Hi IMPC,
With 3 +1 and no -1, the vote has passed.
Thanks to Raphael Bircher, John D. Ament and Josh Elser.
It's our very first release which is meaning a lot to us.
Thanks to people in previous vote thread too.
--
Best Regards!
sospartan
http://weex.apache.org/ <https://weex-project.io>
that.. Looks like your
> build instructions/script could use a refresh :)
> * L look ok at a glance. xsums/sigs are good.
>
> On 6/5/17 5:27 AM, sospartan wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I'm calling a vote for Weex-incubating 0.12.0-RC5 release.
> > The changes fix pro
he.org%3E
--
Best Regards!
sospartan
http://weex.apache.org/ <https://weex-project.io>
HI,
We'll cancel this vote and start a new RC later.
--
Best Regards!
sospartan
http://weex.apache.org/ <https://weex-project.io>
; Justin
>
> 1. https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.txt
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>
--
Best Regards!
sospartan
http://weex.apache.org/ <https://weex-project.io/>
;
>> Thanks for the feedback. I hope sospartan or someone else will soon show
>>> up. I think we should go for an RC5. There are simply too many issues.
>>>
>>
>>
>> All issues I mentioned are minor and can be fixed in a next release, but
>> the binary in sou
Thanks for the review. We are working on these issue now. And
another RC will make.
On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 8:59 AM, Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Thanks for the feedback. I hope sospartan or someone else will soon show
> up. I think we
12:02 Uhr, schrieb sospartan <sospar...@gmail.com>:
>
> Hi guys,
>>
>> I'm calling a vote for Weex-incubating 0.12.0-RC4 release.
>> The issues pointed out by Craig in previous vote were ALL FIXED.
>> A build README(README_RELEASE.md) is in the tarball now.
>>
>
t;
> On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 6:03 AM sospartan <sospar...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > I'm calling a vote for Weex-incubating 0.12.0-RC4 release.
> > The issues pointed out by Craig in previous vote were ALL FIXED.
> > A build README(README_RELEA
on releasing this RC.
[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
--
Best Regards!
sospartan
http://weex.apache.org/ <https://weex-project.io/>
John and Craig,
Take a look at this issue https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WEEX-36
As I said in previous mail, all problems are fixed. Hope it's help.
On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 11:34 AM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org>
wrote:
> sospartan,
>
> One thing that may help oth
Anybody wanna have a look at this release?
I've fixed all problems block release in previous RCs.
On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 6:10 PM, Raphael Bircher <rbircherapa...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
>
> Am .05.2017, 11:23 Uhr, schrieb sospartan <sospar...@apache.org>
com>
wrote:
> Hi John
>
> Am .05.2017, 17:40 Uhr, schrieb John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org>:
>
> sospartan,
>>
>> Couple of things noticed:
>>
>> - Your email still points to your non-ASF hosted website. Don't forget to
>> point to your
ok, I'll update my release script to bring every source code under root
directory.
Thanks for this tip.
On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 11:03 AM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org>
wrote:
> On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 7:57 PM sospartan <sospar...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > John,
&
John,
Thanks for the review.
I don't understand the issue with "sub-directory". Is there any standard
directory structure for source release?
John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org>于2017年5月17日 周三下午11:41写道：
> sospartan,
>
> Couple of things noticed:
>
> - Your ema
.
On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 5:44 PM, Raphael Bircher <rbircherapa...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi sospartan
>
> Yea, I see, there are several issues. I will not act as an official
> mentor, but I subscribed the dev list, and we'll see what we can do.
>
> Regards Raphael
>
> A
and contributors are new to ASF, we are still try to learn the
apache-way.
Especially, there are lots issues about our release according last RC vote.
We need
mentors to guide the community.
--
Best Regards!
--
sospartan
Weex is a framework for building Mobile cross-platform high
Could anyone from IPMC review this release?
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 5:23 PM, sospartan <sospar...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi IPMC,
>
> I'm calling a vote for Weex-incubating 0.12.0-RC4 release.
