Dear Sir,
Im Sivaraman, running small software company in india. i very much wonder about
your ASF. here we are using most of the components of Apache. i would like to
participate in ASF. i hav choosen one project from your incubator, Project name
is iBATIS. How can i participate
The iBATIS project is no longer in the incubator, but if you are
interested in participating, please feel free to join the mailing
lists (http://ibatis.apache.org/mailinglists.html) and get invovled -
lots of questions to answer there, for sure!
There are several issues in JIRA
(http
On 12/22/05, Larry Meadors [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1) We are not in the incubator anymore.
2) Odd...not sure what's up with that.
if it's wrong, patch it :)
- robert
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
Larry Meadors wrote:
3) Probaly will not make that change (and break all those apps) until 3.x
You are informing new adopters about this ? Since you are forcing them to
change quite quickly after their adoption, even though everyone needs to switch
to the new package naming eventually
/Incubating-java-projects-t779868.html
--
Martin Cooper
Larry
On 12/22/05, Martin van den Bemt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
What is the status of iBatis ? On the website (ibatis.apache.org) it
doesn't say it is in the incubator (unless you look really good), in the
status
On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 22:41:18 -0500, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ted,
It seems appropriate to graduate, but should iBATIS be a TLP, or go under
db.apache.org, along with Derby and related Jakarta Commons code that has
been moving, in your opinion?
--- Noel
We did
I've not been following the iBatis incubation closely (as they
expressed a preference to not go under DB, and, while I quite like
iBatis, only have so much time) but if they have a range of
sub-projects already, and a sufficient developer community, a TLP makes
sense from my perspective.
I
+1
I'd be happier to see it in DB as I think that can help build a strong
community there, but it's up to iBATIS peeps... I think we're going to
regret the large number of islands we're creating.
geir
On Mar 16, 2005, at 5:51 AM, Ted Husted wrote:
The iBATIS team has worked through
Ted,
Thanks for the follow-up. Sounds as if there isn't as much of an
opportunity for a close connection as I'd thought.
Best of luck, and congrats. :-)
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
My vote is not binding either, but I'm interested in moving this along. :-)
+1
On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 14:24:54 -0800, Roy T. Fielding [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
Roy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
Ted,
It seems appropriate to graduate, but should iBATIS be a TLP, or go under
db.apache.org, along with Derby and related Jakarta Commons code that has
been moving, in your opinion?
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail
Noel,
Although we are a database related project, I don't believe we could
join db.apache.org without a significant change to what db.apache.org
means.
db.apache.org has its own PMC, which (AFAIK) has no knowledge of
iBATIS, nor would we want to impose such burden upon them. iBATIS is
a large
The iBATIS team has worked through the incubation checklist in a open and
collaborative fashion. The community remains strong, and we feel ready to apply
for graduation.
With the Incubator PMC's approval, we would apply to the board for acceptance
as a top-level project.
Project checklist
Even though my vote is not binding, I think the project is ready to graduate.
+1
Larry
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 05:51:26 -0500, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The iBATIS team has worked through the incubation checklist in a open and
collaborative fashion. The community remains strong
There being three +1s and no negative comments, I've filed an Account Request
with Infrastructure.
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-217
-Ted.
On Sun, 06 Feb 2005 08:59:13 -0500, Ted Husted wrote:
A vote was held among the iBATIS Podling PMC members regarding
adding Roberto Rabe
Ted,
There is a reason why I said:
Right now, you are the only one with karma. Anyone with sufficient
karma can make the adjustment to the ACL.
in my e-mail on the 7th. I was entirely off-line for about half of last
week, and effectively off-line for most of it. This coming week will be
Agreed. Unfortunately, I was entirely off-line at the same time, and your
message was stuck in the moderation queue. My intent was to explain to the team
why there was a lag.
It would be my strong suggestion that we try to funnel all infrastructure
tasks, especially those for the incubator,
The commit hook script for the ibatis SVN repository is incorrect.
It's currently set to ibatis-cvs, but I believe the list is called
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cheers.
Clinton
-- Forwarded message --
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 11:46:04 -0800 (PST
Okay, we can no longer live without our SVN repository.
