+1 too
/Olivier
2011/5/3 Lukasz Lenart :
> +1 for JIRA space and issues@commons.a.o
>
>
> Kind regards
> --
> Łukasz
> + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
> Warszawa JUG conference - Confitura http://confitura.pl/
>
> -
>
+1 for JIRA space and issues@commons.a.o
Kind regards
--
Łukasz
+ 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
Warszawa JUG conference - Confitura http://confitura.pl/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.
Committer votes happen on the PMC list. There won't be an OGNL PMC -
so I don't see this as losing a power over their own affairs. It's not
a power they begin with.
When OGNL is deemed ready by the Incubator, (ie: Incubator PMC has
voted to graduate it), the Commons PMC would vote to accept the co
wrote:
>>>>> just for the record (for the new contributors). As long as your
>>>>> incubating the following rules apply:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/ppmc.html
>>>>>
>>>>> At the time you g
uberg wrote:
>>>> just for the record (for the new contributors). As long as your incubating
>>>> the following rules apply:
>>>>
>>>> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/ppmc.html
>>>>
>>>> At the time you grad
your incubating
>>> the following rules apply:
>>>
>>> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/ppmc.html
>>>
>>> At the time you graduate you need to check who really was active and
>>> 'cleanup' the PPMC. So not every person which was o
who really was active and
>> 'cleanup' the PPMC. So not every person which was on the PPMC automatically
>> makes it to the final PMC anyway ...
>>
>> LieGrue,
>> strub
>>
>> --- On Mon, 5/2/11, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>>
>>>
So not every person which was on the PPMC automatically
> makes it to the final PMC anyway ...
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
> --- On Mon, 5/2/11, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>
>> From: Olivier Lamy
>> Subject: Re: OGNL Infrastructure questions
>> To: general@incubator.
omatically makes it to
the final PMC anyway ...
LieGrue,
strub
--- On Mon, 5/2/11, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> From: Olivier Lamy
> Subject: Re: OGNL Infrastructure questions
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Date: Monday, May 2, 2011, 7:11 AM
> +1
>
>
>
> 2011/5/2 Chr
+1
2011/5/2 Christian Grobmeier :
>> My issue (for the commons PMC I guess) is how committer votes will
>> happen when OGNL graduates.
>>
>> After graduation, how would one of the current contributors propose a
>> new committer if they are not themselves on the Commons PMC?
>
> Proposal:
>
> - I
Hi Christian!!!
it makes a lot of sense, IMHO, it should maintain the stability of
both ecosystems!
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 8:26 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>> My issue (for the commons PMC I guess) is how committer votes w
> My issue (for the commons PMC I guess) is how committer votes will
> happen when OGNL graduates.
>
> After graduation, how would one of the current contributors propose a
> new committer if they are not themselves on the Commons PMC?
Proposal:
- If you are a Commons PMC Member, you are an OGNL
Hi Simone,
My issue (for the commons PMC I guess) is how committer votes will
happen when OGNL graduates.
After graduation, how would one of the current contributors propose a
new committer if they are not themselves on the Commons PMC?
Upayavira
On Sun, 01 May 2011 19:56 +0200, "Simone Tripodi
Hi Upayavira!!!
I agree that commons folks can have rw rights, so people are already
used to co-work in the 'commons way'.
Moreover, I agreed on joining
- dev@commons.a.o
- users@commons.a.o
- issues@commons.a.o
- create the private ML where commons PMCs can join.
Does it make sense?
Simo
http:/
use commons-user: +1
put SVN in 'incubator' space: +1
grant "commons rw: +1 (assuming current OGNL committers agree)
As to a private list, I think the benefit would be the opportunity for
the OGNL committers to learn how such management happens. Where, for
example, would committer votes happen? Th
Agreed, no need to use the svn location from Commons; though I ask to
allow @commons rw access.
The committer of the podling would not automatically become PMC
members, so I don't think there is a need to setup a private list (or
even to consider it a PPMC).
Hen
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 11:05 PM,
2011/4/29 Christian Grobmeier
> For SVN I don't see a benefit. The repos can be moved with less effort
> once component is graduated. I would like to avoid to get something
> into the sandbox which is not cleared from legal perspective. What, if
> OGNL fails in the incubator and we just forget to
> we could share MLs and also SVN (Sandbox
> would be nice, not?)
MLs are fine, b/c one would need to change address later, and
searching for pre-graduation threads is more easily.
For SVN I don't see a benefit. The repos can be moved with less effort
once component is graduated. I would like to
Hi Henri!
thanks for following up the conversation! I agree that joining the
existing Commons infra would simplify the process to graduate OGNL as
a proper Commons component, we could share MLs and also SVN (Sandbox
would be nice, not?)
What Incubator PMCs think about it?
Simo
http://people.apache
Below is a thread from the Commons Dev list in which I'm recommending
that OGNL use the commons dev mailing list and that the svn
permissions allow the ognl committers and the commons committers to
have read write access.
http://commons.markmail.org/thread/ku3ouuilpiicb5is
Is this a concern f
20 matches
Mail list logo
