Re: Request to join IPMC

Hi John, Thanks a lot! 发自我的 iPhone > 在 2016年11月4日，上午10:15，John D. Ament 写道： > > I am about to do the next steps for you. > > John > >> On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 10:10 PM Willem Jiang wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I would like to join the IPMC. I'm a

Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC5)

+1 Fred On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 7:40 AM, Luciano Resende wrote: > Please vote to approve the release of the following candidate as Apache > SystemML version 0.11.0! > > The PPMC vote thread: > https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@systemml.incubator.apache. > org/msg01097.html

Re: [DISCUSS] OpenWhisk Proposal

On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 10:49 AM Felix Meschberger wrote: > Hi John > > My understanding is, that we are well aware of this concern, which others > have mentioned as well. > > Also Greg noted in the proposal: > > > gstein sez: the podling can only graduate within an approved

Re: [DISCUSS] RocketMQ Incubation Proposal

On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 4:43 PM Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > The proposal looks fine in general, but I'm slightly concerned about: >https://github.com/alibaba/RocketMQ/graphs/contributors > > It seems that the model so far has been -- through huge blobs of > code over the

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache Geode (incubating) as a TLP

After seeing the PPMC respond quickly and sensibly to issues I identified without push back, I'd be happy to see them graduate. (I'm also really anxious to drive down our podling count) John On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 10:30 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi Roman, > > Geode

Re: [DISCUSS] RocketMQ Incubation Proposal

The proposal looks fine in general, but I'm slightly concerned about: https://github.com/alibaba/RocketMQ/graphs/contributors It seems that the model so far has been -- through huge blobs of code over the wall. Given that the composition of initial committers is all from Alibaba I hope their

Re: [DISCUSS] RocketMQ Incubation Proposal

+1 ! On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 8:37 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > Cool. > > +1 > > > On Nov 3, 2016, at 6:10 PM, Bruce Snyder wrote: > > > > Please find below a proposal for a new Incubator podling named Apache > > RocketMQ, a fast, low latency, reliable,

Re: [DISCUSS] RocketMQ Incubation Proposal

Cool. +1 > On Nov 3, 2016, at 6:10 PM, Bruce Snyder wrote: > > Please find below a proposal for a new Incubator podling named Apache > RocketMQ, a fast, low latency, reliable, scalable, distributed, easy to use > message-oriented middleware, especially for processing

Re: [DISCUSS] OpenWhisk Proposal

Perfect, already added to the wiki. Thanks, Felix. On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 4:05 PM, Felix Meschberger wrote: > Hi Sergio > > Pleased to meet you and thanks for offering to become a mentor. That helps. > > Feel free to add yourself to the proposal > > Thanks > Felix > > Am

Re: [DISCUSS] OpenWhisk Proposal

Hi Sergio Pleased to meet you and thanks for offering to become a mentor. That helps. Feel free to add yourself to the proposal Thanks Felix Am 04.11.2016 um 15:57 schrieb Sergio Fernández >: Hi Felix, most of the ASF project have successfully

Re: [DISCUSS] OpenWhisk Proposal

Hi Felix, most of the ASF project have successfully manage to keep using GitHub for PRs, having the master git repository in ASF-controlled infrastructure. In the end it doesn't represent that big break on the common workflows. But definitely something the podling could try to address during

Re: [DISCUSS] OpenWhisk Proposal

Hi John My understanding is, that we are well aware of this concern, which others have mentioned as well. Also Greg noted in the proposal: > gstein sez: the podling can only graduate within an approved repository > system. The IPMC may have a differing opinion, but from an Infra perspective:

[VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC5)

Please vote to approve the release of the following candidate as Apache SystemML version 0.11.0! The PPMC vote thread: https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org/msg01097.html And the result: https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org/msg01118.html The

Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC4)

Thanks Justin, We have addressed the issues you have found and we are starting to simplify the released artifacts. We have voted a new RC on the SystemML podling list and I should be sending a new vote soon. On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 6:54 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: >

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache Geode (incubating) as a TLP

