[RESULT] [VOTE] Release JSPWiki version 2.9.0-incubating PASSED

Struberg (struberg) Non-binding votes: none So, finally, we've now got our first incubator release out! I will copy the artifacts to the dist area in a few hours. Best regards Florian Holeczek - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general

[VOTE] Release JSPWiki version 2.9.0-incubating

report from a clean source by running the rat-report Ant target. Please vote: [ ] +1 approve, release Apache JSPWiki 2.9.0-incubating [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and giving a reason) The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. Best regards Florian Holeczek [1] http://markmail.org

Content-Encoding, License for .graffle file, Was: Fwd: [VOTE] Release celix-0.0.1-incubating

Hi all, taking this out of the Celix vote thread in order to keep it tidy. Sebb wrote: The file documents/Celix.graffle does not have a license. In JSPWiki, we have a .graffle file, too. Although this is XML, I consider this a binary file, just like a JPEG image for example. It's the document

Re: Content-Encoding, License for .graffle file, Was: Fwd: [VOTE] Release celix-0.0.1-incubating

Hi Alexander, Alexander Broekhuis wrote: In JSPWiki, we have a .graffle file, too. Although this is XML, I consider this a binary file, just like a JPEG image for example. It's the document format of Graffle, a graphics software for Mac OS X. In the Celix case the file can/should be

Re: Shipping binary file in CloudStack release

Hi Noah, We're just voting on our first release, and I spotted this file in the root of the source: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;f=waf;hb=HEAD It seems to be a sort of hybrid source/binary file. Very strange. Can we ship this? it's

legal conditions regarding project website content

Hi all, in the JSPWiki project, we have an issue similar to the situation described in [1]. The site www.jspwiki.org has always been the project's main page so far. We're aware of the fact that, after graduation, jspwiki.apache.org will have to be the project's main page (according to [2]).

Re: jspwiki

Hi Jukka, basically yes. Maybe important to explain that the slowdown of activity was due to big changes in the codebase (3.0 branch), which had been planned and started mainly by two committers who then hadn't that much time anymore to finish them (That's life!). It took some time to realize

Re: key signing

Hi Benson, A different angle. Noah asks me to sign his key. Noah tells me that he's committed it to KEYS for CloudStack in svn revision 314159. I examine that revision and see that it was made by, indeed, noah's Apache ID, which is associated with a particular email address. I send

Re: key signing

Hi Marvin, On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 8:11 AM, Florian Holeczek flor...@holeczek.de wrote: However, what would now be totally wrong IMO is, that some guys in the ASF redefine these rules in order to make the process of release signing more simple. In the WoT big picture, this would automatically

Re: [VOTE] JSPWiki version 2.9.0-incubating

Christian and Craig, thank you very much for having a look at the RC and pointing out these issues. We'll fix these asap. Regards Florian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional

Re: [VOTE] JSPWiki version 2.9.0-incubating

Hi all, the call is open for over a week now, and we still need at least 2 IPMC votes. Come on, it's not that difficult or time-consuming to have a look at JSPWiki, even if you've never been using it before. All you need is an environment with Subversion, Ant and a JDK (and for giving it a

Re: [VOTE] JSPWiki version 2.9.0-incubating

Hi Ross, To do an IP review, which is what's required for release vote, it is time consuming. That being said, you mentors should be stepping. Seems like you need some more mentors. thanks for pointing out. I guess the thread at [1] contains all information needed for the IP review, in

Re: key signing

Daniel Shahaf wrote on 05.10.2012 at 15:15: Benson Margulies wrote on Fri, Oct 05, 2012 at 08:04:04 -0400: Alternatively, since the chain is CLA - svn access - unsigned key in svn, perhaps all we really need is to document that a signature corresponding to a key in svn is really good enough,

Re: [VOTE] JSPWiki version 2.9.0-incubating

Hi folks, just want to remind you of the ongoing vote... Best regards Florian Holeczek Am 27.09.2012 20:11, schrieb Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez: Hi, This is a call for a vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache JSPWiki version 2.9.0-incubating. This will be our first release

Re: [VOTE] Graduate JSPWiki from Incubator

+1 - Ursprüngliche Mail - Von: Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez juanpa...@apache.org An: jspwiki-...@incubator.apache.org, general@incubator.apache.org Gesendet: Montag, 16. April 2012 00:04:30 Betreff: [VOTE] Graduate JSPWiki from Incubator Hello all, The Apache JSPWiki project entered

Re: Machine account request - www.apache.org

more like a post-graduation task, since the path changes after graduation anyway. Could you please clarify this? Thanks and best regards Florian Holeczek - Ursprüngliche Mail - Von: Tony Stevenson pct...@apache.org An: Florian Holeczek flori...@apache.org CC: infrastruct...@apache.org