Request to grant write access on Incubator Wiki to aditihilbert

[aditi hilbert]

Hi,

Please grant me write access by adding my account to the ContributorsGroup.
My Incubator wiki username is aditihilbert. 

I would like to submit the April board report by tomorrow and subsequent 
reports as well.

thanks,
aditi
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

[NOTICE] Community graduation vote for Apache Zeppelin

[Alexander Bezzubov]

Please note that a community graduation vote is in progress for Apache
Zeppelin (incubating) [1].

Kind regards,
Alex

 1. https://s.apache.org/Fhl0

MX4J dependency in Geode

[Anthony Baker]

I'm working on clearing an issue [1] found during the review for Geode
1.0.0-incubating.M1 [2] (thanks Justin!).  We have a bundled source
dependency on an MX4J file [3].  The file in question has a license [4]
that is similar but different to ASF v1.1 [5].

How should we deal with this license?  Can we follow the advice for ASF
v1.1 [6] or should we file a JIRA with Legal?  In the medium-term we plan
to remove the file entirely but I'd like to make sure we're following the
correct approach for our upcoming releases.

Thanks,
Anthony

[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-902
[2]
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201602.mbox/%3ca44698bc-a87b-48e5-bdf2-29c1a1814...@classsoftware.com%3e
[3]
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-geode.git;a=blob;f=gemfire-core/src/main/java/com/gemstone/gemfire/admin/jmx/internal/MX4JModelMBean.java;h=1add1ecc56912991f23d441b6677b85e5f2867db;hb=HEAD
[4] http://mx4j.sourceforge.net/docs/ch01s06.html
[5] http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-1.1
[6]
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201602.mbox/%3cCAAS6=7giGt-uS2eY=8o6T3=1BS=g_2i1vp2k1cxsj6hsv1x...@mail.gmail.com%3e

Re: [Incubator Wiki] Update of "April2016" by SwapnilBawaskar

[Marvin Humphrey]

On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 6:02 PM, John D. Ament  wrote:
> Swapnii,
>
> Please correct the edit conflicts.

I took the liberty of reverting the changeset with conflicts, because
it's easy if you know how but a pain to figure out if you don't.  All
that's necessary now is to re-add the Geode report.

Marvin Humphrey

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [Incubator Wiki] Update of "April2016" by SwapnilBawaskar

[John D. Ament]

Swapnii,

Please correct the edit conflicts.

John

On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 8:36 PM Apache Wiki  wrote:

> Dear Wiki user,
>
> You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Incubator Wiki"
> for change notification.
>
> The "April2016" page has been changed by SwapnilBawaskar:
> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/April2016?action=diff=16=17
>
> Comment:
> Adding Geode report
>
> - Suneel Marthi
> - Uma Gangumalla
> - Henri Yandell
> -
> People who left the IPMC:
>
> +
> +  /!\ '''Edit conflict - other version:''' 
> - Jukka Zitting
> +
> +  /!\ '''Edit conflict - your version:''' 
> +
> +
> +  /!\ '''End of edit conflict''' 
>
>   * New Podlings
>
> @@ -81, +87 @@
>
> The following releases entered distribution during the month of
> March:
>
> +
> +  /!\ '''Edit conflict - other version:''' 
> +
> +  /!\ '''Edit conflict - your version:''' 
> +   - johnzon-0.9.3-incubating
> +
> +
> +  /!\ '''End of edit conflict''' 
>
>   * IP Clearance
>
> @@ -570, +584 @@
>
>
>   Three most important issues to address in the move towards graduation:
>
> +   1. Rename packages to org.apache
> -   1.
> -   2.
> -   3.
>
>   Any issues that the Incubator PMC (IPMC) or ASF Board wish/need to be
>   aware of?
>
> +   None
>
> -
> - How has the community developed since the last report?
> -
> -
> -
> - How has the project developed since the last report?
> + How has the community developed since the last report?
>
> +   - We have been able to address the “Three most important issues to
> move towards graduation” from the previous report
>
> +   1. We had our first public release
> +   2. We Added 4 new committers, one of which is outside Pivotal
> +   3. We are about to have a second release, establishing a regular
> release cadence
>
> - Date of last release:
> +   - We had a GeodeSummit http://geodesummit.com/
> + - 22 sessions (including Keynote)
> + - Sessions included current use cases as well as integrations with
> other Apache projects
> + - Over 100 attendees
>
> -   -XX-XX
> +   - The Geode Clubhouse hosted a meeting covering a walk through the
> different approaches for caching data in a Spring based application with
> Apache Geode by Luke Shannon
>
> - When were the last committers or PMC members elected?
> +   - The breakdown of JIRA tickets is the following:
> + Q3 / 2015 - 65 created, 19 resolved.
> + Q4 / 2015 - 342 created, 227 resolved.
> + Q1 / 2016 - 438 created, 362 resolved.
> + Q2 / 2016 - 8 created, 12 resolved (As of Apr 4th)
>
> +   - There was a total of 123 pull requests on GitHub with 6 still open.
>
> +   - The breakdown of the mailing lists messages for January, Feb, March
> of 2016:
> + org.apache.geode.issues 4300
> + org.apache.geode.commits 3731
> + org.apache.geode.dev 2154
> + org.apache.geode.user 294
> +
> +   - There are now X subscribers on the dev and X on the user mailing
> lists.
> +
> +   - Community events:
> + - January 2016:
> +   -  FOSDEM 2016 in Brussels:
> + - Taxi trip analysis (DEBS grand-challenge) with Apache Geode
> (incubating)
> + - Big Data meets Fast Data: an scalable hybrid real-time
> transactional and analytics solution
> +   - February 2016:
> + - Seattle Java User’s Group (Talk about Introduction to Apache Geode)
> +
> +
> + How has the project developed since the last report?
> +
> +
> +   - Had first release, close to the second release (with 134 out of 138
> issues resolved)
> +   - Each commit and pull request is run through CI using Travis CI
> +   - Removed @author tags
> +   - First release published to maven central
> +   - Javadocs hosted on the project website.
> +
> +
> + Date of last release:
> +
> +   2016-02-06
> +
> + When were the last committers or PMC members elected?
> +
> +  - Jinmei Liao (2016-01-26)
> +  - Sai Boorlagadda (2016-02-19)
> +  - Nitin Lamba (2016-03-08)
> +  - Dave Barnes (2016-03-30)
>
>   Signed-off-by:
>
> @@ -965, +1022 @@
>
>   Big Data Machine Learning in SQL for Data Scientists.
>
>   MADlib has been incubating since 2015-09-15.
> -
>   Three most important issues to address in the move towards graduation:
>
> 1.
> @@ -999, +1055 @@
>
> [ ](madlib) Ted Dunning
> [ ](madlib) Roman Shaposhnik
>
> - Shepherd/Mentor notes:
> -
>
>
>   
> @@ -1011, +1065 @@
>
>   Hadoop ecosystem.
>
>   Metron has been incubating since 2015-12-06.
> -
> - Three most important issues to address in the move towards graduation:
> -
> -   1.
> -   2.
> -   3.
>
>   Any issues that the Incubator PMC (IPMC) or ASF Board wish/need to be
>   aware of?
> @@ -1047, +1095 @@
>
> [ ](metron) P. Taylor Goetz
> [ ](metron) Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli
>
> - Shepherd/Mentor notes:
> -
> -
> -
>   
>   Milagro
>
>   Distributed Cryptography; M-Pin protocol for Identity and Trust
>
>   Milagro has been incubating since 

New IPMC Uma Gangumalla, Suneel Marthi

[Marvin Humphrey]

Greetings,

The Incubator PMC has two new members.

Suneel Marthi (smarthi) is the PMC Chair of Apache Mahout and an Apache Member.

Uma Gangumalla (umamahesh) serves on the Apache Hadoop and Apache
Bookkeeper PMCs and is an Apache Member.

Welcome!

