Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Baremaps 0.7.3-rc1 (incubating)

I also carry my +1 non-binding vote from dev. > On 18 Apr 2024, at 13:08, Calvin Kirs wrote: > > Carry my +1 binding from dev@ vote. > > On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 7:06 PM Bertil Chapuis > wrote: > >> Hello Everyone, >> >> This is a call for a vote to release Apache

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Baremaps 0.7.2-rc3 (incubating)

+1 (binding) Downloaded, checked signatures, checked checksums Leonard > On 3 Oct 2023, at 00:10, Bertil Chapuis wrote: > > Hello Everyone, > > This is a call for a vote to release Apache Baremaps 0.7.2 (incubating), > release candidate 3. Apache Baremaps is a toolkit and a set of

Re: [IMPC] [VOTE] Graduate Apache Jena as a Top Level Project

On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 11:10 AM, Andy Seaborne a...@apache.org wrote: This is a call for vote to graduate the Apache Jena podling from Apache Incubator to be a top level project. +1, binding, mentor cheers! - Leo (doing a little celebration dance

Re: [VOTE] Release Jena LARQ 1.0.0-incubating

-RC-1/ +1 cheers, Leo - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: Question about downloading binaries

of a discussion. cheers, Leo - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: Question about downloading binaries

particularly understand the purpose/value of either version of (2) (wouldn't I just always want the binary version?), but that's fine :) cheerio, Leo - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org

Re: Multi-licensed dependencies

podlings until the docs have changed. It gets way too confusing way too quickly, otherwise. cheerio, Leo - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h

Re: Binary dependencies in source releases (Was: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC0)

, no discussion. Just fix it. That said, I'm not aware of us actually having such a release out there? How to deal with this stuff for TLPs that got it wrong, well, I guess that's a conversation for (a) different mailing list(s). g'night Leo, still trying to pick his jaw up from the floor

Re: [VOTE] Release Jena Fuseki 0.2.1-incubating

good to me.) cheers, Leo On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 9:20 PM, Andy Seaborne a...@apache.org wrote: Hi, Here is a vote on a release for Jena Fuseki module, 0.2.1-incubating. This RC-2 of this release. Please vote to approve this release:   [ ] +1 Approve the release   [ ]  0 Don't care   [ ] -1

Re: Jena mentors (Was: [VOTE] Release Jena Fuseki 0.2.1-incubating)

On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 5:54 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 5:34 PM, Leo Simons m...@leosimons.com wrote: Can we get 2 more IPMC votes? On a related note, who are currently mentoring Jena? The status page [1] doesn't show. The Jena team page [2

Re: [VOTE] Release jena-tdb-0.9.0-incubating (RC-5)

On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 11:19 PM, Andy Seaborne a...@apache.org wrote: The Jena PPMC has voted to release  Apache Jena TDB 0.9.0-incubating and we would now be grateful if members of IPMC would review and vote for this release. +1 from me. cheers, Leo

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Accumulo to TLP

members on it? That's fine, but I do hope your mentors stick around for a bit...it tends to help 'grease the wheels' during your transition to PMC. cheers, Leo - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org

Re: Thoughts on Incubator board reports

more overseeing by following along than I would have done if, say, I had gotten nagged a couple thousand times more. So, definitely +1 to keep going like that, thanks for spelling it out too, you should know we got your back :) cheers, Leo [1] helped by others of course, yada yada, we so love

Re: [DISCUSS] - Packages renaming and backward compatibility (was: Re: [VOTE] Graduate Sqoop podling from Apache Incubator)

On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 3:00 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote: Leo, are you out there? Hmm? Oh, this again... Having company names or trademarks in java namespaces is a pretty stupid convention. It gets us mess like this... There is no policy that incubating java projects must

Re: [VOTE] Release jena-tdb-0.9.0-incubating (RC-4)

arrive. 3) all looks good to me ;-) ) cheers, Leo - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release jena-tdb-0.9.0-incubating (RC2)

would review and vote for this release. -1, specifically based on On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 1:22 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: The tag and the packaging also need to be sorted out before release. Sorry, but it seems to me like you'll have to bake another RC with some fixes. cheers, Leo

small, reversible steps

, and it impedes consensus much more than needed. We won't get far that way. I'm glad I missed a week full of such e-mail while I was on holiday :-). I shall continue to try to steer clear of it! (hug), Leo [1] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/cocoon-dev/200010.mbox/%3c39fad0b5.2d3f4...@apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Jukka Zitting for IPMC Chair (was Re: NOMINATIONS for Incubator PMC Chair)

