On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 5:18 PM, Noah Slater nsla...@tumbolia.org wrote:
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 4:53 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.comwrote:
There's another side to this, which I would derisively label, 'so
what'? How does it help a user to see that my key is signed by 27 of
my
alternatives
that avoid the need for the user to be a WoT participant, such as
taking advantage of KEYS files and the like.
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 10:37 PM, Benson Margulies
bimargul...@gmail.comwrote:
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 5:18 PM, Noah Slater nsla...@tumbolia.org wrote:
On Mon, Oct 8
Let's try a little statistically-invalid experiment of sample size
one. The last time I had a key signed at Apache, it was by Dan Kulp.
Now, pretend that you are a suspicious user of one of the many Maven
plugins releases that I RM. Can you reach Dan from yourself in the
web? Is there anyone you,
Shane,
After reading all the responses, I'm no longer very interested in
pushing the idea of key signing. I am much more interested in
explaining to users the existence and use of the LDAP keys.
We can explain: If something is signed with a key associated with an
Apache committer via the Apache
So, I voted for the release without making a detailed IP check (just
signatures, buildability, etc) based on the state in the clutch.
We seem to have a problem here. I've pinged two of the mentors here
chosen by people in my gmail 'to' cache; could we get some input?
On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 7:09 PM, Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
Sent from my tablet
On Oct 7, 2012 10:08 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
So, I voted for the release without making a detailed IP check (just
signatures, buildability, etc) based on the state
On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 7:19 PM, Luciano Resende luckbr1...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 4:09 PM, Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com
wrote:
Sent from my tablet
On Oct 7, 2012 10:08 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
So, I voted for the release without making
What I want to know about this is whether incubator.apache.org/clutch
is lying to me when it claims that this project has released before.
I do see that you indicated elsewhere in this thread that
you did misinterpret that aspect of the table. Is there
something that we can do to make it
+1
On Oct 5, 2012, at 5:20 AM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote:
+1
LieGrue,
strub
- Original Message -
From: Dan Haywood d...@haywood-associates.co.uk
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Thursday, October 4, 2012 2:41 PM
Subject: [VOTE] Graduate Isis podling
+1 (IPMC member)
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 2:11 PM, Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez
juanpa...@apache.org wrote:
http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/jspwiki/KEYS
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For
Briefly ...
The process that produced Jukka was not a pretty one, and I was rather
ashamed of myself by the end of it. So, if any other qualified
candidate is available, my inclination is to defer to them. However,
it's not for me to tell the community what to do. If the community
prefers to run
I'm sorry, a work obligation overtook me. I'll have a look around for
future reference at my assignments.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
of those dev lists which is 90% JIRA traffic.
ODFToolkit, on the other hand, seems to have a metadata problem. It
shows no total committers and one new committer. Does anyone
understand that? Otherwise, all their boxes are green.
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 8:09 AM, Benson Margulies bimargul
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 4:42 PM, Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez
juanpablo.san...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
picking up Benson's initial question, just my 2c: how about encouraging a
key signing party (or something alike, but more informal and/or with fewer
people) through general@i.a.o for every
Craig,
I appreciate the general scheme of signing.
It seems as if we have two approaches to key trust. One is the
in-person web of trust, and the other is the CLA - account -
key-in-ldap/svn. Given the Foundations' emphasis on geographic
diversity, the later seems to me to be more appropriate. I
, 2012 at 4:09 AM, Dan Haywood
d...@haywood-associates.co.uk wrote:
On 3 October 2012 07:47, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
Let's fix this: I nominate Benson Margulies as Incubator PMC chair.
Benson's been actively involved in the Incubator for quite a while,
has mentored
I will do an exam this evening when I get where I'm going.
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 2:14 AM, Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez
juanpablo.san...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi again,
we have to submit our IPMC Board report this month, and it would be real
nice if
we could say that we have enough (or at least
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Scott Wilson
scott.bradley.wil...@gmail.com wrote:
We recently started the process of taking Wookie to graduation, however the
current Wookie release is blocked pending the resolution of a crypto export
issue [1].
My question is: can we proceed with
Podling frequently check in dubious IP as part of initial imports, and
then clean up HEAD later. I've never seen any evidence of a more
thorough extirpation.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 6:49 PM, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name wrote:
Jukka Zitting wrote on Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 00:06:38 +0200:
PPS. It would be nice if we could use Apache Steve for the election.
Volunteers?
Seems a bit premature. Let's see if we have more than one candidate.
So
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 7:58 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
FYI - This is being done in public!
Who or what is an RGB.ES? Don't PMC members have to disclose an identity?
