On 15.01.2015 17:57, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 5:20 PM, Branko Čibej br...@apache.org wrote:
...I'll go and kill that cron job then. Woot!...
Can you also write a note at
http://people.apache.org/~brane/incubator/votes.html to indicate that
the service is
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 5:20 PM, Branko Čibej br...@apache.org wrote:
...I'll go and kill that cron job then. Woot!...
Can you also write a note at
http://people.apache.org/~brane/incubator/votes.html to indicate that
the service is discontinued?
People might have bookmarked it.
Thanks again
On 15.01.2015 15:08, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 5:37 AM, jan i j...@apache.org wrote:
I just looked at http://people.apache.org/~brane/incubator/votes.html, and
I do understand that votes can be open for an extended period of time, but
more than 100 days seems excessive:
On 15.01.2015 15:06, jan i wrote:
On 15 January 2015 at 14:58, Branko Čibej br...@apache.org wrote:
On 15.01.2015 14:45, Dave wrote:
This vote: RC4 as Apache Usergrid 1.0 (incubating) 2014–09–03 2014–09–02
135 days was cancelled in an email message titled [VOTE][CANCELLED]
Release RC4 as
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 6:17 AM, jan i j...@apache.org wrote:
Seems the links jumped back in again, I came to it from voting status on
our front page. Don't know how to remove it from there.
We need to remove this line:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 11:57 AM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com
wrote:
General principle: inviting a PPMC member to join a podling should use
exactly the same routine as inviting a PMC member to join a TLP,
except that the entity being notified is the IPMC rather than the
Board.
Recent edits to [1] have made the process of adding a PPMC member
confusing. Previously, the instructions said to 1) forward the initial
vote message to the IPMC, 2) invite the member upon a successful vote, and
3) send a note to the IPMC announcing the new member with the message ID of
the vote
General principle: inviting a PPMC member to join a podling should use
exactly the same routine as inviting a PMC member to join a TLP,
except that the entity being notified is the IPMC rather than the
Board.
Marvin Humphrey
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 11:53 AM, Billie Rinaldi bil...@apache.org
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 1:16 PM, jan i j...@apache.org wrote:
On Thursday, January 15, 2015, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com
wrote:
General principle: inviting a PPMC member to join a podling should use
exactly the same routine as inviting a PMC member to join a TLP,
except that the
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 9:37 AM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
My assumption was that 'setting binding policy on projects' was
something specifically excluded from my level of authority, as an
officer derived from the Office of the President. If that is not the
case, I am happy to define
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 5:46 AM, Alex B abezzu...@nflabs.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 1:42 AM, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote:
There are currently 36 podlings undergoing incubation. One podling
joined us this month (Corinthia).
It might be a typo here as AFAIK there are two
On Thursday, January 15, 2015, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com
wrote:
General principle: inviting a PPMC member to join a podling should use
exactly the same routine as inviting a PMC member to join a TLP,
except that the entity being notified is the IPMC rather than the
Board.
But a
That's already in progress as part of this year's budget planning :-)
Of course this is distinct from policy. For example: Should the policy say
projects are limited to items on the infra core services list?
Ross
Sent from my Windows Phone
From: Shane
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 6:51 PM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 9:37 AM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
My assumption was that 'setting binding policy on projects' was
something specifically excluded from my level of authority, as an
officer derived
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 10:08 AM, Lefty Leverenz
leftylever...@gmail.com wrote:
Please grant LeftyLeverenz write access to the wiki so I can make a few
changes to the Apache Project Maturity Model
https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ApacheProjectMaturityModel.
done
-Bertrand
Please grant LeftyLeverenz write access to the wiki so I can make a few
changes to the Apache Project Maturity Model
https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ApacheProjectMaturityModel.
Thank you.
-- Lefty Leverenz
This vote: RC4 as Apache Usergrid 1.0 (incubating) 2014–09–03 2014–09–02
135 days was cancelled in an email message titled [VOTE][CANCELLED]
Release RC4 as Apache Usergrid 1.0 (incubating) - CORRECTION
- Dave
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 8:37 AM, jan i j...@apache.org wrote:
Hi
I just looked at
On 15 January 2015 at 14:58, Branko Čibej br...@apache.org wrote:
On 15.01.2015 14:45, Dave wrote:
This vote: RC4 as Apache Usergrid 1.0 (incubating) 2014–09–03 2014–09–02
135 days was cancelled in an email message titled [VOTE][CANCELLED]
Release RC4 as Apache Usergrid 1.0 (incubating) -
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 5:37 AM, jan i j...@apache.org wrote:
I just looked at http://people.apache.org/~brane/incubator/votes.html, and
I do understand that votes can be open for an extended period of time, but
more than 100 days seems excessive:
Back in June 2014, I suggested that this
Hi
I just looked at http://people.apache.org/~brane/incubator/votes.html, and
I do understand that votes can be open for an extended period of time, but
more than 100 days seems excessive:
Apache Drill 0.6.0-incubating release 2014–10–20 2014–10–05 102 days Accept
Ignite into the Apache
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 1:42 AM, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote:
There are currently 36 podlings undergoing incubation. One podling
joined us this month (Corinthia).
It might be a typo here as AFAIK there are two new podlings this moth:
*Corinthia* 2014-12-08 and *Zeppelin* 2014-12-23
On 15.01.2015 14:45, Dave wrote:
This vote: RC4 as Apache Usergrid 1.0 (incubating) 2014–09–03 2014–09–02
135 days was cancelled in an email message titled [VOTE][CANCELLED]
Release RC4 as Apache Usergrid 1.0 (incubating) - CORRECTION
The problem here is that the vote tally script does not
On Thursday, January 15, 2015, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com
wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 5:37 AM, jan i j...@apache.org javascript:;
wrote:
I just looked at http://people.apache.org/~brane/incubator/votes.html,
and
I do understand that votes can be open for an extended period
Dear David: I would *love* to see you propose whatever set of
requirements that ASF infra as a service sees as appropriate for our
projects, given our history, budget, and a view to ensuring reliable
service for the future. Then, include a clear list of bullet points
which should go into the
24 matches
Mail list logo