Is it going to be ready soon?
Cheers,
Clinton
On Wed, 9 Feb 2005 13:33:41 -0700, Clinton Begin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Noel,
I just noticed that iBATIS is in the production incubator SVN tree.
Does this mean it's done? Did I
Feb 2005 13:33:41 -0700, Clinton Begin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Noel,
I just noticed that iBATIS is in the production incubator SVN
tree. Does this mean it's done? Did I miss an email?
Thanks again for helping us out with this!
Clinton
On Mon, 7 Feb 2005 19:25:15 +0100, Gilles Bayon
Hi Noel,
I just noticed that iBATIS is in the production incubator SVN tree.
Does this mean it's done? Did I miss an email?
Thanks again for helping us out with this!
Clinton
On Mon, 7 Feb 2005 19:25:15 +0100, Gilles Bayon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Seems good fot me.
+1 to continue
A vote was held among the iBATIS Podling PMC members regarding adding Roberto
Rabe as an iBATIS Committer and PPMC member, according to the Podling decision
making guidelines posted on our website
[http://incubator.apache.org/ibatis/site/bylaws.html].
The vote is successful, and we would
Ted,
You should streamline these issues by notifying the Incubator PMC of the
PPMC vote so that it can participate.
+1 for this committer.
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands,
This is the final step the iBATIS team needs to take before applying for
graduation.
I'm posting the ticket here, in case someone were able to help us resolve it.
-Ted.
--- Original Message ---
From: Ted Husted (JIRA) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Sent: Sat, 22 Jan 2005 19:43:17
This is the final step the iBATIS team needs to take before applying for
graduation.
I'm posting the ticket here, in case anyone were able to help us out.
-Ted.
ibatis podling - import SVN repository
--
Key: INFRA-186
URL: http
Hi,
Could someone please add the following lists to eyebrowse archives?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank you.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands,
STATUS: iBATIS
All needed CLAs are on file. Code grants are in transit. Accounts for the committers
are created. Mailing lists are created. Committers are subscribing. The Jira setup for
the project is being finalized. The project incubator page is created. Committers are
preparing
)
Does the Incubator accept the iBATIS project for Incubation?
Cheers,
Clinton
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 23 Aug 2004, at 06:52, Clinton Begin wrote:
[ ] Accept iBATIS into the Incubator
(late) +1
/Steven
--
Steven Noelshttp://outerthought.org/
Outerthought - Open Source Java XMLAn Orixo Member
Read my weblog athttp://blogs.cocoondev.org/stevenn
+1
Clinton Begin wrote on Sunday, August 22, 2004 9:53 PM:
See: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/IbatisProposal
[ ] Accept iBATIS into the Incubator
[ ] Reject iBATIS
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED
+1
Roy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+1
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ted Husted wrote:
(3.1) mailing list(s)
* ibatis-ppmc (with moderated subscriptions)
* ibatis-svn
Probably -commits, since that is the emerging convention.
(3.2) subversion repositories
* incubator-ibatis
This is subversion, not CVS. It would be the ibatis/ path under
+0. Haven't had time to review.
- Leo
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, 22 Aug 2004 22:52:44 -0600, Clinton Begin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
See: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/IbatisProposal
[ ] Accept iBATIS into the Incubator
[ ] Reject iBATIS
Vote ends 12pm (Noon) EDT, Thursday August 26, 2004.
+1 from me. iBATIS seems a good fit.
--
http
Following is the proposal that Team iBATIS would like to submit to the Incubator PMC
for consideration. This is a current copy of the proposal we drafted on the Wiki. We
are submitting it to the list so that it is archived as part of the iBATIS application
to Apache.
Created 10 August
+1 I think iBatis is a good fit.
-Brian
On Aug 23, 2004, at 12:52 AM, Clinton Begin wrote:
See: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/IbatisProposal
[ ] Accept iBATIS into the Incubator
[ ] Reject iBATIS
Vote ends 12pm (Noon) EDT, Thursday August 26, 2004.
Clinton
See: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/IbatisProposal
[ ] Accept iBATIS into the Incubator
[ ] Reject iBATIS
Vote ends 12pm (Noon) EDT, Thursday August 26, 2004.
