Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator

+1(binding) Best Regards --- Apache DolphinScheduler PMC Chair & Apache SeaTunnel PPMC David Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/davidzollo Twitter: @WorkflowEasy --- On Thu, Sep 1, 2022 at 12:15 AM tison wrote: > Thanks for your

Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator

Thanks for your participation! I'm closing this voting thread now and summarizing the result. Best, tison. Jiafeng.Zhang 于2022年8月31日周三 22:12写道： > +1 (non-binding) > Good luck! > > Jiafeng.Zhang > Email: jiafengzh...@apache.org > > Jia Fan 于2022年8月31日 周三18:38写道： > > > +1 (non-binding) > > Good

Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding) Good luck! Jiafeng.Zhang Email: jiafengzh...@apache.org Jia Fan 于2022年8月31日 周三18:38写道： > +1 (non-binding) > Good luck! > > hulk 于2022年8月31日周三 16:28写道： > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > Good luck! > > > > On Wed, 31 Aug 2022 at 16:26, Stephan Ewen wrote: > > > > > +1 (binding) >

Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding) Good luck! hulk 于2022年8月31日周三 16:28写道： > +1 (non-binding) > > Good luck! > > On Wed, 31 Aug 2022 at 16:26, Stephan Ewen wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > Thank you for kicking off this interesting project! > > > > Best of luck with the project! > > > > On 2022/08/24 03:55:26

Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding) Good luck! On Wed, 31 Aug 2022 at 16:26, Stephan Ewen wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Thank you for kicking off this interesting project! > > Best of luck with the project! > > On 2022/08/24 03:55:26 tison wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Following up on the [DISCUSS] thread on

Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) Thank you for kicking off this interesting project! Best of luck with the project! On 2022/08/24 03:55:26 tison wrote: > Hi all, > > Following up on the [DISCUSS] thread on StreamPark[1], I would like to call > a VOTE to accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator, please check

RE: [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding) - good luck! Dominik -Original Message- From: Yu Xiao Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2022 1:25 PM To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator + 1 non-binding Best wishes! Yu Xiao Apache ShenYu 俊平堵 于2022年8月30日周二 14

Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator

+ 1 non-binding Best wishes! Yu Xiao Apache ShenYu 俊平堵 于2022年8月30日周二 14:33写道： > > +1 (binding). Good luck! > > tison 于2022年8月24日周三 11:56写道： > > > Hi all, > > > > Following up on the [DISCUSS] thread on StreamPark[1], I would like to call > > a VOTE to accept StreamPark into the Apache

Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding). Good luck! tison 于2022年8月24日周三 11:56写道： > Hi all, > > Following up on the [DISCUSS] thread on StreamPark[1], I would like to call > a VOTE to accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator, please check out the > StreamPark Proposal from the incubator wiki[2]. > > Please cast your

Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator

+1 I feel the same with Willem that we have almost finished an incubator release :) Thanks. Willem Jiang 于2022年8月30日周二 11:00写道： > > +1 binding. > After reviewing the latest proposal and third party License issue. > I have a feeling we can do the first incubator release quickly. > > Willem Jiang

Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator

+1 binding. After reviewing the latest proposal and third party License issue. I have a feeling we can do the first incubator release quickly. Willem Jiang Twitter: willemjiang Weibo: 姜宁willem On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 11:56 AM tison wrote: > > Hi all, > > Following up on the [DISCUSS] thread on

Re: Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator

The voting thread looks fragmented in some mail clients (like Gmail). I'd like to make a summary of the current state so that we don't deadlock here: +1 bindings: Thomas Weise Ted Liu +1 non-bindings: Zhuoyu Chen Qingrong wang shaokang lv benjobs Sherlock Homles hulk Jiafeng.Zhang 郭宁 Kelu Tao

Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator

Hi, +1 (binding) - best of luck! Kind Regards, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) Best, tison. Liu Ted 于2022年8月24日周三 23:08写道： > +1 (binding) > Best regards,, > > Ted Liu > > 2022 年 8 月 24 日周三 21:12，Thomas Weise 写道： +1 (binding) > > Thanks, > Thomas > > > On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 3:08 AM Kelu Tao wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > Good Luck! > > > > On

Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator

A few additional comments here: 1. As Justin said, you can select which one you want to choose (and ALv2 is a good choice!). Some projects take extra measures to explicitly state which of the two options they elect. 2. The ALv2 + LGPL option is common, primarily to accommodate projects under

Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator

Hi, > hi，In the process of sorting through all the X class dependencies, we found > that many of them are dual protocol, for example > > org.codehaus.jackson:jackson-xc is dual-licensed. > 1) GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL), Version 2.1 > 2) The Apache Software License, Version 2.0

Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator

@Justin Mclean hi，In the process of sorting through all the X class dependencies, we found that many of them are dual protocol, for example org.codehaus.jackson:jackson-xc is dual-licensed. 1) GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL), Version 2.1 2) The Apache Software License, Version 2.0 How

Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator

Hi Zhuoyu, The mailing list cannot render images embedded. You can attach the file or send a link to CDN for images. If it's a screenshot for some content, you can just paste the content which is better for reading and (partial) referencing. Best, tison. 陈卓宇 于2022年8月29日周一 11:27写道： > The

Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator

The Streampark development community reacted quickly to the compliance issues and now looks to have converged on completion, which is something we should see. [image: 图片.png] Justin Mclean 于2022年8月29日周一 10:45写道： > Hi, > > There is no issue in having a project that does something similar as >

Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator

Hi, There is no issue in having a project that does something similar as another project, that in itself is no reason to vote -1. It is useful to discuss overlap and perhaps work out were projects could complement each other or even if possible reuse code. Kind Regards, Justin

Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator

@tksonjk tk What is the logic of merging products that have the same functionality? You make a search product and you ask Google search to go merge with your project? tksonjk tk 于2022年8月29日周一 01:30写道： > -1, > > @tison, sorry, I can't get your point, please describe it again. how does > it

Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator

hi Dave Fisher，[image: 图片.png] The streampark development community was quick to respond and address this, which is something we should see. Dave Fisher 于2022年8月29日周一 05:00写道： > Hi Julian, > > This is very true. I’m also dismayed by -1 votes based on not yet having > explicit plans on removing

Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator

@Zur Aviem 1. first streampark do is the fact that computing operations support functions, while Apache InLongt is a data integration framework. Data integration and operation and maintenance support are completely different areas 2. The growth of a software product can not be separated from the

Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator

Thanks for your reply :) I second what Julian and Dave said. IIRC in the Uniffle proposal, Justin had a similar statement[1]. StreamPark has its own users and the developers want to build a better community around it under sponsoring and mentoring of the Apache Incubator. This is good and why

Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator

Hi Julian, This is very true. I’m also dismayed by -1 votes based on not yet having explicit plans on removing LGPL/GPL dependencies. Following Apache Release policy is a to do to learn during Incubation. The real question is if the community accepts that their release cycle will be slowed.

Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator

A few people on this thread are voting -1 with the rationale that StreamPark is similar to existing projects. This is not a valid reason. Apache does not try to ensure that projects don't overlap. The 'community over code' mantra holds true: Apache does not pick technologies, it builds

Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator

-1, Apache InLong[1] is a one-stop integration framework for massive data that provides automatic, secure and reliable data transmission capabilities. InLong supports both batch and stream data processing at the same time, which offers great power to build data analysis, modeling and other

Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator

-1, Apache InLong[1] is a one-stop integration framework for massive data that provides automatic, secure and reliable data transmission capabilities. InLong supports both batch and stream data processing at the same time, which offers great power to build data analysis, modeling and other

Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator

-1, @tison, sorry, I can't get your point, please describe it again. how does it differentiate to what StreamPipes does? and how does it differentiate to what Apache Inlong does? These are all handle stream calculation, why not expand the function and create a new project instead?

Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator

Thanks, mysql-connector has been changed to optional. about GPL/LGPL dependancies has also been updated to StreamPark Proposal [1] 1. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/StreamPark+Proposal Best, benjobs Justin Mclean 于2022年8月24日周三 14:12写道： > HI, > > -1 (binding) because

回复：Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) Best regards,, Ted Liu 2022 年 8 月 24 日周三 21:12，Thomas Weise 写道： +1 (binding) Thanks, Thomas On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 3:08 AM Kelu Tao wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Good Luck! > > On 2022/08/24 03:55:26 tison wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Following up on the [DISCUSS] thread

Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) Thanks, Thomas On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 3:08 AM Kelu Tao wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Good Luck! > > On 2022/08/24 03:55:26 tison wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Following up on the [DISCUSS] thread on StreamPark[1], I would like to > call > > a VOTE to accept StreamPark into the

Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding) Good Luck! On 2022/08/24 03:55:26 tison wrote: > Hi all, > > Following up on the [DISCUSS] thread on StreamPark[1], I would like to call > a VOTE to accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator, please check out the > StreamPark Proposal from the incubator wiki[2]. > > Please

Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding) Good luck! Justin Mclean 于2022年8月24日周三 14:12写道： > HI, > > -1 (binding) because of GPL/LGPL dependancies and it’s unknown how these > will be dealt with. > > Note the "FOSS exception license” no longer applies [1] and even if it did > it most likely would not be allowed in ASF

Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator

HI, -1 (binding) because of GPL/LGPL dependancies and it’s unknown how these will be dealt with. Note the "FOSS exception license” no longer applies [1] and even if it did it most likely would not be allowed in ASF project and you would be including GPL licensed- code. Kind Regards, Justin

Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding) Good luck! Jiafeng.Zhang Email: jiafengzh...@apache.org hulk 于2022年8月24日周三 13:34写道： > +1 (non-binding) > > Good luck! > > On Wed, 24 Aug 2022 at 13:04, benjobs wrote: > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > we are looking forward to StreamPark joining the Apache incubator > > > > >

Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding) Good luck! On Wed, 24 Aug 2022 at 13:04, benjobs wrote: > > +1 (non-binding) > we are looking forward to StreamPark joining the Apache incubator > > > > Best, > benjobs. > > > Replied Message > From tison > Date 08/24/2022 11:56 > To Incubator > Subject [VOTE]

Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding) StreamPark is a wonderful project. I have used it in production environment for a long time. Best wishes and Many thanks. Qingrong wang 于2022年8月24日周三 12:43写道： > > +1 (no-binding) > > StreamPark is a very greate project. Good luck! > > 陈卓宇 于2022年8月24日周三 12:40写道： > > > > +1

Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding) we are looking forward to StreamPark joining the Apache incubator Best, benjobs. Replied Message >From tison Date 08/24/2022 11:56 To Incubator Subject [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator Hi all, Following up on the [DISCUSS] thread on

Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator

+1 (no-binding) StreamPark is a nice project. Good luck! Best, Shaokang Lv Qingrong wang 于2022年8月24日周三 12:43写道： > +1 (no-binding) > > StreamPark is a very greate project. Good luck! > > 陈卓宇 于2022年8月24日周三 12:40写道： > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > StreamPark is a nice name. Good luck! > > >

Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator

+1 (no-binding) StreamPark is a very greate project. Good luck! 陈卓宇 于2022年8月24日周三 12:40写道： > > +1 (non-binding) > > StreamPark is a nice name. Good luck! > > Best, > Zhuoyu Chen > > tison 于2022年8月24日周三 12:33写道： > > > Hi, > > > > I already replied to the comment about StreamPipe in the

Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding) StreamPark is a nice name. Good luck! Best, Zhuoyu Chen tison 于2022年8月24日周三 12:33写道： > Hi, > > I already replied to the comment about StreamPipe in the discussion thread: > > > Hi Chris, > > > > I checked out the official site of Apache StreamPipe (Incubator) whose > slogan

Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator

Hi, I already replied to the comment about StreamPipe in the discussion thread: > Hi Chris, > > I checked out the official site of Apache StreamPipe (Incubator) whose slogan writes: > >> A self-service (Industrial) IoT toolbox to enable non-technical users to connect, analyze and explore IoT

Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator

-1, (non-binding) Hmmm how does it differentiate to what StreamPipes does? Can you explain in detail, thanks. and if you work for a company, do you need to prove that this project is not company-related? On 2022/08/24 03:55:26 tison wrote: > Hi all, > > Following up on the [DISCUSS] thread on