I found the problem. Sorry for the bad format. I change another email client
application and fix it now.
Please read the new vote on another email, and reply the new email for vote.
Sorry about that again.
Thanks,
Xiangdong Huang.
> 在 2018年11月7日，下午3:45，Justin Mclean 写道：
>
> Hi,
>
>
Hi,
Sorry for the previous mail with bad format.
I'd like to call a VOTE to accept IoTDB project, a database for managing large
amounts of time series data from IoT sensors in industrial applications, into
the Apache Incubator.
The full proposal is available on the wiki:
Hi,
Not sure about other people’s email reader but the formatting got a bit messed
up for me.
Here’s a link to the proposal:
https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/IoTDBProposal
Thanks,
Justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Hi, I'd like to call a VOTE to accept IoTDB project, a database for managing
large amounts of time series data from IoT sensors in industrial applications,
into the Apache Incubator. The full proposal is available on the wiki:
https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/IoTDBProposaland it is also
+1 (non-binding)
XIAORUI Wang
zhangli...@apache.org 于2018年11月7日 周三09:30写道：
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Thanks,
> John(Zhang Liang) from Sharding-Sphere
>
> Bruno Mahé 于2018年11月7日周三 上午1:37写道：
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Bruno
> >
> > On 11/5/18 10:41 PM, Roman Shaposhnik
+1 (non-binding)
Thanks,
John(Zhang Liang) from Sharding-Sphere
Bruno Mahé 于2018年11月7日周三 上午1:37写道：
> +1 (non-binding)
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Bruno
>
> On 11/5/18 10:41 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > on behalf of Sharding-Sphere community, I'd like to call
> > a VOTE to accept it into
CC += legal-discuss@ since this really isn't an incubator-specific topic any
more. The context is precompiled binary artifacts on
https://www.apache.org/dist/.
David Nalley wrote on Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 17:06:50 -0500:
> So let's assume a PMC (or PPMC) goes through the same process with
>
On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 9:39 PM Greg Stein wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 12:25 PM Julian Hyde wrote:
>
> > Jim, you’re re-iterating the premise of my question. In the context of my
> > question, it doesn’t matter what these things are called. But we need to
> > know how reviewers are to
Hi,
And sent, looking forward to some responses.
Thanks,
Justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 12:05 PM Jacques Basaldúa wrote:
>
>
> I have been working really hard on the documentation in the last two months
> and I am almost done. The current public documentation is very incomplete.
> Please, allow me to share it with you when I merge the new version, as
>
Hi Dave, Nick and everyone,
Thank you very much for the quick answer.
The original project was built by a team and released under an Apache License.
As originally designed, it has no activity now. For the moment, I am alone in
the pivoting the code released into a new idea. I am an original
I agree. This is a policy for the IPMC to determine and I think this will
increase inclusion. We need mentors and of all types. +1
--
Kevin A. McGrail
VP Fundraising, Apache Software Foundation
Chair Emeritus Apache SpamAssassin Project
https://www.linkedin.com/in/kmcgrail - 703.798.0171
On
I like this. I had the (apparently accurate) impression that ASF membership
was the usual route to podling mentorship. I'm very interested in
mentorship generally and ways I can help out ASF - so they might someday
intersect in the formal role of podling mentor. It is nice to see a path
that is
On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 11:25 AM Dave Fisher wrote:
>
> Hi Everyone, but especially mentors.
>
> I saw this email from a mentor on the Airflow dev list: [1]
>
> "The big list that *has* to be filled out and correct is here:
> http://incubator.apache.org/projects/airflow.html
>
+1 (non-binding)
Thanks,
Bruno
On 11/5/18 10:41 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
Hi!
on behalf of Sharding-Sphere community, I'd like to call
a VOTE to accept it into the Apache Incubator. The full
proposal is available on the wiki:
https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ShardingSphereProposal
+1 (binding)
On Tue, 6 Nov 2018 at 06:38, Willem Jiang wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Willem Jiang
>
> Twitter: willemjiang
> Weibo: 姜宁willem
>
> On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 2:41 PM Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> >
> > Hi!
> >
> > on behalf of Sharding-Sphere community, I'd like to call
> > a VOTE to accept
On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 12:26 AM Justin Mclean wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Good to see that the honest (stark even) podling report got several people
> expressing interest in the project.
>
> > 1. Is there anyone here on this list, willing to contribute as
> > Committer/PPMC or even as Mentor?
>
> I’m
+1 (binding)
Willem Jiang
Twitter: willemjiang
Weibo: 姜宁willem
On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 2:41 PM Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> on behalf of Sharding-Sphere community, I'd like to call
> a VOTE to accept it into the Apache Incubator. The full
> proposal is available on the wiki:
>
Great ideas, thanks Justin!
Justin Mclean wrote on 11/6/18 3:20 AM:
> Hi,
>
> I looked at the board resolution for the creation of the IPMC [1] and it says
> nothing about how IPMC members should be added so from that I take it that
> the IPMC can decide how it wants to do that.
The IPMC is a
Hi,
For instance [1] which states:
"For committership, that is typical. Most PMCs allow a veto for adding new
members to the PMC.”
Not to single an individual out but that was the shortest concise statement I
could fine. (But given it was 2013 their views may of changed since then).
Justin
HI,
> That's not correct, its not "no -1s" - quoting [2]:
>
>> Consensus approval' refers to a vote (sense 1) which has completed with at
>> least three
>> binding +1 votes and no vetos.
>
> It says "no vetos", not "no -1s"
>
> And as per [0] vetoes only apply to code changes, so that
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 10:35 AM Justin Mclean wrote:
> I think some of this is confusion between what consensus means and
> consensus voting mean (or more correctly consensus approval) [2] (i.e. 3+1s
> and no -1’s.)
