[jira] [Updated] (INCUBATOR-142) Testing - Sally graphics submission

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-142?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] John D. Ament updated INCUBATOR-142: Component/s: (was: LogoSubmission) > Testing - Sally graphics submiss

[jira] [Updated] (INCUBATOR-141) Test

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-141?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] John D. Ament updated INCUBATOR-141: Component/s: (was: LogoSubmission) > Test > > > Ke

[jira] [Updated] (INCUBATOR-143) SallyTest - 2

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-143?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] John D. Ament updated INCUBATOR-143: Component/s: (was: LogoSubmission) > SallyTest

Re: Page for gathering CFP submissions

I > can link. > I'll also send you the link to the blog post so we can point to each other. > If not, please let me know how you'd like to proceed. > Thanks,Sally = = = = = vox +1 617 921 8656gvox +1 646 598 4616skype > sallykhudairi > > From: Sally Khudairi <s

Re: Omitting "-incubating" suffix in Maven artifact version attribute for FreeMarker

I'll point out that the link Martjin pointed to is a follow up conversation after the vote thread that originally introduced allowing podling artifacts to be distributed via Maven.

Re: Omitting "-incubating" suffix in Maven artifact version attribute for FreeMarker

Just to level set. I don't think its fair to expect a special policy for a single podling. On Sat, Dec 31, 2016 at 9:40 AM Daniel Dekany wrote: > The original question in this thread is much less generic than in the > linked one though, so it's certainly easier to answer.

Re: Omitting "-incubating" suffix in Maven artifact version attribute for FreeMarker

Thanks for the link Martjin! Definitely a late night reading exercise. Maybe since Jukka and Bertrand are around they can give us feedback as well :-) Either way will digest. John On Sat, Dec 31, 2016 at 7:50 AM Martijn Dashorst wrote: > For reference, please read

Re: [DISCUSS] Drop the 2013 Alternate Voting Policy

On Sat, Dec 31, 2016 at 12:02 AM Marvin Humphrey <mar...@rectangular.com> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 11:46 AM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> > wrote: > > Pssst really need you guys looking at the proposed replacement > > documentation. > > >

Re: Page for gathering CFP submissions

> -Sally = = = = = vox +1 617 921 8656gvox +1 646 598 4616skype > sallykhudairi > > From: Sally Khudairi <s...@apache.org> > To: John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org>; "general@incubator.apache.org" > <general@incubator.apache.org> > Sent:

Re: Page for gathering CFP submissions

vox +1 617 921 8656 <(617)%20921-8656> > gvox +1 646 598 4616 <(646)%20598-4616> > skype sallykhudairi > > > -- > *From:* Sally Khudairi <s...@apache.org> > *To:* John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org>; "general@incubator.apache.org" >

Re: [DISCUSS] Replacing Incubator Release Management guide

ink, but I don't think its a bad one in this case). John On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 9:07 PM John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> wrote: > Dale, > > Thanks. Before publishing this, I was planning to remove the link on > [5]. The policy docs are complete as they stand right now fro

Re: Page for gathering CFP submissions

On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 9:37 PM Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 6:26 PM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> > wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 9:14 PM Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org> > > wrote: > > &g

Re: [DISCUSS] Replacing Incubator Release Management guide

On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 9:31 PM Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 6:17 PM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> > wrote: > > This is what I'm trying to say with these sentences: > > > > Those reviewing the releas

Re: Page for gathering CFP submissions

On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 9:14 PM Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 6:08 PM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> > wrote: > > That doesn't work well from a permission standpoint. > > Can you elaborate? > There's a permis

Re: [DISCUSS] Replacing Incubator Release Management guide

This is what I'm trying to say with these sentences: Those reviewing the releases will provide the release managers with information about what is wrong with the release. Release managers should consider issues reported as blocking, unless told otherwise by

