On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 10:43 PM, Jochen Theodorou blackd...@gmx.org wrote:
ok, but there is no harm in listing allergens that are not actually in
there. So why can't we have a single NOTICE/LICENSE file that covers both
cases? Is it not possible to say something that the binary distribution
On 7/13/15, 10:43 PM, Jochen Theodorou blackd...@gmx.org wrote:
Am 14.07.2015 07:26, schrieb Alex Harui:
On 7/13/15, 10:05 PM, Jochen Theodorou blackd...@gmx.org wrote:
then source and binary distribution have to have different
NOTICE/LICENSE files?
Yep, I think of it as the list of
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 1:14 AM, Ian Maxon ima...@uci.edu wrote:
This is pretty far from what the norm is, and is being proposed by a
podling, so I'd expect some skepticism. Other podlings, have proposed
similar workflows (albeit with extra problems.) and were not allowed
to retain that
Hi All,
Voting for Sentry incubating release 1.5.1 is now closed. The release has
passed with the following tally:
Binding +1s: Justin Mclean, Jarek Jarcec Cecho, Arvind Prabhakar.
Non binding +1s: Prasad Mujumdar, Lenni Kuff, Sravya Tirukkovalur
A big thanks to everyone who voted! We'll
Thanks all for voting!
Just to follow up on the suggestions from this thread:
We will update README for the jdk and maven requirements:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SENTRY-801
@Justin: We can compile with mvn install -DskipTests as specified in the
README.
Regards,
On Mon, Jul 13,
On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 5:28 PM, Kengo Seki sek...@gmail.com wrote:
Can someone please grant me write access to the incubator wiki under the
user name KengoSeki?
I'd like to participate in Additional Interested Contributors section in
the YetusProposal page. Thanks.
Done. Sorry for the lag.
This vote passes with 3 binding +1 and no -1.
We will check on the NOTICE for the next release.
Thanks for voting!
--
Gianmarco
On 13 July 2015 at 11:49, amareshwarisr . amareshw...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 (binding)
- Verified signature and checksums
- Top level LICENSE seems fine. I'm not
+1 (binding)
On Jul 13, 2015, at 10:23 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny elecha...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
my +1 (Binding), for the source package.
Addressing Justin's issues :
There *are* issues, but considering the security issue fixed in this
release, I'd rather have this version out.
- The
+1 binding
On Sat, Jul 11, 2015 at 7:32 PM Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.com
wrote:
Hi,
+1 binding
I checked:
- incubating in release name
- DISCLAIMER exits
- LICENSE and NOTICE good
- No unexpected binary files
- All source files have headers
- Can compile from source
Would
+1 Justin (binding)
+1 John (binding)
+1 Dave (binding)
That makes three +1 votes and no negative votes.
Vote passes. I will move the release to the mirrors.
Thanks to all who helped developed and review this release!
- Dave
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 5:17 PM Dave snoopd...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Incubators,
Yes -- I even bug myself.
Can any other binders review the release, please?
Thank you very much,
Marko.
http://markorodriguez.com
On Jul 13, 2015, at 4:31 PM, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.com wrote:
Hi,
+1 binding
For the source releases I checked:
- incubating
+1 binding
On Jul 13, 2015 09:45, Matt Gilman matt.c.gil...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello
The Apache NiFi PPMC has voted to release Apache NiFi 0.2.0-incubating. The
vote was based on the release candidate and thread described below. We now
request the IPMC to vote on this release.
Here is the
Hey Till
All commits must occur against the ASF codebase and can not be mirrored
over from a different location (this includes Github, Gerrit, etc.). This
is a mandate that has come from the board level and is not a negotiable
item.
Gerrit has been discussed many times before and each time the
Hi,
+1 binding
I checked:
- release contains incubating
- hashes and signatures correct
- DISCLAIMER exists
- LICENSE and NOTICE correct
- All source file shave headers
- No unexpected binaries in source release
- Can compile from source
Other minor issues:
- please place RC in correct place
+1 (binding)
* Verified signatures and checksums
* git tag matches with source distribution
* top level files look good
* sources compile and test correctly
* rat check looks good
Regards,
Arvind Prabhakar
On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 6:44 AM, Matt Gilman matt.c.gil...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello
On 14 Jul 2015, at 15:31, David Nalley wrote:
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 1:14 AM, Ian Maxon ima...@uci.edu wrote:
We use Gerrit as
a tool to do code reviews and to organize the commits, as well as to
facilitate easy testing. However that's all it's used for- we still
clone from repositories
Thanks!
2015-07-15 3:23 GMT+09:00 Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com:
On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 5:28 PM, Kengo Seki sek...@gmail.com wrote:
Can someone please grant me write access to the incubator wiki under the
user name KengoSeki?
I'd like to participate in Additional Interested
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 8:08 PM, Till Westmann ti...@apache.org wrote:
On 14 Jul 2015, at 15:31, David Nalley wrote:
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 1:14 AM, Ian Maxon ima...@uci.edu wrote:
We use Gerrit as
a tool to do code reviews and to organize the commits, as well as to
facilitate easy
+1 (binding)
Verified checksum, signature on src/bin. Built package target from
source. NOTICE/LICENSE/DISCLAIMER present, but I only did a cursory
check of the dependencies.
The DEPENDENCIES file at the top level of the source tarball is empty. -C
On Sat, Jul 11, 2015 at 8:09 PM, Jaideep Dhok
19 matches
Mail list logo