+1 - Leo On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 4:16 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote: In the interest of moving the current discussion matters forward, please VOTE on this recommendation to the board by the IPMC. I'll leave the VOTE open for at least the next 72 hours

Re: February report review

+1 I'd also suggest that the below is a partial answer to the board's questions to the IPMC on how it would improve oversight so it should probably go in our report. cheers, Leo On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 4:59 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 4:30 PM, Sam

Re: Incubator, or Incubation?

off to go skiing tomorrow I won't be around next week to participate in the details of all that. Have fun :-) cheerio, Leo [1] the choice of the vague term 'group' is intentional: give us some degrees of freedom to design the structure, in a formal *and* an informal sense. One kind of group

Re: [names] Public Review

need to make clearer the MUSTs around trademarks to new projects, basically passing on the PMC responsibilities we've gotten from the board via trademarks@. Perhaps we need another bit of documentation in the policy that points out the MUSTs, and then that bit links to this guide. cheers, Leo

Re: [DISCUSSION] Regular rotation PMC chair

people bring up rotating the chair - i.e. isn't the current chair doing a good enough job, the current chair should say they want to resign first, etc., rather than it just being time to allow the PMC to reevaluate itself +1 for option 2 and what Ralph said +1 cheers, Leo

[RT] Community over policy, and similar thoughts

. Unfortunately, heated debates have been happening here for a long time, with little break, and though I have something here that is not hot, it still needs contributing. So, sorry about the timing, but I'm posting it anyway Mwuhahah. Hah? cheers, Leo TL;DR [10][12

Re: [RT] Community over policy, and similar thoughts

changed from hmm, how should we tackle this into do what the rules say. This isn't bad per se (it's a good rule, probably), but I believe we do need to spend effort to compensate for the lack of positive feeling. Hence, community over (but not against) policy! cheerio, Leo [1] http://www.apache.org

Thoughts about reporting (was: Re: [RT] Community over policy...)

that will ultimately be published on the ASF web site as a part of the ASF board meetings. Thank you, Sam. I doubt I will beat you, though I may have a go :) cheers, Leo [1] these are imaginary quotes, no one said these things! I'm inventing them and/or paraphrasing from memory. [2] yes yes

Re: Q. Forks without concensus?; A. anytime / depends / never without agreement

inviting everyone to take as much change control as they want. cheers, Leo - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: Forks without concensus?

)? Absolutely. Etc. So the generic policy is there is no generic policy, and instead there is appropriate application of judgement to specific cases. cheerio, Leo On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 6:35 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote: On 1/3/2012 11:14 AM, Greg Stein wrote: On Jan 3, 2012 11:48

Re: [VOTE] Bloodhound to join the Incubator

that was voted on, for clarity). All in all I think bloodhound should continue on, and the incubator PMC should trust the mentors to keep things on their current track (hehe) of collaboration-where-possible, rather than turn this into an overheated debate. cheers, Leo On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 9:30

Re: [PROPOSAL] Flex for Apache Incubator

actual problem with the proposal. I can't say I'm enthusiastic about it, but I don't have to be. cheerio, Leo [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SWF#Licensing [2] http://www.adobe.com/devnet/swf.html [3] http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/eula/flashplayer10.html [4] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki

Re: [PROPOSAL] Flex for Apache Incubator

On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 9:20 PM, Alex Harui aha...@adobe.com wrote: I would like to propose Flex to be an Apache Incubator project. Here's a link to the proposal: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/FlexProposal Pasted inline: = Apache Flex Proposal = == Abstract == Apache Flex is an

Re: [VOTE] Release jena-2.7.0-incubating (RC1)

*bump*. We have 2 +1s from mentors already, so at a minimum we need just one more binding vote to do this release. Anyone have time to do the review? thanks! Leo On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 10:16 AM, Andy Seaborne a...@apache.org wrote: Please vote on releasing the following as  Apache Jena

Re: Any objections to git hosting for Incubator projects?

