2007/6/24, Phil Steitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
---
Java Resource Simulator (JRS) Proposal
The following is a proposal for a new top-level project within the ASF.
Abstract
-
The Java Resource
From an incubator point of view, I think having the sources available
is not yet necessary. Having a clear proposal what the project is
going to do, and who is going to do it is more important, especially
with a third party donation. I think we should focus more on diversity
of the community
+1.. If the source is a big problem for people, maybe putting it in your home
(not on in
public_html) and set appropriate group rights so people can get to it by ssh.
I don't have a problem with not having access to the sources yet though..
Mvgr,
Martin
Phil Steitz wrote:
This is a proposal to
On 6/25/07, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From an incubator point of view, I think having the sources available
is not yet necessary. Having a clear proposal what the project is
going to do, and who is going to do it is more important, especially
with a third party donation. I think
--- robert burrell donkin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/25/07, Martijn Dashorst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From an incubator point of view, I think having
the sources available
is not yet necessary. Having a clear proposal what
the project is
going to do, and who is going to do it is
This is a proposal to develop a Java-based interface response
capture/playback tool. The full proposal is here:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/JrsProposal
Comments and questions are welcome. We are by no means wedded to the
name JRS and have not yet done name searches, etc. If there are
My only concern is with the name, which is surprisingly and
unfortunately similar to JSR. When I saw the acronym I immediately
thought you were proposing a new Java TM Specification Request.
Actually, if you google java jrs you find things like this: This
project consists in a java JRS-168
Big +1. That kind of tool I would have needed a few months ago... :-)
Best regards
Henning
On Sun, 2007-06-24 at 11:24 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
Java Resource Simulator (JRS) Proposal
[...]
-
To
This is definitely interesting... one of the components in Java Web
Parts[1] is a filter[2] that records incoming requests. Along with that
is an application[3] that can take the output file from this filter and
play it back, which can be used as a poor man's load testing tool.
I'm wondering,
Sounds like a good proposal. I'm +1 on this. I'd also be happy to help
out. It could certainly be useful addition to Synapse as well. Looks
like you have enough mentors, but if at any time you need mentoring
help I'll also be willing to do that.
Paul
On 6/24/07, Phil Steitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Jun 24, 2007, at 8:24 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
This is a proposal to develop a Java-based interface response
capture/playback tool.
Interesting proposal. Seems useful.
Documentation
-
Documentation is available on request. See below.
Initial source
-
On 6/24/07, Leo Simons [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 24, 2007, at 8:24 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
This is a proposal to develop a Java-based interface response
capture/playback tool.
Interesting proposal. Seems useful.
Documentation
-
Documentation is available on
What have others done to workaround the bootstrapping problem for code
that is currently internally licensed / restricted distribution before
the proposal is accepted and a grant can be executed?
My understanding is that whether projects get accepted for incubation
don't have to do much with
On 6/24/07, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What have others done to workaround the bootstrapping problem for code
that is currently internally licensed / restricted distribution before
the proposal is accepted and a grant can be executed?
My understanding is that whether projects
Is this a legal issue (you need clearance) or just a matter of well,
there are a bazillion of wrong/strange/bad license headers with (C)'s
inside that we want to clean up first and need time?
Best regards
Henning
On Sun, 2007-06-24 at 14:28 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
On
On 6/24/07, Henning Schmiedehausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is this a legal issue (you need clearance) or just a matter of well,
there are a bazillion of wrong/strange/bad license headers with (C)'s
inside that we want to clean up first and need time?
We have clearance to execute a code grant
16 matches
Mail list logo