Re: [DISCUSS] Replacing Incubator Release Management guide

I'm planning to add this, what do you think? In order for a podling to receive full permission from the IPMC to execute the release, the release vote must be held on the incubator general list and pass based on the http://apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes;>standard Package Release

Re: [DISCUSS] Replacing Incubator Release Management guide

user to [4] for all the std stuff, and remove the list item/link > in [4] so there’s no cycle > > new-incubator/releasemanagement -> incubating-policy/#releases -> > dev/#releases > > [5] http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Releases > > — Da

Re: Omitting "-incubating" suffix in Maven artifact version attribute for FreeMarker

On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 5:35 AM Daniel Dekany wrote: > Wednesday, December 28, 2016, 4:12:06 AM, Christopher wrote: > > [snip] > > The one complication here is that the release artifact (source tarball) > is > > most easily created with a maven project by using the >

Re: Seeking Additional Mentors - Hammock Podling

gt; > > On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 4:03 AM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I'm looking for some additional mentors for a potential new podling - > > Hammock. If anyone has bandwidth and interest, let me know (reply all or > >

Seeking Additional Mentors - Hammock Podling

Hi, I'm looking for some additional mentors for a potential new podling - Hammock. If anyone has bandwidth and interest, let me know (reply all or just to me, either is fine). https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/HammockProposal John

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Eagle to top level project

+1 On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 12:22 AM Edward Zhang wrote: > Hi, > > After discussion in Apache Eagle community [1][2] and IPMC mail list [3], > please vote on the resolution proposed by Apache Eagle community below, > which establishes Apache Eagle as top-level project at

Re: Incoming Website Changes

On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 2:38 AM Bertrand Delacretaz <bdelacre...@apache.org> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 3:49 AM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> > wrote: > > .. should we just drop the > > current "policy" document and make the guides the pol

Re: Incubator PMC Board Report - December 2016

> > > Am 30.11.2016 um 12:42 schrieb John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org>: > > > > December 2016 Incubator report timeline: > > > >https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/December2016 > > > >Wed December 07 -- Podling reports due by end of

Incubator PMC Board Report - December 2016

December 2016 Incubator report timeline: https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/December2016 Wed December 07 -- Podling reports due by end of day Sun December 11 -- Shepherd reviews due by end of day Sun December 11 -- Summary due by end of day Tue December 13 -- Mentor signoff

Re: Incoming Website Changes

practice. > > Line 4 includes "my personal bias". Whose bias is that? Is that bias > now policy, or is it still just a personal opinion? > > On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 7:35 PM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> > wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at

[DISCUSS] Revisions to Policy

All, Based on some of the feedback received, i think we should start putting together some revisions to the Incubator's policy document. The document in reference is at http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html - Acceptance by Incubator Rephrase the first few lines as: If

[DISCUSS] Moving new podling requests to a dedicated form

All, Based on some variations in process, there's some initial talk to moving podling bootstrapping from an infra standpoint to a dedicated form. This form would potentially gather: - Podling name - JIRA - Confluence - Mailing lists - Git Repositories - Travis CI - Coveralls other things as

Re: Github tagging, was Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Joshua 6.1 RC#2

The discussion has moved to legal-discuss. I would encourage everyone to join the discussion there https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/db78e1f8fc121d8e6b016d2f61d06ccafebf9fd30b4ec00883c78557@%3Clegal-discuss.apache.org%3E On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 3:11 PM Tom Barber wrote:

Re: Github tagging, was Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Joshua 6.1 RC#2

since its protected the master in case of a bad release needing to get re-rolled (I personally hate the unnecssary -RC# that projects push out) > On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 11:44 AM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> > wrote: > > IMHO, the tags on github are not formal releases

Re: Github tagging, was Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Joshua 6.1 RC#2

IMHO, the tags on github are not formal releases. The fact that github marks it as a release is just an unfortunate side effect of how github works. So its not a violation of ASF release process. May be good to start a discussion on legal-discuss. Let me know if you're subscribed, we can talk

Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Accept OpenWhisk into the Apache Incubator

t page? > > Thanks, > > Craig > > > On Nov 23, 2016, at 12:20 PM, Sam Ruby <ru...@intertwingly.net> wrote: > > > > This vote passes with 10 binding +1's, 3 non-binding +1, and no -1's > > > > Binding: > > John D. Ament > > Bertrand Delacretaz

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Graduate Commons RDF from incubator

1 Lewis John McGibbney (Incubator PMC binding) > +1 Jochen Wiedman (Incubator PMC binding) > +1 John D. Ament (Incubator PMC binding) > +1 Ted Dunning (Incubator PMC binding) > > +7 positive binding votes, no negative votes. > > The vote has PASSED at Incubator PMC (and at Commons PMC

Re: Incoming Website Changes

On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 10:19 PM Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org> wrote: > On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 6:16 AM, John D. Ament <john.d.am...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 6:04 PM Greg Stein <gst...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> O

Re: Incoming Website Changes

On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 6:04 PM Greg Stein <gst...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 4:06 PM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 4:57 PM Greg Stein <gst...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Fri,

Re: Clarification of Mentors from Proposal Guide

I blended Bertrand's improved form with the remaining information from that section and got this: Lists eligible (and willing) individuals nominated as Mentors [definition] for the candidate. Three Mentors gives a quorum and allows a Podling more autonomy from the Incubator PMC, so the current

Re: Incoming Website Changes

On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 4:57 PM Greg Stein <gst...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 8:26 AM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> > wrote: > >... > > > Graduation Guide http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html > > > > Added a l

Re: Clarification of Mentors from Proposal Guide

role until the proposal is accepted. > > And if a mentor comes along after acceptance, then I think it is enough for > the podling to accept that person, as long as they are on IPMC there is no > need to do any formal appointment beyond updating the right files. (an ASF > Membe

Incoming Website Changes

All, I'm planning to start committing a number of website changes. These changes are a summary of my experience bootstrapping podlings, questions I've received (both on and off mailing list) from people trying to do setup, and ways to leverage new infra services. Here's a summary of the current

Clarification of Mentors from Proposal Guide

All, I was wondering if someone could help me clarify this block of text. This is the section I believe is at an issue: http://incubator.apache.org/guides/proposal.html#template-mentors *It is common for additional Mentors to volunteer their services during the development of the proposal. The

Re: [VOTE] Apache Gearpump (incubating) 0.8.2-RC2

+1 . I would recommend inlining the licenses rather than making them external. But that's a small preference thing. On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 11:14 PM Kam Kasravi wrote: > Hi IPMC Community > > The PPMC vote to release Apache Gearpump (incubating) 0.8.2-RC2 has passed. > We

Re: [VOTE] Weex to enter the Apache Incubator

+1 On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 5:47 PM Edward J. Yoon wrote: > Greetings! > > I would like to call a vote for accepting "Weex" for incubation in the > Apache Incubator. The full proposal is available below. We ask the > Incubator PMC to sponsor it, with myself (Edward J.

Re: [VOTE] Releasing Apache Metron (incubating) 0.3.0-RC1

That's an issue. Want to let them know directly that their website needs fixing? On Nov 24, 2016 1:00 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: > Hi, > > > RE Justin - that's a potential issue, but is also how github works. > > It may be how GitHub works but it is IMO against

Re: [VOTE] Releasing Apache Metron (incubating) 0.3.0-RC1

Hmm thought I voted +1 already RE Julian's concerns - the artifact includes "incubating" so that passes the incubator requirement. The requirement doesn't say that it has to include it in the pom's version. RE Justin - that's a potential issue, but is also how github works. Since they're doing

Re: JSON License and Apache Projects

Understood. There's a discussion on legal-discuss you may want to join in on. The current ruling is that you would have until April 30 2017 to remove the dependency. John On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 9:19 AM Karl Wright wrote: > The Apache ManifoldCF project got an official