Marvin Humphrey, on behalf of the Incubator PMC

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Graduate TinkerPop from Incubator

[John D. Ament]

+1

On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 7:11 AM Stephen Mallette 
wrote:

> The Apache TinkerPop community has discussed graduation to a top level
> project and achieved consensus:
>
> https://s.apache.org/PKhX
>
> Please vote on the resolution that follows to graduate Apache TinkerPop
> from incubator to top level project. This vote will be open for at least 72
> hours.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Stephen Mallette on behalf of the Apache TinkerPop PPMC
>
> ==
> X. Establish the Apache TinkerPop Project
>
> WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best
> interests of the Foundation and consistent with the
> Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management
> Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of
> open-source software, for distribution at no charge to
> the public, related to a graph computing framework for graph
> databases and graph analytic systems
>
> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management
> Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache TinkerPop Project",
> be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the
> Foundation; and be it further
>
> RESOLVED, that the Apache TinkerPop Project be and hereby is
> responsible for the creation and maintenance of software
> related to a graph computing framework for graph databases
> and graph analytic systems.
>
> RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache TinkerPop" be
> and hereby is created, the person holding such office to
> serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair
> of the Apache TinkerPop Project, and to have primary responsibility
> for management of the projects within the scope of
> responsibility of the Apache TinkerPop Project; and be it further
>
> RESOLVED,that the persons listed immediately below be and
> hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the
> Apache TinkerPop Project Management Committee:
>
> * Daniel Gruno 
> * Daniel Kuppitz 
> * James Thornton 
> * Hadrian Zbarcea 
> * Marko Rodriguez 
> * Stephen Mallette 
> * Ted Wilmes 
>
> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Stephen Mallette
> be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache TinkerPop, to
> serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the
> Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until
> death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification,
> or until a successor is appointed; and be it further
>
> RESOLVED, that the initial Apache TinkerPop PMC be and hereby is
> tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to
> encourage open development and increased participation in the
> Apache TinkerPop Project; and be it further
>
> RESOLVED, that the Apache TinkerPop Project be and hereby
> is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache
> Incubator TinkePop podling; and be it further
>
> RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache
> Incubator TinkerPop podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator
> Project are hereafter discharged.
>

Re: [VOTE] Graduate TinkerPop from Incubator

[Hadrian Zbarcea]

+1 (mentor and ipmc)

Hadrian

On 04/05/2016 07:11 AM, Stephen Mallette wrote:

The Apache TinkerPop community has discussed graduation to a top level
project and achieved consensus:

https://s.apache.org/PKhX

Please vote on the resolution that follows to graduate Apache TinkerPop
from incubator to top level project. This vote will be open for at least 72
hours.

Thanks,

Stephen Mallette on behalf of the Apache TinkerPop PPMC

==
X. Establish the Apache TinkerPop Project

WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best
interests of the Foundation and consistent with the
Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management
Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of
open-source software, for distribution at no charge to
the public, related to a graph computing framework for graph
databases and graph analytic systems

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management
Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache TinkerPop Project",
be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the
Foundation; and be it further

RESOLVED, that the Apache TinkerPop Project be and hereby is
responsible for the creation and maintenance of software
related to a graph computing framework for graph databases
and graph analytic systems.

RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache TinkerPop" be
and hereby is created, the person holding such office to
serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair
of the Apache TinkerPop Project, and to have primary responsibility
for management of the projects within the scope of
responsibility of the Apache TinkerPop Project; and be it further

RESOLVED,that the persons listed immediately below be and
hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the
Apache TinkerPop Project Management Committee:

* Daniel Gruno 
* Daniel Kuppitz 
* James Thornton 
* Hadrian Zbarcea 
* Marko Rodriguez 
* Stephen Mallette 
* Ted Wilmes 

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Stephen Mallette
be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache TinkerPop, to
serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the
Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until
death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification,
or until a successor is appointed; and be it further

RESOLVED, that the initial Apache TinkerPop PMC be and hereby is
tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to
encourage open development and increased participation in the
Apache TinkerPop Project; and be it further

RESOLVED, that the Apache TinkerPop Project be and hereby
is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache
Incubator TinkePop podling; and be it further

RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache
Incubator TinkerPop podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator
Project are hereafter discharged.



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: Podling Report Reminder - April 2016

[John D. Ament]

That's fine.  If you want to remove it go for it, otherwise I'll be editing
the report page shortly and can remove you.

John

On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 2:13 AM Todd Lipcon  wrote:

> Hi Incubator,
>
> It seems that this request for a report is in error -- we already completed
> our initial three months of monthly reporting and should now be reporting
> as part of group 2 (next report due in May). I missed updating the
> podlings.xml file after our most recent report.
>
> Shall I go ahead and remove Kudu from this month's report draft? I'll also
> update podlings.xml to remove the monthly=true tag (I missed the
> instructions to do this after the third monthly report).
>
> -Todd
>
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 4:03 AM,  wrote:
>
> > -
> > Apologies if you received this multiple times
> > -
> >
> > Dear podling,
> >
> > This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache
> > Incubator PMC. It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to
> > prepare your quarterly board report.
> >
> > The board meeting is scheduled for Wed, 20 April 2016, 10:30 am PDT.
> > The report for your podling will form a part of the Incubator PMC
> > report. The Incubator PMC requires your report to be submitted 2 weeks
> > before the board meeting, to allow sufficient time for review and
> > submission (Wed, April 6th).
> >
> > Please submit your report with sufficient time to allow the Incubator
> > PMC, and subsequently board members to review and digest. Again, the
> > very latest you should submit your report is 2 weeks prior to the board
> > meeting.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > The Apache Incubator PMC
> >
> > Submitting your Report
> >
> > --
> >
> > Your report should contain the following:
> >
> > *   Your project name
> > *   A brief description of your project, which assumes no knowledge of
> > the project or necessarily of its field
> > *   A list of the three most important issues to address in the move
> > towards graduation.
> > *   Any issues that the Incubator PMC or ASF Board might wish/need to be
> > aware of
> > *   How has the community developed since the last report
> > *   How has the project developed since the last report.
> >
> > This should be appended to the Incubator Wiki page at:
> >
> > http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/April2016
> >
> > Note: This is manually populated. You may need to wait a little before
> > this page is created from a template.
> >
> > Mentors
> > ---
> >
> > Mentors should review reports for their project(s) and sign them off on
> > the Incubator wiki page. Signing off reports shows that you are
> > following the project - projects that are not signed may raise alarms
> > for the Incubator PMC.
> >
> > Incubator PMC
> >
> > --
> > Todd Lipcon
> > Software Engineer, Cloudera
> >
>

[CANCELED] [VOTE] releasing Apache Metron 0.1BETA-RC7

[James Sirota]

On 4/5/16, 2:30 PM, "P. Taylor Goetz"  wrote:

>[CANCELED] [VOTE] releasing Apache Metron 0.1BETA-RC7

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] releasing Apache Metron 0.1BETA-RC7

[P. Taylor Goetz]

There are some tools that rely on specific formatting of vote subject lines, to 
cancel this vote the subject should read:

[CANCELED] [VOTE] releasing Apache Metron 0.1BETA-RC7

-Taylor

> On Apr 5, 2016, at 5:23 PM, James Sirota  wrote:
> 
> THE VOTE IS CANCELLED 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> On 4/5/16, 2:21 PM, "P. Taylor Goetz"  wrote:
>> 
>> I also replied on dev@metron. Let's cancel this vote sort it out there.
>> 
>> -Taylor
>> 
>>> On Apr 5, 2016, at 5:15 PM, James Sirota  wrote:
>>> 
>>> So was the proper process to cancel the RC6 vote and point everyone to the 
>>> RC7 vote?  As Casey mentioned, the only issue was that the Snort dependency 
>>> changed and we had to re-link.  Otherwise they are identical. We could have 
>>> gone ahead and put up a vote for RC6 on the general boards, but we decided 
>>> to fix the issue instead because we didn’t want the community to have a 
>>> non-working release. 
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> James 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
 On 4/5/16, 2:10 PM, "larry mccay"  wrote:
 
 Have to admit that I as confused by that as well.
 I voted previously and didn't see a CANCEL - so I intended to dig through
 the emails to see what I missed bit haven't gotten around to it.
 
