[RESULT][VOTE] Accept the iota project into the Apache Incubator

Vote passes with: [10] +1 - amareshwari, jmclean, hthomann, humbedooh, sterling, jbonofre, jhyde, venkatesh, jamestaylor, hadrian [ 3] +1 - (non-binding) [ 0] 0 - [ 0] -1 - Congrats to the iota community and welcome to the ASF. I will work with the iota community and our infra to get the

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Accept the iota project into the Apache Incubator

This is great news we look forward to creating a vibrant community with you all. -Tony > On Jan 20, 2016, at 6:04 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote: > > Vote passes with: > [10] +1 - amareshwari, jmclean, hthomann, humbedooh, sterling, jbonofre, > jhyde, venkatesh, jamestaylor,

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Dataflow Incubator Proposal

Hi, great: I added you in the proposal. Thanks ! Regards JB On 01/21/2016 12:24 AM, Prasanth Jayachandran wrote: Hi Jean I’d be interested in contributing as well. Thanks Prasanth Jayachandran On Jan 20, 2016, at 5:20 PM, ksobkowiak wrote: It's a great news

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Dataflow Incubator Proposal

Awesome: you are in the proposal ;) Regards JB On 01/21/2016 12:55 AM, Johan Edstrom wrote: Looking forward, also interested in contributing. On Jan 20, 2016, at 4:54 PM, Hugo Louro wrote: Hello everyone, Very compelling proposal; congrats! I would be interested in

Re: Request for advice on code donation

Alex has it right, and it's important to remember that the ASF never asks for copyright assignment of code; we only ask for an SGA grant or a voluntary submission from a contributor of ICLA signer. We only want a license to be able to ship the eventual Apache project under the Apache License

Re: Milagro trademark

Alex Harui wrote on 1/16/16 12:59 AM: > I would recommend asking this on trademarks@a.o. Correct, someone associated with the podling please gather all the information and ask what you need there (which is privately archived). > > I would also recommend two separate transactions. IIRC, the SGA

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Dataflow Incubator Proposal

Hi Hugo, I added you on the proposal Thanks Regards JB On 01/21/2016 12:54 AM, Hugo Louro wrote: Hello everyone, Very compelling proposal; congrats! I would be interested in contributing to this project from the beginning. Looking forward to it. Best, Hugo On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 3:24 PM,

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Dataflow Incubator Proposal

Cool ! I added you on the proposal. Regards JB On 01/21/2016 12:20 AM, ksobkowiak wrote: It's a great news the project is going to move to Apache. I'd be interested in contributing too Regards Krzysztof -- View this message in context:

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Dataflow Incubator Proposal

Nice proposal, exactly matches with what we wanna do in some projects, interested to contribute. Regards, Hao On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 12:32 AM, James Malone < jamesmal...@google.com.invalid> wrote: > Hello everyone, > > Attached to this message is a proposed new project - Apache Dataflow, a >

RE: [DISCUSS] Apache Dataflow Incubator Proposal

Pls add me to "Additional Interested Contributors" section too. :-) -- Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon -Original Message- From: Jean-Baptiste Onofr� [mailto:j...@nanthrax.net] Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2016 2:39 PM To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Dataflow

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Dataflow Incubator Proposal

Great: done ;) Regards JB On 01/21/2016 07:15 AM, Edward J. Yoon wrote: Pls add me to "Additional Interested Contributors" section too. :-) -- Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon -Original Message- From: Jean-Baptiste Onofr� [mailto:j...@nanthrax.net] Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2016 2:39

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.24-rc01 (incubating)

Those are artifacts for unit-testing functionality that needs jar files as input. Yes, they could be generated as part of the build, but that wasn't done yet, and frankly that would just complicate the test suite without practical benefits. Their content is mostly just text files, with the

