On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 9:48 AM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com
wrote:
So we now have Sentry artifacts being distributed which have not been
approved
by the full Incubator PMC. A similar situation with another project was
once
resolved by having the full PMC vote on the
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 5:26 AM, Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net wrote:
On Sun, May 10, 2015, at 03:20 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
Apache Sentry
This one looks like a problem. A vote was taken for Sentry 1.5.0 on the
podling dev list, but there has been no vote on general@incubator.
Was this vote ever resolved?
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 11:21 AM Marko Rodriguez okramma...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello,
Make sure to include a voting record, not just the summary votes. It
helps
to point at a single result e-mail to see everyone who voted, rather than
having to dig through
On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 6:05 AM, John D. Ament john.d.am...@gmail.com wrote:
svn log -v -r {2015-04-01}:HEAD
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator
I'm noticing that a lot of unapproved releases are ending up in here.
These are the ones I've identified, with no matching result
On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 10:02 PM Marko Rodriguez okramma...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello,
The vote for Apache TinkerPop 3.0.0.M8-incubating is now closed with a
final tally of:
+1 (3) -- 0 (0) -- -1 (0)
Make sure to include a voting record, not just the summary votes. It helps
to point
Hello,
Make sure to include a voting record, not just the summary votes. It helps
to point at a single result e-mail to see everyone who voted, rather than
having to dig through the thread.
Understood. The URL to the bottom of the [VOTE] thread is here:
Hello,
The vote for Apache TinkerPop 3.0.0.M8-incubating is now closed with a final
tally of:
+1 (3) -- 0 (0) -- -1 (0)
Thank you everyone for helping to get TinkerPop 3.0.0.M8 out. We will push to
Central Repo on Monday.
Take care,
Marko.
http://markorodriguez.com
On Apr 25, 2015,
Signature file good
Hashes file good
LICENSE file good
NOTICE file exists and GOOD
No 3rd part executables in source package.
+1 binding
Good job
- Henry
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Marko Rodriguez okramma...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello everyone,
We need one more +1 vote to release. A
Hello everyone,
We need one more +1 vote to release. A review would be much appreciated.
Thank you,
Marko.
http://markorodriguez.com
On Apr 23, 2015, at 6:31 PM, Matt Franklin m.ben.frank...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 binding
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 10:03 PM Justin Mclean
+1 binding
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 10:03 PM Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.com
wrote:
Hi,
(sending again as sent from wrong address first time)
+1 binding
For the source release I checked:
- incubating in artifact name
- signatures and hashes good
- LICENSE and NOTICE ok
- All
Hello,
Thanks for voting Justin. Appreciate it.
- I'm still not sure of the reason why some of the artefacts are named
gremlin rather than tinkerpop
TinkerPop is the project as a whole. Within TinkerPop, there are various
components.
gremlin-core
gremlin-groovy
Hi,
+1 binding
For the source release I checked:
- incubating in artifact name
- signatures and hashes good
- LICENSE and NOTICE ok
- All source files have Apache headers
- No unexpected binary files
- Still can’t compile from source but it tells me I have wrong java version
- most of the issues
Hi,
(sending again as sent from wrong address first time)
+1 binding
For the source release I checked:
- incubating in artifact name
- signatures and hashes good
- LICENSE and NOTICE ok
- All source files have Apache headers
- No unexpected binary files
- Still can’t compile from source but it
Hello,
Apache TinkerPop (http://tinkerpop.incubator.apache.org/) would like to release
TinkerPop 3.0.0.M8-incubating. We had a dev@ VOTE which resulted in a tally of
+1 (3), 0 (0), and -1 (0). We now present our artifacts for vote by Incubator.
The dev@ [VOTE] thread can be found here:
14 matches
Mail list logo
