Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Apache Maven - Mvndaemon

2021-12-04 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
AFAIK, Guillaume fixed the issue as described in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-586 Nothing blocks now, isn't it? Do we consider the clearance ok as a conclusion, or should we restart a new thread? Regards, Hervé Le jeudi 16 septembre 2021, 10:05:06 CET Olivier Lamy a écrit :

[RESULT] [IP CLEARANCE] Aether, renamed to Maven Artifact Resolver

2016-10-01 Thread Hervé Boutemy
there were a few questions answered, and a good number of +1 this vote passes thank you for your review and votes Regards, Hervé Le mercredi 28 septembre 2016 17:25:01 Hervé Boutemy a écrit : > Apache Maven received a code donation for Aether, that we renamed to Maven > Artifact Re

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Aether, renamed to Maven Artifact Resolver

2016-10-01 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
ok, got it: it's about dependencies https://github.com/eclipse/aether-ant/blob/master/src/main/resources/about.html not about source code not an issue Regards, Hervé Le vendredi 30 septembre 2016 10:23:12 Justin Mclean a écrit : > Hi, > > > AFAIK, the incoming ant repo is covered by the

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Aether, renamed to Maven Artifact Resolver

2016-09-29 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
: > *Big* +1. Lets hope, that Sisu follows (sooner, or later). It feels > *so* unnatural, to have this stuff at Eclipse. > > On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 5:25 PM, Hervé Boutemy <hbout...@apache.org> wrote: > > Apache Maven received a code donation for Aether, that we renamed to Mav

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Aether, renamed to Maven Artifact Resolver

2016-09-29 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
yes, for sure, -1 until answered AFAIK, the incoming ant repo is covered by the Sonatype software grant: what precise 3rd party code are you concerned about? Regards, Hervé Le jeudi 29 septembre 2016 22:51:23 jus...@classsoftware.com a écrit : > Hi, > > Sorry but -1 (binding) until this is

[IP CLEARANCE] Aether, renamed to Maven Artifact Resolver

2016-09-28 Thread Hervé Boutemy
Apache Maven received a code donation for Aether, that we renamed to Maven Artifact Resolver to fix a trademark issue: http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/maven-aether.html The import plan is more detailed at http://maven.apache.org/aether.html Please vote to approve this contribution.

Re: Retirement guide updates

2016-02-06 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
(sorry, I'm a little late in the discussion...) no, DOAP was not retired I tried to makes things simpler in the documentation: https://projects.apache.org/about.html Regards, Hervé Le dimanche 31 janvier 2016 22:00:18 John D. Ament a écrit : > I believe doap was retired in the projects-new

Re: Retirement guide updates

2016-02-06 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
dropping the DOAP file of a retired incubator project means removing the project from projects list [1]: it seems reasonable there is one task to do: remove the entry from projects DOAP files list [2] notice that this step has to be done only when a project has previously made the effort to

Re: [DISCUSS] Groovy Incubation proposal

2015-03-16 Thread Hervé Boutemy
Hi, We're scheduling the Jira migration for Maven projects on the week-end of 4/5/6 april. If this schedule is fine for Groovy, I suppose it would be ok to add Groovy Jira project to the actual list [1] Just tell, and I'll avoid to remove Groovy from the full dump we'll have during the

Re: [DISCUSS] Groovy Incubation proposal

2015-03-16 Thread Hervé Boutemy
yes, I dropped every project we didn't want to import since some of them had special configuration that were causing issues The first dump we used contained everything Regards, Hervé Le lundi 16 mars 2015 10:03:37 Stephen Connolly a écrit : On 16 March 2015 at 09:58, Mark Thomas