> On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 5:08 PM, Casey Stella  wrote:
> 
> Regarding what changed between RC6 and RC7, it was just a PR to correct 
> the
> snort URL issue, from teh changelog:
> 
> METRON-92: Snort has moved their release artifacts, breaking
> deployment (dlyle65535 via cestella) closes apache/incubator-metron#65
> 
> 
>> On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 4:54 PM, P. Taylor Goetz  
>> wrote:
>> 
>> James,
>> 
>> I’m a bit confused. There’ve been a number of votes on the dev@ list,
> but
>> only one that was closed with a RESULT (rc5). I voted on rc6, but it
> seems
>> that rc was abandoned without ever being CANCELED. The labels/links in
> the
>> message below don’t match (RC6 != RC7) — which I imagine is just a
>> copy/paste error, but it makes it confusing trying to figure out what
>> exactly we’re reviewing. The vote on RC7 also hasn’t run for 72 hours
> yet.
>> 
>> Also, when starting an IPMC release vote, please provide a link to the
>> RESULT email.
>> 
>> Please CANCEL this vote on general@, and we can sort things out on
>> dev@metron.
>> 
>> -Taylor
>> 
 On Apr 5, 2016, at 4:15 AM, James Sirota 
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> This is a call to vote on releasing Apache Metron 0.1BETA-RC7
>>> 
>>> Full list of changes in this release:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/metron/0.1BETA-RC7-incubating/CHANGES
>> <
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/metron/0.1BETA-RC6-incubating/CHANGES
>>> 
>>> 
>>> The tag/commit to be voted upon is Metron_0.1BETA_rc7:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-metron.git;a=commit;h=ad3866bdf4b6233950e7803c3c3141f0f859e994
>>> 
>>> The source archive being voted upon can be found here:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/metron/0.1BETA-RC7-incubating/apache-metron-0.1BETA-RC7-incubating.tar.gz
>> <
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/metron/0.1BETA-RC6-incubating/apache-metron-0.1BETA-RC6-incubating.tar.gz
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Other release files, signatures and digests can be found here:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/metron/0.1BETA-RC7-incubating/
>> <
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/metron/0.1BETA-RC6-incubating/
>>> 
>>> 
>>> The release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-metron.git;a=blob_plain;f=KEYS;hb=dc59e37e402bd868aeac7ab42a0cc9c51ccae3c2
>>> 
>>> The Nexus staging repository for this release will be created after
> this
>> vote has been passed.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Metron 0.1BETA-RC7.
>>> 
>>> When voting, please list the actions taken to verify the release.
>>> Recommended build validation and verification instructions are posted
>> here:
>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/METRON/Verifying+Builds
>>> 
>>> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>>> 
>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Metron 0.1BETA-RC7
>>> [ ]  0 No opinion
>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>>> ?B‹CB•?È?[œÝXœØÜšX™K??K[XZ[?ˆ?Ù[™\˜[?][œÝXœØÜšX™P?[˜ÝX˜]?Ü‹˜\?XÚ?K›Ü™ÃB‘›Üˆ?Y??]?[Û˜[??ÛÛ[X[™?Ë??K[XZ[?ˆ?Ù[™\˜[?Z?[???[˜ÝX˜]?Ü‹˜\?XÚ?K›Ü™ÃB
>> 
>> -
>> To 

Re: [VOTE] releasing Apache Metron 0.1BETA-RC7

[James Sirota]

THE VOTE IS CANCELLED 





On 4/5/16, 2:21 PM, "P. Taylor Goetz"  wrote:

>I also replied on dev@metron. Let's cancel this vote sort it out there.
>
>-Taylor
>
>> On Apr 5, 2016, at 5:15 PM, James Sirota  wrote:
>> 
>> So was the proper process to cancel the RC6 vote and point everyone to the 
>> RC7 vote?  As Casey mentioned, the only issue was that the Snort dependency 
>> changed and we had to re-link.  Otherwise they are identical. We could have 
>> gone ahead and put up a vote for RC6 on the general boards, but we decided 
>> to fix the issue instead because we didn’t want the community to have a 
>> non-working release. 
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> James 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On 4/5/16, 2:10 PM, "larry mccay"  wrote:
>>> 
>>> Have to admit that I as confused by that as well.
>>> I voted previously and didn't see a CANCEL - so I intended to dig through
>>> the emails to see what I missed bit haven't gotten around to it.
>>> 
 On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 5:08 PM, Casey Stella  wrote:
 
 Regarding what changed between RC6 and RC7, it was just a PR to correct the
 snort URL issue, from teh changelog:
 
 METRON-92: Snort has moved their release artifacts, breaking
 deployment (dlyle65535 via cestella) closes apache/incubator-metron#65
 
 
> On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 4:54 PM, P. Taylor Goetz  wrote:
> 
> James,
> 
> I’m a bit confused. There’ve been a number of votes on the dev@ list,
 but
> only one that was closed with a RESULT (rc5). I voted on rc6, but it
 seems
> that rc was abandoned without ever being CANCELED. The labels/links in
 the
> message below don’t match (RC6 != RC7) — which I imagine is just a
> copy/paste error, but it makes it confusing trying to figure out what
> exactly we’re reviewing. The vote on RC7 also hasn’t run for 72 hours
 yet.
> 
> Also, when starting an IPMC release vote, please provide a link to the
> RESULT email.
> 
> Please CANCEL this vote on general@, and we can sort things out on
> dev@metron.
> 
> -Taylor
> 
>>> On Apr 5, 2016, at 4:15 AM, James Sirota 
>> wrote:
>> 
>> This is a call to vote on releasing Apache Metron 0.1BETA-RC7
>> 
>> Full list of changes in this release:
 https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/metron/0.1BETA-RC7-incubating/CHANGES
> <
 https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/metron/0.1BETA-RC6-incubating/CHANGES
>> 
>> 
>> The tag/commit to be voted upon is Metron_0.1BETA_rc7:
 https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-metron.git;a=commit;h=ad3866bdf4b6233950e7803c3c3141f0f859e994
>> 
>> The source archive being voted upon can be found here:
 https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/metron/0.1BETA-RC7-incubating/apache-metron-0.1BETA-RC7-incubating.tar.gz
> <
 https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/metron/0.1BETA-RC6-incubating/apache-metron-0.1BETA-RC6-incubating.tar.gz
>> 
>> 
>> Other release files, signatures and digests can be found here:
 https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/metron/0.1BETA-RC7-incubating/
> <
 https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/metron/0.1BETA-RC6-incubating/
>> 
>> 
>> The release artifacts are signed with the following key:
 https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-metron.git;a=blob_plain;f=KEYS;hb=dc59e37e402bd868aeac7ab42a0cc9c51ccae3c2
>> 
>> The Nexus staging repository for this release will be created after
 this
> vote has been passed.
>> 
>> 
>> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Metron 0.1BETA-RC7.
>> 
>> When voting, please list the actions taken to verify the release.
>> Recommended build validation and verification instructions are posted
> here:
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/METRON/Verifying+Builds
>> 
>> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>> 
>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Metron 0.1BETA-RC7
>> [ ]  0 No opinion
>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>> ?B‹CB•?È?[œÝXœØÜšX™K??K[XZ[?ˆ?Ù[™\˜[?][œÝXœØÜšX™P?[˜ÝX˜]?Ü‹˜\?XÚ?K›Ü™ÃB‘›Üˆ?Y??]?[Û˜[??ÛÛ[X[™?Ë??K[XZ[?ˆ?Ù[™\˜[?Z?[???[˜ÝX˜]?Ü‹˜\?XÚ?K›Ü™ÃB
>
>-
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] releasing Apache Metron 0.1BETA-RC7

[P. Taylor Goetz]

I also replied on dev@metron. Let's cancel this vote sort it out there.

