On 9 February 2014 06:47, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 7:42 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
WDYT?
Non-trivial; maintaining the meta-data needed to accurately generate
the NOTICE file is likely to require more effort than writing the
NOTICE file itself.
Thanks everyone for the votes. Since we now have accounts for everyone, I’ve
updated the committer list below to include ASF IDs. Thanks to INFRA, we also
now have both pull request postings and comments on them forwarded to the our
mailing list.
snip
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors
I think it would be better to start a new thread with the updated text.
Also, the two scope descriptions are slightly different:
related to fast and flexible large-scale data analysis
on clusters.
v.
related to efficient cluster management, resource isolation
and sharing across distributed
Thanks Matei and sebb.
Starting a new thread and collecting the VOTEs all over again would be
time consuming. In the [RESULT] [VOTE] thread, we'll have the updated
resolution
text, and it will be present in the board report shortly thereafter. If
discussion
needs to continue at that point we can
On 9 February 2014 17:11, Mattmann, Chris A (3980)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
Thanks Matei and sebb.
Starting a new thread and collecting the VOTEs all over again would be
time consuming.
So?
Better to than being confusing, as the current thread has become.
Also it may not be
Hi Sebb,
-Original Message-
From: sebb seb...@gmail.com
Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org general@incubator.apache.org
Date: Sunday, February 9, 2014 4:39 PM
To: general@incubator.apache.org general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the
Chris no offense but all we can do is vote on what you put in front of us. As
soon as you realized that that document was a mess the vote should have been
cancelled. Right now you have no clear picture of what each vote *means*
because the thing we are supposed to be approving is in flux.
Joe,
Thanks for your cordial tone and to the point email. Thinking about it,
I agree with you. We'll start a new VOTE in a day or so to clean up
the resolution per Matei's updates and the typo fix caught by Sebb.
Cheers,
Chris
-Original Message-
From: Joseph Schaefer
I agree with Joe, voting on a moving target is not going to produce a result
anyone can look back on and understand. Chris, you may be able to understand
what is happening but I'm having trouble from my attempts to follow this thread.
thanks
david jencks
On Feb 9, 2014, at 5:29 PM, Joseph
