Re: [DISCUSS] Storage-class memory ecosystem program

Hi Avinash, Welcome to join us. please register in the-asf.slack.com and join our channel #storage-class-memory as well, Thanks! Best Gary. On Sat, Nov 4, 2017 at 10:18 AM, Avinash Dongre wrote: > I'd like to participate in this as well. > > Thanks > Avinash > > > On Sat,

Re: [DISCUSS] Resolution to graduate Apache Impala to TLP

Hey John, I'm not sure if Jim (proposed PMC chair) has surveyed all the PMC members recently but I'm in touch with a good number of the PMC so I think I have a good sense, and I'll take a whack at answering this: It looks like of the proposed 24 PMC members, 15 work at Cloudera, the original

Re: [DISCUSS] Resolution to graduate Apache Impala to TLP

The only question I have is the typical distribution of proposed PMC members to companies. John On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 4:57 PM Todd Lipcon wrote: > Seems there isn't much discussion. Given the high number of +1s on the > podling vote, maybe time to move this to a VOTE on

Re: [DISCUSS] Resolution to graduate Apache Impala to TLP

Seems there isn't much discussion. Given the high number of +1s on the podling vote, maybe time to move this to a VOTE on general? -Todd On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 7:59 AM, Jim Apple wrote: > My methodology was to make it opt-out - I discussed this with one of > our mentors,

Re: Accepting Fineract CN code into TLP Apache Fineract

I can confirm: the SGA has been filed in the ASF records. On Nov 6, 2017 13:14, "Ed Cable" wrote: > Myrle and others, > > I just filed the software grant agreement. I will let everyone know once > it's been acknowledged so we can continue in the IP clearance process: > >

[DRAFT] Incubator PMC Board Report - November 2017

All, Below is the current draft. We have 7 podling reports missing/not signed off. Hopefully they can come soon. Incubator PMC report for November 2017 The Apache Incubator is the entry path into the ASF for projects and codebases wishing to become part of the Foundation's efforts. October

Re: Accepting Fineract CN code into TLP Apache Fineract

Myrle and others, I just filed the software grant agreement. I will let everyone know once it's been acknowledged so we can continue in the IP clearance process: https://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/ip-clearance-template.html Ed On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 11:57 AM, Greg Stein

Re: Trafodion: in need of one more mentor

You might prefer a more technical review: http://trafodion.apache.org/architecture-overview.html Jacques Le 06/11/2017 à 16:53, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : Hi Pierre, I'd not have said it like that :) But it's true that the Trafodion project is an amazing one which badly lacks consideration

Re: [RESULT]: [VOTE] Release 1.5 of NetBeans HTML/Java API

I see. I started to think about moving the bits to proper place on the lasts weekend, but then I realized that the release is so bad, that we need release 1.5.1 anyway. Thus I stopped trying. All bugs reported against 1.5 version have been fixed. It is possible to release 1.5.1 now. Does it still

Re: Trafodion: in need of one more mentor

Hi Pierre, I'd not have said it like that :) But it's true that the Trafodion project is an amazing one which badly lacks consideration Why it's amazing? Because it opens SQL access to Apache Hadoop: "Trafodion is a relational database management system that runs on Apache Hadoop, providing

[VOTE] Apache Trafodion (incubating) release 2.2.0 RC 1

Hello , This is a call to vote on Apache Trafodion (incubating) release 2.2.0 RC1 (Release Candidate 3) Apache Trafodion is a webscale SQL-on-Hadoop solution enabling transactional or operational workloads on Hadoop. Trafodion builds on the scalability, elasticity, and flexibility of Hadoop.

Re: Affiliation vs. individual

On Sat, Nov 4, 2017 at 8:13 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: > ...As you understand we want to know affiliation as a measure of diversity > for practical reasons But nobody is *required* to disclose their affiliations, doing so is optional. -Bertrand

Re: Update README for retired podlings?

On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 4:29 AM, Shane Curcuru wrote: > Dave Fisher wrote on 11/2/17 11:13 PM: > >> On Nov 2, 2017, at 7:06 PM, John D. Ament > wrote: > >>> On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 6:17 PM Dave Fisher > wrote: > > On Nov 2,

Re: PPMC voting new committers

Scratching my head as I assumed it was a normal non-tech vote conducted on the PPMC private list, majority wins, must be at least 3 votes. The one 'additional' rule I assumed was that the same must be true of PMC members voting; effectively the PPMC vote needs to include 3 mentor +1s. If a vote