-Taylor

> On Apr 5, 2016, at 5:15 PM, James Sirota  wrote:
> 
> So was the proper process to cancel the RC6 vote and point everyone to the 
> RC7 vote?  As Casey mentioned, the only issue was that the Snort dependency 
> changed and we had to re-link.  Otherwise they are identical. We could have 
> gone ahead and put up a vote for RC6 on the general boards, but we decided to 
> fix the issue instead because we didn’t want the community to have a 
> non-working release. 
> 
> Thanks,
> James 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> On 4/5/16, 2:10 PM, "larry mccay"  wrote:
>> 
>> Have to admit that I as confused by that as well.
>> I voted previously and didn't see a CANCEL - so I intended to dig through
>> the emails to see what I missed bit haven't gotten around to it.
>> 
>>> On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 5:08 PM, Casey Stella  wrote:
>>> 
>>> Regarding what changed between RC6 and RC7, it was just a PR to correct the
>>> snort URL issue, from teh changelog:
>>> 
>>> METRON-92: Snort has moved their release artifacts, breaking
>>> deployment (dlyle65535 via cestella) closes apache/incubator-metron#65
>>> 
>>> 
 On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 4:54 PM, P. Taylor Goetz  wrote:
 
 James,
 
 I’m a bit confused. There’ve been a number of votes on the dev@ list,
>>> but
 only one that was closed with a RESULT (rc5). I voted on rc6, but it
>>> seems
 that rc was abandoned without ever being CANCELED. The labels/links in
>>> the
 message below don’t match (RC6 != RC7) — which I imagine is just a
 copy/paste error, but it makes it confusing trying to figure out what
 exactly we’re reviewing. The vote on RC7 also hasn’t run for 72 hours
>>> yet.
 
 Also, when starting an IPMC release vote, please provide a link to the
 RESULT email.
 
 Please CANCEL this vote on general@, and we can sort things out on
 dev@metron.
 
 -Taylor
 
>> On Apr 5, 2016, at 4:15 AM, James Sirota 
> wrote:
> 
> This is a call to vote on releasing Apache Metron 0.1BETA-RC7
> 
> Full list of changes in this release:
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/metron/0.1BETA-RC7-incubating/CHANGES
 <
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/metron/0.1BETA-RC6-incubating/CHANGES
> 
> 
> The tag/commit to be voted upon is Metron_0.1BETA_rc7:
>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-metron.git;a=commit;h=ad3866bdf4b6233950e7803c3c3141f0f859e994
> 
> The source archive being voted upon can be found here:
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/metron/0.1BETA-RC7-incubating/apache-metron-0.1BETA-RC7-incubating.tar.gz
 <
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/metron/0.1BETA-RC6-incubating/apache-metron-0.1BETA-RC6-incubating.tar.gz
> 
> 
> Other release files, signatures and digests can be found here:
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/metron/0.1BETA-RC7-incubating/
 <
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/metron/0.1BETA-RC6-incubating/
> 
> 
> The release artifacts are signed with the following key:
>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-metron.git;a=blob_plain;f=KEYS;hb=dc59e37e402bd868aeac7ab42a0cc9c51ccae3c2
> 
> The Nexus staging repository for this release will be created after
>>> this
 vote has been passed.
> 
> 
> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Metron 0.1BETA-RC7.
> 
> When voting, please list the actions taken to verify the release.
> Recommended build validation and verification instructions are posted
 here:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/METRON/Verifying+Builds
> 
> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> 
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Metron 0.1BETA-RC7
> [ ]  0 No opinion
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
> B‹CB•È[œÝXœØÜšX™KK[XZ[ˆÙ[™\˜[][œÝXœØÜšX™P[˜ÝX˜]Ü‹˜\XÚK›Ü™ÃB‘›ÜˆY][Û˜[ÛÛ[X[™ËK[XZ[ˆÙ[™\˜[Z[[˜ÝX˜]Ü‹˜\XÚK›Ü™ÃB

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] releasing Apache Metron 0.1BETA-RC7

[James Sirota]

So was the proper process to cancel the RC6 vote and point everyone to the RC7 
vote?  As Casey mentioned, the only issue was that the Snort dependency changed 
and we had to re-link.  Otherwise they are identical. We could have gone ahead 
and put up a vote for RC6 on the general boards, but we decided to fix the 
issue instead because we didn’t want the community to have a non-working 
release. 

Thanks,
James 




On 4/5/16, 2:10 PM, "larry mccay"  wrote:

>Have to admit that I as confused by that as well.
>I voted previously and didn't see a CANCEL - so I intended to dig through
>the emails to see what I missed bit haven't gotten around to it.
>
>On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 5:08 PM, Casey Stella  wrote:
>
>> Regarding what changed between RC6 and RC7, it was just a PR to correct the
>> snort URL issue, from teh changelog:
>>
>> METRON-92: Snort has moved their release artifacts, breaking
>> deployment (dlyle65535 via cestella) closes apache/incubator-metron#65
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 4:54 PM, P. Taylor Goetz  wrote:
>>
>> > James,
>> >
>> > I’m a bit confused. There’ve been a number of votes on the dev@ list,
>> but
>> > only one that was closed with a RESULT (rc5). I voted on rc6, but it
>> seems
>> > that rc was abandoned without ever being CANCELED. The labels/links in
>> the
>> > message below don’t match (RC6 != RC7) — which I imagine is just a
>> > copy/paste error, but it makes it confusing trying to figure out what
>> > exactly we’re reviewing. The vote on RC7 also hasn’t run for 72 hours
>> yet.
>> >
>> > Also, when starting an IPMC release vote, please provide a link to the
>> > RESULT email.
>> >
>> > Please CANCEL this vote on general@, and we can sort things out on
>> > dev@metron.
>> >
>> > -Taylor
>> >
>> > > On Apr 5, 2016, at 4:15 AM, James Sirota 
>> > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > This is a call to vote on releasing Apache Metron 0.1BETA-RC7
>> > >
>> > > Full list of changes in this release:
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/metron/0.1BETA-RC7-incubating/CHANGES
>> > <
>> >
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/metron/0.1BETA-RC6-incubating/CHANGES
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > The tag/commit to be voted upon is Metron_0.1BETA_rc7:
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-metron.git;a=commit;h=ad3866bdf4b6233950e7803c3c3141f0f859e994
>> > >
>> > > The source archive being voted upon can be found here:
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/metron/0.1BETA-RC7-incubating/apache-metron-0.1BETA-RC7-incubating.tar.gz
>> > <
>> >
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/metron/0.1BETA-RC6-incubating/apache-metron-0.1BETA-RC6-incubating.tar.gz
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Other release files, signatures and digests can be found here:
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/metron/0.1BETA-RC7-incubating/
>> > <
>> >
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/metron/0.1BETA-RC6-incubating/
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > The release artifacts are signed with the following key:
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-metron.git;a=blob_plain;f=KEYS;hb=dc59e37e402bd868aeac7ab42a0cc9c51ccae3c2
>> > >
>> > > The Nexus staging repository for this release will be created after
>> this
>> > vote has been passed.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Metron 0.1BETA-RC7.
>> > >
>> > > When voting, please list the actions taken to verify the release.
>> > > Recommended build validation and verification instructions are posted
>> > here:
>> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/METRON/Verifying+Builds
>> > >
>> > > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>> > >
>> > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Metron 0.1BETA-RC7
>> > > [ ]  0 No opinion
>> > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>> >
>> >
>>

Re: [VOTE] releasing Apache Metron 0.1BETA-RC7

[larry mccay]

Have to admit that I as confused by that as well.
I voted previously and didn't see a CANCEL - so I intended to dig through
the emails to see what I missed bit haven't gotten around to it.

On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 5:08 PM, Casey Stella  wrote:

> Regarding what changed between RC6 and RC7, it was just a PR to correct the
> snort URL issue, from teh changelog:
>
> METRON-92: Snort has moved their release artifacts, breaking
> deployment (dlyle65535 via cestella) closes apache/incubator-metron#65
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 4:54 PM, P. Taylor Goetz  wrote:
>
> > James,
> >
> > I’m a bit confused. There’ve been a number of votes on the dev@ list,
> but
> > only one that was closed with a RESULT (rc5). I voted on rc6, but it
> seems
> > that rc was abandoned without ever being CANCELED. The labels/links in
> the
> > message below don’t match (RC6 != RC7) — which I imagine is just a
> > copy/paste error, but it makes it confusing trying to figure out what
> > exactly we’re reviewing. The vote on RC7 also hasn’t run for 72 hours
> yet.
> >
> > Also, when starting an IPMC release vote, please provide a link to the
> > RESULT email.
> >
> > Please CANCEL this vote on general@, and we can sort things out on
> > dev@metron.
> >
> > -Taylor
> >
> > > On Apr 5, 2016, at 4:15 AM, James Sirota 
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > This is a call to vote on releasing Apache Metron 0.1BETA-RC7
> > >
> > > Full list of changes in this release:
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/metron/0.1BETA-RC7-incubating/CHANGES
> > <
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/metron/0.1BETA-RC6-incubating/CHANGES
> > >
> > >
> > > The tag/commit to be voted upon is Metron_0.1BETA_rc7:
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-metron.git;a=commit;h=ad3866bdf4b6233950e7803c3c3141f0f859e994
> > >
> > > The source archive being voted upon can be found here:
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/metron/0.1BETA-RC7-incubating/apache-metron-0.1BETA-RC7-incubating.tar.gz
> > <
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/metron/0.1BETA-RC6-incubating/apache-metron-0.1BETA-RC6-incubating.tar.gz
> > >
> > >
> > > Other release files, signatures and digests can be found here:
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/metron/0.1BETA-RC7-incubating/
> > <
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/metron/0.1BETA-RC6-incubating/
> > >
> > >
> > > The release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-metron.git;a=blob_plain;f=KEYS;hb=dc59e37e402bd868aeac7ab42a0cc9c51ccae3c2
> > >
> > > The Nexus staging repository for this release will be created after
> this
> > vote has been passed.
> > >
> > >
> > > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Metron 0.1BETA-RC7.
> > >
> > > When voting, please list the actions taken to verify the release.
> > > Recommended build validation and verification instructions are posted
> > here:
> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/METRON/Verifying+Builds
> > >
> > > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> > >
> > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Metron 0.1BETA-RC7
> > > [ ]  0 No opinion
> > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
> >
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] releasing Apache Metron 0.1BETA-RC7

[Casey Stella]

Regarding what changed between RC6 and RC7, it was just a PR to correct the
snort URL issue, from teh changelog:

METRON-92: Snort has moved their release artifacts, breaking
deployment (dlyle65535 via cestella) closes apache/incubator-metron#65


On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 4:54 PM, P. Taylor Goetz  wrote:

> James,
>
> I’m a bit confused. There’ve been a number of votes on the dev@ list, but
> only one that was closed with a RESULT (rc5). I voted on rc6, but it seems
> that rc was abandoned without ever being CANCELED. The labels/links in the
> message below don’t match (RC6 != RC7) — which I imagine is just a
> copy/paste error, but it makes it confusing trying to figure out what
> exactly we’re reviewing. The vote on RC7 also hasn’t run for 72 hours yet.
>
> Also, when starting an IPMC release vote, please provide a link to the
> RESULT email.
>
> Please CANCEL this vote on general@, and we can sort things out on
> dev@metron.
>
> -Taylor
>
> > On Apr 5, 2016, at 4:15 AM, James Sirota 
> wrote:
> >
> > This is a call to vote on releasing Apache Metron 0.1BETA-RC7
> >
> > Full list of changes in this release:
> >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/metron/0.1BETA-RC7-incubating/CHANGES
> <
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/metron/0.1BETA-RC6-incubating/CHANGES
> >
> >
> > The tag/commit to be voted upon is Metron_0.1BETA_rc7:
> >
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-metron.git;a=commit;h=ad3866bdf4b6233950e7803c3c3141f0f859e994
> >
> > The source archive being voted upon can be found here:
> >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/metron/0.1BETA-RC7-incubating/apache-metron-0.1BETA-RC7-incubating.tar.gz
> <
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/metron/0.1BETA-RC6-incubating/apache-metron-0.1BETA-RC6-incubating.tar.gz
> >
> >
> > Other release files, signatures and digests can be found here:
> >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/metron/0.1BETA-RC7-incubating/
> <
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/metron/0.1BETA-RC6-incubating/
> >
> >
> > The release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> >
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-metron.git;a=blob_plain;f=KEYS;hb=dc59e37e402bd868aeac7ab42a0cc9c51ccae3c2
> >
> > The Nexus staging repository for this release will be created after this
> vote has been passed.
> >
> >
> > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Metron 0.1BETA-RC7.
> >
> > When voting, please list the actions taken to verify the release.
> > Recommended build validation and verification instructions are posted
> here:
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/METRON/Verifying+Builds
> >
> > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> >
> > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Metron 0.1BETA-RC7
> > [ ]  0 No opinion
> > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>
>

Re: [VOTE] releasing Apache Metron 0.1BETA-RC7

[P. Taylor Goetz]

James,

I’m a bit confused. There’ve been a number of votes on the dev@ list, but only 
one that was closed with a RESULT (rc5). I voted on rc6, but it seems that rc 
was abandoned without ever being CANCELED. The labels/links in the message 
below don’t match (RC6 != RC7) — which I imagine is just a copy/paste error, 
but it makes it confusing trying to figure out what exactly we’re reviewing. 
The vote on RC7 also hasn’t run for 72 hours yet.

Also, when starting an IPMC release vote, please provide a link to the RESULT 
email.

Please CANCEL this vote on general@, and we can sort things out on dev@metron.

-Taylor

> On Apr 5, 2016, at 4:15 AM, James Sirota  wrote:
> 
> This is a call to vote on releasing Apache Metron 0.1BETA-RC7
> 
> Full list of changes in this release:
> 
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/metron/0.1BETA-RC7-incubating/CHANGES
> 
> The tag/commit to be voted upon is Metron_0.1BETA_rc7:
> 
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-metron.git;a=commit;h=ad3866bdf4b6233950e7803c3c3141f0f859e994
> 
> The source archive being voted upon can be found here:
> 
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/metron/0.1BETA-RC7-incubating/apache-metron-0.1BETA-RC7-incubating.tar.gz
> 
> Other release files, signatures and digests can be found here:
> 
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/metron/0.1BETA-RC7-incubating/
> 
> The release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> 
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-metron.git;a=blob_plain;f=KEYS;hb=dc59e37e402bd868aeac7ab42a0cc9c51ccae3c2
> 
> The Nexus staging repository for this release will be created after this vote 
> has been passed.
> 
> 
> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Metron 0.1BETA-RC7.
> 
> When voting, please list the actions taken to verify the release.
> Recommended build validation and verification instructions are posted here:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/METRON/Verifying+Builds
> 
> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> 
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Metron 0.1BETA-RC7
> [ ]  0 No opinion
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...



signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Wave Release 0.4.0-incubating released

[Yuri Zelikov]

The Apache Wave community is pleased to announce 0.4.0-incubating release.

The source and binary release can be found at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/wave/0.4.0-incubating/ 


Changes:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/wave/0.4.0-incubating/CHANGES
 


Wave is a distributed, near-real-time, rich collaboration platform that allows 
users to work together in new and exciting ways. Wave allows for flexible modes 
of communication, blending chat, email and collaborative document editing in to 
one seamless environment. Wave provides a lively and responsive environment 
that promotes more fluid and dynamic collaboration between users. The addition 
of Robots and Gagets allow the Wave platform to provide intelligence, 
integration, and customizability to the users experience.