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Dataflow Incubator Proposal

I added you on the proposal. Thanks ! Regards JB On 01/21/2016 07:36 AM, Hao Chen wrote: Nice proposal, exactly matches with what we wanna do in some projects, interested to contribute. Regards, Hao On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 12:32 AM, James Malone < jamesmal...@google.com.invalid> wrote:

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Dataflow Incubator Proposal

This looks very interesting. I'm interested in contributing. Thanks. -Gon --- Byung-Gon Chun On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 1:32 AM, James Malone < jamesmal...@google.com.invalid> wrote: > Hello everyone, > > Attached to this message is a proposed new project - Apache Dataflow, a > unified

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Joshua Incubator Proposal - Machine Translation Toolkit

Hey Hen, Matt Post who I believe is monitoring this list and who has been one of the key Joshua developers and I have discussed this and we believe that potentially GPL/LGPL dependencies can: 1. be replaced with category-A or category-B alternatives. Matt mentioned one already to me which has

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Dataflow Incubator Proposal

Hi JB Would love to join now. regards debo On 1/20/16, 9:31 AM, "Jean-Baptiste Onofré" wrote: >Hi Debo, > >Awesome: do you want to join now (in the initial committer list) and >once we are in the incubation ? > >Let me know, I can update the proposal. > >Regards >JB > >On

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Dataflow Incubator Proposal

On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 9:17 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > We're proposing Apache Dataflow naming because Google Cloud Dataflow is an > already known name and "brand". I don't see anything in the proposal about Google ceasing the use of the brand "Google Cloud Dataflow".

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.24-rc01 (incubating)

Oh no... So what should I do now? Cancel the vote and restart it with the same version etc., or is this correction enough: The "+1" voting box was incorrectly labelled. Please vote according to this: [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache FreeMarker 2.3.24-rc01 [ ] 0 I don't feel strongly

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Joshua Incubator Proposal - Machine Translation Toolkit

All of this can be worked during Incubation and I think we have the right folks here who can help to get it set up. Cheers, Chris ++ Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. Chief Architect Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398)

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Dataflow Incubator Proposal

Hi all, I second James there, and really excited to be champion on the project (and work on the codebase as well). I blogged about a quick dataflow technical introduction: http://blog.nanthrax.net/2016/01/introducing-apache-dataflow/ Thanks James ! We are looking forward your feedbacks.

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Dataflow Incubator Proposal

Great proposal. I like that your proposal includes a well presented roadmap, but I don't see any goals that directly address building a larger community. Y'all have any ideas around outreach that will help with adoption? As a start, I recommend y'all add a section to the proposal on the wiki page

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Dataflow Incubator Proposal

> Great proposal. I like that your proposal includes a well presented > roadmap, but I don't see any goals that directly address building a larger > community. Y'all have any ideas around outreach that will help with > adoption? > Thank you and fair point. We have a few additional ideas which we

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Dataflow Incubator Proposal

Great, I add you in the initial committer list then ;) I quickly discussed with James, we gonna create a section for additional people as proposed by Sean. Thanks ! Regards JB On 01/20/2016 06:33 PM, Debo Dutta (dedutta) wrote: Hi JB Would love to join now. regards debo On 1/20/16, 9:31

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Dataflow Incubator Proposal

Good point Marvin, Google Dataflow SDK will "disappear" for Apache Dataflow, but you are right, the complete Dataflow "brand" will stay at Google. Let me double check with James and the team. Regards JB On 01/20/2016 06:40 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 9:17 AM,

[DISCUSS] Apache Dataflow Incubator Proposal

Hello everyone, Attached to this message is a proposed new project - Apache Dataflow, a unified programming model for data processing and integration. The text of the proposal is included below. Additionally, the proposal is in draft form on the wiki where we will make any required changes:

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Dataflow Incubator Proposal

Hi Sean, It's a fair point, but not present in most of the proposals. It's something that we can address in the "Community" section. Regards JB On 01/20/2016 05:55 PM, Sean Busbey wrote: Great proposal. I like that your proposal includes a well presented roadmap, but I don't see any goals

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Dataflow Incubator Proposal

Hi Debo, Awesome: do you want to join now (in the initial committer list) and once we are in the incubation ? Let me know, I can update the proposal. Regards JB On 01/20/2016 06:23 PM, Debo Dutta (dedutta) wrote: +1 Proposal looks good. Also a small section on relationships with Apache

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Dataflow Incubator Proposal

Yes, you are right, we also know that other companies use dataflow wording (it's the case at Hortonworks for instance). We gonna start a thread to propose alternative names. Regards JB On 01/20/2016 06:41 PM, Gregory Chase wrote: This is also a similarly named Spring project:

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Dataflow Incubator Proposal

Well, I for one would be very interested in this project and would be happy to contribute. On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 12:09 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi Sean, > > It's a fair point, but not present in most of the proposals. It's > something that we can address in the

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Joshua Incubator Proposal - Machine Translation Toolkit

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 20/01/2016 11:18, Henri Yandell wrote: > 'TM'? Translation Memory. jonathon -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJWn8SIAAoJEKG7hs8nSMR7h8EP/01XxxF896gbhRJBhlv5ng0J

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Dataflow Incubator Proposal

This is also a similarly named Spring project: http://cloud.spring.io/spring-cloud-dataflow/ On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 9:40 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 9:17 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré > wrote: > > > We're proposing Apache Dataflow

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Dataflow Incubator Proposal

As suggested, I added "Additional Interested Contributors" section, and already added Debo. Thanks ! Regards JB On 01/20/2016 05:55 PM, Sean Busbey wrote: Great proposal. I like that your proposal includes a well presented roadmap, but I don't see any goals that directly address building a

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Dataflow Incubator Proposal

This is great proposal. Been working with Apache Flink for a while so love to help with this project. - Henry On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 8:32 AM, James Malone < jamesmal...@google.com.invalid> wrote: > Hello everyone, > > Attached to this message is a proposed new project - Apache Dataflow, a >

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Joshua Incubator Proposal - Machine Translation Toolkit

This is a bit tricky and I suppose we could leave behind the GPL/LGPL dependencies that are used for model building when generating releases under ASF license. I hope that will work. - Henry On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 7:51 AM, Matt Post wrote: > I imagine so. Model building is

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.24-rc01 (incubating)

On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 10:28 AM, Daniel Dekany wrote: > Oh no... So what should I do now? Cancel the vote and restart it with > the same version etc., or is this correction enough: Please keep this VOTE going. It's just a typo, the intent is clear and there are no real

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Joshua Incubator Proposal - Machine Translation Toolkit

I imagine so. Model building is very technical and resource intensive and something only a few people will want or need to do. Working on and running the decoder (#2) should be the much more common use case, and with the (included, Apache-licensed) Berkeley LM, that can be done without the need

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Dataflow Incubator Proposal

Hi Marvin, you raise a point that we have a bit anticipated ;) We're proposing Apache Dataflow naming because Google Cloud Dataflow is an already known name and "brand". The naming is not directly related to dataflow programming: it's more representative of the data flowing inside a

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Dataflow Incubator Proposal

+1 Proposal looks good. Also a small section on relationships with Apache Storm and Apache Samza would be great. I would like to sign up, to help/contribute. debo On 1/20/16, 8:55 AM, "Sean Busbey" wrote: >Great proposal. I like that your proposal includes a well

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Joshua Incubator Proposal - Machine Translation Toolkit

The dependencies can be split into two kinds: ones required for building new models, and ones needed by the decoder to translate new sentences with a pre-built model (i.e., black-box translation with the language packs). 1. For building new models, you need a way to align the words between

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Joshua Incubator Proposal - Machine Translation Toolkit