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposing Griffin for Apache incubator

in the proposal: > > " > The initial committers are employees of eBay Inc. > " > > - Henry > > On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 4:50 PM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > Henry, > > > > Can you add initial committer affiliations to t

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposing Griffin for Apache incubator

Henry, Can you add initial committer affiliations to the proposal? John On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 6:30 PM Henry Saputra wrote: > Hi All, > > As the champion for Griffin, I would like to bring up discussion to > bring the project as Apache incubator podling. > > Here is

Re: [DISCUSS] Weex for Apache Incubator

Sounds good to me. On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 4:54 PM Edward J. Yoon wrote: > Okay, if there is no more feedback then I'll send out a VOTE thread > tomorrow. > :-) > > Thanks! > > -- > Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon > > -Original Message- > From: hedh...@gmail.com

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Commons RDF from incubator

+1 yes please graduate into a subproject (I'm still not sure what the process looks like, if there's anything actually required) John On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 8:49 AM Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote: > [Note: this is the IPMC vote on general@incubator - there's a > concurrent VOTE

Re: [DISCUSS] Concur for Apache Incubator

On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 6:40 AM Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 11:58 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré > wrote: > > Hi Jitendra, > > > > I gonna take a deeper look. > > > > My first feedback would be about the name: Concur is traveling/expense

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Accept RocketMQ into the Incubator

the binding count based on people stating that their vote is > > binding. Is this incorrect? > > > > Bruce > > > > On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 10:45 AM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > >> Bruce > >> > >> Please double

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Accept RocketMQ into the Incubator

Bruce Please double check your binding list. On Nov 21, 2016 12:24, "Bruce Snyder" <bsny...@apache.org> wrote: > The vote passes with 38 +1 votes (5 binding) and no -1 votes. Below are the > results: > > Jochen Wiedmann +1 (binding) > Rob Davies +1 > Bertran

Re: [DISCUSS] Weex for Apache Incubator

On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 8:23 AM John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 8:08 AM Bertrand Delacretaz < > bdelacre...@apache.org> wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 10:31 AM, BonoLv <lvs...@gmail.com> wrote: > > ...Longda is ver

Re: [DISCUSS] Weex for Apache Incubator

On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 8:08 AM Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 10:31 AM, BonoLv wrote: > > ...Longda is very warmhearted in helping us to learn the Apache way. > We hope > > his application will be successful... > > Experienced

Re: [VOTE] Apache CarbonData 0.2.0-incubating release

I'm changing my vote to +1 since I'm able to build from source after installing thrift. Going through this did point out one issue - the Thrift TLP does not publish valid releases. I've pinged them separately. John On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 6:50 PM John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org>

Re: [VOTE] Apache CarbonData 0.2.0-incubating release

know, we will update. However, as the build should work on your machine > as soon as you have thrift installed, I don't think we should cancel > this release. > > Thoughts ? > > Thanks ! > Regards > JB > > On 11/14/2016 12:00 AM, John D. Ament wrote: > > Hi, >

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache CarbonData 0.2.0-incubating release

t; - Henry > > On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 5:23 PM John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> > wrote: > > No. I voted -1. You have a +2 right now. > > On Nov 18, 2016 20:20, "Liang Chen" <chenliang6...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi all > > > >

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache CarbonData 0.2.0-incubating release

No. I voted -1. You have a +2 right now. On Nov 18, 2016 20:20, "Liang Chen" wrote: > Hi all > > Finally, this vote passed with the following result: > > +1 (binding) : Henry Saputra,Uma Gangumalla,Jean-Baptiste Onofré > > Thanks all for your vote. > > > Regards >

Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenWhisk into the Apache Incubator

Hey Sam, I don't think the discussion died down. Questions were asked. I'm not sure we got answers. At this point, I'm +1 to accept OpenWhisk. I'm not going to block OpenWhisk, I am going to work on the assumption that our current git requirements are met (apache is the canonical repository).