We welcome your help and feedback. For more information on the project and
how to get involved, visit our website at:

http://incubator.apache.org/wave/ 

Regards,
The Apache Wave community


Disclaimer:
Apache Wave is an effort undergoing incubation at the Apache Software
Foundation (ASF), sponsored by the Apache Incubator PMC.
Incubation is required of all newly accepted projects until a further review
indicates that the infrastructure, communications, and decision making
process
have stabilized in a manner consistent with other successful ASF projects.
While incubation status is not necessarily a reflection of the completeness
or stability of the code, it does indicate that the project has yet to be
fully endorsed by the ASF.


signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Johnzon from the Incubator

[Craig Russell]

+1 for graduation (binding)

I don’t see any value in keeping Johnzon in incubation. 

The project seems to be ticking along, with several releases, frequent commits, 
and a low excitement but active community.

Craig

> On Apr 1, 2016, at 12:49 PM, Hendrik Dev  wrote:
> 
> The Apache Johnzon community has discussed and voted on graduation to
> a top level project. The vote passed with 8 +1 votes (5 from the PPMC)
> and no 0 or -1 votes.
> 
> Incubation Status:
> http://incubator.apache.org/projects/johnzon.html
> Maturity Assessment:
> https://s.apache.org/d88S
> Discussions:
> https://s.apache.org/5vxO
> https://s.apache.org/8VkX
> Vote:
> https://s.apache.org/suuK
> (http://markmail.org/message/mawumtfqokgye5xn)
> Result:
> https://s.apache.org/Erd0
> (http://markmail.org/message/qmqvk56ccqkq2gob)
> 
> Please vote on the resolution pasted below to graduate Apache Johnzon
> from the incubator to top level project.
> 
> [ ] +1 Graduate Apache Johnzon from the Incubator.
> [ ] +0 Don't care.
> [ ] -1 Don't graduate Apache Johnzon from the Incubator because ...
> 
> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> 
> Many thanks to our mentors and everyone else for the support,
> 
> Hendrik Saly on behalf of the Apache Johnzon PPMC
> 
> Apache Johnzon top-level project resolution:
> 
> 
> WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best
> interests of the Foundation and consistent with the
> Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management
> Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of
> open-source software, for distribution at no charge to
> the public, related to JSR-353 compliant JSON parsing and a
> set of useful modules to help with the usage of JSR-353
> as well as JSR successors (like JSR-374) or related JSRs
> (like JSR-367).
> 
> 
> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management
> Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Johnzon Project",
> be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the
> Foundation; and be it further
> 
> RESOLVED, that the Apache Johnzon Project be and hereby is
> responsible for the creation and maintenance of software
> related to JSR-353 compliant JSON parsing and a
> set of useful modules to help with the usage of JSR-353
> as well as JSR successors (like JSR-374) or related JSRs
> (like JSR-367); and be it further
> 
> RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache Johnzon" be
> and hereby is created, the person holding such office to
> serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair
> of the Apache Johnzon Project, and to have primary responsibility
> for management of the projects within the scope of
> responsibility of the Apache Johnzon Project; and be it further
> 
> RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and
> hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the
> Apache Johnzon Project:
> 
> * Justin Mclean 
> * Romain Manni-Bucau 
> * Jean-Louis Monteiro 
> * Mark Struberg 
> * Hendrik Saly 
> 
> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Hendrik Saly (salyh)
> be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache Johnzon, to
> serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the
> Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until
> death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification,
> or until a successor is appointed; and be it further
> 
> RESOLVED, that the initial Apache Johnzon PMC be and hereby is
> tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to
> encourage open development and increased participation in the
> Apache Johnzon Project; and be it further
> 
> RESOLVED, that the Apache Johnzon Project be and hereby
> is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache
> Incubator Johnzon podling; and be it further
> 
> RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache
> Incubator Johnzon podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator
> Project are hereafter discharged.
> 
> -- 
> Hendrik Saly (salyh, hendrikdev22)
> @hendrikdev22
> PGP: 0x22D7F6EC
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> 

Craig L Russell
Secretary, Apache Software Foundation
c...@apache.org http://db.apache.org/jdo


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Graduate TinkerPop from Incubator

[Daniel Gruno]

With both my mentor and IPMC hat on, +1 (binding)!

With regards,
Daniel.

On 04/05/2016 01:11 PM, Stephen Mallette wrote:
> The Apache TinkerPop community has discussed graduation to a top level
> project and achieved consensus:
> 
> https://s.apache.org/PKhX
> 
> Please vote on the resolution that follows to graduate Apache TinkerPop
> from incubator to top level project. This vote will be open for at least 72
> hours.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Stephen Mallette on behalf of the Apache TinkerPop PPMC
> 
> ==
> X. Establish the Apache TinkerPop Project
> 
> WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best
> interests of the Foundation and consistent with the
> Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management
> Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of
> open-source software, for distribution at no charge to
> the public, related to a graph computing framework for graph
> databases and graph analytic systems
> 
> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management
> Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache TinkerPop Project",
> be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the
> Foundation; and be it further
> 
> RESOLVED, that the Apache TinkerPop Project be and hereby is
> responsible for the creation and maintenance of software
> related to a graph computing framework for graph databases
> and graph analytic systems.
> 
> RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache TinkerPop" be
> and hereby is created, the person holding such office to
> serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair
> of the Apache TinkerPop Project, and to have primary responsibility
> for management of the projects within the scope of
> responsibility of the Apache TinkerPop Project; and be it further
> 
> RESOLVED,that the persons listed immediately below be and
> hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the
> Apache TinkerPop Project Management Committee:
> 
> * Daniel Gruno 
> * Daniel Kuppitz 
> * James Thornton 
> * Hadrian Zbarcea 
> * Marko Rodriguez 
> * Stephen Mallette 
> * Ted Wilmes 
> 
> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Stephen Mallette
> be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache TinkerPop, to
> serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the
> Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until
> death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification,
> or until a successor is appointed; and be it further
> 
> RESOLVED, that the initial Apache TinkerPop PMC be and hereby is
> tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to
> encourage open development and increased participation in the
> Apache TinkerPop Project; and be it further
> 
> RESOLVED, that the Apache TinkerPop Project be and hereby
> is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache
> Incubator TinkePop podling; and be it further
> 
> RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache
> Incubator TinkerPop podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator
> Project are hereafter discharged.
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Johnzon from the Incubator

[Mattmann, Chris A (3980)]

+1 from me.

++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Chief Architect
Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398)
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527
Email: chris.a.mattm...@nasa.gov
WWW:  http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
++
Director, Information Retrieval and Data Science Group (IRDS)
Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department
University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
WWW: http://irds.usc.edu/
++










On 4/5/16, 10:07 AM, "Craig Russell"  wrote:

