The Incubator ReportingSchedule needs better management.
At the moment it is manually maintained.
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ReportingSchedule
Podlings are expected to manage their entry.
Add to it when they enter the Incubator, tweak it
after their initial three months, and remove
Please see
http://incubator.apache.org/history/
This is a Timeplot chart of the number of projects
handled by the Incubator.
The green line shows the Count podlings entered incubation.
The yellow line shows the Total podlings currently in incubation.
The growth of the yellow line is showing
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
On most months, I have to chase down missing reports.
ETCH, HAMA, HCATALOG (managed to do a release, though), KATO, MANIFOLDCF
(also managed to do a release, though), RAT and WAVE all failed to report
this month.
Eek, sorry. It seems that i messed up when initialising
Brian LeRoux wrote:
Exciting stuff! thanks Christian and Jukka!!!
Is it in ok form for us to start using both these resources
immediately or do should we be waiting for the lists?
Yes, any committer is encouraged to help with
maintaining the status pages, and any of the
Incubator docs if
sebb wrote:
The incubator site has an .htaccess file containing redirects for many
of the graduated podlings.
However, not all graduated podlings are in the file; the following are
missing:
[ snip ]
Should redirects be added for these? I'm happy to do so, but maybe
there is a reason
sebb wrote:
At present, clutch.py generates the output HTML directly.
To clarify for others (i know that sebb knows):
It generates the whole xml into site-author, using some
fragments of html that are hard-coded in the clutch.py code.
Anakia then generates the html page as normal.
This means
Christian Grobmeier wrote:
David Crossley wrote:
The Incubator website has many documentation pages and sections.
...
Another aspect that needs attention is the recent changes
to link colours, which have removed the ability to know
where one has been.
...
It is important to be able
Here is a solution which should meet the quest for appealing
and also meet the quest for usability.
This intends to use the same colour that bootstrap uses
for a:hover.
I presume that they have used a dull variant of the link colour.
If anyone can work out the exact colour by looking at
the
sebb wrote:
David Crossley wrote:
Here is a solution which should meet the quest for appealing
and also meet the quest for usability.
This intends to use the same colour that bootstrap uses
for a:hover.
I presume that they have used a dull variant of the link colour.
If anyone
Note that there is no distinction between links and plain text in
either case (except on hover).
I think that needs to be fixed.
Could people please just concentrate on the rest of the site.
I have already been addressing the Clutch table and colours
(and other aspects of its page) as we
sebb wrote:
I think it would be useful to use relative links where possible
throughout the Incubator site.
Also, by switching to using h2 id=anchor rather than h2a
name=anchor will avoid having to distinguish links from anchors, at
least in the Anakia-generated output.
Both of these will
sebb wrote:
David Crossley wrote:
sebb wrote:
David Crossley wrote:
Here is a solution which should meet the quest for appealing
and also meet the quest for usability.
This intends to use the same colour that bootstrap uses
for a:hover.
I presume that they have used
David Crossley wrote:
Note that there is no distinction between links and plain text in
either case (except on hover).
I think that needs to be fixed.
Could people please just concentrate on the rest of the site.
I have already been addressing the Clutch table and colours
sebb wrote:
I've uploaded the current site to my pao directory:
http://people.apache.org/~sebb/incubator/
This was created using a reworked site.vsl that creates relative links
where possible, so the LH menu should work OK
the directories are:
current - as for existing CSS files
The Incubator website has many documentation pages and sections.
It is especially important for incoming projects to be able
to easily navigate our documentation quagmire. Of course also
important for Mentors.
Some other aspects of our site navigation are already being
addressed. Thanks.
sebb wrote:
Clutch uses a blue-green background colour for satisfactory entries.
However, many entries include clickable blue links which are not very
distinct from the background.
I suggest changing the background to light green (#90EE90) which works
much better for me.
See the sample
sebb wrote:
Christian Grobmeier wrote:
I've not started looking at generating projects/index.xml yet.
