Hello,
I'd like to propose Warble as an Apache Incubator project. The draft of
the proposal is at https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/WarbleProposal and
included in this message.
Feedback from the community is welcome and encouraged. We're also still
looking for possible mentors if anyone would
Cool.. thx. I see only the 3 original committers were made email
moderators... good to know. I've filed an infra ticket to add some new
volunteers.
-s
On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 12:57 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
> Kumar,
>
> If you are interested in Airflow then you should be subscribed to
>
Would it be helpful if incubator submissions came with a [IP Review]
subject line? All accepted incubator and already-evaluated TLP records
would still be presented, with a [IP Recorded] or [IP Reviewed] subject
line.
I suspect it is helpful to show all incoming projects the conclusion of
other
Hi -
Thanks to everyone for participating so far. I see that many feel that the IP
Clearance being part of the Incubator for public recording purposes is in the
interests of the Foundation.
The records at http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/index.html
Hi -
The sha512 checksums match.
I’m changing my VOTE to a +1 (binding)
Let’s make the next release perfect.
Thanks,
Dave
> On Jun 4, 2018, at 7:09 PM, Wang Wei wrote:
>
> Thanks, Dave.
>
> On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 1:26 AM, Dave Fisher wrote:
>
>> -1 (binding)
>>
>> I am not getting
Thank you very much John!
Congratulations Justin!
> On Jun 4, 2018, at 3:12 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> John D. Ament recently announced his desire to step down from the
> Incubator PMC chair role. Thank you so much John for your efficient
> service here, "retiring" from
Hi Dave,
> On Jun 4, 2018, at 10:46 AM, Dave Fisher wrote:
>
> Hi -
>
> I think that the IP Clearance process has become very much a bureaucratic
> process where the IPMC is contributing little of value. Very seldom is there
> any feedback provided.
It is intended to be a bureaucratic
On 5 June 2018 at 10:51, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
> That doesn't do any good to the community if this is recorded privately.
>
> Unlike ICLA/CCLA documents which are quasi-private (the existence
> of a committer account is sufficient to document that the appropriate
> forms are on file), other
On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 8:26 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> > On Jun 5, 2018, at 4:53 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz <
> bdelacre...@codeconsult.ch> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 9:30 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> >> ...In other words, unless the code is for a podling, the IPMC shouldn't
> be
On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 5:15 PM, Matt Sicker wrote:
> On 5 June 2018 at 08:26, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> Since it's a foundation record, that should be the secretary's job, I
>> think. That is, the responsible PMC does the IP clearance and then submits
>> that info/record to the ASF secretary for
On 5 June 2018 at 08:26, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Since it's a foundation record, that should be the secretary's job, I
> think. That is, the responsible PMC does the IP clearance and then submits
> that info/record to the ASF secretary for filing.
>
Right. Any software grants are emailed to
Congrats Justin!
- Xin
2018-06-05 22:51 GMT+08:00 ShaoFeng Shi :
> Congratulations Justin!
>
> 2018-06-05 16:26 GMT+08:00 Mark Struberg :
>
> > +1 to both!
> >
> > LieGrue,
> > strub
> >
> > > Am 04.06.2018 um 13:33 schrieb Jacques Le Roux <
> > jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com>:
> > >
> > > Le
Congratulations Justin!
2018-06-05 16:26 GMT+08:00 Mark Struberg :
> +1 to both!
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
> > Am 04.06.2018 um 13:33 schrieb Jacques Le Roux <
> jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com>:
> >
> > Le 04/06/2018 à 12:12, Bertrand Delacretaz a écrit :
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> John D. Ament recently
Le 04/06/2018 à 16:29, Bertrand Delacretaz a écrit :
On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 1:31 PM, Jacques Le Roux
wrote:
...Anyway a big +1 to invite Graphviz in the incubator. I may even help if
necessary
Note that Stephen North who started this conversation with Sharan
hasn't been CCed in all
> On Jun 5, 2018, at 4:53 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 9:30 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> ...In other words, unless the code is for a podling, the IPMC shouldn't be
>> involved, IMHO
>
> But it's good to have a central place to record those IP clearances,
On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 4:31 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
...
> Do we still need the jbake-site branch?
> I don't think so, and if I'm correct I suggest deleting it to avoid
> confusion. ...
I have renamed that branch to UNUSED-jbake-site now.
-Bertrand
clear ~~~
For Podlings, vote in IPMC and document it in the exist center place.
For TLPs, vote in its PMC and document in the exist center place.
> 在 2018年6月5日，16:53，Bertrand Delacretaz 写道：
>
> clearance
On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 9:30 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> ...In other words, unless the code is for a podling, the IPMC shouldn't be
> involved, IMHO
But it's good to have a central place to record those IP clearances, IMO.
So maybe:
-The Incubator PMC provides the space for IP clearances to
+1 to both!
LieGrue,
strub
> Am 04.06.2018 um 13:33 schrieb Jacques Le Roux :
>
> Le 04/06/2018 à 12:12, Bertrand Delacretaz a écrit :
>> Hi,
>>
>> John D. Ament recently announced his desire to step down from the
>> Incubator PMC chair role. Thank you so much John for your efficient
>>
Hi,
This vote has passed with 3 +1 votes (bindings), 2 +1 votes (non-binding) and
no 0 or -1 votes.
+1 (binding), Willem Jiang
+1 (binding), Justin Mclean
+1 (binding), Mark Thomas
+1 (non-binding), Huxing Zhang
+1 (non-binding), Xin Wang
Thank you all for your votes and suggestions to this
20 matches
Mail list logo