>+1 for graduation (binding)
>
>I don’t see any value in keeping Johnzon in incubation. 
>
>The project seems to be ticking along, with several releases, frequent 
>commits, and a low excitement but active community.
>
>Craig
>
>> On Apr 1, 2016, at 12:49 PM, Hendrik Dev  wrote:
>> 
>> The Apache Johnzon community has discussed and voted on graduation to
>> a top level project. The vote passed with 8 +1 votes (5 from the PPMC)
>> and no 0 or -1 votes.
>> 
>> Incubation Status:
>> http://incubator.apache.org/projects/johnzon.html
>> Maturity Assessment:
>> https://s.apache.org/d88S
>> Discussions:
>> https://s.apache.org/5vxO
>> https://s.apache.org/8VkX
>> Vote:
>> https://s.apache.org/suuK
>> (http://markmail.org/message/mawumtfqokgye5xn)
>> Result:
>> https://s.apache.org/Erd0
>> (http://markmail.org/message/qmqvk56ccqkq2gob)
>> 
>> Please vote on the resolution pasted below to graduate Apache Johnzon
>> from the incubator to top level project.
>> 
>> [ ] +1 Graduate Apache Johnzon from the Incubator.
>> [ ] +0 Don't care.
>> [ ] -1 Don't graduate Apache Johnzon from the Incubator because ...
>> 
>> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>> 
>> Many thanks to our mentors and everyone else for the support,
>> 
>> Hendrik Saly on behalf of the Apache Johnzon PPMC
>> 
>> Apache Johnzon top-level project resolution:
>> 
>> 
>> WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best
>> interests of the Foundation and consistent with the
>> Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management
>> Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of
>> open-source software, for distribution at no charge to
>> the public, related to JSR-353 compliant JSON parsing and a
>> set of useful modules to help with the usage of JSR-353
>> as well as JSR successors (like JSR-374) or related JSRs
>> (like JSR-367).
>> 
>> 
>> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management
>> Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Johnzon Project",
>> be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the
>> Foundation; and be it further
>> 
>> RESOLVED, that the Apache Johnzon Project be and hereby is
>> responsible for the creation and maintenance of software
>> related to JSR-353 compliant JSON parsing and a
>> set of useful modules to help with the usage of JSR-353
>> as well as JSR successors (like JSR-374) or related JSRs
>> (like JSR-367); and be it further
>> 
>> RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache Johnzon" be
>> and hereby is created, the person holding such office to
>> serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair
>> of the Apache Johnzon Project, and to have primary responsibility
>> for management of the projects within the scope of
>> responsibility of the Apache Johnzon Project; and be it further
>> 
>> RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and
>> hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the
>> Apache Johnzon Project:
>> 
>> * Justin Mclean 
>> * Romain Manni-Bucau 
>> * Jean-Louis Monteiro 
>> * Mark Struberg 
>> * Hendrik Saly 
>> 
>> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Hendrik Saly (salyh)
>> be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache Johnzon, to
>> serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the
>> Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until
>> death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification,
>> or until a successor is appointed; and be it further
>> 
>> RESOLVED, that the initial Apache Johnzon PMC be and hereby is
>> tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to
>> encourage open development and increased participation in the
>> Apache Johnzon Project; and be it further
>> 
>> RESOLVED, that the Apache Johnzon Project be and hereby
>> is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache
>> Incubator Johnzon podling; and be it further
>> 
>> RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache
>> Incubator Johnzon podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator
>> Project are hereafter discharged.
>> 
>> -- 
>> Hendrik Saly (salyh, hendrikdev22)
>> @hendrikdev22
>> PGP: 0x22D7F6EC
>> 
>> 

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Johnzon from the Incubator

[Mark Struberg]

+1

I'd like to further elaborate why we did not choose to graduate under Geronimo 
or TomEE.

* TomEE: Johnzon is not only bound to a JavaEE container but could really be 
used separately, e.g. in CXF. It would be kind of weird if we need to do a 
Johnzon release in TomEE first, then build CXF to finally be able to release 
TomEE. 


* Geronimo is not really active. There are a few parts which are actively 
maintained, but those are mainly the parts used by TomEE and the specs sub 
project. The rest has very low activity.



What we potentially need for a lot similar projects (BVal, Johnzon, etc) is a 
kind of 'EE at Apache' umbrella project. That might be a candidate to graduate 
under. After all, the people contributing to those projects are most times the 
same anyway ;) But such a project doesn't yet exist.

LieGrue,
strub




> On Tuesday, 5 April 2016, 14:37, Hendrik Dev  wrote:
> > I agree with Justin, there is no real benefit (either for the podling
> nor for apache/incubator) when Johnzon stays in the Incubator.
> 
> We have an active, friendly, diverse and responsive community, we had
> regular releases, we promote Johnzon [1] and Jira tickets are
> typically closed a few days after they we're reported.
> 
> I'd like to keep the vote open till 8th April to continue the
> discussion and to reach consensus.
> For me graduation under Geronimo makes no sense cause Geronimo is (at
> the moment) a really inactive project.
> 
> Thanks
> Hendrik
> 
> [1]
> https://speakerdeck.com/salyh/johnzon-apaches-upcoming-json-library
> held @ApacheCon Europe 2015
> https://www.codecentric.de/2016/01/11/apache-roadshow-24755/ (germany only)
> https://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/tag/johnzon/
> 
> On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 9:42 AM, Mark Struberg  
> wrote:
>>  Good morning!
>> 
>>  Of course Johnzon could be bigger.
>>  And as said before: there are 3 active committers (not 2!) and an active 
> PMC.
>> 
>>  Plus there are at least 2 further people who contributed patches and are on 
> our watch-list.
>>  I also believe that we are a really friendly community :)
>> 
>> 
>>  That said I have no problem with either graduating now nor with waiting for 
> another tick as I'm really confident that we will grow the community pretty 
> soon. But we will NOT invite people just for the sake of growing. They must 
> earn 
> their merit first!
>> 
>> 
>>  LieGrue,
>>  strub
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>>  On Tuesday, 5 April 2016, 8:43, Justin Mclean 
>  wrote:
>>>  > Hi,
>>> 
>>>  I agree the project doesn’t have a large visible active community but 
> I’m also
>>>  not sure what the point of having Johnzon staying in the incubator. 
> They tick
>>>  along nicely, they certainly don’t need the incubator to check their 
> releases
>>>  and they understand the Apache Way of doing things. What harm would be 
> done if
>>>  they did graduate as a TLP vs keeping them in incubation?
>>> 
>>>  Thanks,
>>> 
>>>  Justin
>>>  -
>>>  To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>>>  For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>>> 
>> 
>>  -
>>  To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>>  For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Hendrik Saly (salyh, hendrikdev22)
> @hendrikdev22
> PGP: 0x22D7F6EC
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Johnzon from the Incubator

[Hendrik Dev]

I agree with Justin, there is no real benefit (either for the podling
nor for apache/incubator) when Johnzon stays in the Incubator.

We have an active, friendly, diverse and responsive community, we had
regular releases, we promote Johnzon [1] and Jira tickets are
typically closed a few days after they we're reported.

I'd like to keep the vote open till 8th April to continue the
discussion and to reach consensus.
For me graduation under Geronimo makes no sense cause Geronimo is (at
the moment) a really inactive project.

Thanks
Hendrik

[1]
https://speakerdeck.com/salyh/johnzon-apaches-upcoming-json-library
held @ApacheCon Europe 2015
https://www.codecentric.de/2016/01/11/apache-roadshow-24755/ (germany only)
https://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/tag/johnzon/

On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 9:42 AM, Mark Struberg  wrote:
> Good morning!
>
> Of course Johnzon could be bigger.
> And as said before: there are 3 active committers (not 2!) and an active PMC.
>
> Plus there are at least 2 further people who contributed patches and are on 
> our watch-list.
> I also believe that we are a really friendly community :)
>
>
> That said I have no problem with either graduating now nor with waiting for 
> another tick as I'm really confident that we will grow the community pretty 
> soon. But we will NOT invite people just for the sake of growing. They must 
> earn their merit first!
>
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
>
>
>> On Tuesday, 5 April 2016, 8:43, Justin Mclean  
>> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>>
>> I agree the project doesn’t have a large visible active community but I’m 
>> also
>> not sure what the point of having Johnzon staying in the incubator. They tick
>> along nicely, they certainly don’t need the incubator to check their releases
>> and they understand the Apache Way of doing things. What harm would be done 
>> if
>> they did graduate as a TLP vs keeping them in incubation?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Justin
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>



-- 
Hendrik Saly (salyh, hendrikdev22)
@hendrikdev22
PGP: 0x22D7F6EC

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate TinkerPop from the Apache Incubator

[Stephen Mallette]

You are right - fixing that now - thanks

On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 7:25 AM, John D. Ament  wrote:

