[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache brpc (Incubating) 0.9.7-rc03

2020-02-27 Thread tan zhongyi
Hi all, The vote to release Apache brpc (incubating) 0.9.7-rc03 has passed with 3 +1 binding votes and no -1 votes. +1 votes from: - Justin Mclean (binding) - Von Gosling (binding) - Willem Jiang (binding) Voting Thread:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache brpc(incubating) 0.9.7-rc03

2020-02-27 Thread tan zhongyi
Thanks, We got 3 +1(binding) from Justin, Willem, Von, and no -1. So I will close this vote as Pass. 在 2020/2/27 下午7:49,“Willem Jiang” 写入: +1. I checked - Download links are valid. - Checksums and PGP signature are valid. - DISCLAIMER file is included. - Both

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache brpc(incubating) 0.9.7-rc03

2020-02-27 Thread Willem Jiang
+1. I checked - Download links are valid. - Checksums and PGP signature are valid. - DISCLAIMER file is included. - Both LICENSE and NOTICE files are just fine, there is an known issue(#1045). - No binary file. Willem Jiang Twitter: willemjiang Weibo: 姜宁willem On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 9:19 PM

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache brpc(incubating) 0.9.7-rc03

2020-02-23 Thread Tan,Zhongyi
Hi, willem, Here it is. https://github.com/apache/incubator-brpc/issues/1045 在 2020/2/22 下午8:57,“Willem Jiang” 写入: Please create an issue to check this problem. We need to address it in the next release. Willem Jiang Twitter: willemjiang Weibo: 姜宁willem

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache brpc(incubating) 0.9.7-rc03

2020-02-23 Thread Tan,Zhongyi
Yeah, I will do that to address this problem。 在 2020/2/22 下午8:57,“Willem Jiang” 写入: Please create an issue to check this problem. We need to address it in the next release. Willem Jiang Twitter: willemjiang Weibo: 姜宁willem On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 5:21 PM

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache brpc(incubating) 0.9.7-rc03

2020-02-23 Thread tan zhongyi
Thanks, justin. Any more feedback? 在 2020/2/21 上午9:39,“Justin Mclean” 写入: Hi, +1 (binding) I checked: - incubating in name - signatures and hashes are fine - DISCLAIMER exists (WIP version) - LICENSE and NOTICE are good - No unexpected binary files

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache brpc(incubating) 0.9.7-rc03

2020-02-22 Thread Willem Jiang
Please create an issue to check this problem. We need to address it in the next release. Willem Jiang Twitter: willemjiang Weibo: 姜宁willem On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 5:21 PM tan zhongyi wrote: > > Yes, we will fix these issues later, > so we add WIP disclaimer as Justin suggested. > Thanks > > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache brpc(incubating) 0.9.7-rc03

2020-02-21 Thread vongosling
Hi, +1 (binding) I checked: - signatures and hashes fine - LICENSE and NOTICE is basically ok(there is still a category b dependency in the source code) - All necessary files have license headers To Willem Jiang, the problem I listed last time was the main license issue(category X should be

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache brpc(incubating) 0.9.7-rc03

2020-02-21 Thread tan zhongyi
Yes, we will fix these issues later, so we add WIP disclaimer as Justin suggested. Thanks 在 2020/2/19 下午7:36,“Justin Mclean” 写入: Hi, > From my understanding, for the CDDL license and LGPL license > dependencies, if we don't modify the code, it should be fine. You

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache brpc(incubating) 0.9.7-rc03

2020-02-20 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, +1 (binding) I checked: - incubating in name - signatures and hashes are fine - DISCLAIMER exists (WIP version) - LICENSE and NOTICE are good - No unexpected binary files (although it is unusual to see .pttx files) - All source files have ASF headers - the source file could be better

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache brpc(incubating) 0.9.7-rc03

2020-02-19 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > From my understanding, for the CDDL license and LGPL license > dependencies, if we don't modify the code, it should be fine. You can’t have a category X dependancy unless it’s optional. So GPL or LGPL dependancies are in general not allowed. See [1] Thanks, Justin 1.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache brpc(incubating) 0.9.7-rc03

2020-02-19 Thread Willem Jiang
Hi Gosling, Could you share more detail for the third party dependencies license issue? We need to look into the library for the license issue. >From my understanding, for the CDDL license and LGPL license dependencies, if we don't modify the code, it should be fine. Willem Jiang Twitter:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache brpc(incubating) 0.9.7-rc03

2020-02-17 Thread Gosling Von
Hi Some reasonable feedback from the Justin since last 0.9.7-rc2 version: - the artefact names must include "incubating “ but this can be easily fixed and the voting doesn’t need to restarted (if this was the only issue) - but it also contains category B code [2] under the CDDL license. - and it

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache brpc(incubating) 0.9.7-rc03

2020-02-17 Thread tan zhongyi
Hi, any feedback for this ? 在 2020/2/12 下午9:19,“tan zhongyi” 写入: Hi, guys, I am pleased to be calling this vote for the release of Apache brpc (incubating) 0.9.7-rc03 (it goes to vote in incubator mail list at last.) BTW: there is still some license issues to be

[VOTE] Release Apache brpc(incubating) 0.9.7-rc03

2020-02-12 Thread tan zhongyi
Hi, guys, I am pleased to be calling this vote for the release of Apache brpc (incubating) 0.9.7-rc03 (it goes to vote in incubator mail list at last.) BTW: there is still some license issues to be fixed, so we add DISCLAIMER-WIP there, we will fix them in later releases. Apache brpc