Regards,
Dave
Begin forwarded message:
From: Andrew Rist andrew.r...@oracle.com
Date: October 1, 2012
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 8:07 PM, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
No, just like Upayavira doesn't.
Oh, I thought he was just a person-of-single-name, like a number of
people I've met (often from Indonesia).
From: Benson Margulies bimargul
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Andrus Adamchik and...@objectstyle.org wrote:
Hi Bertrand,
OpenDDR combining forces with DeviceMap is great news! And having the
resource file will make it very useful immediately.
Regarding this vote.. While the original wurfl.xml was clearly open source,
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 5:11 PM, Noah Slater nsla...@tumbolia.org wrote:
Speaking as CouchDB's RM, I would consider missing license headers a
blocker.
Are rules more lax within the Incubator?
In the incubator, minor problems of this sort are non-blocking. They
per-file notices are suspenders
Does anyone seriously believe that IP notices are required in files like these?
These files cannot be copyrighted because they do not have any
'creative' content. If they can't be copyrighted, they can't be
licensed. And, even it were otherwise, the notices at the top of the
tree are sufficient.
.
We still have the following reviews to do:
Benson Margulies - Cordova, Flex, S4
Jukka Zitting- OpenOffice
Matt Franklin- Isis, NPanday, Wave
Matt Hogstrom- Bigtop, Openmeetings
I'm a bit late myself too [*], so it's still fine if you can complete
the reviews by tonight
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 6:18 AM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Sep 8, 2012 at 12:37 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com
wrote:
Let me know if you won't have time for the review by Wednesday.
We still have the following reviews to do:
Benson Margulies
Jim,
Two points:
1: you skip over the liability question. Is Bill legally exposed?
2: You can't distribute a binary application to the Mac App store, or
other places, without a signature.
Some complex requirements for using an Apache signature have been
posed; I don't know why Donald
You can also use OSSRH to push more jars to central.
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
Many projects in a similar situation ship a deps
package that contains dependencies and distribute
those from the mirrors.
HTH
Sigh. Apache is a volunteer organization with a history and a culture.
As a volunteer organization, it cannot possibly create and maintain a
set of documents that describe every bit of cultural norm and
historical context.
New committers on existing projects learn from their communities.
Podling
Joe, I know very well (and you know that I know) that I can edit most of
the things that appear on our web site. But if community-oriented means
that anyone should just edit those docs to scratch an itch and to hell
with consensus and the consequences, then you're right, I'm definitely a
I submit that this sub-thread has reached the end of its useful lifetime.
The IPMC's view of binaries is clear, and the IPMC believes that its
views reflect the will of the board. 'Official' binaries, like
binaries signed with a certificate with the Foundation's name on it,
are not currently
This policy is enshrined in the original foundation articles of
incorporation, and has been restated, over and over, by board members.
Most colorfully by Roy T. Fielding, who was 'present at the birth.'
Many are sympathetic to the AOO situation, and this is why the
suggestion from the VP legal
After my recent adventure sorting out Kato's IP clearance, I have an
intention as a shepherd, and I'd like to suggest that others pick it
up, as well.
If a podling has not filled in the IP clearance field on their status
page, ask them what's going on, and ask them to report the status in
their
I would like to offer a very loud +1 to Bertrand's email.
Here we are on a community graduation vote thread. This sub-discussion
would seem to lead to one of three outcomes:
1) No place new. AOO proceeds out of the incubator operating under the
current regime, and those AOO community members who
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 9:24 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 8:53 AM, Thilo Goetz twgo...@gmx.de wrote:
On 21/08/12 13:59, Branko Čibej wrote:
On 21.08.2012 12:52, sebb wrote:
I think the NOTICE problems are serious enough to warrant a respin.
This is an
Officially, no Apache project has ever, ever, released a binary.
Apache projects have published convenience binaries to accompany their
releases, which have been, by definition, source.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
flame...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Tuesday, August 14, 2012, Benson Margulies wrote:
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 3:54 PM, Henri Yandell
flame...@gmail.comjavascript:;
wrote:
Just because it was released doesn't
I don't have karma to mess with svn. Can someone who does please set
Kato's SVN to Read-Only? I've done the necessary research into the IP
situation.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For
Would it be reasonable to suggest that the file names of grants in
documents/grants reflect the target project, somehow? Just having them
named after the grantor makes it a bit hard to track things down. If
not, now about some sort of readme file in the directory to which
pointers could be added?
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 1:36 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 18 August 2012 18:20, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't have karma to mess with svn. Can someone who does please set
Kato's SVN to Read-Only? I've done the necessary research into the IP
situation.
