away
Hi,
I almost forgot about that, as it is not a summit but may be the
earliest date for a meeting.
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/DE/QAWochenende2011
So if some of you live rather close to Essen/Germany you may join us
there. It would be helpfull to understand / speak German, as it is
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 9:49 PM, robert_w...@us.ibm.com wrote:
This is for the proposal, the Nominated Mentors section.
My observation, after seeing the topics that seem to be getting the most
attention from the IPMC members on this list, is that in the the Podling
we will want to pay special
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 6:11 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
I say that the sooner one can move to uni-directional flows with the
bi-directionals out in customization and adoption layers, if anywhere, the
better. It is difficult to conceive of any other way to get on top
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 8:43 PM, Danese Cooper dan...@gmail.com wrote:
We at Apache don't think that money is evil, but we also believe that seeing
our code in wide use is more important than money. OpenOffice.org is
important to the Developing World, some of whom will pay for convenience. I
Robert Weir wrote:
- Community development, due to the need to develop and
coordinate/collaborate with current and anticipated
downstream consumers of the project, as well as potentially
forging bi-directional collaborations.
we would benefit from having incubation mentors with noted
I finally had access to the edit function and updated the wiki.
Thanks everyone for the support :)
Best,
Jomar
-Original Message-
From: Danese Cooper dan...@gmail.com
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 17:20:38
To: general@incubator.apache.orggeneral@incubator.apache.org
Reply-To:
On Jun 8, 2011, at 2:33 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Robert Weir wrote:
- Community development, due to the need to develop and
coordinate/collaborate with current and anticipated
downstream consumers of the project, as well as potentially
forging bi-directional collaborations.
we would
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 10:45 AM, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.comwrote:
Danese,
3) LOTS of people download OOo
Like maybe 10% of the human population of the planet. And its a big
file.
Initially we engaged Akamai, but it quickly became too expensive. Serving
up downloads of OOo
The expectation, assumption and intent behind the grant was
that Openoffice.org would also be granted. In many, many ways,
this trademark is just as important, if not more so, than the
actual code for the success of the podling.
Have we rec'd the updated grant yet?
Nothing else has been received from Oracle. You will be the third
person to know. ;-)
Craig
On Jun 8, 2011, at 12:58 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
The expectation, assumption and intent behind the grant was
that Openoffice.org would also be granted. In many, many ways,
this trademark is just as
On 07/06/2011 Andrew Rist wrote:
We are trying to provide all of the Oracle owned content in the OOo
repositories.
As a longtime OpenOffice.org volunteer (mini-introduction: involved with
the OpenOffice.org project since 2003, main contributions in QA,
Localization and QA Tools, Italian
I just checked with my Brazilian friends involved with the BrOffice
project in the past years, and it seems that all problems that we've
had in the past with the OpenOffice.org trademark are now solved.
Best,
Jomar
-
To
Richard S. Hall wrote (08-06-11 11:03)
On 06/08/2011 04:16 AM, Christian Lippka wrote:
Moin Moin [1],
my name is Christian Lippka and I work on the donnated code base since
1998
[..]
I just wanted to say that this is one of the best messages I've read
throughout this entire ordeal. Thanks.
I'll quote my earlier answer [1] on that:
Our approach is to start with the main open source code - stuff with
clear provenance. The OOo extensions are more complex in terms of
licensing and other issues, but this is certainly something to revisit
at a later stage of the project.
Andrew Rist wrote:
I'll quote my earlier answer [1] on that:
Our approach is to start with the main open source code - stuff with
clear provenance. The OOo extensions are more complex in terms of
licensing and other issues, but this is certainly something to revisit
at a later stage of the
I started looking around at the OOo website.
I'm not sure if now is the time to bring this up, but at
http://contributing.openoffice.org/donate.html there is a solicitation for
funds via three processes.
Here's what the page says:
Your donation will go directly towards helping this project.
Dave Fisher wrote:
Your donation will go directly towards helping this project. Some of the
ways
in which your funds might be used include:
• Hiring independent developers to work with OpenOffice.org.
• Paying for participation at trade shows and conferences.
• Paying for
On 8 June 2011 22:50, Noel J. Bergman n...@devtech.com wrote:
Dave Fisher wrote:
Your donation will go directly towards helping this project. Some of the
ways
in which your funds might be used include:
• Hiring independent developers to work with OpenOffice.org.
• Paying
-Original Message-
From: Noel J. Bergman [mailto:n...@devtech.com]
Sent: Thursday, 9 June 2011 3:51 AM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: Add incubator group to podling committers
Christian Grobmeier wrote:
I sent this to infra, but I have been told the incubator
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 11:08 PM, Ian Lynch ianrly...@gmail.com wrote:
On 8 June 2011 22:50, Noel J. Bergman n...@devtech.com wrote:
Dave Fisher wrote:
Your donation will go directly towards helping this project. Some of
the
ways
in which your funds might be used include:
•
Simon Phipps wrote:
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 11:08 PM, Ian Lynchianrly...@gmail.com wrote:
On 8 June 2011 22:50, Noel J. Bergmann...@devtech.com wrote:
Dave Fisher wrote:
Your donation will go directly towards helping this project. Some of
the
ways
in which your funds might be used
Indeed, the ASF has been consistent that monetary donations be made to
the ASF as a whole, and we have not accepted targeted cash donations for
specific projects in the past. And as a Foundation, we have not paid
directly for development on our projects (although obviously we have a
paid
On Jun 8, 2011, at 4:31 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
I started looking around at the OOo website.
I'm not sure if now is the time to bring this up, but at
http://contributing.openoffice.org/donate.html there is a solicitation for
funds via three processes.
Here's what the page says:
Your
to a foundation independent of Oracle: Team OpenOffice.org e.V.
searching for a more complete answer
Oracle Email Signature Logo
Andrew Rist | Interoperability Architect
Oracle Corporate Architecture Group
Redwood Shores, CA | 650.506.9847
On 6/8/2011 4:19 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Jun 8,
http://www.teamopenoffice.de/
I believe it is at the disposal of the Community Council, so probably Louis
could give a more complete answer.
S.
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 12:24 AM, Andrew Rist andrew.r...@oracle.com wrote:
to a foundation independent of Oracle: Team OpenOffice.org e.V.
Andrew Rist wrote:
to a foundation independent of Oracle: Team OpenOffice.org e.V.
searching for a more complete answer
It would be interesting to find out if all funds received for OOo were
accounted for since the fork. The e.V changed names and collects
donations for LibreOffice,
Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com wrote on 06/08/2011 06:44:35 PM:
I was actually thinking of Freies Office Deutschland e.V. primarily,
http://www.frodev.org/
Interesting. That happens to also be where TDF donations go:
http://www.documentfoundation.org/contribution/
-Rob
1 - 100 of 124 matches
Mail list logo