Also in S4, everyone agrees. It was discussed in the dev mailing list. -leo On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 2:02 PM, Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com wrote: Sent from my mobile device, please forgive errors and brevity. On Dec 5, 2011 10:21 AM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote: +1

Re: Voting time period can be shortened ? (was: [VOTE] Release Kafka 0.7.0-incubating)

Yupyup. I thought I'd add a little background rant here, that I wrote for the jena podling a bit ago. Purely optional reading but maybe illuminating for some. cheerio, - Leo On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 9:44 PM, Leo Simons m...@leosimons.com wrote: On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 3:54 PM, Benson Margulies

Re: Git to SVN

system perhaps we can just try it and help improve it. We all benefit. -leo On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 11:48 PM, Bruce Robbins bruce.robbins...@gmail.comwrote: I am the fellow trying to convert the S4 git repository to SVN with history preserved. I gave the following a whirl: http://code.google.com/p

Re: Git to SVN

relying on a third party but for an organization powered by volunteers, using a free service like this could be a great benefit. Perhaps there are good reasons why this cannot be done but was wondering if it was discussed at all. -leo On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Christian Grobmeier grobme

Re: [VOTE] S4 to join the Incubator

other ideas, that would be extremely valuable. thanks! -leo On Sep 28, 2011, at 12:36 PM, Sajeevan Achuthan wrote: Hi Leo, I am Sajeevan , I am working for Ericsson, Ireland . I have 13 years of experience in Java technologies and distributed computing. We(Ericsson) are looking

Re: [VOTE] S4 to join the Incubator

Thank you all for your support, looking forward to working with the Apache community. -leo On Sep 26, 2011, at 9:47 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote: This passes, with 16 +1 votes, plenty of them binding, and no -1 votes. Thanks to all who voted! We can now get started creating the Apache S4

Re: [PROPOSAL] S4 for the Apache Incubator

volunteer some time, start thinking on how to contribute. If the project is accepted we will discuss the details in the mailing list. Thanks again! -leo On Sep 15, 2011, at 5:54 PM, Phillip Rhodes wrote: On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 5:34 PM, Flavio Junqueira f...@s4.io wrote: I have read the guide

[PROPOSAL] S4 for the Apache Incubator

Dear all, I would like to propose S4 to be an Apache Incubator project. S4 is a distributed streaming platform written in Java. Here is a link to the proposal in the Incubator wiki: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/S4Proposal Thanks, Leo Neumeyer http://s4.io http://twitter.com/leoneu

[DISCUSS] how to add many committers to a new project (was: Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation)

that have sent in CLAs and are wanting to touch the code/website/etc. That's what harmony did. It helped the project get into a mode of voting in new people frequently, and it also helped make visible to the project that it was ok if you didn't show up on day 0. cheers... Leo

Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 5:02 PM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote: As the discussions on the OpenOfficeProposal threads seem to be winding down, I would like to initiate the vote to accept OpenOffice.org as an Apache Incubator project. +1 from me (binding). cheers, Leo

Re: [VOTE] Flume to join the Incubator.

+1 and welcome on board. cheers, Leo On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 5:38 AM, Jonathan Hsieh j...@cloudera.com wrote: [  ] +1 Accept Flume for incubation [  ] +0 Indifferent to Flume incubation [  ]  -1 Reject Flume for incubation ... = Flume - A Distributed Log Collection System = == Abstract

Re: [VOTE] Accept Sqoop for Incubation

+1! cheers, Leo On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 4:39 AM, arv...@cloudera.com arv...@cloudera.com wrote: As there are no active discussions on the [PROPOSAL] thread for a few days now, I will like to initiate the vote to accept Sqoop as an Apache Incubator project. The proposal discussion thread

OOo mirroring (was: Re: A little OOo history)

the existing CGI scripts integrate into the download pages of every apache project. cheers, Leo PS: LibreOffice also uses mirrorbrain [5], having about 65 mirrors. They required only 15GB for a mirror though [6], not the OOo footprint 200GB. Sounds much more reasonable... [1] http://mirrorbrain.org/ [2

Re: A little OOo history

decent mirroring mostly because it has its own share of beard stroking [1] uber experienced unix [2] administrators. They are typically referred to as the infra team, and they must also be kept happy and well-fed at all times! [3] cheerio, Leo [1] amount of beard on administrator may vary. Beard

Re: OpenOffice.org Apache Incubator Proposal: Splitting the Community?