Reading the past mails shows me you are +1 to commit the layout
changes. You are already working on the next steps :-)
I'm not keen on losing the RH podling list, if that's what you
sebb wrote:
David Crossley wrote:
sebb wrote:
Christian Grobmeier wrote:
I have added my layout changes too (website not updated). We need to
find a consens on the rh table. I am still not a fan of this, it
simply ugly. We have spoken on this thread about generating some kind
Donald Whytock wrote:
sebb wrote:
There ought to be a tapestry.html file locally; may need to generate a
dummy one if the original cannot be recovered (or never existed).
Weird...there IS a Tapestry page: http://tapestry.apache.org
The URL on the podling page is just wrong.
Latest
sebb wrote:
There were some recent additions of existing committers to podlings;
they need to be added to the incubator group which gives site-update
karma.
=Podling committers missing from incubator group:
modify_unix_group.pl incubator -add=dvryaboy,jmannix,kzhang
Done. Thanks again
Christian Grobmeier wrote:
Surely a podling does not exist until it enters incubation?
Beforehand, it is just a proposal to create a podling.
So whats the name for Podling before it becomes one? Simply project?
As suggested above Proposal. Or this
Benson Margulies wrote:
In an effort to reduce the number of procedures vying for neurons in
my memory, I think it would be good if we went ahead and CMS-ed the
incubator website. I'm willing to help Joe with this, and he suggested
that I post this message looking for other contributors to
sebb wrote:
Mohammad Nour El-Din
sebb wrote:
Also, what about clutch? That currently depends on being able to read
some XML files.
Although I have another long term idea for that, but it can be updated
to read the relevant pages of Incubator CMS, and I am also very
willing to help
Shane Curcuru wrote:
None of them has a useful description on this page:
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/
Podling mentors, have at it, please! People (even ones not me) really
do look at this page and wonder what the next big thing at the ASF will be.
Thanks for bumping this
Christian Grobmeier wrote:
all ASF project need to be conform with the branding requirements.
Therefore I think it should be an exit criteria to implement this
requirements. To track that, I would like to add a new item on the
template in section Copyright, like:
Does the projects website
This one is because the Libcloud project has not tidied
up after graduating from the Incubator.
See some tips at http://incubator.apache.org/clutch.html#h-Graduate
-David
On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 02:00:07PM +, no-re...@apache.org wrote:
Dear Libcloud Developers,
This email was sent by an
Daniel Kulp wrote:
Christian Grobmeier wrote:
What is with user accounts of people who are not active in other
apache projects and started at the ASF with the retired project? Are
the accounts closed too?
Any more ideas?
I am +1 for creating a page on the incubator site with a
Gavin McDonald wrote:
From: Jonathan Hsieh
Looking for some advise on a quick question:
What have folks generally done to transfer folks from an external mailing
list
to a new podling mailing list?
- Forward mail from old list to new list @incubator.apache.org list ?
No
Christian Grobmeier wrote:
I would like to propose Dormant or Retired status for the alois
project - not sure what is more matching or what the difference
between these two is. Unfortunately I have not found any docs about
this process.
I suggest search the mail lists for past similar
David Crossley wrote:
Christian Grobmeier wrote:
I would like to propose Dormant or Retired status for the alois
project - not sure what is more matching or what the difference
between these two is. Unfortunately I have not found any docs about
this process.
I suggest search
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-100?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13050185#comment-13050185
]
David Crossley commented on INCUBATOR-100:
--
Permanent links to some discussion
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-100?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13050185#comment-13050185
]
David Crossley edited comment on INCUBATOR-100 at 6/16/11 3:40 AM
Greg Stein wrote:
robert_w...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Presumably the wiki locks, if not physically, then at least by convention,
when the call for a vote has been made?
Yeah.
Yes. However we have lost our ability to oversee the Wiki.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-3668
Moin Wiki
-Original Message-
From: David Crossley [mailto:cross...@apache.org]
Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2011 18:54
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Vote plans for OOo proposal
Greg Stein wrote:
robert_w...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Presumably the wiki locks, if not physically
Alex, same answer as for March 2011 report:
Celix is listed in the Monthly section of ReportingSchedule.
