On Tuesday 25 September 2007 04:18, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
this is probably just an indication that it's time to starting thinking...
+1 to all said.
Do we have any examples where corporate backing has been withdrawn, and how
the project was affected, whether inside or outside ASF?
It
Hi ,
I want to create SOAP Requests from the WSDL of service.
What I want to do is like dynamically creating RAW SOAP Request from the
WSDL and sending it to the Web Service so that the user can directly
provide parameters to the service and test it. I am a bit new to apache
incubator so
+1.
...ant
On 9/22/07, Daniel Kulp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Due to some license issues pointed out from Kevan and Matthieu as well as
some TCK failures when run in Geronimo and the bouncycastle discussions,
we had to rebuild CXF 2.0.2.
Note: the main changes between this and the first
On Tuesday 25 September 2007 14:28, Harshit Madania wrote:
Hi ,
I want to create SOAP Requests from the WSDL of service.
What I want to do is like dynamically creating RAW SOAP Request from the
WSDL and sending it to the Web Service so that the user can directly
provide parameters to the
-- Forwarded message --
From: ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sep 25, 2007 10:45 AM
Subject: Account Request - Simon Nash - Tuscany (incubating)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dear root,
Please create an id
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
Harshit Madania wrote:
I want to [dynamicaly] create SOAP Requests from the WSDL of service.
Wrong list... Check with Web Services guys [http://ws.apache.org/]
And they do have the technology for it there. :-)
--- Noel
TSIK - Verisign folks lost interest, community did not form, project shelved.
-- dims
On 9/25/07, Niclas Hedhman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 25 September 2007 04:18, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
this is probably just an indication that it's time to starting thinking...
+1 to all
One of the purpose of the incubator is to ensure that there is a
sustainable developer community, so I don't see failure of incubating
projects as a real problem.
On 9/25/07, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dims wrote:
Niclas Hedhman asked:
Do we have any examples where corporate
Hey Robert..
You have something that checks a directory tree full of binary .jar
files for the embedded LICENSE files?? If you do, could you post it..
It would make my life easier.
On 9/24/07, Robert Burrell Donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/22/07, Daniel Kulp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 25, 2007, at 8:28 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
One of the purpose of the incubator is to ensure that there is a
sustainable developer community, so I don't see failure of incubating
projects as a real problem.
+1.
If we knew for sure that a project would be able to attract a
I would like to call the Incubator PMC to vote to incubate the proposed
Pig project. Discussion on this list evidenced broad interest in this
project, which bodes well for its ability to build a diverse developer
community.
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/PigProposal
+1
Doug
I would like to call the Incubator PMC to vote to incubate the proposed
Pig project. Discussion on this list evidenced broad interest in this
project, which bodes well for its ability to build a diverse developer
community.
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/PigProposal
+1
Doug
Oops. I inadvertently somehow hijacked an old thread. Sorry!
Please reply to the other call to vote on this issue. Thanks!
Doug
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 9/25/07, Doug Cutting [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to call the Incubator PMC to vote to incubate the proposed
Pig project. Discussion on this list evidenced broad interest in this
project, which bodes well for its ability to build a diverse developer
community.
Yo,
On 9/25/07, Doug Cutting [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to call the Incubator PMC to vote to incubate the proposed
Pig project. Discussion on this list evidenced broad interest in this
project, which bodes well for its ability to build a diverse developer
community.
On 9/25/07, Hiram Chirino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey Robert..
You have something that checks a directory tree full of binary .jar
files for the embedded LICENSE files?? If you do, could you post it..
It would make my life easier.
there's a python script in RAT that unpacks and runs RAT
One of the purpose of the incubator is to ensure that there is a
sustainable developer community, so I don't see failure of
incubating projects as a real problem.
Neither do I. It merely underscores the need to make sure that there is
such a sustainable community. But Niclas did ask for
On 9/25/07, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One of the purpose of the incubator is to ensure that there is a
sustainable developer community, so I don't see failure of incubating
projects as a real problem.
Actually I think it's showing the incubator's success even if it's always
On Sep 25, 2007, at 10:26 AM, Doug Cutting wrote:
I would like to call the Incubator PMC to vote to incubate the
proposed Pig project. Discussion on this list evidenced broad
interest in this project, which bodes well for its ability to build
a diverse developer community.
On 9/25/07, Doug Cutting [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to call the Incubator PMC to vote to incubate the
proposed
Pig project. Discussion on this list evidenced broad interest in this
project, which bodes well for its ability to build a diverse developer
community.
On Sep 25, 2007, at 1:20 PM, Doug Cutting wrote:
I would like to call the Incubator PMC to vote to incubate the
proposed Pig project. Discussion on this list evidenced broad
interest in this project, which bodes well for its ability to build
a diverse developer community.
+1
-Brian
On Sep 25, 2007, at 10:20 AM, Doug Cutting wrote:
I would like to call the Incubator PMC to vote to incubate the
proposed Pig project. Discussion on this list evidenced broad
interest in this project, which bodes well for its ability to build
a diverse developer community.
+1
Erik
On Sep 25, 2007, at 1:20 PM, Doug Cutting wrote:
I would like to call the Incubator PMC to vote to incubate the
proposed Pig project. Discussion on this list evidenced broad
interest in this project, which bodes well for its ability to build
a diverse developer
On 9/25/07, Doug Cutting [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to call the Incubator PMC to vote to incubate the proposed
Pig project. Discussion on this list evidenced broad interest in this
project, which bodes well for its ability to build a diverse developer
community.
+1
Martijn
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 9/25/07, Doug Cutting [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to call the Incubator PMC to vote to incubate the proposed
Pig project. Discussion on this list evidenced broad interest in this
project, which bodes well for its ability to build a diverse developer
community.
This vote has now passed.
In addition to the votes from the original cxf-dev vote, we have added:
+1 non-binding - Kevan Miller
+1 binding - mriou, rdonkin, antelder, jjagielski*
* Jim voted +1 on cxf-dev, not here.
Thus, we have 6 binding +1 votes, 16 non-binding +1 votes, no other
votes.
On Sep 25, 2007, at 11:28 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
One of the purpose of the incubator is to ensure that there is a
sustainable developer community, so I don't see failure of incubating
projects as a real problem.
Neither do I...
On Sep 25, 2007, at 4:39 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
+1 binding - mriou, rdonkin, antelder, jjagielski*
* Jim voted +1 on cxf-dev, not here.
Actually, just 'jim' not 'jjagielski' :)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 9/25/07, Doug Cutting [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to call the Incubator PMC to vote to incubate the proposed
Pig project. Discussion on this list evidenced broad interest in this
project, which bodes well for its ability to build a diverse developer
community.
+1
On 9/25/07, Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/25/07, Doug Cutting [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to call the Incubator PMC to vote to incubate the proposed
Pig project. Discussion on this list evidenced broad interest in this
project, which bodes well for its ability
31 matches
Mail list logo
