+1 (non-binding)
On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 10:30 AM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
Please don't apologize for a change that is proper and Right. In fact,
when you look at the *actual* change, it is awesome. It is a clear
benefit for the podling and project, and a demonstration of WSO2's
Let me add that a TLP sometimes get confused when it faces a problem. :-)
Why these problem solving superheroes should limit themselves to the
incubator?
15.06.2013 19:53 пользователь Alan Cabrera a...@toolazydogs.com написал:
Problem: podlings are confused on where to go when there's a
I believe a set of automatically generated monthly metrics including a
number of commits, total number of letters to the project mail list and
number of mentor letters to the list will give a good picture which
projects experience which problems.
15.06.2013 19:48 пользователь Alan Cabrera
Good point. For non-incubator problems they shouldn't limit themselves to
the incubator. They should be (and are) on the relevant committees.
For me the ombudsmen would be the people that speak for the incubation
process and point those suffering from ISSUE 01 in the right direction.
Again I
+1 (binding)
2013/6/15 Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com:
I would like to invite the IPMC vote to accept the Stratos proposal [1].
I want to clarify that this vote is for the Stratos project to enter
the incubator as a standard podling under the existing incubation
policy. The
On Jun 14, 2013, at 5:49 PM, Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
I would like to invite the IPMC vote to accept the Stratos proposal [1].
I want to clarify that this vote is for the Stratos project to enter
the incubator as a standard podling under the existing incubation
+1 (non-binding)
On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 6:27 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
On Jun 14, 2013, at 5:49 PM, Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com
wrote:
I would like to invite the IPMC vote to accept the Stratos proposal [1].
I want to clarify that this vote is for the
On Sat, Jun 15, 2013, at 12:18 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
I'm not keen on this one. I don't like surveys and I don't like mandatory
activities for volunteers.
Yet, Apache does have mandatory reporting for podlings and TLPs. It's
not like this is particularly onerous. (Note, I read the proposal as
Since I realize that most of you can't be
bothered to look at the wiki page I created ;-),
I'll go ahead and post the current content
here for commentary. I hope the bulk of it
is non-controversial, though some of it may
not belong on the page...
+1 (non-binding)
Thanks
Milinda
On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 9:09 AM, Lahiru Sandaruwan lahi...@wso2.com wrote:
+1 (non-binding)
On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 6:27 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
On Jun 14, 2013, at 5:49 PM, Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com
wrote:
I would
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache Curator has asked Eric
Tschetter to become a committer and we are pleased to announce that he has
accepted.
Eric Tschetter is the lead architect of Druid, Metamarkets' distributed,
in-memory database. He held senior engineering positions at
FWIW, I read it, and liked it. I would support something like this in
terms of making it clearer what we are promising to podlings.
I guess a question that it would be worth clarifying - what happens to a
perfectly reasonable podling who's mentors resign/go awol, when the
Incubator PMC cannot
On Jun 15, 2013, at 10:52 AM, Joseph Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
This is a suggestion that has come up in the past, and the typical
counter-argument is that this is something the chair needs to provide
themselves.
Sent from my iPhone
The usual reason for an ombudsman is to
Yeah I get that, but I'm wondering what sort of power we'd
impart to the position besides information gathering. It
might make an interesting complementary position to the
chair that's more directly focused on the Incubator as it
presents itself to podlings, which is something we recently
I think that it would be a great idea to have an ASF wide ombudsman instead.
There's been a few times where I've been personally asked to watch the goings
on in another project by a committer, or ASF member, to provide an outside
opinion as to what's going on, only to receive the ire of the
Not a lot of power. Just a designated safe person to bring issues up with. I
trust the relevant, empowered, parties in the ASF to work with the ombudsman to
resolve the issues in a confidential safe manner.
Regards,
Alan
On Jun 16, 2013, at 10:41 AM, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com
Yeah! Congrats Eric!!!
A fantastic library and great addition to keeping it awesome!
On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 4:47 PM, Jordan Zimmerman randg...@apache.orgwrote:
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache Curator has asked Eric
Tschetter to become a committer and we are pleased to
Hello,
This is the third release candidate for Apache jclouds 1.6.1-incubating,
the first jclouds release at Apache.
This is the IPMC vote. The PPMC vote passed, with three +1s from mentors
(David Nalley, Olivier Lamy, and Suresh Marru).
It fixes the following issues:
On 6/16/13 10:36 AM, Alan Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote:
On Jun 15, 2013, at 10:52 AM, Joseph Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com
wrote:
This is a suggestion that has come up in the past, and the typical
counter-argument is that this is something the chair needs to provide
themselves.
On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 12:38 PM, Joseph Schaefer
joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
This argument reminds me of the current debate in Congress about whether or
not military sex offense reporting should remain within the chain of
command. Proponents argue that it's hard to hold commanders
I'll grant you that it is an imperfect analogy, but I have no idea why you
continue to make such a fuss about things we've all come to accept about roles
and responsibilities of a chair. Nobody is questioning the traditional role
you seek for yourself, and you can take comfort in the idea that
Hi,
the voting period has passed but we had another IPMC +1 from our mentor
Nick Burch on odf-dev. Our other mentor Yegor seems to be pretty busy
currently so it would be great if somebody else could have a look at the
release candidate.
Regards
Florian
On 06.06.2013 07:43, Florian Hopf
On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 7:16 AM, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
Since I realize that most of you can't be
bothered to look at the wiki page I created ;-),
I'll go ahead and post the current content
here for commentary. I hope the bulk of it
is non-controversial, though some of it
+1 (non-binding)
On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 9:45 PM, Milinda Pathirage
milinda.pathir...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 (non-binding)
Thanks
Milinda
On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 9:09 AM, Lahiru Sandaruwan lahi...@wso2.com
wrote:
+1 (non-binding)
On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 6:27 PM, Jim Jagielski
24 matches
Mail list logo