External is good news. I'm not sure how much leeway there is in the following quote from [1], but what percentage of your users are currently using an all-ASF-compatible set of projects? The question to ask yourself in this situation is: * "Will the majority of users want to use my

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Dataflow Incubator Proposal

On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 8:32 AM, James Malone wrote: > == Abstract == > > Dataflow is an open source, unified model and set of language-specific SDKs > for defining and executing data processing workflows, and also data > ingestion and integration flows,

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Dataflow Incubator Proposal

Hi, This is a cool idea. Its like Apache TinkerPop (http://tinkerpop.incubator.apache.org/) but for data flow/stream systems as opposed to graph systems. Our tag line is "the JDBC for graphs." You would be "the JDBC for streams." :) You might be interested in looking TinkerPop's Gremlin

Re: [VOTE] Accept the iota project into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) Julian > On Jan 19, 2016, at 10:43 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > Regards > JB > > On 01/19/2016 01:25 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote: >> I want to encourage more IPMC members to cast a vote, in case this >> thread went unnoticed. >> >>

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Dataflow Incubator Proposal

You are on the proposal ;) Thanks ! Regards JB On 01/20/2016 08:04 PM, P. Taylor Goetz wrote: Nice proposal. I’d be interested in contributing as well. I’m about at my mentor limit with projects, but I’d be willing to contribute in other/similar ways. -Taylor On Jan 20, 2016, at 12:46 PM,

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Dataflow Incubator Proposal

Hi James, Can I add your to the proposal ? Regards JB On 01/20/2016 07:20 PM, James Carman wrote: Well, I for one would be very interested in this project and would be happy to contribute. On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 12:09 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: Hi Sean, It's a

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Dataflow Incubator Proposal

good proposal, look forward to participating this project contribution. -- View this message in context: http://apache-incubator-general.996316.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Apache-Dataflow-Incubator-Proposal-tp47985p48014.html Sent from the Apache Incubator - General mailing list archive at

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Dataflow Incubator Proposal

Nice proposal. I’d be interested in contributing as well. I’m about at my mentor limit with projects, but I’d be willing to contribute in other/similar ways. -Taylor > On Jan 20, 2016, at 12:46 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > Great, I add you in the initial committer

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Dataflow Incubator Proposal

Hey James, you are on the proposal ;) Thanks ! Regards JB On 01/20/2016 07:20 PM, James Carman wrote: Well, I for one would be very interested in this project and would be happy to contribute. On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 12:09 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: Hi Sean, It's

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Ranger 0.5.1 (incubating)

+1 (binding) From: Madhan Neethiraj Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2016 1:46 PM To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Ranger 0.5.1 (incubating) Incubator PMC, The Apache Ranger community has voted on and approved

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Dataflow Incubator Proposal

Of course! I'd be happy to help On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 2:02 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi James, > > Can I add your to the proposal ? > > Regards > JB > > On 01/20/2016 07:20 PM, James Carman wrote: > > Well, I for one would be very interested in this project and would

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Dataflow Incubator Proposal

Hello This is a very interesting proposal and concept. I'd like to contribute. Thanks Joe On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 2:50 PM, James Carman wrote: > Of course! I'd be happy to help > > On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 2:02 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré > wrote: >

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Dataflow Incubator Proposal

Cool: you are on the proposal Regards JB On 01/20/2016 09:52 PM, Vaibhav Gumashta wrote: Hi Jean, I¹d like to contribute as well. Thanks, ‹Vaibhav On 1/20/16, 11:19 AM, "Jean-Baptiste Onofré" wrote: Hey James, you are on the proposal ;) Thanks ! Regards JB On

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Dataflow Incubator Proposal

> On Jan 20, 2016, at 8:32 AM, James Malone > wrote: > > The Dataflow programming model has been designed with simplicity, > scalability, and speed as key tenants. s/tenants/tenets? david jencks