Clutch gathers that data.
If your project feels that it has finished their monthly
reporting cycles, then edit that schedule to go onto quarterly.
It is all in your control from here on in.
Les Hazlewood wrote:
For Shiro (which is now a TLP), I just moved the artifacts out of
/www/www.apache.org/dist/incubator/shiro and then deleted the shiro
directory.
Remember that stuff is automatically copied to archives:
http://archive.apache.org/dist/incubator/shiro/
perfectly acceptable to keep releases that are made in
Incubator ville on the Incubator dist page -- that's not just a requirement
for active Incubator projects, it should be true even when they graduate.
Cheers,
Chris
David Crossley wrote:
Les Hazlewood wrote:
For Shiro (which
to talk to all
projects that have too much stuff in their w.a.o/dist/
space.
-David
Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
David Crossley wrote:
Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
Hmmm,
I'd like to question this: why would the Incubator ever delete archives of
releases? We have active links
Jeremy Hughes wrote:
Thanks, but Aries graduated in December. I've just now removed Aries
from the report and the Incubator reporting schedule.
Please encourage the Aries project to do the remainder
of the post-graduation steps.
http://incubator.apache.org/clutch.html#other
-David
On 1 March
Sim IJskes - QCG wrote:
River has graduated as well, what do we need to do to get removed from
the reporting schedule?
Please encourage the River project to do the remainder
of the post-graduation steps.
http://incubator.apache.org/clutch.html#other
-David
On 01-03-11 15:00,
Would the Nuvem project please add your entry to the
Currently in incubation section of Projects in Incubation
table at:
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/
See hints at:
http://incubator.apache.org/clutch.html#h-hasStatusEntry
-David
Would these projects please tidy up, following your graduation from
the Incubator.
abdera aries buildr chemistry esme oodt river shiro thrift uima
For example many still have remains on the distribution mirrors.
We know that some projects have only recently graduated, so will
not yet have done
Author: nick
Date: Thu Feb 17 13:30:58 2011
New Revision: 1071607
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1071607view=rev
Log:
Chemistry has graduated. So, update the Chemistry status page, the project
list, and clutch.
Oh, far out. You are a champ.
I have never seen anyone do it in one
Hello fapeeler, you have made various changes to the *generated* document.
You need to follow the instructions, make changes to the source xml file,
and then re-generate.
-David
David Crossley wrote:
Please make changes to the source files and then re-generate.
http://incubator.apache.org
Please make changes to the source files and then re-generate.
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/website.html
-David
Author: fapeeler
Date: Tue Feb 15 16:50:18 2011
New Revision: 1070961
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1070961view=rev
Log:
Updated Apache VCL committer list
Added
Benson Margulies wrote:
Let's say that I have an idea for some new open source initiative. How
would I proceed?
IIRC then the Apache PhotArk podling started with an idea from
Angela Cymbalak but no initial community. There was various
discussion about starting a podling here at Incubator from
Upayavira wrote:
Sorry, I should have looked at this. I'll need to dig more, because you
*are* in the incubator group - I saw it when checking your CLAs were
present. So there's something else going on.
I found it. In the svn asf-authorization-template
the wave entry was missing one part of
Fri, Feb 04, 2011 at 01:52:43PM -0800, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On Feb 4, 2011, at 12:17 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 15:11, Alan D. Cabrera a...@toolazydogs.com wrote:
It's my understanding that all voting takes place during a 72 hour period.
If that period ends on a
When publishing some Incubator docs (doing 'svn up' on the server)
i see that someone has made some hard-coded changes to the
generated html doc for the Wave status page.
You need to follow this process to make the changes in
the SVN source files instead, then re-generate, etc.
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
Incubator PMC,
After Apache River has graduated, I want to take a long break from the
Incubator and wish to go Emeritus.
Thanks for all that you have done for the Incubator
across the board. You have made a huge difference.
