[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache PredictionIO 0.11.0 (incubating) RC2

The vote passes with: +1's Andrew Purtell (binding) John D. Ament (binding) Luciano Resende (binding) Pat Ferrel (non-binding) No other votes. RAT issues is tracked by https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIO-62. Thanks everyone! Regards, Donald On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 10:11 AM, Andrew

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PredictionIO 0.11.0 (incubating) RC2

No, you are free to make this release provided there is an issue tracking the RAT check failures and a promise to fix them for the next release. > On Apr 23, 2017, at 8:50 AM, Pat Ferrel wrote: > > Many thanks! > > I for one was not aware we could change an RC

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PredictionIO 0.11.0 (incubating) RC2

Many thanks! I for one was not aware we could change an RC without a podling vote, which seems better in any case. These issues will be fixed asap in master and the live site. On Apr 22, 2017, at 6:28 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote: I was just trying to get something

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PredictionIO 0.11.0 (incubating) RC2

I was just trying to get something moving. Glad to see it. +1 (binding) > On Apr 22, 2017, at 6:24 PM, Luciano Resende wrote: > > Sure, I am ok having this become blocker if its still an issue on the next > release. > > Here is my +1 the . > >> On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PredictionIO 0.11.0 (incubating) RC2

Sure, I am ok having this become blocker if its still an issue on the next release. Here is my +1 the . On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 4:49 PM John D. Ament wrote: > In general, the preference is to report the non-blocking issue, and confirm > the podling has it entered into

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PredictionIO 0.11.0 (incubating) RC2

In general, the preference is to report the non-blocking issue, and confirm the podling has it entered into their bug tracker. Then they accept the +1. We don't generally wait for a code change to be made, but would block the next release if these issues are not addressed. I personally want to

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PredictionIO 0.11.0 (incubating) RC2

I will too, and then you will have two binding votes in the affirmative. > On Apr 22, 2017, at 12:34 PM, Luciano Resende wrote: > >> On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 12:14 PM, Pat Ferrel wrote: >> >> But is it worth doing yet another podling RC and

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PredictionIO 0.11.0 (incubating) RC2

On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 12:14 PM, Pat Ferrel wrote: > But is it worth doing yet another podling RC and release vote? > > If it is, please vote -1, at least we won’t be left waiting and we thank > you for being the one who took a look either way. > > We are just trying to

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PredictionIO 0.11.0 (incubating) RC2

But is it worth doing yet another podling RC and release vote? If it is, please vote -1, at least we won’t be left waiting and we thank you for being the one who took a look either way. We are just trying to move, out if possible or iterate if not. These issues have not changed from the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PredictionIO 0.11.0 (incubating) RC2

I would feel ok voting positively once these are fixed in master. On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 1:00 PM, Donald Szeto wrote: > Hi Luciano, > > Thanks for your review. I will file JIRAs regarding these files. They are > project build files and documentation. > > Regards, > Donald >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PredictionIO 0.11.0 (incubating) RC2

There have been no binding votes, thanks. On Apr 22, 2017, at 11:31 AM, Joe Schaefer wrote: How many binding votes do you need at this point? On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 12:34 PM Pat Ferrel wrote: > +1 non-binding > > Next release we could exclude the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PredictionIO 0.11.0 (incubating) RC2

How many binding votes do you need at this point? On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 12:34 PM Pat Ferrel wrote: > +1 non-binding > > Next release we could exclude the doc site. Do build files like .sbt > require licenses? I suppose it can be done in comments. But again can we > push

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PredictionIO 0.11.0 (incubating) RC2

+1 non-binding Next release we could exclude the doc site. Do build files like .sbt require licenses? I suppose it can be done in comments. But again can we push to next release? Can other binding voters have a look? I know everyone is busy but hey, tax day is past ;-) On Apr 18, 2017, at

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PredictionIO 0.11.0 (incubating) RC2

Hi Luciano, Thanks for your review. I will file JIRAs regarding these files. They are project build files and documentation. Regards, Donald On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 1:29 PM, Luciano Resende wrote: > On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 11:41 AM, Donald Szeto

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PredictionIO 0.11.0 (incubating) RC2

On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 11:41 AM, Donald Szeto wrote: > Hi all, > > The PredictionIO community has voted that 0.11.0-incubating-rc2 to be good > for a source-only release. This thread is to facilitate a voting for the > IPMC before a final official source-only release. > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PredictionIO 0.11.0 (incubating) RC2

Hi all, This is a friendly reminder for the release voting of Apache PredictionIO 0.11.0-incubating-rc2. The voting will stay open until there are enough votes for acceptance or rejection. Regards, Donald On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 11:41 AM, Donald Szeto wrote: > Hi all, > >

[VOTE] Release Apache PredictionIO 0.11.0 (incubating) RC2

Hi all, The PredictionIO community has voted that 0.11.0-incubating-rc2 to be good for a source-only release. This thread is to facilitate a voting for the IPMC before a final official source-only release. Vote result on dev@: