On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 10:50AM, Steve Loughran wrote:
> On 28 April 2014 19:19, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 11:18 AM, Henry Saputra
> > wrote:
> > > Congrats and welcome to ASF incubator guys!
> >
> > Indeed! Best of luck growing your community and project!
> >
> > Tha
On 28 April 2014 19:19, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 11:18 AM, Henry Saputra
> wrote:
> > Congrats and welcome to ASF incubator guys!
>
> Indeed! Best of luck growing your community and project!
>
> Thanks,
> Roman.
>
thx, I'll hope to submit stuff into bigtop when possibl
Andrew, Roman, Nick,
thanks for your insights. I can see that some competition within the
incubator can help with advancement of technology, and who knows, Slider
and Twill may have completely different motivations and focus on distinct
aspects of the same problem. I also agree that Slider can hel
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 11:18 AM, Henry Saputra wrote:
> Congrats and welcome to ASF incubator guys!
Indeed! Best of luck growing your community and project!
Thanks,
Roman.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubato
Congrats and welcome to ASF incubator guys!
- Henry
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 10:43 AM, Steve Loughran wrote:
> After the week's voting, here's the results.
>
> Binding +1s:
>
> Arun C Murthy
> Suresh Srinivas
> Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli
> Devaraj Das
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> Jakob Homan
>
> Non-bin
After the week's voting, here's the results.
Binding +1s:
Arun C Murthy
Suresh Srinivas
Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli
Devaraj Das
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Jakob Homan
Non-binding +1s:
P. Taylor Goetz
larry mccay
On and after April 25:
Binding +1s:
Mahadev Konar
Non-binding +1s:
Dilli Arumugam
Edward
On Sun, 27 Apr 2014, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
That's actually a great point. The way I look at it is this: there's
nothing wrong with an alternative healthy community, but it has to be
healthy. So I guess what I'm really saying is this: it may behove us to
double click into the health of communi
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 12:20 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote:
> Not necessarily in this case (I do not know), sometimes I wonder if
> incubation proposals having significant overlap with existing projects are
> simply a shorter path to getting up and running on the desired objectives
> instead of joinin
+1 (non binding)
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 10:01 PM, Steve Loughran wrote:
> I'd like to call a vote on accepting Slider into the incubator
>
>
> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/SliderProposal
>
> [ ] +1 Accept Slider into the Incubator
> [ ] +0 Indifferent to the acceptance of Slider
> [ ] -1 Do
Based on prior experience I'd say the Members take a liberal attitude to
duplication of efforts. There are pros and cons. "Constructive competition"
versus siloing and dissipation of the potential of a common community.
Given what I've read on this thread I hope ultimately Twill, Helix, and
Slider,
-0 (non-binding).
Slider has a lot of good ideas and features and there is no doubt it has
significant value. Yet I do think that there is large overlap between
Slider and recently incubated Twill. The Twill community has repeatedly
offered collaboration and/or convergence of Twill and Slider into
+1 (non binding)
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 11:14 AM, Mahadev Konar wrote:
> +1 (binding).
>
> Mahadev Konar
> Hortonworks Inc.
> http://hortonworks.com/
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 7:39 PM, larry mccay
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> > On Apr 17, 2014 9:02 AM, "Steve Loughran"
> wrote:
> >
>
+1 (binding).
Mahadev Konar
Hortonworks Inc.
http://hortonworks.com/
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 7:39 PM, larry mccay wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
> On Apr 17, 2014 9:02 AM, "Steve Loughran" wrote:
>
> > I'd like to call a vote on accepting Slider into the incubator
> >
> >
> > https://wiki.apache.o
+1 (non-binding)
On Apr 17, 2014 9:02 AM, "Steve Loughran" wrote:
> I'd like to call a vote on accepting Slider into the incubator
>
>
> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/SliderProposal
>
> [ ] +1 Accept Slider into the Incubator
> [ ] +0 Indifferent to the acceptance of Slider
> [ ] -1 Do not ac
+1 binding. Let me know if I can help.
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 5:44 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> Yeah, I'm eager to see Slider in the incubator !
>
> Regards
> JB
>
>
> On 04/24/2014 01:32 PM, Steve Loughran wrote:
>
>> thanks -I hope to be filing work against your name shortly
>>
>
> --
>
Yeah, I'm eager to see Slider in the incubator !
Regards
JB
On 04/24/2014 01:32 PM, Steve Loughran wrote:
thanks -I hope to be filing work against your name shortly
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
---
On 24 April 2014 07:47, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> As I said for Hoya, I'm in as a mentor if you need.
>
> Regards
> JB
thanks -I hope to be filing work against your name shortly
--
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or en
+1 (binding)
As I said for Hoya, I'm in as a mentor if you need.
Regards
JB
On 04/23/2014 08:32 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
+1 (binding)
thanks,
Arun
On Apr 17, 2014, at 6:01 AM, Steve Loughran wrote:
I'd like to call a vote on accepting Slider into the incubator
https://wiki.apache.org/in
+1 (binding)
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 6:01 AM, Steve Loughran wrote:
> I'd like to call a vote on accepting Slider into the incubator
>
>
> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/SliderProposal
>
> [ ] +1 Accept Slider into the Incubator
> [ ] +0 Indifferent to the acceptance of Slider
> [ ] -1 Do not
This is a great addition to the Hadoop YARN ecosystem.
Hoping the name doesn't conflict with any existing software, here's my +1.
Thanks,
+Vinod
On Apr 17, 2014, at 6:01 AM, Steve Loughran wrote:
> I'd like to call a vote on accepting Slider into the incubator
>
>
> https://wiki.apache.org/i
Tx Chip/Suresh. I'd join IPMC if needed.
+Vinod
On Apr 17, 2014, at 6:52 AM, Chip Childers wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 9:36 AM, Suresh Marru wrote:
>> Champion on this proposal Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli doesn't seem to be on the
>> IPMC but since he is a member its just a customary to ask
+1 (non-binding)
-Taylor
> On Apr 17, 2014, at 9:01 AM, Steve Loughran wrote:
>
> I'd like to call a vote on accepting Slider into the incubator
>
>
> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/SliderProposal
>
> [ ] +1 Accept Slider into the Incubator
> [ ] +0 Indifferent to the acceptance of Slider
+1 (binding)
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 6:01 AM, Steve Loughran wrote:
> I'd like to call a vote on accepting Slider into the incubator
>
>
> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/SliderProposal
>
> [ ] +1 Accept Slider into the Incubator
> [ ] +0 Indifferent to the acceptance of Slider
> [ ] -1 Do not
+1 (binding)
thanks,
Arun
On Apr 17, 2014, at 6:01 AM, Steve Loughran wrote:
> I'd like to call a vote on accepting Slider into the incubator
>
>
> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/SliderProposal
>
> [ ] +1 Accept Slider into the Incubator
> [ ] +0 Indifferent to the acceptance of Slider
>
Hi Steve,
As a Apache Twill committer, I want to call out the inaccuracy about
Apache Twill in the "Relationship with Apache Twill" section. In
specific, about the two key differentiators that you mentioned.
1. Long live static application. Twill has no assumption about how
long an application ru
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 9:36 AM, Suresh Marru wrote:
> Champion on this proposal Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli doesn't seem to be on the
> IPMC but since he is a member its just a customary to ask and get inducted.
>
> Can this be addressed?
As I read [1], thats only really necessary if he wants to be
Champion on this proposal Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli doesn't seem to be on the
IPMC but since he is a member its just a customary to ask and get inducted.
Can this be addressed?
Suresh
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 9:01 AM, Steve Loughran wrote:
> I'd like to call a vote on accepting Slider into the in
I'd like to call a vote on accepting Slider into the incubator
https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/SliderProposal
[ ] +1 Accept Slider into the Incubator
[ ] +0 Indifferent to the acceptance of Slider
[ ] -1 Do not accept Slider because …
The vote will be open until Thursday April 24 13:00 UTC
28 matches
Mail list logo