-David
Karl Wright wrote:
The other interesting question has to do with overlap with existing
Apache projects. In particular, there seems to be a great deal of
overlap between Apache Forrest and the Apache CMS. Can someone
comment on that please?
Essentially Forrest is not a CMS. It is not for
Karl Wright wrote:
(4) Grant suggested that we simply not include the PDF portion of the
doc build. This has the disadvantage of causing each site page to
have a broken link, but otherwise the PDFs are not of great value,
excepting perhaps the end-user documentation PDF. Savings: about
of an
initial ManifoldCF setup.
One consolation is that we do finally have a release of 0.9 planned.
http://s.apache.org/ln
-David
David Crossley wrote:
Karl Wright wrote:
Very well; we will discontinue all binary distributions.
One major problem will therefore be that we rely on Apache
Karl Wright wrote:
The RAT report after these changes looks good except for two files,
which come from the skins in the site:
[rat:report] Unapproved licenses:
[rat:report]
[rat:report]
C:/wip/mcf-release/release-0.1-branch/site/src/documentation/skins/common/xslt/html/split.xsl
Karl Wright wrote:
Very well; we will discontinue all binary distributions.
One major problem will therefore be that we rely on Apache Forrest to
build the documentation pages. Forrest requires Java 1.5. The
availability of documentation in the release will therefore depend on
the
I wondered why the Wave initial committer accounts were not
yet set up. The wave-dev list indicates that it seems to be stalled.
(Please come to general@ and ask if ever there is a holdup.)
Yes Infra does do it in batches.
However, one reason might be that the request for
accounts might not have
Benson Margulies wrote:
Oy. Where does the board agenda live in svn?
At https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/foundation/board
See also:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/board
and
https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/board/templates
-David
The Proposal phase is for discussing the proposal,
encouraging people, attracting mentors, ensuring that
the proposal is ready.
Then the Vote phase is for voting.
-David
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
David Crossley wrote:
The Proposal phase is for discussing the proposal,
encouraging people, attracting mentors, ensuring that
the proposal is ready.
Then the Vote phase is for voting.
Dunno what to do now that it has started :-)
They gather steam, and we don't want to re-do it.
Perhaps
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Since a number of projects got back into the bad habit of using Wiki markup,
let me remind you that there is to be no Wiki markup in the project reports.
There is no benefit to it; since the Board requires me to remove all Wiki
markup before submitting the monthly
At BarCamp Apache Sydney last Saturday, we had a couple of sessions
about the Incubator. (Thanks to the organisers and the sponsors.)
My session was to further explain the steps, and to try to show
how Clutch helps us all to keep the process flowing.
Really sorry that i was not properly prepared
To the new projects, e.g.
Jena, Nuvem, OpenNLP
Please add an entry for your project to
the Currently in incubation table:
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/
Some docs: http://incubator.apache.org/clutch.html#h-Sponsor
The incubator website docs are able to be edited by
any committers on
Stephen Williams wrote:
We have a proposal, to be released shortly, that seems complete with an
initial set of five committers. We believe we now need a champion and
nominated mentors. I have agreed to lead this effort and would be happy to
act as a mentor if promoted to that status.
Tad Glines wrote:
According to this (
http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Setting+Up+a+New+Podling),
once our mentors are added to the IPMC (assuming they where not already
members), one or more of them will initiate:
Anyone who has commit access can do the steps.
Les Hazlewood wrote:
Hi all,
As Apache Shiro has graduated to a TLP, the post graduation guidelines
[1] indicate that now is a good time to be removed from the Incubator
reporting schedule.
How do we ensure that we are removed?
By just doing it. From here on it is all
up to the Shiro
Author: billgraham
Date: Thu Sep 9 21:33:13 2010
New Revision: 995581
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=995581view=rev
Log:
fixing links to chukwa site
Modified:
incubator/public/trunk/site-publish/projects/chukwa.html
Modified:
Would all projects please ensure that your list of mentors
is up-to-date.