Done
.
I volunteered to deal with all this as an expansion of a Shepherd
assignment. I confess that I'm feeling a bit whelmed.
Hen
On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 12:30 PM, Benson Margulies
bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
Henri,
Ant pointed out that Kato released. Where is the signoff you are looking
I need some more help here. The IPMC approved a release of kato, but
no one ever updated the status page to reflect copyright clearance.
What shall I do?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For
Henri,
Ant pointed out that Kato released. Where is the signoff you are looking at?
--benson
On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 2:29 PM, Henri Yandell flame...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 7:17 AM, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jul 7, 2012, at 10:22 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
. Here's the latest TODO list:
And an updated one:
Benson Margulies - Syncope, Nuvem
Dave Fisher - DeltaSpike
Matt Franklin- Droids
Matt Hogstrom- SIS, Wookie
Mohammad Nour- Airavata
Ross Gardler - Wink
That's quite a few reports still to review
VCL has escaped the incubator while I was being slow.
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 6:41 AM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
I reviewed Syncope and found no cause for concern with their report.
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 8:31 PM, Franklin, Matthew B.
mfrank...@mitre.org wrote:
I reviewed
Nuvem seems adequately described. The report comment about small size
and slow growth seems accurate, but there's at least an active mentor
in the house and some things are happening.
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 6:41 AM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
VCL has escaped the incubator
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 5:18 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com
wrote:
...I'd like to start fixing this by forming a release task force of a
handful of volunteers who are ready to invest an hour or two
/mod_mbox/incubator-kato-dev/200903.mbox/%3c71e1b5740903160445r4e9b9911m480860a46b0dd...@mail.gmail.com%3E
...ant
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 1:49 AM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com
wrote:
I see that incubator.apache.org/clutch does not reveal the IP
clearance status of projects. I need
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 9:29 PM, David Crossley cross...@apache.org wrote:
Benson Margulies wrote:
Please remind me of how to edit the clutch. It has an obsolete remark
about river.
Clutch just needs to be re-run occasionally.
See http://incubator.apache.org/clutch.html#notes
Regarding
TWIMC,
Some weeks ago, after receiving no responses to email to this
projects' lists, the IPMC voted to shut down this podling. Since you
did not complete IP clearance, this calls for deleting any source from
svn. I'll do this in about a week, along with other cleanup.
--benson margulies
I see that incubator.apache.org/clutch does not reveal the IP
clearance status of projects. I need some help here.
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 7:17 AM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 7:15 AM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Benson, AFAIK all the IP
Please remind me of how to edit the clutch. It has an obsolete remark
about river.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 8:49 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
I see that incubator.apache.org/clutch does not reveal the IP
clearance status of projects. I need some help here.
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 7:17 AM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 5:37 PM, Upayavira u...@odoko.co.uk wrote:
Marvin,
While I (think I) can understand your concern (that it should be the
mentors who are reviewing releases, not yet another group), I'd suggest
that Jukka's approach might be a way to get there.
The incubator release
+1 (mentor)
On Jul 23, 2012, at 3:08 AM, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote:
+1
Stefan
On 2012-07-21, Prescott Nasser wrote:
Hey all,
The Lucene.Net community feels ready to graudate. Our internal vote was a
success (~40 +1's and a bit of a mess because we had a number of mailing
Here are some thoughts about this based on my particular experiences.
So I won't preface each particular observation with 'In my
experience.'
There is a narrative around the Foundation about 'Diversity'. The
narrative goes like this: once upon a time, one (or more) projects
were predominantly
http://javaadventure.blogspot.ie/2012/07/do-you-want-to-become-maven-committer.html
is an example that comdev might want to propagate?
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Benson Margulies
bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
Here are some thoughts about this based on my particular experiences.
So I
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 7:16 PM, Rich Bowen rbo...@rcbowen.com wrote:
On Jul 11, 2012, at 12:15 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 2:24 AM, Niall Pemberton
niall.pember...@gmail.com wrote:
...my 2 cents would be to make it optional - keep it where theres a
synergy and
A thread on the subject of EasyAnt highlighted some perplexity for me,
and I think that it deserves a thread of its own.
Once upon a time, the Foundation had a set of 'Umbrella projects'.
These were PMCs that managed a collection of 'sub-projects', each
considered a relatively independent
I probably should have been clearer about my mediocre availability for
Shepherding activities until 17 July. I will be happy to become a
burr under the saddle of these projects as needed them, but I'm not in
a position to be helpful in beating reports out of them.