Hi Roman, Geode looks ready for graduation to me. +1 Regards JB On 11/03/2016 08:47 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: Hi! with the 1.0.0-incubating release officially out (huge kudos to the team!) there's an overwhelming sentiment among the Apache Geode community and its mentors that it is time

Re: [DISCUSS] OpenWhisk Proposal

I raised the concern over using github as the primary repo. This is still unresolved, as I understood it. John On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 9:36 AM Felix Meschberger wrote: > Hi all > > I have made some additions to the OpenWhisk Proposal [1]: > > - restructured the API Gateway

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache Geode (incubating) as a TLP

On 04/11/2016 13:36, Anthony Baker wrote: > Thanks, updated with notes on RE50. Excellent. Tx. Mark > > Anthony > >> On Nov 4, 2016, at 1:43 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: >> >> On 03/11/2016 19:47, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: >> >>> Maturity assessment: >>>

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache Geode (incubating) as a TLP

Thanks, updated with notes on RE50. Anthony > On Nov 4, 2016, at 1:43 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: > > On 03/11/2016 19:47, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > >> Maturity assessment: >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/Geode+Podling+Maturity+Assessment > > I'd like to see

[DISCUSS] OpenWhisk Proposal

Hi all I have made some additions to the OpenWhisk Proposal [1]: - restructured the API Gateway references: It is expected that the API Gateway will be refactored with additional code donated by IBM during incubation. - added a note on the API Gateway’s dependency on OpenSSL - added a

Re: Request to edit OpenWhiskProposal

Thanks, works. Regards Felix > Am 04.11.2016 um 13:27 schrieb Bertrand Delacretaz : > > On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 12:59 PM, Felix Meschberger wrote: >> ...Can it please be reestablished for user FelixMeschberger ? ... > > You should be good now. >

Re: Request to edit OpenWhiskProposal

On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 12:59 PM, Felix Meschberger wrote: > ...Can it please be reestablished for user FelixMeschberger ? ... You should be good now. -Bertrand - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Request to edit OpenWhiskProposal

Hi As a mentor I have to add some updates to the OpenWhiskProposal but it looks like my editing karma has been revoked. Can it please be reestablished for user FelixMeschberger ? Thanks Felix - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: Incubator chat on Hipchat?

Slack is more stable than hipchat, some of the infra staff have had difficulties with new versions of the desktop client breaking. On Fri, 4 Nov 2016 at 21:04 Wade Chandler wrote: > Personally I tried gitter as GitHub was to come on-site at work, and > planned to use

Re: Seek one Champion for incubating Weex project

Thanks for welcome. Jut FYI, creating the editable proposal page on the wiki ( maybe https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/WeexProposal ) allows easy collaboration! To get edit permission to edit Wiki, please send a mail to general@i.a.o. Thanks. On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 12:14 PM, Longda Feng

Re: Incubator chat on Hipchat?

Personally I tried gitter as GitHub was to come on-site at work, and planned to use it, and the experience was quite horrible. Look at its app reviews; I tend to agree with the low ones which get into its UX and usability. Even creating a room or finding existing groups didn't seem to work well

Re: [EXPERIMENT] Moving Incubator Website from CMS to gitpubsub

On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 3:56 AM, John D. Ament wrote: > ...I'd also seek out > some usability style testing from other users to make sure they're > comfortable before doing anything permanent... I should be able to help with that, at least. -Bertrand

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache Geode (incubating) as a TLP

On 03/11/2016 19:47, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > Maturity assessment: > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/Geode+Podling+Maturity+Assessment I'd like to see this updated to use the latest version of the maturity model. Mark

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache Geode (incubating) as a TLP

I believe they are ready. +1 On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 12:47PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > Hi! > > with the 1.0.0-incubating release officially out (huge kudos > to the team!) there's an overwhelming sentiment among > the Apache Geode community and its mentors that > it is time to consider

Re: Incubator chat on Hipchat?

I think for external chats we should rather recommend Gitter, which has open rooms (anonymous lurking allowed) and "unlimited" searchable logs (and unlimited number of users) and don't require workarounds with a sign up bot. We did the same for Taverna, we tried an IRC chat, but its synchronous