(but welcome on board guys! Good luck! :-) ) but you're pretty obviously not done with some of the basics yet. The responsible vote AFAICS right now would be something like -1, seems like a good idea, but the proposal is not finished, so please fix it. cheers! Leo [1] Oracle and ASF agree [broad

Re: I think individuals need SGAs

as you might think...so I think this really is something to run by legal-discuss / whoever designed the process (Roy?), people like me just regurgitate what they learned before :) cheerio, Leo On Dec 1, 2010, at 10:15 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote: I've been thinking about

Re: Setting up the Jena podling

On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 12:12 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote: I'm a bit up to my eyes in OpenNLP. Can one of you get the initial status page going? On it. - Leo - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr

Re: Clarification about SGA versus CCLA

-documenting how to actually use these documents -- in the end the documents themselves are pretty clear. cheerio! Leo - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h

Re: [VOTE] Accept Jena into the incubator

+1 obviously! - Leo On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 5:49 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote: +1 binding On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 10:17 PM, Niclas Hedhman nic...@hedhman.org wrote: Lacking a lot of binding votes... +1 binding On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 9:10 PM, Ross Gardler rgard

Re: [PROPOSAL] Zeta Components - Further comments?

like an interesting project to bring into the apache fold - some more PHP sounds like a good idea :) It looks like you now need to sign up some mentors after which your proposal would be ready for a vote. cheers, Leo

Re: [PROPOSAL] Whirr Project

is hot, go build community :) You do know any ASF member can sign up to be an incubator mentor, right? If I count correctly you have two on your list :) cheers, Leo -- = Whirr, a library of cloud services = == Abstract == Whirr will be a set of libraries for running cloud services

Re: [VOTE] Subversion podling for graduation

+1 - Leo On 2/12/10 4:08 AM, Greg Stein wrote: Hello all, I started a discussion thread a week-ish ago to seek out issues for Subversion's graduation. The couple bits that were raised[1] have been handled, I believe. So with that said, I am unaware of any potential showstoppers, and would

Re: Discussion: graduating Subversion

the question of graduation being asked means that all 'em boxes should in fact have been ticked by now. If so I say tick 'em and vote :) cheers, Leo - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Shindig as an Apache Top Level Project

On 1/14/10 11:41 AM, Vincent Siveton wrote: I would like to start an official vote to recommend the graduation of Apache Shindig as a Top Level Project to the Board. +1! - Leo - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr

The incubator is here to help projects

on general@, please do take care to always get off your soap box first, and please always remember you are here to help them. If what you're going to say about a project won't help anyone, please do reconsider sending that e-mail. Just a friendly reminder... thanks for reading! Leo

Re: [PROPOSAL] Validation incubator for JSR-303 Bean Validation

ciao... - Leo - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [PROPOSAL] OpenCMIS incubator for Content Mangement Interoperability Services (CMIS)

and Chemistry. Keep at it! cheers, Leo [1] no, you really don't want me as a mentor [2], so don't ask :) [2] because I would offer you an opinion or two about CMIS and it'd all end in tears... - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general

Re: How documentation != code, and how to do policy (was: Re: Publishing api docs for Subversion)

perspective, you are right that code and text is effectively the same thing, but that code has a common tendency to be depending on other work, introducing licensing into the legal mix. I think it was Leo who also pointed out that Trademarks is an additional legal aspect of it. I have no idea what

Re: OSS Java AAC Decoder?

... ...also it seems like java is actually quite fine for encoding/decoding of low-level high-bandwidth things like audio and video, as long as you stay away from java.util.* and other high-level stuff like that and you tune your GC appropriately :) ciao, Leo

How documentation != code, and how to do policy (was: Re: Publishing api docs for Subversion)

/ to http://www.gnu.org/licenses/old-licenses/gpl-2.0.html I think nearly everyone can agree on which is friendlier :) cheers! Leo - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail

Re: Question for mentors: crediting the original project?

). cheers, Leo [1] http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/trunk/ABOUT_APACHE - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] release Apache VCL 2.1

to validate the $_POST['password']. I'm by no means a PHP expert so I might be making a fool of myself here, but better safe than sorry. So, can you explain (preferably on, err, your website) what measures are in place to guard against things like SQL injection and XSS? thanks, Leo

Re: JavaHL package namespace / migration / compatability

of breaking the rules), we as incubator should really not even try to enforce these kinds of standards; projects should make their own decisions about that. ciao, Leo - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr

Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Pivot

On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 5:47 PM, Todd Volkert tvolk...@gmail.com wrote: The Apache Pivot community feels that it is ready to graduate into the Apache Pivot top-level project. +1 from me! cheers, Leo - To unsubscribe, e-mail

Re: [Discussion] Graduation of Pivot Podling

Hey hey, I've checked in on Pivot now and again and reviewing recent activities, I think its definitely ready to leave the nest! I will be happy to vote +1 when it comes to a vote. cheers, Leo On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 3:10 AM, Todd Volkert tvolk...@gmail.com wrote: The feeling among

