On Mon, 25 Feb 2013, Jordan Zimmerman wrote:
May I have to edit the Curator Proposal wiki, please? My id is
JordanZimmerman.
Done!
Nick
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional
On Thu, 21 Feb 2013, Hyunsik Choi wrote:
I missed my account of incubator wiki. My account is HyunsikChoi.
Karma granted
Nick
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands,
On Tue, 19 Feb 2013, Arun C Murthy wrote:
Help, please?
I've added you to this list. Two things though, firstly usernames with
spaces in aren't that usual, so you should check it works. Secondly, an
account with the username ArunMurthy already had karma, so is it
possible you previously
Hi All
Hopefully all of you know that it's ApacheCon in Portland in just under 2
weeks. The Community Over Code track in particular should be of great
interest + help to many in the incubator community, as we've some
excellent speakers talking about all sorts of things around our projects,
On Thu, 20 Dec 2012, Shane Curcuru wrote:
I put the DRAFT on because I originally wrote these for my personal
Community Over Code site, and I wanted to ensure the style was
appropriate for a path under a.o/foundation, which makes it official.
I wonder if a label like work in progress might be
On Mon, 15 Oct 2012, Benson Margulies wrote:
Choices:
There is another option, which I mentioned in the other key signing thread
on members@, which applies equally here too. Reposting my answer from
there, with a few tweaks...
In-person keysigning doesn't just have to be at ApacheCons,
On Tue, 2 Oct 2012, Pepijn Noltes wrote:
Could anybody grant me write access to the incubator wiki, I need this to
fill in the Celix report.
Karma granted, enjoy!
Nick
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
On Fri, 13 Jul 2012, Aaron McCurry wrote:
I am requesting permission to be able to edit the
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/BlurProposal wiki page, so that I may
respond to comments made on the proposal.
Karma granted. Please remember though that the mailing list is often
better than the
On Wed, 2 May 2012, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
I went to go take care of this so Jukka wouldn't have to, but I don't
have write access yet myself. :) Can someone please add me?
Wiki user: MarvinHumphrey
I've added you to the admin group[1], so you can add others to the
Contributors group[2]
On Wed, 2 May 2012, Raymond Feng wrote:
I need write access too to copy and sign off the Amber report.
RaymondFeng
rf...@apache.org
Should be granted now
Nick
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
On Sun, 26 Feb 2012, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
The graduation guide[1] recommends that the Rat community demonstrates
it's willingness to govern itself through a free VOTE before asking the
IPMC to approve graduation. So, here it is :-)
+1, good luck!
Nick
On Mon, 9 Jan 2012, Devin Han wrote:
The vote is open for 72 hours, or until we get the needed number of votes
(3 +1).
Looks good to me, I'm +1 to the release (IPMC binding)
Nick
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
On Tue, 20 Dec 2011, Devin Han wrote:
I also see Apache POI keeping JUnit statement in their LICENSE file:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/poi/trunk/legal/LICENSE
We do ship the junit jar in some of our release artifacts though, which is
why it's there
(It's also worth pointing out that
On Wed, 16 Nov 2011, Sam Ruby wrote:
Meanwhile, I will personally focus on JSPWiki. If others wish to join
me, here is a a current list of projects that have been incubating
more than a year:
I've been meaning to try to help out with JSPWiki for a while, but I've
not yet had the time. If
On Wed, 9 Nov 2011, Leo Neumeyer wrote:
Perhaps there are concerns about relying on a third party but for an
organization powered by volunteers, using a free service like this could
be a great benefit. Perhaps there are good reasons why this cannot be
done but was wondering if it was discussed
On Sat, 3 Sep 2011, Davide Palmisano wrote:
Here's a link to the proposal in the Incubator wiki
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/Any23Proposal
Any chance you could expand a bit on interactions with the Apache projects
that Any23 is built on? eg how have you engaged with the communities, have
On Tue, 9 Aug 2011, Nick Burch wrote:
we're now waiting on infra[1] to have the cycles to create the lists.
The lists have now been created for the ODF Toolkit podling
Anyone who's interested in the project should sign up to the user and dev
lists. These are odf-us...@incubator.apache.org
On Mon, 15 Aug 2011, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
but I have no access. According to the guide below mentors should be
able to do it but it seems there is a further restriction?