> In this release, source tarball only include files necessary to build Weex
> SDK
for at least 72 hours.
Please vote on releasing this RC.
[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
--
Best Regards!
--
sospartan
https://weex-project.io
> > such convenience download would be made available through the various jar
> > repos (e.g. mvnrepository). This should (preferably) be done by the
> Gradle
> > community/organisation. However, in the short term, the project could
> > adjust the gradlew scrip
ay 3, 2017, at 7:24 PM, Niclas Hedhman <nic...@hedhman.org>
> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> BUT ALSO figuring out what to start looking for. For fak sake,
> >>>> man Get a grip on reality!
> >>>
> >>> Craig L Russell
> >&
t; Well, you just introduced more complexity in "using the project" with your
> insistence on no binaries, and more so if your "no execute flag" is also
> now not allowed. AFAIK, there is no obligation that the source distribution
> must contain all details needed to build the project, only that it can be
> built. But for you convenience;
>
> 1. Install Gradle and learn how to use it.
> 2. Install Maven and learn how to use it.
> 3. Install Android NDK and learn how to use it.
> 4. Install Android SDK and learn how to use it.
> 5. Install Xcode and learn how to use it.
> 6. Install IOS SDK and learn how to use it.
> 7. Build each part with the tool needed.
>
>
> Cheers
> --
> Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
> http://polygene.apache.org - New Energy for Java
>
--
sospartan
Phone:13588488290
HangZhou
This vote will remain open for at least 72 hours.
Please vote on releasing this RC.
[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
--
Best Regards!
--
sospartan
https://weex-project.io
nt from my iPhone
>
> > On Apr 24, 2017, at 7:02 PM, sospartan <sospar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Yes, that the RESULT I need. Thank you.
> > But It's empty in content when I open this address.
> > I want make sure. So, Is there a specific rule that
ivate.weex.apache.org%3E
>
> Hopefully this is the one you meant... Pinging your mentors in the future
> might be better to avoid any chance of accidentally leaking some private
> context :)
>
> - Josh
>
> sospartan wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> May I ask who has karma to
> > > > > > itself in a single sentence, and think that the approach taken by
> > > Weex
> > > > is
> > > > > > appropriate.
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > I disagree. I think you're thinking of source release vs binary
> > > release.
> > > > > Weex has only presented a source release.
> > > >
> > > > I am aware of that, but the documentation says "make it easier for
> the
> > > > downstream" and by "excluding all non-bundled, but required,
> > dependencies
> > > > from NOTICE" we actually make it harder for the downstream. And
> sorry,
> > I
> > > > place "common sense" and "tribal knowledge" way over someone writing
> a
> > > > documentation and perhaps didn't realize the consequences. I never
> stop
> > > > thinking, just because I read something somewhere.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > I'm not sure what a valid response to this would be. I don't believe
> we
> > > should be taking into account ease of use for downstream consumers,
> > however
> > > at the end of the day those downstream consumers of a source release
> > > eventually get a binary and that binary should include proper data.
> > What I
> > > am trying to say is that these contents look more appropriate for the
> > > binary release, which would be a satisfactory use case for downstream
> > > consumers.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Cheers
> > > > --
> > > > Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
> > > > http://polygene.apache.org - New Energy for Java
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
> > http://polygene.apache.org - New Energy for Java
> >
>
--
sospartan
Phone:13588488290
HangZhou
.
--
Best Regards!
--
sospartan
https://weex-project.io
This vote will remain open for at least 72 hours.
Please vote on releasing this RC.
[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
--
Best Regards!
--
sospartan
https://weex-project.io
Thanks.
On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 4:12 PM, Nick Burch <apa...@gagravarr.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Apr 2017, sospartan wrote:
>
>> I'm request for the karma to editing podling report wiki.
>> My wiki username: sospartan
>>
>
> Karm
Hi ,
I'm request for the karma to editing podling report wiki.
Could anyone please grant me that?
My wiki username: sospartan
Thanks.
Best Regards!
--
sospartan
https://weex-project.io
30 matches
Mail list logo
