Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hivemall (Incubating) v0.5.0 Release Candidate 3

+1 On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 5:20 PM, Makoto Yui wrote: > Hi, > > I created a docker image [1,2] to verify release artifacts. > > Just run the following command to verify a release artifact. > > # 1). run a docker image > $ docker run -it hivemall/verify:v0.5.0-rc3 > > # 2).

Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenWhisk into the Apache Incubator

+1 On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 7:22 AM, Sam Ruby wrote: > Now that the discussion thread on the OpenWhisk Proposal has died > down, please take a moment to vote on accepting OpenWhisk into the > Apache Incubator. > > The ASF voting rules are described at: >

Re: [DISCUSS] China Contribution. (was: RocketMQ Incubation Proposal)

mon in China. Dozens of Apache projects have wechat groups (mostly by users of those projects and not by PMCs or committers, with some projects having multiple groups with thousands of users). On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 2:32 PM, Jeff Genender <jgenen...@savoirtech.com> wrote: > > > On Nov 1

Re: [DISCUSS] China Contribution. (was: RocketMQ Incubation Proposal)

"a better global way to A) communicate across a medium that everyone uses daily B) archive to search and come back to" How would we even validate or decide that? For discussions like this it is very easy to fall into confirmation bias. I use mailing lists all the time since it is the Apache Way,

Re: [DISCUSS] China Contribution. (was: RocketMQ Incubation Proposal)

n't mention the language. > > > > Thought must be taken for jira and code comments as well. how would non > Chinese speaking people follow development? > > > > > > On 11 Nov 2016 06:45, "Reynold Xin" <r...@apache.org r...@apache.org>> wrote: > &g

Re: [DISCUSS] China Contribution. (was: RocketMQ Incubation Proposal)

Adding members@ On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 10:40 PM, Reynold Xin <r...@apache.org> wrote: > To play devil's advocate: is it OK for Apache projects that consist > primarily of Chinese developers to communicate in Chinese? Or put it > differently -- is it a requirement that all comm

Re: [DISCUSS] China Contribution. (was: RocketMQ Incubation Proposal)

To play devil's advocate: is it OK for Apache projects that consist primarily of Chinese developers to communicate in Chinese? Or put it differently -- is it a requirement that all communications must be in English? I can see an inclusiveness argument for having to use English, as English is one

Re: [VOTE] Accept Hivemall into the Apache Incubator

e.org (with moderated subscriptions) > * comm...@hivemall.incubator.apache.org > * d...@hivemall.incubator.apache.org > * u...@hivemall.incubator.apache.org > > === Git Repository === > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-hivemall.git > > === JIRA assis

Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.10.0-incubating (RC2)

+1 On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 2:27 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > +1 binding > > I checked: > - names contain incubating > - signatures good > - DISCLAIMER exists > - LICENSE and NOTICE correct > - There are NO unexpended binary in the source release > - All files

Re: [VOTE] Accept PredictionIO into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 3:22 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote: > Since discussion on the matter of PredictionIO has died down, I would like > to call a VOTE > on accepting PredictionIO into the Apache Incubator. > > Proposal:

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Zeppelin from the Incubator

+1 On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 2:01 AM, moon soo Lee wrote: > Hi, > > Apache Zeppelin started incubating about a year and 4 months ago > (2014-12-23) and the members of the community think that it is ready to > graduate from the incubator to be a TLP. > > Since it's inception,

