Hi,
> @Justin I understand the need for this to be transitive but what if the
> artifact has contracting licenses, e.g. as mentioned BSD-c2 vs BSD-c3? I
> assume it is not our problem to figure this out but just put whatever is in
> there in our LICENSE file?=
I would probably put both in the
2018 12:43PM
Subject: Re: licenses and copyrights of dependencies
What Alex is saying makes sense. Whether you like it or not, you are
creating a derived work (or something - I am not a lawyer), and that
needs its own L
On Nov 7, 2018, at 9:03 AM, Alex Harui
wrote:
IIRC, we use the
ulian Hyde wrote: -
To: general@incubator.apache.org
From: Julian Hyde
Date: 11/07/2018 12:43PM
Subject: Re: licenses and copyrights of dependencies
What Alex is saying makes sense. Whether you like it or not, you are creating a
derived work (or something - I am not a lawyer), and that needs
Hi,
> we need to include licenses of all components shipped in an artifact. The
> example just appends all licenses to the LICENSE file including the
> copyrights. Is the copyright required?
If the license include it and the terms of the license say so then yes. This
applied to common
n.
>>
>>
>> Best wishes.
>> Vincent Hou (侯胜博)
>>
>> Advisory Software Engineer, OpenWhisk Contributor, Open Technology,
>> IBM Cloud
>>
>> Notes ID: Vincent S Hou/Raleigh/IBM, E-mail: s...@us.ibm.com,
>> Phone: +1(919)254-7182
>&g
nWhisk Contributor, Open Technology,
>IBM Cloud
>
> Notes ID: Vincent S Hou/Raleigh/IBM, E-mail: s...@us.ibm.com,
> Phone: +1(919)254-7182
> Address: 4205 S Miami Blvd (Cornwallis Drive), Durham, NC 27703,
>United States
>
> -----"Jon
S Hou/Raleigh/IBM, E-mail: s...@us.ibm.com,
Phone: +1(919)254-7182
Address: 4205 S Miami Blvd (Cornwallis Drive), Durham, NC 27703,
United States
-"Jonas Pfefferle" wrote: -
To: "general@incubator.apache.org"
From: "Jonas Pfefferle"
Date: 11/07/2018 07:35AM
Su
efferle" wrote: -
To: "general@incubator.apache.org"
From: "Jonas Pfefferle"
Date: 11/07/2018 07:35AM
Subject: licenses and copyrights of dependencies
Hi all,
We are just preparing a new release and are wondering how and what is
required for licenses and copyright
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 1:35 PM Jonas Pfefferle wrote:
> ...Shouldn't the copyright be appended
> to the NOTICE file instead?...
Probably not - the NOTICE must be minimal as per
http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html we must only add "any
*mandatory* legal notifications specific to
general@incubator.apache.org
Date: 11/07/2018 01:52 PM
Subject: Re: licenses and copyrights of dependencies
Since we are only shipping jars and jars already include the licenses e.g.
in META-INF or the pom file, we could refer to them in the NOTICE file
instead of replicating them.
Jonas
Since we are only shipping jars and jars already include the licenses e.g.
in META-INF or the pom file, we could refer to them in the NOTICE file
instead of replicating them.
Jonas
On Wed, 07 Nov 2018 13:35:04 +0100
"Jonas Pfefferle" wrote:
Hi all,
We are just preparing a new release
Hi all,
We are just preparing a new release and are wondering how and what is
required for licenses and copyrights of components shipped with an artifact.
According to the release
policy http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#distribute-other-artifacts
we need to include licenses
12 matches
Mail list logo