It looks like someone needs to correct the guide you were following
If you look at the recent account creation
On Mon, 8 Aug 2011, Dave Fisher wrote:
If you have been waiting for three volunteers before moving forward then
I'll raise my hand as well.
Thanks for the offer. We did hit the required number of moderators last
week, we're now waiting on infra[1] to have the cycles to create the
lists. Once
On Tue, 9 Aug 2011, Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote:
I would like to help as well if you still need more mentors :).
If you've got the spare cycles, please feel free to give us a hand!
Currently we have our minimum of 3 mentors:
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/odftoolkit.html
Nick
On Sun, 31 Jul 2011, Sam Ruby wrote:
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 3:53 PM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
As the discussions on the ODF Toolkit threads seem to be winding down,
I would like to initiate the vote to accept the ODF Toolkit as an
Apache Incubator project.
This vote will close
On Mon, 1 Aug 2011, drew wrote:
Wondering if it is still appropriate, acceptable, to add myself to the
list of initial Committers
Alas not, now the proposal has been accepted, that initial list is final
The good news is that as soon as the lists are set up, the podling would
be able to vote
On Mon, 1 Aug 2011, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Sendingasf-authorization-template
svn: Commit failed (details follow):
svn: access to
'/repos/infra/!svn/ver/793489/infrastructure/trunk/subversion/authorization/asf-authorization-template'
forbidden
If you could post the diff, then one of
On Mon, 1 Aug 2011, Craig L Russell wrote:
On Aug 1, 2011, at 10:52 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
There are 30 PMC chairs on the Incubator PMC, which is more than enough
to sort its own authz needs without bugging infra every time.
It would be nice if this fact were better known, so
On Thu, 28 Jul 2011, Sam Ruby wrote:
Please cast your votes:
+1
Nick
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
On Fri, 1 Jul 2011, Rob Weir wrote:
We continue to discuss moving this work to Apache. Feedback so far has
been to try for an eventual TLP. We're starting to draft the Incubation
proposal. We talked to the maintainer of the C#/AODL component and he
confirmed that it is not really active
On Fri, 10 Jun 2011, Sam Ruby wrote:
Please cast your votes:
I'm +1
If accepted, I'll try to help out with the podling, but alas I've not got
time at the moment to take on a full mentorship role of it.
Nick
-
To
On Fri, 3 Jun 2011, robert_w...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Are there any other Apache projects where there might be an interesting
relationship? Anything jump out?
We have spreadsheets, word procesor, presentation, mathematical formula,
graphics editor, they export PDF, HTML, ODF, MS Office, raster
On Wed, 1 Jun 2011, robert_w...@us.ibm.com wrote:
But I see this as pulling in two directions:
1) On the one hand it is a good fit for a module in an OpenOffice SDK, so
the OpenOffice project might be a good fit. On the other hand ODF is an
application-independent document format, not
On Wed, 1 Jun 2011, Luke Kowalski wrote:
The following project is being sent in as an incubator candidate.
As there are likely quite a few people new to Apache interested in and
coming with this proposal, I thought I should send a quick note pointing
out some community releated resources and
On Fri, 11 Feb 2011, Nick Burch wrote:
The vote has received 12 PPMC approvals, of which 2 were also IPMC
approvals (Jukka Zitting and myself).
I'd therefore like to ask the IPMC to approve the graduation.
We've had 8 further IPMC +1s, so the graduation votes passes! I'll take
(jpo...@apache.org)
* Jens Hübel(j...@apache.org)
* Jukka Zitting (ju...@apache.org)
* Martin Hermes (herm...@apache.org)
* Nick Burch(n...@apache.org)
* Paolo Mottadelli (pa...@apache.org)
* Paul Goetz(pgo...@apache.org)
* Richard
On Tue, 25 Jan 2011, Jeff Potts wrote:
The release has passed the Chemistry PMC vote: http://bit.ly/eqXU2X
During the vote, 1 IPMC vote was collected (Nick Burch), so we need 2
more IPMC +1 votes to proceed with the release.
Is anyone able to review and vote on these for us? The other two
On Wed, 12 Jan 2011, Gabriele Columbro wrote:
The release has passed the Chemistry PMC vote: http://bit.ly/i0qwI0
During the vote, also 1 IPMC (Jukka Zitting) vote has been collected, so
we'd need 2 more IPMC +1 to proceed with the release.
Appologies for not having the time to review it
Hi All
If you're going to be at ApacheCon in Atlanta next week, and no-one is
already speaking about your incubating project, then you really ought to
sign up for the Fast Feather Track!
The Fast Feather Track is running on the Thursday, and sessions are about
20 minutes long. It's a great
On Thu, 7 Oct 2010, Paul Querna wrote:
Things to look at...
release.sh: this invokes setup.py to build out source tarballs and
then uses the hash/sign script to make the gpg/asc/sha1/md5s:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/libcloud/tags/0.4.0/dist/release.sh
setup.py: contains lots of
Hi All
Does anyone happen to know of some pre-existing release guidelines for
python or php libraries, either in an apache TLP or a podling? For
Chemistry we've got the docs sorted for maven-based releases of the java
codeline, and now we're looking to sort something similar for our python
On Sun, 19 Sep 2010, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
Over the past week or so we've been discussing the Gora project and
bringing it into the Apache Incubator [1]. It's time to call a VOTE
thread on the issue. Please VOTE below:
+1 (binding)
Nick
On Mon, 28 Jun 2010, Gabriele Columbro wrote:
this to vote is the first incubator release for Apache Chemistry OpenCMIS,
with the artifacts being versioned as 0.1.0-incubating.
Sorry, but I'm -1 on this. I think you need to fix at least one of the
problems raised in
On Mon, 28 Jun 2010, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
I think the key point in http://apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#notice
is that NOTICE is for *required* third-party notices, so it should be as
small as possible and contain only notices that the owners of
third-party code require.
OK, so
On Thu, 10 Jun 2010, Nick Burch wrote:
Full details of the grant are in the form:
http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/chemistry-cmis-php-client.html
As per incubator policy, please shout in the next 72 hours if you can
spot a problem with the grant, otherwise it will proceed by lazy
Hi All
We've another contribution for the incubating Chemistry project, this time
a PHP CMIS library.
Full details of the grant are in the form:
http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/chemistry-cmis-php-client.html
As per incubator policy, please shout in the next 72 hours if you can spot
On Thu, 3 Jun 2010, Jukka Zitting wrote:
I agree about it being a good idea to use the status page to explicitly
list the composition of the PPMC. For Chemistry that can be achieved by
simply adding a note like: The Chemistry PPMC consists of all the
committers and mentors listed here.
OK.
Hi All
I've just had a question from someone in Chemistry, one of the projects I
mentor, about ppmc vs committership. Having explained it, I wanted to
check who was currently on the Chemistry ppmc, but I couldn't seem to find
the list anywhere...
At the bottom of:
On Thu, 3 Jun 2010, Jukka Zitting wrote:
So far the approach in Chemistry has been to make all committers also
PPMC members, so the committer (+ mentor) list on the Chemistry status
page is also a list of the PPMC members.
I'd thought that was the case, but wanted to check!
I agree about it
On Mon, 17 Nov 2008, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Could you please add this when you do the final update of the
ip-clearance/openxml4j.html page?
OK, I've added in the md5 to the document, along with links to this thread
etc
And maybe move the code archive to a JIRA issue so that it stays
On Tue, 11 Nov 2008, Nick Burch wrote:
As per the IP Clearance template, POI has received a software grant for
OpenXML4J, and we'd like to get the OK for this.
Lazy consensus 72 hours would appear to run to 18:00 GMT on Friday 14th.
The last consensus 72 hours passed without comment, so
Hi All
As per the IP Clearance template, POI has received a software grant for
OpenXML4J, and we'd like to get the OK for this. The template in svn is
filled out as openxml4j.xml, and the source bundle is available from
http://people.apache.org/~nick/OpenXML4J-Grant/ . An appropriate software
Hi All
With my POI PMC chair hat on, I've been speaking to the company behind the
OpenXML4J[1] library. Within POI, we use OpenXML4J for the fiddly bits in
dealing with ooxml files.
The company behind OpenXML4J would like OpenXML4J to become part of POI.
Having spoken with Robert Burrell
101 - 149 of 149 matches
Mail list logo