Re: Review-Then-Commit

to manage it within SVN perhaps with the aid of svnmerge.py), I don't think it is _wrong_. If the community really wants to do it that way, I say let them. Sorry Paul :) cheers, Leo PS: for the record I've followed cassandra on and off and I would most likely +1 on a graduation vote

Re: Two other issues to discuss for Subversion

, as long as y'all make sure to do that good stuff (be clear to users and protect the involved brands), I think what infrastructure goes where exactly, can be up to infra@, in this case. And y'all are talking to PRC anyway about any press stuff. I see no real risks. cheers, Leo

Re: Side Discussion; Mentorship [PROPOSAL][VOTE] Subversion

to offset any perceived risk is probably to have some lively discussion between the mentors and the rest of the incubator. So, risk mitigated, I say :) ciao, Leo - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org

Re: Insanity (of the release process)

On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 4:05 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 04:07, William A. Rowe, Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote: Leo Simons wrote: Here's what I understand: 1) Apache rule: all apache releases must be made by PMCs 2) Apache rule: a release needs at least

Re: [VOTE] Release cassandra 0.4.2

+1, nice work folks! cheers, Leo On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 5:37 PM, Eric Evans eev...@rackspace.com wrote: The Cassandra community voted on and approved the release of Apache Cassandra 0.4.2. We would now like to request the approval of the Incubator PMC for this release. Cassandra

Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 1.0 (RC-5)

+1 from me! cheers, Leo On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 3:53 PM, Nicholas Gallardo nickgalla...@yahoo.com wrote: The Wink community has voted on and approved the release of Wink 1.0 (RC-5).  We would now like to request the approval of the Incubator PMC for this release. Details of the Wink

Re: [PROPOSAL][VOTE] Subversion

On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 2:26 AM, Niclas Hedhman nic...@hedhman.org wrote: On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 7:39 AM, Leo Simons m...@leosimons.com wrote: PS: +1 to start incubation obviously. The record is 2 weeks set for MerlinDeveloper back in 2003...you have 9 days left to try and beat it Hey, you

Re: Insanity. Apache Incubator should be about education (was: [PROPOSAL][VOTE] Subversion)

? Or perhaps that using an argument based on authority is a good strategy? Not very good lessons either. Please kindly step off the soap box... Thanks, Leo PS: For the record I do agree that its not really necessary for subversion to do an incubation release. I like to think that kind of stuff

Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 1.0 (RC-5)

On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 2:23 PM, Nicholas L Gallardo nlgal...@us.ibm.com wrote: Thanks Leo, your input is much appreciated. In addition to this +1, we received a +1 from Kevan Miller in the Wink community vote. Is that vote transportable here? If so, then we just need one more +1 to release

Re: Insanity. Apache Incubator should be about education (was: [PROPOSAL][VOTE] Subversion)

believe it's reasonable to ask for the trust that goes with ensuring that we'll be sure to keep Subversion in line with Apache practices and procedures - and we will continue to do so long after the Incubator has recommended Subversion for graduation.  =) You have it! cheers, Leo PS: Just

Re: Insanity (of the release process)

On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 3:24 PM, Justin Erenkrantz jus...@erenkrantz.com wrote: On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 4:03 PM, Leo Simons m...@leosimons.com wrote: Also, to be clear, as an IPMC member I spend quite a bit of time with projects where I am not a mentor, casting (binding) votes on things like

Re: Insanity (of the release process)

On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 4:48 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 11:16, Leo Simons m...@leosimons.com wrote: ... Not merit, just binding vote. I agree that it sucks, but it is not something where the incubator has gone awry, it has _always_ been messed up like

Re: [PROPOSAL][VOTE] Subversion

not in the NOTICE file. On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 12:07 AM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote: We're not ready for an alpha, but we could do an internal experimental release. I seem to recall seeing that in the docs. How about that? Sure :) ciao, Leo PS: +1 to start incubation obviously

Re: [PROPOSAL] Libcloud Project

On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 6:59 AM, Paul Querna p...@querna.org wrote: I would like to propose incubating the existing Libcloud project to join the ASF Cool! I will try to make the time to help out a little; I'm interested in this space :) cheers, Leo

Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 1.0

, and they should reproduce the exact text of those notices. For example, the slf4j notice line should not be there since slf4j does not require it. cheers, Leo - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 1.0