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 12:22
I count 11 binding votes for, 1 non-binding vote for, and no other
contributions to the process.
Barring any surprises, I plan to look for help in executing the
retirement process when I return on 17 July.
On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 3:32 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm going
to be your 'champion' for this purpose if you
decide to go here, or perhaps some other member of the Incubator PMC
will step up who has an interest.
Thanks,
Benson Margulies
On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 11:46 AM, Suleman Khan sule...@sit.fraunhofer.de wrote:
Dear All,
In Fraunhofer AISEC, we developed
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 9:44 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
On Jul 3, 2012, at 12:06 PM, Nicolas Lalevée wrote:
Le 3 juil. 2012 à 19:00, Jukka Zitting a écrit :
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 6:44 PM, Nicolas Lalevée
nicolas.lale...@hibnet.org wrote:
The primary target for
On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 5:18 PM, Roger Schildmeijer
schildmei...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
The AWF community has voted to retire the project.
Following the retirement guide [1], I now call the Incubator PMC to vote on
confirming this decision. (Will be open for 72 hours).
[ ] +1 Retire the
, 2012, at 7:29 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
Based on the status of this podling as reported in the June board
report, I propose that the IPMC retire the Kato podling.
I'm not sure how long a vote for this should remain open.
here is my +1
On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 5:59 PM, Niall Pemberton
niall.pember...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 8:46 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com
wrote:
Let me try this again.
Chuckwa looks pretty normal; report in place, traffic on mailing list.
I don't see any particular cause
Based on the status of this podling as reported in the June board
report, I propose that the IPMC retire the Kato podling.
I'm not sure how long a vote for this should remain open.
here is my +1.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Wearing the very small hat of shepherd, I write to start a discussion
of moving Kato to the attic.
The last sign of activity was at the last reporting period, and the
only activity then was for one contributor to note that he had really
no time to spend on the project and the future needed to be
On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 11:46 AM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for the report, Isis!
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Apache Wiki wikidi...@apache.org wrote:
+ - only really one issue: need to demonstrate can bring in at least one
+ new committer. At that
The diversity (so-called) requirement is often stated in terms of the
risk of the project being stranded if a company changes course. From
what I see around the Foundation, this is usually a risk much akin to
the risk of all the air molecules congregating in one corner of the
room at the board
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 7:13 AM, Shane Curcuru a...@shanecurcuru.org wrote:
Doesn't the IPMC (and not any individuals, even Roy) decide what the
official Incubation policies should be? Ralph's reply, and my general
reading of the feeling in the IPMC is that graduation votes *should* take
I know that I, and I think that Marvin, got a bit distracted by their
exact choice of wording. I join him in agreeing with you that the
people proposing a podling should be entitled, no, encouraged, to
control their list of initial collaborators. Also note the other email
in this thread about
Ross,
I can see why my 'sandbag' approach makes you uncomfortable. I've
suggested it once or twice when a proposed podling had a lot of
interested parties already involved. This is a two-edged situation. On
the one hand, instant size and diversity. On the other hand, that may
represent the pool
So, what message here should the incubator send a podling, or the
foundation send a TLP? I really don't mean this as a rhetorical
question at all, I'm honestly puzzled. In the case of Lucene, I've
been hanging out for months, and I feel perfectly confident that it's
a healthy community by any
Marvin,
I am at your disposal to collaborate on something here; note my reply
at infrastructure@. It seems to me that this thread would largely go
better over there, now that the caveat that 'a podling run entirely on
JIRA may have community problems' has been delivered.
--benson
I'll see Jukka one and raise him one. I have advised potential
podlings to be very conservative with their initial list, and keep
some potential contributors in their collective back pocket. This
gives them a ready-made source of community growth, which is typically
the scarcest and most precious
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 12:53 AM, Steve Loughran
steve.lough...@gmail.com wrote:
On 24 May 2012 06:15, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
I've met other groups of people who like a JIRA centric view
of the world. I suspect that if they did a bunch of other good things
called out
+1 (binding) ...
And a friendly reminder to the ppmc via their mentors -- in response
to that email about limiting the initial committers to a tight group.
They will soon be learning that the big challenge of incubation is not
writing a lot of code, its recruiting new faces. They'll want to
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 10:09 PM, Ralph Goers
ralph.go...@dslextreme.com wrote:
Right after I read Jukka's email that started this thread and I posted my
reply and discovered to my shock that they had started a graduation vote. I
am shocked because I have pointed out repeatedly the project's
Yes, thank you both. Every so often maxwel's daemon sends all the
google results to the wrong side of the internet for me.
