Re: [DISCUSS] - Packages renaming and backward compatibility (was: Re: [VOTE] Graduate Sqoop podling from Apache Incubator)

2012-02-29 Thread Ian Dickinson
On 29/02/12 10:02, Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote: I don't see that this getting to any clear end yet. So I suggest that we take this from a Sqoop instance to be a discussion on rules them selves. I would like to start a [VOTE] about whether it is a *must* for podlings to rename all packages before

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Sqoop podling from Apache Incubator

2012-02-29 Thread Ian Dickinson
On 29/02/12 13:07, Alex Karasulu wrote: [snip] There is no legal (trademark or copyright) problem that I'm aware of. There is no technical problem that I'm aware of. OK do we have the right to create any kind of package or class under com.cloudera (or any other companies packages)? This is

Re: Clarification about SGA versus CCLA

2010-11-27 Thread Ian Dickinson
are all *former* HP employees. The discontinuation of HP's semantic web research programme provided much of the motivation for migrating the copyright, and ongoing development, of Jena to a non-HP body. Ian -- Ian Dickinson

Re: Clerezza, Stanbol, Jena, Semantic Commons, WDYT?

2010-11-08 Thread Ian Dickinson
. Are there examples of existing commons areas between Apache projects, other than basic application-library dependencies? Ian -- Ian Dickinson Epimorphics Ltd, Bristol, UK mailto:i...@epimorphics.comhttp

Re: Clerezza, Stanbol, Jena, Semantic Commons, WDYT?

2010-11-08 Thread Ian Dickinson
to Olivier: let's wait until a clear requirement is identified. Ian -- Ian Dickinson Epimorphics Ltd, Bristol, UK mailto:i...@epimorphics.comhttp://www.epimorphics.com cell: +44-7786-850536 landline