Re: [VOTE] Release taverna-language-0.15.1-incubating-RC5 and taverna-osgi-0.2.1-incubating-RC5

I did not get to too details, but the basics of LICENSE, NOTICE files and signatures all are tallying. I am + 1 (binding) for this release. Suresh > On Mar 10, 2016, at 6:55 PM, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote: > > Hi folks, > > With Justin revising his vote to +1 we just need

[ANNOUNCE] Henri Yandell rejoins the IPMC

Greetings, Henri Yandell has rejoined the Incubator PMC. Henri has served multiple past stints as an Apache Director, and currently serves as the PMC Chair of the Apache Attic. He is also a committer on Tomcat and Commons, and is very active on legal-discuss@apache. For those of you who are not

Re: [VOTE] Release taverna-language-0.15.1-incubating-RC5 and taverna-osgi-0.2.1-incubating-RC5

Hi folks, With Justin revising his vote to +1 we just need one more binding +1 for this release candidate from the Taverna podling. Would someone else have time for a quick review..? On 3 Mar 2016 16:13, "Pierce, Marlon" wrote: > Hello Incubator, > > Apache Taverna is looking

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Ranger 0.5.2 (incubating)

Incubator PMC, The vote has passed with 3 “+1” votes from IPMC members and no “0” or “-1” votes. Here is the voting thread - http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201603.mbox/%3c6ac34b04-2140-4ea6-8001-b38c1ca29...@apache.org%3e. +1 (binding): - Alan Gates - John Ament

Re: GSoC Mentor ACK for PPMC vs Incubator PMC

> Am 10.03.2016 um 18:23 schrieb Suresh Marru : > > Hi All, > > Since there will be significant Incubator PPMC mentors, I will start a > broader discussion on this topic. Please be cautious, I am cc’ing a private > list and a public list, please only contain this thread to

Re: GSoC Mentor ACK for PPMC vs Incubator PMC

On 10 Mar 2016, at 9:23, Suresh Marru wrote: With this long background, my personal opinion for Incubator projects is to expect PPMC to acknowledge the mentor. If we go by the rule book, Incubator PMC should ACK the request, but in many cases the IPMC may not be able to step up and help the

GSoC Mentor ACK for PPMC vs Incubator PMC

Hi All, Since there will be significant Incubator PPMC mentors, I will start a broader discussion on this topic. Please be cautious, I am cc’ing a private list and a public list, please only contain this thread to the topic and do not discuss any student proposals or other sensitive GSOC

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Kudu (incubating) 0.7.1 released

The Apache Kudu (incubating) team is happy to announce the release of Kudu 0.7.1! Kudu is an open source storage engine for structured data which supports low-latency random access together with efficient analytical access patterns. It is designed within the context of the Apache Hadoop ecosystem

Re: Short form IP clearance

Stian's comment that the individual members of the IPMC be consulted simply due to their encountering IP issues more often is a very nice way to put it. My only small edit would be to not mention a -1 vote, but just to say "any objection or suggestion raised on the IPMC list should be considered

Re: Document No 0890302

no document attached. R U a spammer ? On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 1:31 PM, Accounts wrote: > Thanks for using electronic billing > > Please find your document attached > > Regards > > Accounts > > > > - > To

Document No 0890302

Thanks for using electronic billing Please find your document attached Regards Accounts - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [DRAFT] - Incubator Board Report March 2016

I guess the Wave project missed the report. Can you guide us on how do we fill in the report now? On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 8:24 PM John D. Ament wrote: > On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 12:14 AM Justin Mclean wrote: > > > Hi John, > > > > > I've moved the

Re: Short form IP clearance

So perhaps the clarification (beyond removing SVN reference) would be that IPMC just records the IP clearance documents for TLPs, and each clearance mentioned on incubator list gives a possibility to get insight from IPMC members who do IP clearance more often than each TLP on its own. However