Clinton
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
Since there does seem to be interest in reviewing a proposal from iBATIS, I've setup a
draft in the Incubator wiki.
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/IbatisProposal
Based on the discussion here, I've included a section on whether to apply as TLP or
subproject.
The iBATIS scope
To answer Clinton's question - I have very little knowledge or interest
in either OJB or Torque. IMO, having any sort of oversight of those
projects would be pointless.
From what I have seen of them, they both take very different
philisophical approaches to interacting with data than iBATIS
-Original Message-
From: Ted Husted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2004 7:13 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Incubation of iBATIS Data Mapper
Since there does seem to be interest in reviewing a proposal from iBATIS,
I've setup a draft in the Incubator
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2004 7:13 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Incubation of iBATIS Data Mapper
Since there does seem to be interest in reviewing a proposal from
iBATIS,
I've setup a draft in the Incubator wiki.
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/IbatisProposal
Brian McCallister wrote:
J Aaron Farr wrote:
We're seeing a general explosion of new TLP's in Apache or subprojects
graduating to TLP level. IMHO at some point we're going to reach a
critical mass where it will no longer be very feasible for the Board
to directly handle so many TLP's. I
On Aug 10, 2004, at 1:15 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
snip /
TLP reporting is a corporate structure issue, whereas
federation is about sharing resources (e.g., web-site and mail domain)
and
community building.
Exactly!
-Brian
-
Hi Noel,
Thanks for your response.
For those who may not be familiar with iBATIS, it is a persistence tool.
More specifically, it is a Data Mapper (PoEAA, Fowler). iBATIS is not
an Object Relational Mapper, however many people find it does a better
job of isolating the object model from
technology. My own concern as
to db.apache.org would be scope.
* PMC Scope
We have six members of Team iBATIS, working on either the Java or .NET version, or
both. Our initial expectation would be that all six would become the iBATIS PMC. As it
stands, there are currently five members of the DB PMC
1.0.
iBATIS seems to fit well into DB, but if they don't want that for
personal reasons as a project, their call =) In terms of skewing the
PMC -- skew away if need be, I am a firm believer in the all active
committers should be PMC members goal =)
* Product scope
snip /
This, to me, is a good
1.0.
iBATIS seems to fit well into DB, but if they don't want that for
personal reasons as a project, their call =) In terms of skewing the
PMC -- skew away if need be, I am a firm believer in the all active
committers should be PMC members goal =)
* Product scope
snip /
This, to me, is a good
on the website list (I am one of those unlisted
people, oops!), I realized over the weekend. Will fix it as soon as I
get the site looking right under Maven 1.0.
iBATIS seems to fit well into DB, but if they don't want that for
personal reasons as a project, their call =) In terms of skewing the
PMC
On Mon, 09 Aug 2004 10:09:31 -0400, Brian McCallister wrote:
I cannot speak for the whole DB PMC, but I am pretty confident that
the project would be quite happy to provide a hat peg and help as
needed =) I'd love to see iBATIS join the DB project, and this
seems the natural home
On Mon, 9 Aug 2004, Ted Husted wrote:
if [...] overseeing a DB product with non-Java implementations is not an
issue
There is nothing Java specific about the Apache DB charter, indeed the DB
proposal specicially calls out a language-agnostic approach.
I don't believe anyone has a strong inclination one way or the other.
I'll jump off the fence into a yard. :-)
I'd prefer to see iBATIS as a TPL for the reasons Ted has laid out. I
don't think joining the DB project would benefit either team.
The key question would be whether members
Greetings,
I would also have to agree that I feel more comfortable being a TLP rather
than part of the DB. I don't want to sound arrogant or presumptuous; I
simply think it would be organizationally cleaner. For example, we are
looking to add IBatis Productivity Tools to our repertoire
iBATIS is a unique framework for mapping objects to database queries. Many agree that iBATIS is simpler and more flexible than object relational mapping tools, and is particular good with complex databases. The Java framework http://www.ibatis.com is freely distributed, ASF licensed, open source
54 matches
Mail list logo