The primary location is the Currently in incubation table:
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/
All incubator website docs are able to be edited by
any committers on incubating projects. So please don't
leave it to your
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
David Crossley wrote:
Would all projects please ensure that your list of mentors
is up-to-date.
The primary location is the Currently in incubation table:
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/
That info is duplicated then, as many projects have
Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
Actually, speaking of which too, Noel, since I'm on the Incubator PMC, please
add me as a mentor for SIS now too. I'll add myself as a mentor to the SIS
proposal on the wiki as well, but can someone please add me to the other
appropriate areas (or tell me how
sebb wrote:
Clutch could compare the directories under:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/
with the list of graduated podlings, and report a warning against any
that still have SVN directories.
Thanks for the suggestion. I am too busy now, but will
investigate that sometime.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-108?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12870923#action_12870923
]
David Crossley commented on INCUBATOR-108:
--
These projects need to tidy up
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 David Crossley wrote:
I have noticed a trend lately, that Graduated projects
are not tidying up after themselves. They should be
self-sufficient by this stage.
For example, if they don't remove themselves from
the Wiki page ReportingSchedule then they will be still
Tom White wrote:
Bertrand Delacretaz
Looks like there are other inconsistencies in the wiki report, Amber,
Hise and Whirr are missing but according to
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ReportingSchedule they should be
there.
I read the page to mean that the first report for Amber and
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Daniel S. Haischt wrote:
...Btw, in the first place you confused me a bit using the term member
but pointing to the committers list :)
ASF members are called out here -
http://www.apache.org/foundation/members.html
ASF committers are called out here -
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Julien Vermillard wrote:
...I was contacted by a Zeta components contributor,
I'm no experienced mentor, but I'm ASF member.
I can help mentoring if needed
Cool - I see your pending request to join the Incubator PMC on
priv...@incubator.apache.org.
Noel
Marshall Schor wrote:
I'm not a python expert - so I don't know how to fix this. Any suggestions?
Sorry about that. The whole thing is a rush job by me,
who is not a even a python bootlace.
There is a note at the top of clutch.py ...
Note: The 'svn log' queries will only run on UNIX.
I have noticed a trend lately, that Graduated projects
are not tidying up after themselves. They should be
self-sufficient by this stage.
For example, if they don't remove themselves from
the Wiki page ReportingSchedule then they will be still
listed to report this month. Poor Clutch only gets
Ate Douma wrote:
What exactly is the standard procedure for a terminated podling, I can't
really find anything on that on the incubator website.
There ain't no exactlies.
Searching for the term Retire has better results. However as far
as i recall not much actual docs. Searching the mail
Martin Cooper wrote:
Unless I'm missing something, using svnpubsub will only remove the
need for the second part (checkout on p.a.o), but not the first part
(Anakia). People will still need to run Anakia to generate the HTML
pages from the XML sources, but when they check in the HTML, it
Grant Ingersoll wrote:
I believe this has passed. Any pointers on next steps would be welcome,
otherwise, I will go RTM.
Please do step one, which is to add it to the
ReportingSchedule and Projects in Incubation table.
Clutch can then pick it up and start assisting
to track what remains to
Donald Whytock wrote:
I did find the docs, yes, thanks. The docs themselves are fairly clear,
though perhaps there needs to be a more straightforward Start Here.
My impression from them, though, was that a community should exist first,
before the actual proposal hit the list...? If the
Donald Whytock wrote:
I have a personal project that I would like to make OpenSource and submit to
the ASF. It is a small framework for chat responders, designed to be
multi-user and multi-protocol, called ChatterBot.
The website for the project is:
http://www.imtower.net/chatterbot
Upayavira wrote:
Grant Ingersoll wrote:
Hasn't Lucene.Net officially graduated or am I misinformed?
You may not be, but Clutch [1] would appear not to have been told. Fix
that, and these mails will stop :-)
I'm not sure exactly which data source Clutch uses for this information
David Crossley wrote:
Upayavira wrote:
Grant Ingersoll wrote:
Hasn't Lucene.Net officially graduated or am I misinformed?
