Hi Daniel,
thanks for your vote, see inline
On 1/15/07, Daniel Kulp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-1 (non-binding)
Issues:
1) We shouldnt' be voting on SNAPSHOT's. We need to be voting on the final
artifacts that will be put in the non-snapshot repository.
is that new ? My understanding is
Looks better..
Although a couple of things :
- No reference to any license in the pom (and therefor not on the generated
site). It's (at least
for me) a piece of vital data. I even heard talk about tooling around that
specific metadata, to be
able to detect eg unacceptable licenses. (probably
Thanks Martin for your feedback here and on our dev_list
I'll address the hopefully last missing pieces and start a vote
thread at the end of the week
-M
On 1/16/07, Martin van den Bemt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looks better..
Although a couple of things :
- No reference to any license in
Hi all,
the Trinidad community voted on and approved to release the the maven2
plugins as a milestone1 release. These plugins are required for the maven2
build of the core code of the Trinidad Podling. To fulfill the incubator
guides, we like to ask you guys, the Incubator PMC, for a permission
-1 (non-binding)
Issues:
1) We shouldnt' be voting on SNAPSHOT's. We need to be voting on the final
artifacts that will be put in the non-snapshot repository.
2) The -sources jars do not have the proper NOTICE, DISCLAIMER, and LICENSE
files in them.
3) Nothing is signed.
4) All the
On 10/27/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
If not, I guess we are not allowed to make a release.
If so, that would be a pity, because we all (the Trinidad podling)
like to go the next step and
if I read the Harmony releated emails right, creating a release is step that
a
Hi,
I am just wondering if there is anything new from here.
Is the vote of Martin now binding or not ?
If not, I guess we are not allowed to make a release.
If so, that would be a pity, because we all (the Trinidad podling)
like to go the next step and
if I read the Harmony releated emails
Became binding yesterday evening :)
Mvgr,
Martin
Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
Hi,
I am just wondering if there is anything new from here.
Is the vote of Martin now binding or not ?
If not, I guess we are not allowed to make a release.
If so, that would be a pity, because we all (the Trinidad
Hi
Congrats to you Martin to be a IPMC member.
So we now can move forward w/ pushing that release out?
But I am still wondering about the attention on this.
Is it just a matter of time and the point, that not really everybody is
using JSF for web apps ?
Thanks!
Matthias
On 10/27/06, Martin
Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
Hi
Congrats to you Martin to be a IPMC member.
So we now can move forward w/ pushing that release out?
Post a vote result and start pushing :)
But I am still wondering about the attention on this.
Is it just a matter of time and the point, that not really
I don't use Trinidad myself (or JSF for that matter), but since you guys
appeared on my radar last
year I actively monitor all myfaces (related) lists. The lack of attention you
are getting on the
incubator list could also be viewed from a positive side : you are, as a
project, handling
Not being noticed doesn't mean you are doing a bad job :)
I tried to find some info about adding a mentor, but couldn't find anything specific, but I guess
just a notification after to the vote to the general should do it (assuming I get voted as a mentor
that is)
Mvgr,
Martin
Matthias
On 10/27/06, Martin van den Bemt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not being noticed doesn't mean you are doing a bad job :)
so do we need to make it bad, to get attention ? :)
I tried to find some info about adding a mentor, but couldn't find anything
specific, but I guess
just a notification after
To summarize there are three votes and that from Martin is not
binding, as far as I understand it.
Only Incubator PMC, right ? Or member is allowed to vote (binding) too?
Thanks,
Matthias
On 10/14/06, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 (binding) on the revised plugins that include
You need to be part of the incubator PMC to have a binding vote. Every member can request to do so
(which I did), but still waiting for the approval..
Mvgr,
Martin
Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
To summarize there are three votes and that from Martin is not
binding, as far as I understand it.
Ok, I see.
you do you have to *revote* again?
or is your old vote a binding vote than?
On 10/16/06, Martin van den Bemt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You need to be part of the incubator PMC to have a binding vote. Every member
can request to do so
(which I did), but still waiting for the
that's fine.
just curious
On 10/16/06, Martin van den Bemt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Don't think I need to revote when I am added to the incubator PMC (which will
take 72 hours after
the board acknowledges my addition).
So if you want to release earlier than that, find another binding +1..
+1 (non-binding)...
-Matthias
On 9/28/06, Martin van den Bemt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1..
Mvgr,
Martin
Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
The Trinidad community voted on and approved to release the the maven2
plugins as a milestone1 release. These plugins are required for the maven2
build of
On 9/28/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Robert, thanks for hooking in.
I am wondering if there are so big concerns by the rest of the Incubator PMC
that there is no vote here.
nope: it's safe to assume that a lack of noise indicates inertia
the only circumstance that i can
The Trinidad community voted on and approved to release the the maven2
plugins as a milestone1 release. These plugins are required for the maven2
build of the core code of the Trinidad Podling. To fulfill the incubator
guides, we like to ask you guys, the Incubator PMC, for a permission to
On 9/26/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Trinidad community voted on and approved to release the the maven2
plugins as a milestone1 release. These plugins are required for the maven2
build of the core code of the Trinidad Podling. To fulfill the incubator
guides, we like to
21 matches
Mail list logo