Re: [VOTE] Accept Gearpump into the Apache Incubator

ions) > > gearpump-dev > > gearpump-user > > gearpump-commits > > > > ==== Git repository > > Git is the preferred source control system: git:// > git.apache.org/gearpump > > > > Documentation > > https://gearpump.incubator.apache.org/docs/ > > > > JIRA instance > > JIRA Gearpump (GEARPUMP) > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/gearpump > > > > === Initial Committers === > > * Xiang Zhong > > > > * Tianlun Zhang > > > > * Qian Xu > > > > * Huafeng Wang > > > > * Kam Kasravi > > > > * Weihua Jiang > > > > * Tomasz Targonski > > > > * Karol Brejna > > > > * Gang Wang > > > > * Mark Chmarny > > > > * Xinglang Wang > > > > * Lan Wang > > > > * Jianzhong Chen > > > > * Xuefu Zhang > > > > * Rui Li > > > > === Affiliations === > > * Xiang Zhong – Intel > > > > * Tianlun Zhang – Intel > > > > * Qian Xu – Intel > > > > * Huafeng Wang – Intel > > > > * Kam Kasravi – Intel > > > > * Weihua Jiang – Intel > > > > * Tomasz Targonski – Intel > > > > * Karol Brejna – Intel > > > > * Mark Chmarny – Intel > > > > * Gang Wang – Intel > > > > * Mark Chmarny – Intel > > > > * Xinglang Wang – Ebay > > > > * Lan Wang – Huawei > > > > * Jianzhong Chen – Cloudera > > > > * Xuefu Zhang – Cloudera > > > > * Rui Li – Intel > > > > === Sponsors === > > > > Champion > > Andrew Purtell > > > > Nominated Mentors > > * Andrew Purtell > > > > * Jarek Jarcec Cecho > > > > * Todd Lipcon > > > > * Xuefu Zhang > > > > * Reynold Xin > > > > Sponsoring Entity > > Apache Incubator PMC​ > > > > ​ > > >

Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.9.0-incubating (RC3)

+1 (some issues as pointed out above, but we can fix those in the next release) On Sat, Feb 6, 2016 at 11:29 AM, Luciano Resende wrote: > Let me reiterate my +1 (binding) vote here... > > Anyone else willing to review the release ? > > On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 2:57 PM,

Re: [VOTE] Accept Torii into Apache Incubator

tic Linking Exception, >> http://zeromq.org/area:licensing) >> * Akka (MIT) >> * JOpt Simple (MIT) >> * Spring Framework Core (Apache v2) >> * Play (Apache v2) >> * SLF4J (MIT) >> * Scala >> * Scalatest (Apache v2) >> * Scalactic (Apache v2) >> *

Re: [VOTE] Accept Kudu into the Apache Incubator

+1 On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > Hi all, > > Discussion on the [DISCUSS] thread seems to have wound down, so I'd like to > call a VOTE on acceptance of Kudu into the ASF Incubator. The proposal is > pasted below and also available on the wiki at: >

Re: RTC vs CTR (was: Concerning Sentry...)

Most non-trivial software projects I worked on (paid or un-paid) have RTC culture. I cannot represent every single project, but in the ones that I'm closely involved with that use RTC, it is simply part of the culture and recognition that mandatory code review improves code quality. (We can debate

Re: [DISCUSS] Spark-Kernel Incubator Proposal

I'm happy to mentor the incubation if you are still looking for mentors. I'd also like to second Matei that spark-kernel as a name is fairly confusing. It only makes sense when viewing from IPython notebook's point of view to refer to these things as kernels. Outside of that context, it sounds

request to join ipmc

Hi, I am an Apache member and would like to join the IPMC. I'm a Spark committer & PMC member, and have also contributed to various other projects including Hive, Hadoop, etc. Let me know what else you need from me. Thanks!

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark 0.8.0-incubating (RC6)

+1 On Sep 21, 2013 8:03 AM, Matei Zaharia matei.zaha...@gmail.com wrote: +1 Matei On Sep 20, 2013, at 1:56 PM, Patrick Wendell pwend...@gmail.com wrote: Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark (incubating) version 0.8.0. This will be the first incubator release

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Spark for the Incubator

, joins, etc. Shark uses Spark as the execution engine but provides a Hive-compatible SQL interface. This proposal is however only about moving Spark to ASF incubator, and not Shark. -- Reynold Xin, AMPLab, UC Berkeley http://rxin.org On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 1:03 PM, Henry Saputra henry.sapu