On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 3:29 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
...This is a bit of a mess
Yeah - I wish projects would just refer to
http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html and
http://www.apache.org/foundation/glossary.html and avoid duplicating
that information.
-Bertrand
On 19 November 2013 08:29, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 4:03 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 9 November 2013 12:17, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.com wrote:
...
My guess is that Lazy Majority is used because Majority implies more than
50%
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 4:03 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 9 November 2013 12:17, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.com wrote:
...
My guess is that Lazy Majority is used because Majority implies more than
50% of possible voters need to vote.
My guess is that it is a misprint for Lazy
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 4:03 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 9 November 2013 12:17, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.com wrote:
...
My guess is that Lazy Majority is used because Majority implies more
than 50% of possible voters need to vote.
My guess
Hi David,
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 9:52 AM, David Crossley cross...@apache.org wrote:
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
...lazy majority is mentioned at
http://ant.apache.org/bylaws.html but I didn't know there was such a
concept in our projects.
Many projects use it. See this Google search:
well that type of lazy majority is really a majority of binding votes
cast with a quorum which differs from majority of binding votes cast,
majority of votes cast and quorum (i.e. the needs 3x+1 to release...
because remember you cannot veto releases ;-) though only a fool of a
release manager
On 9 November 2013 12:17, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.com wrote:
Hi,
Is there such a concept as Lazy Majority ?
Yes many Apache projects define it (eg Ant, Kafka, Hadoop, Pig, Hive and
others ) as does Apache HTTP. [1]
Lazy majority decides each issue in the release plan.
The phrase
Hi,
Every American that has voted for a public office
knows that winning the majority has nothing to do
with the total population of potential voters.
Where I'm from voting is compulsory so it has a different meaning.
Thanks,
Justin
Well I can assure you it’s NOT compulsory at Apache ;-).
On Nov 10, 2013, at 3:54 PM, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.com wrote:
Hi,
Every American that has voted for a public office
knows that winning the majority has nothing to do
with the total population of potential voters.
Where
Hi,
Is there such a concept as Lazy Majority ?
Yes many Apache projects define it (eg Ant, Kafka, Hadoop, Pig, Hive and others
) as does Apache HTTP. [1]
Lazy majority decides each issue in the release plan.
Different projects however use different terms, as far as I can see Lazy
Majority
Every American that has voted for a public office
knows that winning the majority has nothing to do
with the total population of potential voters. Let’s
not try to rationalize geekdom’s love affair with
special purpose terminology- my own pet peeve is
what the java world did to the word
On Sat, Nov 9, 2013, at 07:06 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
Hi,
Someday I will get back to improving the Voting and Glossary pages, but
meanwhile, the Apache Flex PMC is still trying to construct a set of
bylaws and we are currently discussing whether there is a difference
between Majority
On 9 November 2013 07:06, Alex Harui aha...@adobe.com wrote:
Hi,
Someday I will get back to improving the Voting and Glossary pages, but
meanwhile, the Apache Flex PMC is still trying to construct a set of
bylaws and we are currently discussing whether there is a difference
between Majority
Hi,
Someday I will get back to improving the Voting and Glossary pages, but
meanwhile, the Apache Flex PMC is still trying to construct a set of
bylaws and we are currently discussing whether there is a difference
between Majority Approval which is in the Glossary and Lazy Majority
which isn't,
14 matches
Mail list logo
