On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 5:21 PM, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
i've committed a stripped down template and moved the prose into a
guide. this guide is just copy ATM
With all due and sincere respect to Roy, the current IP Clearance form was
done in
Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
The Legal Committee does not appear to have any concerns over Roy's
proposed
changes.
legal-hat
i don't recall being officially asked
/legal-hat
I was referring to
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
in [EMAIL PROTECTED] In any event,
Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
If the IP template should be RTC then it should be moved into the
policy area. But IMO the incubator is not the right place for
normative legal policy: the legal committee should maintain policy.
It probably embodies both procedure and policy. And I agree with
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 1:44 PM, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
If the IP template should be RTC then it should be moved into the
policy area. But IMO the incubator is not the right place for
normative legal policy: the legal committee should maintain
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 1:47 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 1:44 PM, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
snip
Given that we now have a Legal Committee, any substantive revision of
that
form should be run through
On 4/23/08, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
i've committed a stripped down template and moved the prose into a
guide. this guide is just copy ATM
With all due and sincere respect to Roy, the current IP Clearance form was
done in conjunction with the
Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
i've committed a stripped down template and moved the prose into a
guide. this guide is just copy ATM
With all due and sincere respect to Roy, the current IP Clearance form was
done in conjunction with the Board. Over the past several years it has been
modified
