Re: [DISCUSS] HAWQ Incubation Proposal

2015-08-30 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 7:54 PM, Justin Erenkrantz jus...@erenkrantz.com wrote: On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 7:45 PM, Roman Shaposhnik ro...@shaposhnik.org wrote: ...With Justin volunteering at this point we've got 6 very active, very experienced mentors. I really don't think the # of committers

Re: BatchEE Report - why are they monthly

2015-08-30 Thread John D. Ament
I'm fine with that. It helps clean up the fact that this reporting group has too many podlings. I'm wondering if there's anything the IPMC can do to help balance this out more. John On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 3:31 PM Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote: Txs for clarifying Marvin, we gonna

Re: September 2015 Report

2015-08-30 Thread John D. Ament
I remember asking about public vs private board reporting in the past. I'm curious what you have to report that is private (since the final report does become public record). John On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 2:58 AM jan i j...@apache.org wrote: Hi. I really like our open way of reporting using

Re: September 2015 Report

2015-08-30 Thread John D. Ament
On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 9:39 AM John D. Ament johndam...@apache.org wrote: I remember asking about public vs private board reporting in the past. I'm curious what you have to report that is private (since the final report does become public record). Err ok, read the situation. I would

Re: September 2015 Report

2015-08-30 Thread Shane Curcuru
On 8/30/15 9:40 AM, John D. Ament wrote: I remember asking about public vs private board reporting in the past. I'm curious what you have to report that is private (since the final report does become public record). Correct: board reports become public record when posted, typically the

Re: September 2015 Report

2015-08-30 Thread Craig L Russell
On Aug 30, 2015, at 7:13 AM, Shane Curcuru a...@shanecurcuru.org wrote: On 8/30/15 9:40 AM, John D. Ament wrote: I remember asking about public vs private board reporting in the past. I'm curious what you have to report that is private (since the final report does become public record).

Re: [VOTE] Release apache-calcite-1.4.0-incubating

2015-08-30 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, I've filed CALCITE-860 and CALCITE-861 to address the issues you identified. We'll be sure to get them addressed for the next release. Thanks for that. If you need anyone to double check the LICENSE file before you next release candidate just ask. Justin

Re: [VOTE] Release apache-calcite-1.4.0-incubating

2015-08-30 Thread John D. Ament
Here's my +1. Reiterating Justin's notes about cleaning up your license file, the mvn compile vs mvn package issue is pretty common. John On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 5:32 PM Jacques Nadeau jacq...@apache.org wrote: Hi all, The Calcite community has voted on and approved a proposal to release

Re: [DISCUSS] Horn Incubation Proposal

2015-08-30 Thread Edward J. Yoon
Hi, If there are no more comments/concerns, I plan to call for a vote soon. Thanks! On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 9:37 PM, Edward J. Yoon edwardy...@apache.org wrote: More diverse volunteers for Horn project will be added, from cldi-kaist team who is ranked 7th in the ImageNet ILSVRC last year.