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 2:10 PM, Billie J Rinaldi
billie.j.rina...@ugov.gov wrote:
On Friday, May 18, 2012 2:03:39 PM, Benson Margulies
bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm
I was late to volunteer. Do you have any leftover projects?
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 9:20 AM, Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
I've done my shepherd reviews and made one comment (about Amber) on
this list). I'm not sure where you want general observations recording
but I have moved
Well, the Wiki page explicitly says that the chair will assign.
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 1:38 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
No such thing as leftover. Doubling up (or more) is just fine.
Q is whether there are some under-reviewed...
On May 8, 2012 6:40 AM, Benson Margulies bimargul
If you don't want to be a Shepherd, don't sign up. The board asked us
to do a better job of reviewing reports and detecting mentor
deficiencies. This is a plan to accomplish that.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Lucene.NET
- active: Stefan Bodewig
- inactive: Benson Margulies, Gianugo Rabellino
Guilty as charged. I didn't even realize that I was a mentor until
comparatively recently, and I keep thinking that they will graduate
any minute. I'm not set up to test their releases at the moment. Can
Graduation is very much *not* about maturity of the code, and very
much about maturity of the community.
2012/4/16 Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez juanpablo.san...@gmail.com:
Hi Ross,
no worries, community voting is also meant to bring up this kind of
conversations too. I will try to -briefly-
Karl,
I hope that you are making this too hard.
We don't care about the contents of someone else's binaries. If you
make and deploy a -deps package of third-party binaries, as a
convenience for your users, it can contain any strange mixture of
sources and binaries it contains. If you provide a
.
Karl
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 2:14 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2 April 2012 17:53, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
Karl,
I hope that you are making this too hard.
We don't care about the contents of someone else's binaries. If you
make and deploy a -deps package of third
+1 binding mentor
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 5:20 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 11:10 AM, Andy Seaborne a...@apache.org wrote:
...We ask that the IPMC approve this graduation request though this VOTE.
[X ] +1 Recommend to the ASF Board that Apache
Karl,
I'm exceedingly sorry here that the IPMC as a whole let you down by
not turning into these issues and dealing with them at the outset.
There's been a lot of sensitivity expressed lately to Apache projects
stepping on each other's toes.
Personally, I have no objection to including mutant
+1
On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 3:48 PM, Paolo Castagna
castagna.li...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
here is a vote on a release for Apache Jena LARQ module:
jena-larq-1.0.0-incubating.
Please vote to approve this release:
[ ] +1 Approve the release
[ ] 0 Don't care
[ ] -1 Don't release,
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 10:34 AM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 3:35 PM, Roy T. Fielding field...@gbiv.com
wrote:
Yes, it's called a -deps package, and individuals occasionally produce
them and even redistribute them from our servers (as
Roy,
Of course you, personally, can't be expected to supervise all projects
or fix all documentation. At the same time, there's something a little
depressing about the situation. On the one hand, the principle at work
here is, to paraphrase you, absolutely central to the defined mission
of the
+1
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 10:52 AM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Currently new podlings have most of their infrastructure (lists, web
site, svn, etc.) set up under incubator.apache.org and
repos/asf/incubator. As a consequence they need to perform an extra
Folks,
I'm a little puzzled by the lack of response here. No one's objecting,
but not much of anyone's voting +1, either. The board meeting looms.
Not that it would be the end of the world if it takes another month,
but they'd just as soon get on with it.
--benson
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 5:29 PM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 9:11 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com
wrote:
Folks,
I'm a little puzzled by the lack of response here. No one's objecting,
but not much of anyone's voting +1, either. The board meeting
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 2:31 AM, Alex Karasulu akaras...@apache.org wrote:
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 3:03 AM, Leo Simons m...@leosimons.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 3:00 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com
wrote:
Leo, are you out there?
Hmm? Oh, this again...
Having company
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Alex Karasulu akaras...@apache.org wrote:
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 6:05 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.comwrote:
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 2:31 AM, Alex Karasulu akaras...@apache.org
wrote:
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 3:03 AM, Leo Simons m...@leosimons.com
I'm willing to be added or voted if the community wants to keep me around.
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 5:03 PM, Leo Simons m...@leosimons.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Billie J Rinaldi
billie.j.rina...@ugov.gov wrote:
Please vote on recommending the graduation of
Apache Accumulo with
Jukka's recent email and activity are precisely what I was hoping for
when I joined the chorus of voices for new leadership.
On this thread, I have a thought or two. Of the podlings I have known,
most required very little supervision. The single largest exception
has always been getting the first
301 - 400 of 665 matches
Mail list logo