Re: [VOTE] Accept the iota project into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding). Thanks! On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 8:49 AM Julian Hyde wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Julian > > > On Jan 19, 2016, at 10:43 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré > wrote: > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > Regards > > JB > > > > On 01/19/2016 01:25 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Dataflow Incubator Proposal

Hi Jean, I¹d like to contribute as well. Thanks, ‹Vaibhav On 1/20/16, 11:19 AM, "Jean-Baptiste Onofré" wrote: >Hey James, > >you are on the proposal ;) > >Thanks ! >Regards >JB > >On 01/20/2016 07:20 PM, James Carman wrote: >> Well, I for one would be very interested in

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Dataflow Incubator Proposal

Great: you are on the proposal. Regards JB On 01/20/2016 09:00 PM, Joe Witt wrote: Hello This is a very interesting proposal and concept. I'd like to contribute. Thanks Joe On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 2:50 PM, James Carman wrote: Of course! I'd be happy to help

Re: [VOTE] Accept the iota project into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding). Interesting proposal and I love the name. On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 12:58 PM, Seetharam Venkatesh < venkat...@innerzeal.com> wrote: > +1 (binding). > > Thanks! > > On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 8:49 AM Julian Hyde wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > Julian > > > > > On Jan

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Dataflow Incubator Proposal

Hi Jean I’d be interested in contributing as well. Thanks Prasanth Jayachandran > On Jan 20, 2016, at 5:20 PM, ksobkowiak wrote: > > It's a great news the project is going to move to Apache. I'd be interested > in contributing too > > Regards > Krzysztof > > > >

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Dataflow Incubator Proposal

It's a great news the project is going to move to Apache. I'd be interested in contributing too Regards Krzysztof -- View this message in context: http://apache-incubator-general.996316.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Apache-Dataflow-Incubator-Proposal-tp47985p48025.html Sent from the Apache Incubator

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Dataflow Incubator Proposal

> > > I don't see anything in the proposal about Google ceasing the use of the > brand > "Google Cloud Dataflow". Yet the co-existence of "Google Cloud Dataflow" > and > "Apache Dataflow" would conflict with Apache requirements for vendor > neutrality and project independence. > > The issue seems

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.24-rc01 (incubating)

Hi, I notice the release contains several jars: ./src/test/resources/freemarker/ext/jsp/webapps/config/WEB-INF/lib/templates.jar ./src/test/resources/freemarker/ext/jsp/webapps/config/WEB-INF/lib/WebappLocalFreemarkerServlet.jar

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Dataflow Incubator Proposal

Looking forward, also interested in contributing. > On Jan 20, 2016, at 4:54 PM, Hugo Louro wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > Very compelling proposal; congrats! I would be interested in contributing > to this project from the beginning. > > Looking forward to it. > > Best,

RE: [DISCUSS] Apache Dataflow Incubator Proposal

Wow .. great news! -- Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon -Original Message- From: Johan Edstrom [mailto:seij...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2016 8:56 AM To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Dataflow Incubator Proposal Looking forward, also interested in

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Dataflow Incubator Proposal

Hello everyone, Very compelling proposal; congrats! I would be interested in contributing to this project from the beginning. Looking forward to it. Best, Hugo On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 3:24 PM, Prasanth Jayachandran < pjayachand...@hortonworks.com> wrote: > Hi Jean > > I’d be interested in

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.24-rc01 (incubating)

[x] -1 Do not release this package as Apache Myriad 0.1.0-incubating because it is actually Apache FreeMarker 2.3.24-rc01-incubating I am +0, however, to releasing it as Apache FreeMarker 2.3.24-rc01-incubating On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 11:26 PM, Daniel Dekany wrote: > Hi

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Joshua Incubator Proposal - Machine Translation Toolkit

'TM'? On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 9:42 PM, toki wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 20/01/2016 03:38, Henri Yandell wrote: > > > License-wise, any expectation of problems from the GPL and LGPL depend > encies? > > I'd also recommend closely