You may not be, but Clutch [1] would appear not to have been told. Fix
that, and these mails will stop :-)
I'm not sure exactly which data source Clutch
Ben Dewey wrote:
I created the December 2009 page with all the projects based on the schedule.
In order to retain the Template page I created the 2010 pages. I didn't
have the deadline dates available, so they are currently in there as 'todos'.
Hope this is okay.
Good on you for
I did the first step for you ... added to the ReportingSchedule
with December, January, February being your first three
reporting months. Please adjust that if you want to.
This gets your project into Clutch immediately, which helps
to manage the incubation process.
Clutch is showing that HISE mailing lists are not yet setup.
Therefore the automated reminder for monthly reports will
be going to this general list.
-David
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For
Paul Querna wrote:
ping? anyone know the answer?
It was there. See message
Subject Re: incubator-info.txt?
Henri Yandell
Thu, 02 Nov 2006
I think that was a great idea, as it got people used to maintaining
the committee-info.txt file for after graduation.
There was later a drive to remove it
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
I concur with Bertrand as well, the STATUS page was consider 'master
authorative' and should be the only place kept up to sync (well, ASF
authorization is another)...
Please keep the Reporting Schedule [1] and the
Projects in Incubation [2] tables up-to-date.
Or return
Todd Volkert wrote:
The Apache Pivot community feels that it is ready to graduate into the
Apache Pivot top-level project.
Please place your votes within the next 72 hours -- to serve as
recommendations to the Board at the December Board meeting.
+1
-David
Branko ??ibej wrote:
Niall Pemberton wrote:
I ran a RAT report (0.6 version) on subversion trunk but theres alot
of *noise* from it. I have opened a bug ticket for license header
review here:
http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3529
Very helpful, thanks.
It would
Niall Pemberton wrote:
David Crossley wrote:
Branko ??ibej wrote:
Niall Pemberton wrote:
I ran a RAT report (0.6 version) ?on subversion trunk but theres alot
of *noise* from it. I have opened a bug ticket for license header
review here:
http://subversion.tigris.org/issues
The OpenWebBeans Status page links directly to apache.org /dist
Please see the ASF mirror guidelines, which emphatically say
to use the mirrors. So either set up your own mirrors script
(preferred because then you can show Incubator notice),
or use the default one, e.g.
David Crossley wrote:
Kevan Miller wrote:
Upayavira wrote:
My question is, why is Clutch reporting the Aries developer list as
being gene...@? Presumbaly this is something that the Aries developers
should be fixing.
So, if I'm interpreting clutch.py correctly, looks like
Especially to the new projects, a reminder that Clutch is a tool
to assist us all with the incubation process. Please interpret
this table from the point-of-view of encouragement and nurture.
http://incubator.apache.org/clutch.html
It gathers details and hints from three main resources:
A) the
Kevan Miller wrote:
Upayavira wrote:
My question is, why is Clutch reporting the Aries developer list as
being gene...@? Presumbaly this is something that the Aries developers
should be fixing.
So, if I'm interpreting clutch.py correctly, looks like the mailing
lists are obtained from
Greg Stein wrote:
The proposal to make Subversion an Apache Incubator podling has PASSED.
Later this weekend, I'll start sending out emails and requests to
begin the process. I've also started on the Podling web documents.
etc. There are also a number of issues for the dev list to decide
Paul Querna wrote:
Vote passes with:
...
I did the first step for you ... added Libcloud to the
ReportingSchedule with December, January, February being
your first three reporting months. Report in November if
you want to.
This gets your project into Clutch, which helps to manage
the
I did the first step for you ... added HISE to the
ReportingSchedule with December, January, February being
your first three reporting months. Report in November if
you want to.
This gets your project into Clutch, which helps to manage
the incubation process.
Greg Stein wrote:
David Crossley wrote:
I did the first step for you ... added Subversion to the
ReportingSchedule with December, January, February being
your first three reporting months. Report in November if
you want to.
This gets your project into Clutch, which helps to manage
201 - 300 of 632 matches
Mail list logo