That's not correct, its not "no -1s" - quoting [2]:
> Consensus approval'
Hi,
> Well I guess then I'll simply step up as third mentor on Edgent.
> Do I formally have to do anything for this?
Ask the PPMC if they are willing to take you on as a mentor would be the best
way.
Thanks,
Justin
-
To
Hi Justin
Very interesting proposal. And I like it, also willing to request for that :)
>From my experience, several projects have invited me or involved me in, such
>as Zipkin(Incubating) and IoTDB(In Incubator discussion). But because I can't
>be podling project mentor, based on Apache
Hi,
> To me the ultimate reference is
> https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html - decisions are made by
> consensus (*) which can be expressed by a majority vote with a least
> three +1s, and vetoes are only valid for code changes.
That page has a few issues IMO, for starters it not clear
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 10:02 AM Sheng Wu wrote:
> ...The proposal and vote are here
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/88beebeec1aec8c32d331a3957b9eaec5aeee3e4e1bb23664731d048@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E
Oops sorry, it landed in my spam folder for some reason - sorry for the
+1
Von Gosling
> 在 2018年11月6日，下午2:41，Roman Shaposhnik 写道：
>
> Hi!
>
> on behalf of Sharding-Sphere community, I'd like to call
> a VOTE to accept it into the Apache Incubator. The full
> proposal is available on the wiki:
>https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ShardingSphereProposal
> and it
+1 no binding
Sheng Wu 于2018年11月6日周二 下午5:09写道：
> +1 no binding
>
> Sheng Wu
> Apache SkyWalking
>
> On 2018/11/06 06:41:08, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > on behalf of Sharding-Sphere community, I'd like to call
> > a VOTE to accept it into the Apache Incubator. The full
> > proposal
+1 no binding
Sheng Wu
Apache SkyWalking
On 2018/11/06 06:41:08, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> Hi!
>
> on behalf of Sharding-Sphere community, I'd like to call
> a VOTE to accept it into the Apache Incubator. The full
> proposal is available on the wiki:
>
Hi Bertrand
The proposal and vote are here
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/88beebeec1aec8c32d331a3957b9eaec5aeee3e4e1bb23664731d048@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E
I think just Justin's reply didn't include them.
Sheng Wu
On 2018/11/06 08:50:03, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> On Tue,
Well I guess then I'll simply step up as third mentor on Edgent.
Do I formally have to do anything for this?
Chris
Am 06.11.18, 09:26 schrieb "Justin Mclean" :
Hi,
Good to see that the honest (stark even) podling report got several people
expressing interest in the project.
On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 9:40 AM Justin Mclean wrote:
> +1 (binding)...
Where's the proposal that you are voting upon?
In general, such votes link to a wiki proposal and copy it on the vote
thread for clarity.
-Bertrand
-
To
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 9:39 AM Justin Mclean wrote:
> ...From my reading of policy and many many discussions on mailing lists, it
> seem
> that consensus approval not majority approval is the standard way...
To me the ultimate reference is
https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html -
+1 (binding)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Hi,
> I'm in favor of removing that clause and operating in the standard way with
> majority votes.
From my reading of policy and many many discussions on mailing lists, it seem
that consensus approval not majority approval is the standard way. Although
there is some confusion on this, and
On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 9:32 AM Christofer Dutz
wrote:
> ...So we could do the following ... I nominate some new PPMCs and start a
> vote.
> If not enough votes come in, I'll come back here asking for the IPMCs
> assistance again
I think that works and apparently you have two active mentors
Hi all,
well that's the main problem ... I doubt that we would have enough PPMCs voting.
I had addressed a security problem some time ago and didn't get a single
response on the private list.
So we could do the following ... I nominate some new PPMCs and start a vote.
If not enough votes come
UPS ... didn't mean the (I)PCM , but the (P)PMC ...
Am 06.11.18, 09:18 schrieb "Christofer Dutz" :
Hi all,
as it seems and as I have reported in the last podling report, the Apache
Edgent project had been suffering of one of the things that happen if you don’t
have a diverse
Hi Chris,
On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 9:19 AM Christofer Dutz
wrote:
> ... 2. Is it possible to sort of reset a podling IPMC and start with a new
> set of people?...
I think the easiest is to have the existing PMC vote in new members.
If that doesn't work, I think the votes of Incubator PMC
Hi,
Good to see that the honest (stark even) podling report got several people
expressing interest in the project.
> 1. Is there anyone here on this list, willing to contribute as
> Committer/PPMC or even as Mentor?
I’m happy to continue as a mentor, the project currently has 2 mentors. If
Hi,
I looked at the board resolution for the creation of the IPMC [1] and it says
nothing about how IPMC members should be added so from that I take it that the
IPMC can decide how it wants to do that.
Currently the IPMC can vote people in (which is not so common) or an ASF member
can request
Hi all,
as it seems and as I have reported in the last podling report, the Apache
Edgent project had been suffering of one of the things that happen if you don’t
have a diverse committer base.
After IBM pulling out the Edgent contributors we are left effectively with only
me. After mentioning
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 7:04 PM Ryan Blue wrote:
>... I'd like to start a discussion about moving Netflix's Iceberg project to
> the incubator...
Looks like a very interesting project!
>...I can post it to the wiki as well if that's needed,...
Yes please, it's good to have all proposals
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 8:41 AM Justin Mclean wrote:
> ..."Individuals may be nominated to join the IPMC after a vote which passes
> with more than 3/4 of those voting.”...
I didn't remember the discussion that led to that, and looking at it
again I don't think it solves an actual problem -
44 matches
Mail list logo