> Stephen,
>
> Would you mind updating your project status page? I suspect the latter 2015
> entries are actually 2016.
>
> http://incubator.apache.org/projects/tinkerpop.html
>
> John
>
> On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 2:37 PM Stephen Mallette 
> wrote:
>
> > The TinkerPop community/mentors have had a discussion and established
> > consensus in favor of proposing graduation to a top-level project.  Here
> is
> > the discussion on the dev list:
> >
> > https://pony-poc.apache.org/thread.html/Zvgmc96r64mjn5l
> >
> > Assuming this discussion reaches consensus we will move to a formal vote.
> >
>

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate TinkerPop from the Apache Incubator

[John D. Ament]

Stephen,

Would you mind updating your project status page? I suspect the latter 2015
entries are actually 2016.

http://incubator.apache.org/projects/tinkerpop.html

John

On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 2:37 PM Stephen Mallette 
wrote:

> The TinkerPop community/mentors have had a discussion and established
> consensus in favor of proposing graduation to a top-level project.  Here is
> the discussion on the dev list:
>
> https://pony-poc.apache.org/thread.html/Zvgmc96r64mjn5l
>
> Assuming this discussion reaches consensus we will move to a formal vote.
>

[VOTE] Graduate TinkerPop from Incubator

[Stephen Mallette]

The Apache TinkerPop community has discussed graduation to a top level
project and achieved consensus:

https://s.apache.org/PKhX

Please vote on the resolution that follows to graduate Apache TinkerPop
from incubator to top level project. This vote will be open for at least 72
hours.

Thanks,

Stephen Mallette on behalf of the Apache TinkerPop PPMC

==
X. Establish the Apache TinkerPop Project

WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best
interests of the Foundation and consistent with the
Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management
Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of
open-source software, for distribution at no charge to
the public, related to a graph computing framework for graph
databases and graph analytic systems

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management
Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache TinkerPop Project",
be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the
Foundation; and be it further

RESOLVED, that the Apache TinkerPop Project be and hereby is
responsible for the creation and maintenance of software
related to a graph computing framework for graph databases
and graph analytic systems.

RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache TinkerPop" be
and hereby is created, the person holding such office to
serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair
of the Apache TinkerPop Project, and to have primary responsibility
for management of the projects within the scope of
responsibility of the Apache TinkerPop Project; and be it further

RESOLVED,that the persons listed immediately below be and
hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the
Apache TinkerPop Project Management Committee:

* Daniel Gruno 
* Daniel Kuppitz 
* James Thornton 
* Hadrian Zbarcea 
* Marko Rodriguez 
* Stephen Mallette 
* Ted Wilmes 

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Stephen Mallette
be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache TinkerPop, to
serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the
Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until
death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification,
or until a successor is appointed; and be it further

RESOLVED, that the initial Apache TinkerPop PMC be and hereby is
tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to
encourage open development and increased participation in the
Apache TinkerPop Project; and be it further

RESOLVED, that the Apache TinkerPop Project be and hereby
is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache
Incubator TinkePop podling; and be it further

RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache
Incubator TinkerPop podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator
Project are hereafter discharged.

[VOTE] releasing Apache Metron 0.1BETA-RC7

[James Sirota]

This is a call to vote on releasing Apache Metron 0.1BETA-RC7

Full list of changes in this release:

https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/metron/0.1BETA-RC7-incubating/CHANGES

The tag/commit to be voted upon is Metron_0.1BETA_rc7:

https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-metron.git;a=commit;h=ad3866bdf4b6233950e7803c3c3141f0f859e994

The source archive being voted upon can be found here:

https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/metron/0.1BETA-RC7-incubating/apache-metron-0.1BETA-RC7-incubating.tar.gz

Other release files, signatures and digests can be found here:

https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/metron/0.1BETA-RC7-incubating/

The release artifacts are signed with the following key:

https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-metron.git;a=blob_plain;f=KEYS;hb=dc59e37e402bd868aeac7ab42a0cc9c51ccae3c2

The Nexus staging repository for this release will be created after this vote 
has been passed.


Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Metron 0.1BETA-RC7.

When voting, please list the actions taken to verify the release.
Recommended build validation and verification instructions are posted here:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/METRON/Verifying+Builds

This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.

[ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Metron 0.1BETA-RC7
[ ]  0 No opinion
[ ] -1 Do not release this package because...

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Johnzon from the Incubator

[Mark Struberg]

Good morning!

Of course Johnzon could be bigger.
And as said before: there are 3 active committers (not 2!) and an active PMC. 

Plus there are at least 2 further people who contributed patches and are on our 
watch-list.
I also believe that we are a really friendly community :)


That said I have no problem with either graduating now nor with waiting for 
another tick as I'm really confident that we will grow the community pretty 
soon. But we will NOT invite people just for the sake of growing. They must 
earn their merit first!


LieGrue,
strub





> On Tuesday, 5 April 2016, 8:43, Justin Mclean  
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> 
> I agree the project doesn’t have a large visible active community but I’m 
> also 
> not sure what the point of having Johnzon staying in the incubator. They tick 
> along nicely, they certainly don’t need the incubator to check their releases 
> and they understand the Apache Way of doing things. What harm would be done 
> if 
> they did graduate as a TLP vs keeping them in incubation?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Justin
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] MADlib v1.9-rc1

[Justin Mclean]

Hi,

> The only new files are build related cmake or yaml files.

That's probably OK but given the statement in the LICENSE that all files 
without Apache headers are BSD licensed it probably would of made sense to add 
the headers to reduce any confusion.

Thanks,
Justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Johnzon from the Incubator

[Justin Mclean]

Hi,

I agree the project doesn’t have a large visible active community but I’m also 
not sure what the point of having Johnzon staying in the incubator. They tick 
along nicely, they certainly don’t need the incubator to check their releases 
and they understand the Apache Way of doing things. What harm would be done if 
they did graduate as a TLP vs keeping them in incubation?

Thanks,
Justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: Podling Report Reminder - April 2016

[Todd Lipcon]

Hi Incubator,

It seems that this request for a report is in error -- we already completed
our initial three months of monthly reporting and should now be reporting
as part of group 2 (next report due in May). I missed updating the
podlings.xml file after our most recent report.

Shall I go ahead and remove Kudu from this month's report draft? I'll also
update podlings.xml to remove the monthly=true tag (I missed the
instructions to do this after the third monthly report).

-Todd

On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 4:03 AM,  wrote:

> -
> Apologies if you received this multiple times
> -
>
> Dear podling,
>
> This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache
> Incubator PMC. It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to
> prepare your quarterly board report.
>
> The board meeting is scheduled for Wed, 20 April 2016, 10:30 am PDT.
> The report for your podling will form a part of the Incubator PMC
> report. The Incubator PMC requires your report to be submitted 2 weeks
> before the board meeting, to allow sufficient time for review and
> submission (Wed, April 6th).
>
> Please submit your report with sufficient time to allow the Incubator
> PMC, and subsequently board members to review and digest. Again, the
> very latest you should submit your report is 2 weeks prior to the board
> meeting.
>
> Thanks,
>
> The Apache Incubator PMC
>
> Submitting your Report
>
> --
>
> Your report should contain the following:
>
> *   Your project name
> *   A brief description of your project, which assumes no knowledge of
> the project or necessarily of its field
> *   A list of the three most important issues to address in the move
> towards graduation.
> *   Any issues that the Incubator PMC or ASF Board might wish/need to be
> aware of
> *   How has the community developed since the last report
> *   How has the project developed since the last report.
>
> This should be appended to the Incubator Wiki page at:
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/April2016
>
> Note: This is manually populated. You may need to wait a little before
> this page is created from a template.
>
> Mentors
> ---
>
> Mentors should review reports for their project(s) and sign them off on
> the Incubator wiki page. Signing off reports shows that you are
> following the project - projects that are not signed may raise alarms
> for the Incubator PMC.
>
> Incubator PMC
>
> --
> Todd Lipcon
> Software Engineer, Cloudera
>