[DISCUSS] Graduate CommonsRDF Podling as Apache Commons RDF

All, The Apache CommonsRDF podling has begun discussions within itself and with the Commons TLP to begin the migration over into the Commons TLP as a subproject. The incubator guides a bit limited in this aspect - I suspect because the process is really up to the receiving TLP. By following

Re: [VOTE] Apache CarbonData 0.2.0-incubating release

issue. John On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 9:46 AM Liang Chen <chenliang6...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi John D. Ament and Henry > > Gentle reminder! > Could you please check again? please feel free to let me know if need to > provide more information. > > BTW,buil

Re: TSU/ECCN notification for Impala podling

Todd, Please be cautious about mixing public/private email lists. I'm removing impala's private based on this. The guide that Sailesh pointed to [1] mentions the "PMC Chair" which would be the Incubator PMC, and hence Ted Dunning. If you don't hear back, may be best to ping him directly (I had

Re: [VOTE] Apache CarbonData 0.2.0-incubating release

remove-thrift-solution-td2253.html > > Definitely,we will update the compile document accordingly also for the 1st > compile users. > > Regards > Liang > > > John D. Ament-2 wrote > > Hi, > > > > Can you please provide build instructions? It fails for

Re: [VOTE] Apache CarbonData 0.2.0-incubating release

Hi, Can you please provide build instructions? It fails for me on [ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project carbondata-core: Could not resolve dependencies for project org.apache.carbondata:carbondata-core:jar:0.2.0-incubating: Could not find artifact

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons RDF 0.3.0-incubating RC2

+1 release looks great, thanks Stian! John On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 6:03 PM Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote: > The Apache Commons RDF podling has voted to release > > Apache Commons RDF 0.3.0-incubating RC2 > > Vote thread: > >

Re: svn commit: r1000984 - /websites/production/incubator/content/

James, Could you please test it locally? Run "ant" from the root directory, then open up target/site/projects/metron.html in a browser. John On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 4:52 PM wrote: > Author: jsirota > Date: Fri Nov 11 21:51:48 2016 > New Revision: 1000984 > > Log: >

Re: [FINAL] Incubator PMC Board Report - November 2016

Feel free to edit, it's still not submitted. On Nov 11, 2016 15:42, "P. Taylor Goetz" <ptgo...@gmail.com> wrote: Yeah, they pulled their report, but their still listed in the “Summary of podling reports” section. -Taylor > On Nov 11, 2016, at 3:34 PM, John D. Ament <

Re: [FINAL] Incubator PMC Board Report - November 2016

> > -Taylor > > > On Nov 11, 2016, at 8:12 AM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > All, > > > > I'll be submitting this report in a couple of hours, on behalf of the > > IPMC. I don't see any changes, but I will grab the c

Re: [FINAL] Incubator PMC Board Report - November 2016

All, I'll be submitting this report in a couple of hours, on behalf of the IPMC. I don't see any changes, but I will grab the current copy from https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/November2016 . John On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 9:12 PM John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> wrote: > All,

Re: [FINAL] Incubator PMC Board Report - November 2016

On Nov 10, 2016 17:40, "Roman Shaposhnik" wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 12:52 PM, Greg Stein wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 2:05 PM, Roman Shaposhnik > > wrote: > >>... > > > >> It just comes from my own experience of

Re: [FINAL] Incubator PMC Board Report - November 2016

On Nov 10, 2016 15:05, "Roman Shaposhnik" <ro...@shaposhnik.org> wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 3:40 AM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> wrote: > > In addition, I'm a bit confused over the role you're expecting Ted to fill > > on this one.

