Re: Write access to January report page

2017-01-05 Thread jean-frederic clere
On 01/05/2017 07:03 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: > On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 6:41 PM, jean-frederic clere > wrote: > >> On 01/05/2017 01:51 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote: >>> Hi, >>> Isn't the https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/January2017 supposed to be >>> editable by Mentors/IPMC

Re: Write access to January report page

2017-01-05 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 6:41 PM, jean-frederic clere wrote: > On 01/05/2017 01:51 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote: > > Hi, > > Isn't the https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/January2017 supposed to be > > editable by Mentors/IPMC members? > > So I probably have a problem...

Re: Write access to January report page

2017-01-05 Thread jean-frederic clere
On 01/05/2017 01:51 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote: > Hi, > Isn't the https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/January2017 supposed to be > editable by Mentors/IPMC members? So I probably have a problem... JeanFredericClere my user can't edit it or is it too late? Cheers Jean-Frederic > > Cheers >

Re: [DISCUSS] publishing docker image for podling

2017-01-05 Thread Roman Shaposhnik
On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 1:32 AM, Greg Stein wrote: > Taking off my Infrastructure hat from within that issue, and speaking to > this from a Foundation policy standpoint ... I think this is probably okay, > if the docker image is named (say) u/apache/incubator-singa. We allow >

Re: Write access to January report page

2017-01-05 Thread Marvin Humphrey
On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 9:41 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote: > On 01/05/2017 01:51 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote: >> Hi, >> Isn't the https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/January2017 supposed to be >> editable by Mentors/IPMC members? > > So I probably have a problem... JeanFredericClere

Re: [VOTE] Drop incubating requirement of Maven artifacts

2017-01-05 Thread Niclas Hedhman
Coming late to the party... This has been discussed, and contentious, since "forever". A long time ago, there was a notion that a podling release was not an ASF release (which was the main reason for the "incubating" marker in all release and support artifacts. But that pendulum has swung in the

Re: [DISCUSS] publishing docker image for podling

2017-01-05 Thread Greg Stein
Taking off my Infrastructure hat from within that issue, and speaking to this from a Foundation policy standpoint ... I think this is probably okay, if the docker image is named (say) u/apache/incubator-singa. We allow incubator projects in our github namespace as

Re: [DISCUSS] publishing docker image for podling

2017-01-05 Thread Felix Meschberger
Hi Deploying containers to Docker hub IMHO is the same as deploying Java artefacts to Maven or Node.JS modules to NPM or whatever. It is a release of a convenience binary in addition to the official source release. As such: +1 to supporting Docker, just like Maven Repositories or NPM

Re: [DISCUSS] publishing docker image for podling

2017-01-05 Thread John D. Ament
I'll point out that there was a discussion around docker and podlings back over the summer, [1]. It appears that Greg is correct, it has not been presented to infra yet, but the IPMC has moved forward on a proposal which seemed to be to allow guacamole to publish as "apache/guacamole". I see no

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Ranger Project from the Incubator - Resending with additional mail distro

2017-01-05 Thread Balaji Ganesan
+1 Great to see the progress from the Ranger community. On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 4:54 PM, Suneel Marthi wrote: > +1 binding > > On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 5:48 PM, Ramesh Mani wrote: > > > Dear Incubator members, > > > > Apache Ranger Project community has

Re: [DISCUSS] Significance of Artifact Names

2017-01-05 Thread Paul King
+1 from me too. For Groovy, we had a discussion internally and with our mentors. The src archive and website disclaimer seemed to be the things that were cared about from a legal point of view and so that is what we renamed. For us, "convenience binaries" were something that should be

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Control 1.8.0-incubating (RC5)

2017-01-05 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > is this referring to the tar ball having the name "incubator-trafficcontrol" > and just changing that to "incubating-..." would suffice? Yep that’s what’s required. You might find this check list [1] useful. Thanks, Justin 1.

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposing MXNet for the Apache Incubator

2017-01-05 Thread Suneel Marthi
I would like to sign up as mentor for MxNet. On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 12:12 AM, Henri Yandell wrote: > Hello Incubator, > > I'd like to propose a new incubator Apache MXNet podling. > > The existing MXNet project (http://mxnet.io - 1.5 years old, 15 > committers, > 200

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposing MXNet for the Apache Incubator

2017-01-05 Thread Henri Yandell
Brilliant - thank you Suneel :) I see you're on the Incubator PMC and have added you to the wiki page. On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 9:25 PM, Suneel Marthi wrote: > I would like to sign up as mentor for MxNet. > > On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 12:12 AM, Henri Yandell

[DISCUSS] Proposing MXNet for the Apache Incubator

2017-01-05 Thread Henri Yandell
Hello Incubator, I'd like to propose a new incubator Apache MXNet podling. The existing MXNet project (http://mxnet.io - 1.5 years old, 15 committers, 200 contributors) is very interested in joining Apache. MXNet is an open-source deep learning framework that allows you to define, train, and

Re: [VOTE] Drop incubating requirement of Maven artifacts

2017-01-05 Thread Emilian Bold
> I would favor a system of marker(s) indicating the code maturity (incl legal) There is no standard afaik to indicate legal or community 'maturity'. It would be something for a (RDF) vocabulary for artifacts to be adopted industry wide. Right now none of the Maven coordinates are a good fit

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposing MXNet for the Apache Incubator

2017-01-05 Thread Henry Saputra
This is great news and I am looking forward to it =) According to proposal, the community want to stick with Github issues for tracking issues and bugs? I suppose this needs a nod by Greg Stein as rep from Apache Infra to confirm that this is ok for incubation and how would it impact during

[jira] [Assigned] (INCUBATOR-144) Incubator Task

2017-01-05 Thread Freddy Barboza (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-144?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Freddy Barboza reassigned INCUBATOR-144: Assignee: Freddy Barboza > Incubator Task > -- > >

[jira] [Resolved] (INCUBATOR-144) Incubator Task

2017-01-05 Thread Freddy Barboza (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-144?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Freddy Barboza resolved INCUBATOR-144. -- Resolution: Resolved this ticket was created as a test. > Incubator Task >

[jira] [Closed] (INCUBATOR-144) Incubator Task

2017-01-05 Thread Freddy Barboza (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-144?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Freddy Barboza closed INCUBATOR-144. ticket created as a Test for Incubator projects > Incubator Task > -- > >