Dave,
You probably already know enough to use Jekyll.
It is just a markdown to HTML translator. It is what github uses, as I
remember.
On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 8:31 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
> I’m always willing to learn new tools.
>
> Regards,
> Dave
>
> Sent from my
On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 8:15 PM, Julian Hyde wrote:
> Luciano created a Jekyll prototype a year or so ago. Let’s dust that off.
>
> Julian
>
>
Here is the link:
https://github.com/apache/apache-website-template
--
Luciano Resende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
I’m always willing to learn new tools.
Regards,
Dave
Sent from my iPhone
> On Apr 15, 2018, at 8:15 PM, Julian Hyde wrote:
>
> Luciano created a Jekyll prototype a year or so ago. Let’s dust that off.
>
> Julian
>
>>> On Apr 15, 2018, at 19:30, Ted Dunning
Luciano created a Jekyll prototype a year or so ago. Let’s dust that off.
Julian
> On Apr 15, 2018, at 19:30, Ted Dunning wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 12:37 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
>>
>> Hi -
>>
>> I think that a brand compliant initial
On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 12:37 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
> Hi -
>
> I think that a brand compliant initial podling page would not be hard to
> create using the Apache CMS.
>
The problem I have with that is that it encourages further use of CMS and
also that CMS is hard for
A template paragraph of simple HTML seems ideal, and it’s reasonable to expect
podlings to create it by the time of their first board report.
A full branding-compliant web site is a more complex undertaking, and we the
IPMC should not try to hurry that process. The podling's interests are
> This avoid unnecessary 404's for the project, and gives them some time to
> move their infrastructure over. Once they have their website up and
> running (either migrated or created from scratch) then they can switch the
> redirect to point to their actual content.
I have a (not necessarily
I like the idea of generating a placeholder for a podling on incubation.
It can serve many purposes. See the other thread.
I don’t think time limits like three months works as some podlings wait more
than six months for all of their SGAs.
Regards,
Dave
> On Apr 15, 2018, at 10:26 AM, Greg
Hi -
I think that a brand compliant initial podling page would not be hard to create
using the Apache CMS.
This could have two simple pages that would show a compliant examples:
(1) Index page with all of the appropriate links to both podling Mailing lists,
Download placeholder, Apache
Exactly. Nobody ever mentioned "redirect". Gian's original email said
"placeholder" five times.
On Sun, Apr 15, 2018, 10:15 Gian Merlino wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> What we were thinking in Druid is that we want to have _something_ up on
> http://druid.incubator.apache.org/, but it
I don't believe that linking to the status page would satisfy the website
requirement, but solves the 404 issue. At least in my mind it wouldn't get
them out of needing a website. I put out three months because that's
that's the longest I've seen the bootstrapping to take. To make sure I'm
I think this is a great day one idea but by 3 months,.the project should be
having a website to start that ball rolling. This might be too much of a
crutch.
On Sun, Apr 15, 2018, 11:10 John D. Ament wrote:
> Based on some of the on going discussions, wanted to get
Hi Gian,
Knowing that you're waiting on SGAs explains this a bit better. I have an
inquiry out to press to confirm what's expected (since I know that's why
everyone's reacting to websites right now).
I would recommend podlings review the Branding guide, there's important
tidbits
Yes, MySQL will be an optional feature. And only required by a few people.
So, asking them to download is good enough.
I will share this solution to the community.
Sheng Wu
---Original---
From: "sebb"
Date: Fri, Apr 13, 2018 21:36 PM
To:
The simple rule, in standards or in open source, is:
Incorporate by Reference not by Inclusion.
All else is details.
-Original Message-
From: William Guo [mailto:gu...@apache.org]
Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2018 8:44 AM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Are MySQL driver and
Hi John,
What we were thinking in Druid is that we want to have _something_ up on
http://druid.incubator.apache.org/, but it didn't seem appropriate to move
over the full site before the SGA & CLAs have all been finalized (those are
in progress). So we put up a temporary placeholder.
IMO, a
Based on some of the on going discussions, wanted to get opinions on how to
get podling websites bootstrapped a bit easier.
When I review https://incubator.apache.org/guides/sites.html it seems
pretty clear what we expect on a podling website. I'm wondering if during
the bootstrapping phase
On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 10:08 AM sebb wrote:
> On 15 April 2018 at 14:48, Greg Stein wrote:
> > It is unreasonable to assume a podling can do everything on Day One.
> >
> > Incubation is a *process*, not an instantaneous production of effort.
> >
> > While
On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 07:39, William Guo wrote:
> that means if we cannot have category X dependencies in our source release,
> but for category B, since we don't bundled in our source release, so it is
> fine.
That’s correct.
>
> Correct me if I am wrong.
>
> Thanks,
>
On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 9:48 AM Greg Stein wrote:
> It is unreasonable to assume a podling can do everything on Day One.
>
>
There's nothing about my email that says this needs to be done on day one.
> Incubation is a *process*, not an instantaneous production of effort.
>
>
On 15 April 2018 at 14:48, Greg Stein wrote:
> It is unreasonable to assume a podling can do everything on Day One.
>
> Incubation is a *process*, not an instantaneous production of effort.
>
> While the website work is being performed, having
> podling.incubator.apache.org NOT
It is unreasonable to assume a podling can do everything on Day One.
Incubation is a *process*, not an instantaneous production of effort.
While the website work is being performed, having
podling.incubator.apache.org NOT produce a 404 is useful.
Having that page describe the podling is in the
My input is a point for pagespeed to consider. Personally, I'm not
comfortable with what's proposed by Druid but it's not worth muddying up
pagespeed's inquiry. My preference is for a podling to get their website
moved over quickly (and we need to figure out how to help them make that
move
Thanks for the explanation.
William
On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 9:36 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 13 April 2018 at 11:26, Karl Wright wrote:
> > You can't distribute the MySQL driver, but as long as you don't
> distribute
> > the driver, you are free to solve the
that means if we cannot have category X dependencies in our source release,
but for category B, since we don't bundled in our source release, so it is
fine.
Correct me if I am wrong.
Thanks,
William
On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 11:58 PM, Matt Sicker wrote:
> On 13 April 2018 at
25 matches
Mail list logo