...@mail.gmail.com%3e cheers, Leo - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 1.0

On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 9:23 PM, Bryant Luk bryant@gmail.com wrote: Thanks for the links.  One general comment I have is that I understand this is part of the incubation process (and no offense intended to Leo since obviously taking energy and time for this) but if I can't look and see

Re: [VOTE] Release cassandra 0.4.0-rc2

On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 6:05 PM, Leo Simons m...@leosimons.com wrote: On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 4:46 PM, Eric Evans eev...@rackspace.com wrote: I'm curious though, when you say ...which makes me whinge just enough to not give a +1, is that hypothetical, or is there feedback that we could

Re: [VOTE] Accept Aries proposal for incubation

rather optimistic that things will work out ok, and so here's my +1 to the proposal. cheers, - Leo PS: BTW, I think it's a great proposal and podling and technically am a big    +1 on it. My only concern is lack of directed focus

Re: [VOTE] Release cassandra 0.4.0-rc2

a license header, which makes *me* whinge just enough to not give a +1, but that's also because I don't know much about the provenance of the codebase. You might get +1s from other folks, you did before, the files are there in the 0.3.x :) - Leo

Re: [VOTE] Release cassandra 0.4.0-rc2

just fix your open jira eventually and lobby some other IPMC members for +1s...just I don't have more time to look at things atm to convince myself all is fine. ciao, - Leo - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Empire-db 2.0.5-incubating (rc5)

). The thing that matters much more is linking up to the apache web of trust: http://www.apache.org/dev/release-signing.html#web-of-trust For similar reasons it is also good if multiple people sign releases - more trust :) cheers, - Leo (who in java land already considers it a win these days when

Re: Review of cassandra NOTICE and LICENSE requested.

to be mentioned in NOTICE if it is only used at build-time. It should not be in the binary release if it's not needed at run-time. Same comment -- it shouldn't hurt to have it in NOTICE. ciao, - Leo, who often gives credit to his stuffed animal wombat in NOTICE files

minimal NOTICE files (was: Re: Review of cassandra...)

(dropped cassandra-dev) On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 10:44 AM, sebbseb...@gmail.com wrote: On 09/09/2009, Leo Simons m...@leosimons.com wrote: Even if it is not in the release I believe there is nothing wrong with  putting an acknowledgment in the NOTICE file. (putting terms in the  LICENSE file

Re: minimal NOTICE files (was: Re: Review of cassandra...)

On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 2:00 PM, Leo Simonsm...@leosimons.com wrote: (dropped cassandra-dev) On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 10:44 AM, sebbseb...@gmail.com wrote: On 09/09/2009, Leo Simons m...@leosimons.com wrote: Even if it is not in the release I believe there is nothing wrong with  putting

Re: Review of cassandra NOTICE and LICENSE requested.

On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 10:44 AM, sebbseb...@gmail.com wrote: On 09/09/2009, Leo Simons m...@leosimons.com wrote: On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 10:28 PM, sebbseb...@gmail.com wrote: Does the release actually *include* JUnit, or is that only used for testing? If so, then it should

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Incubator Shindig version 1.1-BETA2

of the code for the these subcomponents is subject to the terms and conditions of the following licenses. but then there are no following licenses. Might as well remove that notice. etc/check_staged_release.sh in the source release has no license header. cheers, - Leo On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 3

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Aries incubator for Enterprise OSGi

the communities because we disagree on how to do things then I'd like to see that clearly spelled out. cheers, - Leo - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Aries incubator for Enterprise OSGi

. cheers, - Leo - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: incorrect terminology: lead developers

! :) cheers, - Leo - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: XAP?

on XAP by the end of this month, I'll do just that based on the already passed suspension vote. [1] http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/RetiringPodlings Go for it +1; you shall be owed some beer :-) cheers, - Leo

Making some thrift releases

that.)) Please check in with your incubator mentors if you need any more help figuring out what to do. Thanks!! cheers, - Leo PS: I'm not on thrift-dev@; feel free to CC gene...@incubator if you want a response from me! :) [1] at a very minimum you really need appropriate disclaimers, i.e

Re: [Proposal][Vote] Traffic Server

a request for Traffic Server to be accepted into the Incubator. +1 welcome on board! - Leo - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: Community readiness-when does it show?

to have a very energetic leader already and so I think it didn't really much nudging :-) sorry for the rant I hope it helps you anyway :-) cheers, - Leo - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org

  1   2   3   4   5   >