The size of the community doesn't matter; what does is that
the project is useful to said community and that the community
itself (and the project) are healthy.
There is nothing wrong with niche projects ;)
-
To unsubscribe,
Adobe legal pretty much explained the situation as I did. They said that
it is common to have the second sentence about “No other license..” when
trademarks are used in content that has open licenses. So, AIUI, no need
to worry about who can fix missing attributions.
Thanks,
-Alex
On 4/28/15,
Hi,
it is common to have the second sentence about “No other license..” when
trademarks are used in content that has open licenses.
I’d hardly say it’s common. A google search returns no hits for it (other than
this thread) and no other Adobe OS project that I could find is using it. The
Well, for the End User, he/she can not use Tinkerpop+Neo4j without
complying with GPL/AGPL.
If Tinkerpop doesn't require Neo4j and still be useful, then that should be
Ok.
If Neo4j is essential to Tinkerpop, i.e. not useful without Neo4j, then
this is simply not acceptable.
Apache Zest has a
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 7:25 PM Niclas Hedhman nic...@hedhman.org wrote:
Well, for the End User, he/she can not use Tinkerpop+Neo4j without
complying with GPL/AGPL.
If Tinkerpop doesn't require Neo4j and still be useful, then that should be
Ok.
If Neo4j is essential to Tinkerpop, i.e. not
