William,
Thank you for verification and votes. Will certainly optimize LICENSE
in the next release.
Thanks,
Makoto
2018-03-05 12:02 GMT+09:00 Willem Jiang :
> Hi,
>
> I just checked smile and jafama projects they don't have the NOTICE file.
> Their License files are standard Apache license (ALv2
Hi,
I just checked smile and jafama projects they don't have the NOTICE file.
Their License files are standard Apache license (ALv2), we can optimize it
in next release.
Here is my +1(binding) for the release kit.
Willem Jiang
Blog: http://willemjiang.blogspot.com (English)
http://jn
Hi,
> We included exact copies of LICENSE file of depending projects.
> We can alternatively use LICENSE.ASLv2 Instead of using exact copies
> (if there are no diffs).
Yes the standard Apache license (ALv2) has the same text so no need to include
it multiple time if that is the case. [1] Note ho
Hi Willem,
We included exact copies of LICENSE file of depending projects.
We can alternatively use LICENSE.ASLv2 Instead of using exact copies
(if there are no diffs).
It's up to you in my understanding.
Thanks,
Makoto
2018-03-03 22:40 GMT+09:00 Willem Jiang :
> Hi，
>
> I found the License fil
Hi，
I found the License files (LICENSE-jafama.txt and LICENSE-smile) are both
standate ASLV2, they are the same with LICENSE file. Do we still need to
ship them separately? Can we just using the LICENSE file directly?
Willem Jiang
Blog: http://willemjiang.blogspot.com (English)
http
Justin,
Thank you for verification!
Will certainly fix `font-awesome.css` issue in the next release.
Makoto
2018-03-03 12:40 GMT+09:00 Justin Mclean :
> Hi,
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> I checked:
> - incubating in name
> - signatures and hashes correct
> - disclaimer exists
> - LICENSE and NOTICE good
Hi,
+1 (binding)
I checked:
- incubating in name
- signatures and hashes correct
- disclaimer exists
- LICENSE and NOTICE good
- all source files have ASF headers
- no unexpected binary files
I noticed a minor issue is that LICENSE is missing the MIT license for this
file [1]
Thanks,
Justin
1
Hi IPMC members,
It's already 72 hours passed.
We need two more votes from IPMC members.
Could anyone in IPMC volunteer help verifying our release?
With a prepared docker image, just type the following commands to run Rat check:
$ docker run -it hivemall/verify:v0.5.0-rc3
$ wget
https://d
+1
On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 5:20 PM, Makoto Yui wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I created a docker image [1,2] to verify release artifacts.
>
> Just run the following command to verify a release artifact.
>
> # 1). run a docker image
> $ docker run -it hivemall/verify:v0.5.0-rc3
>
> # 2). download Hivemall rel
Hi,
I created a docker image [1,2] to verify release artifacts.
Just run the following command to verify a release artifact.
# 1). run a docker image
$ docker run -it hivemall/verify:v0.5.0-rc3
# 2). download Hivemall release artifacts, build, and run unit tests.
$ ./build_from_src.sh
We need
Hi all,
The Apache Hivemall community has approved a proposal to release
Apache Hivemall v0.5.0
by v0.5.0 Release Candidate 3.
We now kindly request that the Incubator PMC members review and vote
on this incubator release candidate.
The PPMC vote thread is located here:
https://www.mail-arch
11 matches
Mail list logo