Re: Looking for a mentor for Gossip and Rya

That and update podlings.xml On Nov 10, 2016 15:04, "Josh Elser" wrote: Actaully, I should probably ask: is there any sort of formal process we need to go through to officially add a new mentor on a podling? Or, simply add her name to

Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC5)

ating-src.zip.asc > > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-src.zip.md5 > > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-src.zip.sha > > > > > > There is also a blocking jira that we are working for future releases. > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-926 > > > &

Re: svn commit: r1769188 - /incubator/public/trunk/content/projects/metron.xml

Hi, Probably not a good idea to inline the reports, usually we just see links to whimsy. Here's Metron's - https://whimsy.apache.org/board/minutes/Metron.html John On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 2:30 PM wrote: > Author: jsirota > Date: Thu Nov 10 19:30:31 2016 > New Revision:

Re: [VOTE] Accept RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator

+1 On Nov 10, 2016 11:41, "Bruce Snyder" wrote: > Subsequent to the discussion on RocketMQ, I would like to call a vote on > accepting RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator. > > [ ] +1 Accept RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator > [ ] +0 Abstain. > [ ] -1 Do not accept RocketMQ

Re: [DRAFT] Incubator PMC Board Report - November 2016

se find it on > https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/November2016 > > We apologize for being late. > > Thanks, > Makoto > > 2016-11-09 13:06 GMT+09:00 John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org>: > > All, > > > > Below is the current draft of the board rep

Re: [FINAL] Incubator PMC Board Report - November 2016

In addition, I'm a bit confused over the role you're expecting Ted to fill on this one. When I read http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#top-level-board-proposal it seems like anyone can submit the resolution to the board. The board may discuss it, they may be quiet about it. I

Re: Help for hawq wiki/jira permission

Hongxu: Please reach out to the HAWQ podling directly. Either a PPMC member or a mentor can help you. John On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 4:34 AM Hongxu Ma wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I dived into HAWQ recently, wish to share some ideas to wiki (e.g. build > and install), and assign

Re: New git mirror created: incubator.git

Roman, Here's where I sent out the experiment idea to the group - https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/927db43fa0221bcf862088d495be2d15ce433c4bd20f4de8715bb8ae@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E There's actually been quite a few colorful conversations about this on hipchat with infra. Ranging

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Streams 0.4-incubating

, 2016 at 10:37 PM John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> wrote: > Is this test runtime normal? > > Running org.apache.streams.monitoring.tasks.BroadcastMonitorThreadTest > Tests run: 4, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time e

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Streams 0.4-incubating

e, and execute streams out of modules. > > It looks like your issue stems from not running `mvn install` on > streams-master prior to streams-project. > > Running `mvn clean install` on each in order should result in BUILD > SUCCESS. > > Steve > > On November 9, 2016 at

[FINAL] Incubator PMC Board Report - November 2016

to the infra team for replacing the moin-moin wiki server quickly, avoiding much impact on this months report. * Miscellaneous - None * Credits - Report Manager: John D. Ament Summary of podling reports * Still getting started at the Incubator

Re: [DISCUSS] RocketMQ Incubation Proposal

On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 9:08 PM Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 3:19 AM, vongosling wrote: > > Hi, Guys: > > > > I have revised a little about RocketMQ proposal, adding some text to > focus > > our design attention about RocketMQ. Also,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Streams 0.4-incubating

ct-0.4-incubating johnament$ On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 9:08 PM John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 11:51 AM sblackmon <sblack...@apache.org> wrote: > > Hi Incubator PMC, > > The Apache Streams community has voted and approved the proposal to > re

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Streams 0.4-incubating

On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 11:51 AM sblackmon wrote: > Hi Incubator PMC, > > The Apache Streams community has voted and approved the proposal to > release Apache Streams 0.4 (incubating). > > We now kindly request the Incubator PMC members to review and vote on this > incubator

Re: Request to add to Wiki ContributorsGroups

Done, happy editing! On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 8:03 PM Jitendra Pandey wrote: > My Wiki user account name is JitendraPandey, and email: > jiten...@apache.org . > Could you please grant me write access to the Incubator Wiki? > > Thank you > jitendra > >

