Re: [DISCUSS] Hudi Incubation Proposal

2019-01-07 Thread Julien Le Dem
Sorry I misspoke, I won’t have time to be a *mentor* but the champion role is what I’ve done so far and leads to the vote. so in the interest of not blocking the submission, I would suggest that I stay as champion and be removed as mentor while we add the volunteers who chimed in on this thread.

[CANCELLED][VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.4.0.rc0

2019-01-07 Thread Steffen Rochel
Dear community - I'm cancelling the vote due to -1 feedback from Justin due to outstanding licensing issues. For details see https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ebb8c4c00fb66dd98da13621c7dcb8753fee57562a861d61379d31e9@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E The MXNet community will address the

Re: Official releases vs unreleased code

2019-01-07 Thread Mark Thomas
On 07/01/2019 12:05, Geertjan Wielenga wrote: > So, just to be clear what this means in the context of Apache NetBeans. > > Here's two different scenarios that relate to this: > > 1. CoolBeans (coolbeans.xyz) is a distribution of Apache NetBeans, with the > difference that it includes the

Re: Official releases vs unreleased code

2019-01-07 Thread Geertjan Wielenga
So, just to be clear what this means in the context of Apache NetBeans. Here's two different scenarios that relate to this: 1. CoolBeans (coolbeans.xyz) is a distribution of Apache NetBeans, with the difference that it includes the 'enterprise' cluster (i.e., Jakarta/Java EE features) of Apache

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.4.0.rc0

2019-01-07 Thread Hagay Lupesko
Thanks for clarifying Justin. On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 1:06 AM Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > Good call. I will work with my colleagues in Amazon to try and help with > > this. > > Great if you need any help just ask. > > > I'm not sure what is the best approach with 3P code issues though: you

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.4.0.rc0

2019-01-07 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > Good call. I will work with my colleagues in Amazon to try and help with > this. Great if you need any help just ask. > I'm not sure what is the best approach with 3P code issues though: you call > out 3rdparty/onnx-tensorrt as having a mix of license types and having > other issues.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.4.0.rc0

2019-01-07 Thread Hagay Lupesko
Justin, Good call. I will work with my colleagues in Amazon to try and help with this. I'm not sure what is the best approach with 3P code issues though: you call out 3rdparty/onnx-tensorrt as having a mix of license types and having other issues. However, this is part of another repo,