[VOTE] Release Apache Doris 0.10.0-incubating-rc04

Hi all, Please review and vote on Apache Doris 0.10.0-incubating-rc04 release. Apache Doris is an MPP-based interactive SQL data warehousing for reporting and analysis. The Apache Doris community has voted on and approved this release: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/a4b5c1102168769e680

Infrastructure removing releases Was: Re: [VOTE] Apache Tuweni 0.8.0

> > Have you checked with infra that they will allow this? Previous they have > said they will remove any release with an issue like this. I’ve tried to get > clarity on this (see board report before last) but with no luck. > Justin, I apologize for missing that question in the May report. Can

Re: [VOTE] Apache Tuweni 0.8.0

Hi, I’m also curious to know how that jar is licensed. This doesn’t help [1] and this [2] while claiming to be ALV2 includes category X LGPL license. Thanks, Justin 1. https://github.com/gradle/gradle/tree/master/subprojects/wrapper 2. https://github.com/gradle/gradle/blob/master/LICENSE --

Re: [VOTE] Apache Tuweni 0.8.0

Hi, > We have been working on improving the situation. The gradle wrapper is no > longer checked in sources, and the README has been updated to make sure folks > can build from source and download the wrapper as needed. > > Unfortunately I missed something and the jar found its way into the >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Tuweni 0.8.0

We have been working on improving the situation. The gradle wrapper is no longer checked in sources, and the README has been updated to make sure folks can build from source and download the wrapper as needed. Unfortunately I missed something and the jar found its way into the distributions. T

Re: Podlings, the Incubator, relationships and Apache

On Sun, Jun 23, 2019 at 11:03 PM Alex Harui wrote: > > But, IMO, the reason the question went to VP Legal is that it doesn't really > matter what the IPMC thinks if their "business decision" will have an impact > on the "Legal Shield" and the insurance premiums that go with it. So I think > th

Re: Podlings, the Incubator, relationships and Apache

On Sun, Jun 23, 2019 at 11:26 PM Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 22, 2019 at 3:31 PM Rich Bowen wrote: > > > > A couple of thoughts: > > And a couple of thoughts on top of that. > > > Podlings are not permitted to call themselves "Apache Foo" because they are > > not yet full Apache proje

Re: Podlings, the Incubator, relationships and Apache

On Sat, Jun 22, 2019 at 6:31 PM Rich Bowen wrote: > > A couple of thoughts: > > Podlings are not permitted to call themselves "Apache Foo" because they are > not yet full Apache projects. > Actually we compel them to call themselves Apache Foo (incubating) https://incubator.apache.org/guides/bran

Re: [VOTE] (Re)Release Apache Flagon UserALE.js (Incubating) 1.0.0

Copy. Copyrights are 2019 in V2.0.0 under vote now in dev@. Moving forward, we’ll be more careful. Thanks! Joshua Poore > On Jun 24, 2019, at 9:37 AM, Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > >> 1. Will certainly fix copyright before pushing to release distro. > > Well actually that would change th

Re: [VOTE] Apache Tuweni 0.8.0

+1 (binding) carried over from dev@tuweni Vote. Regards, Dave Sent from my iPhone > On Jun 24, 2019, at 6:39 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > +1 (binding) - carried over from PPMC vote > >> On Jun 24, 2019, at 6:03 AM, Antoine Toulme wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> The Tuweni community voted on and has

Re: [VOTE] Apache Tuweni 0.8.0

Hi, Sorry, it’s late, I made a mistake. I meant to say VP infra not VP incubator, as Apache Infrastructure are responsible for distribution policy [1] not us. Thanks, Justin 1. https://www.apache.org/dev/release-distribution.html -

Re: [VOTE] Apache Tuweni 0.8.0

Hi, JFYI - this is uncharted waters and VP incubator was previous said they will not allow distribution of incubator source releases with jars in them. They may of changed their minds and may allow this, but you might want to check with them first. Thanks, Justin --

Re: [VOTE] Apache Tuweni 0.8.0

+1 (binding) - carried over from PPMC vote > On Jun 24, 2019, at 6:03 AM, Antoine Toulme wrote: > > Hi all, > The Tuweni community voted on and has approved a proposal to release > Tuweni 0.8.0. Pursuant to the Releases section of the Incubation > Policy and we would now like to request the perm

Re: [VOTE] (Re)Release Apache Flagon UserALE.js (Incubating) 1.0.0

Hi, > 1. Will certainly fix copyright before pushing to release distro. Well actually that would change the hashes / invalidate the signatures. It’s very minor just fix next release. > So, yes. We’ll be hunting for 2 new mentors. I suggest you send an email to genaral@incubator asking for som

Re: [VOTE] (Re)Release Apache Flagon UserALE.js (Incubating) 1.0.0

Hi Justin, 1. Will certainly fix copyright before pushing to release distro. 2. One committer accidentally voted in private@ (tried to express that in the release thread notes in the VOTE) and our newest contributor voted after the VOTE went to general (dev@ was cc’d). 3. Mentors: Of our three

Re: [VOTE] Apache Tuweni 0.8.0

Hi, I see that the gradle jar is still in the source release. This was discussed last release [1] and as discussed previously [2] this is currently not allowed. It was mentioned in the last release vote that the gradle jar was removed, but it seems it hasn’t been? Thanks, Justin 1. https://l

Re: Podlings, the Incubator, relationships and Apache

++1. I agree w/ Rich and Roman > On Jun 23, 2019, at 11:25 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 22, 2019 at 3:31 PM Rich Bowen > wrote: >> >> A couple of thoughts: > > And a couple of thoughts on top of that. > >> Podlings are not permitted to call themselve

[VOTE] Apache Tuweni 0.8.0

Hi all, The Tuweni community voted on and has approved a proposal to release Tuweni 0.8.0. Pursuant to the Releases section of the Incubation Policy and we would now like to request the permission of the Incubator PMC to publish the tarball on the Tuweni Download page. Note we have collected 4 +1

Re: Podlings, the Incubator, relationships and Apache

Hi, Thanks to David for a very good summary of the historical situation and Davor for IMO correctly summing up peoples positions. I think both of those replies are worth a very careful read. Thanks, Justin - To unsubscribe,

Re: Podlings, the Incubator, relationships and Apache

Hi, > What kinds of policy violations truly affect the legal shield if the > non-compliance: > 1) is actually released > 2) released but noted in RELEASE_NOTES or DISCLAIMER > 3) released but not corrected in the next release This question (in a slightly different form) was in the proposal to th

Re: Podlings, the Incubator, relationships and Apache

Hi, > Correct. The I way I see this thread is this: *when it comes to > releases*, there’s always been two camps in Incubator. One thinks that > Incubator is a TLP… Which would be a reasonable assumption give: a) That only IPMC votes are binding on releases. b) It listed as a TLP in Whimsy c) Th