Re: [DRAFT] Incubator PMC Board Report - November 2016

server quickly, avoiding much impact on this months report. * Miscellaneous - None * Credits - Report Manager: John D. Ament Summary of podling reports * Still getting started at the Incubator - AriaTosca - Guacamole - Hivemall - iota

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Geode (incubating)

On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 7:58 PM Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > This is a page about Gemfire, not Geode. > > Sure but it’s based on / use Apache Geode right? > > > the ones you're pointing to are the old ones. > > So it might be a good idea to point people to the right

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Geode (incubating)

Cos, Did you mean this section? http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#community John On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 5:41 PM Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > Besides, last time I checked there's no such thing as "diversity > requirement" > in the graduation. It is indeed

Re: [DRAFT] Incubator PMC Board Report - November 2016

> txs and LieGrue, > strub > > > > > > > On Tuesday, 8 November 2016, 22:36, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > It was probably a gremlin, I see prior edits from you as well. > > > > John > > > > > > On Tue, Nov 8, 20

Re: [DRAFT] Incubator PMC Board Report - November 2016

lse lost edit rights, please shoot an email to get readded. John On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 4:35 PM John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> wrote: > It was probably a gremlin, I see prior edits from you as well. > > John > > > On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 4:32 PM Henry Saput

Re: [DRAFT] Incubator PMC Board Report - November 2016

It was probably a gremlin, I see prior edits from you as well. John On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 4:32 PM Henry Saputra <henry.sapu...@gmail.com> wrote: > Ah, interesting, I was able to review prev incubator reports. > > Thanks, John! > > - Henry > > > On Tue, Nov 8,

Re: [DRAFT] Incubator PMC Board Report - November 2016

Well that explains it. You weren't on the contributors group - I've added you. John On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 4:19 PM Henry Saputra <henry.sapu...@gmail.com> wrote: > I logged in. My username is Henry Saputra > > On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 12:06 PM, John D. Ament <johndam...@a

Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC5)

Hi Deron, Here's an example from a release I did recently for a TLP to give you some guidance. https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/deltaspike/1.7.2/ (and i'm sure others may find some errors in what I did - no one's perfect) In this release, for each file there are 3 accompanying files -

Re: [DRAFT] Incubator PMC Board Report - November 2016

gt; On Saturday, November 5, 2016, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > All, > > > > Please find below the draft board report for the incubator for this > month. > > > > John > > > > Incubator PMC report for November 2016

Re: [DRAFT] Incubator PMC Board Report - November 2016

All, Not a lot has changed in the podling report. We still have 7 podlings missing sign off from mentors. Please review your podlings quickly and provide them feedback. John On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 9:22 AM John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> wrote: > All, > > Please find th

Re: [DISCUSS] Policy Question: GA for GitHub for Podlings

On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 9:30 PM Sam Ruby <ru...@intertwingly.net> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 9:10 PM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> > wrote: > > I'm +0.5 for this right now. There's some challenges I would like to see > > answered to be able to move

Re: [DISCUSS] Policy Question: GA for GitHub for Podlings

I'm +0.5 for this right now. There's some challenges I would like to see answered to be able to move forward on this. - Who controls the ACLs? I have some strong opinions of the ACL. Specifically, when the podling joins the incubator, I expect that the "OpenWhisk" organization be handed over to

Re: Request to join Incubator PMC

I sent notice. On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 10:02 PM Niclas Hedhman wrote: > Hi, > I (apache ID "niclas") would like to rejoin the Incubator PMC. > > Thanks > -- > Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer > http://zest.apache.org - New Energy for Java >

Re: Please grant wiki write access for me

I've added you, happy editing. On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 10:08 PM BonoLv wrote: > My incubator wiki user name is "BonoLv" . Please grant write access > permission for me . > > Thx. >

Re: [DISCUSS] RocketMQ Incubation Proposal

On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 3:08 AM Bertrand Delacretaz <bdelacre...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 10:26 PM, John D. Ament <john.d.am...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > ...- How can RocketMQ work with the existing Kafka or ActiveMQ > communities to

<    5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   >