Hi folks,
I'm not sure what's going on with this project, it looks like mail is being
sent to a non-existent domain here. I see in my email that this is a brand new
podling. It doesn't appear that the DNS has been added for this, or that the
lists have been created at all.
-Chris
> On Apr
I am aware. I'd say it doesn't (or shouldn't) apply in this case. Nobody is
taking a library out of SO and putting it into a project -- they don't have
such a thing. Reading a generic answer how to do something from a 5-line
code snippet, and then applying the (derivative) learning should not be
On the other hand, I don't think there'd be an objection -- and it might be
the right moment -- to redirect netbeans.org to netbeans.apache.org right
now, there's an issue for this with Greg Stein that we could follow up in
the form of doing this, it would be a good moment because of the symbolism
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-17245
Gj
On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 7:53 AM Geertjan Wielenga <
geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On the other hand, I don't think there'd be an objection -- and it might
> be the right moment -- to redirect netbeans.org to netbeans.apache.org
>
On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 12:41 AM Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> >> - What the situation with https://netbeans.org website?
> >
> > That question is too open-ended. What is your concern?
>
> No specific concern other than a general branding one. It’s slightly
> unusual for a podling to graduate
Hi Justin,
We're close to being able to shutdown/redirect netbeans.org completely and
use netbeans.apache.org for everything. In terms of content, everything we
wanted to keep from netbeans.org, e.g., tutorials and feature descriptions,
has been donated by Oracle to Apache. We're matching the URL
Note that every link on netbeans.org front page redirects to
netbeans.apache.org -- it's simply a facade right now for
netbeans.apache.org and is only there since we're concerned that parts of
it are still needed. So, it is not the podling's previous website in the
true sense of the word.
Gj
On
Hi,
+1 (non-binding)
Hi,
I vote with:
+1 release the software
Are release files in correct location? Yes
Do release files have the word incubating in their name? Yes
Are the digital signature and hashes correct? Yes
Does DISCLAIMER file exist? Yes
Do LICENSE and NOTICE files
Hi,
Just wondering if you could answer a few questions:
- What the situation with https://netbeans.org website?
- How diverse (in terms of who employs them) are the proposed PPMC members?
With the large size I’m assuming many different employers but it would still be
interesting to know how
On Sun, Apr 7, 2019 at 6:14 PM Justin Mclean
wrote:
>...
> - What the situation with https://netbeans.org website?
>
That question is too open-ended. What is your concern?
Cheers,
-g
Hi,
>> - What the situation with https://netbeans.org website?
>
> That question is too open-ended. What is your concern?
No specific concern other than a general branding one. It’s slightly unusual
for a podling to graduate with it’s previous website still in existence, but
the explanation
Hi,
> - We should -not- stress about whether SO is used by our contributors (to
> create contributions) and/or (its derivatives are) included in Apache
> projects.
Did you read currently legal policy on including CC-BY-SA licensed code? (not
matter where it comes from) It’s considered category
It feels this thread has somewhat veered off the initial question. My
position on this is non-purist, and perhaps more pragmatic.
SO licensing:
- Their licensing is reasonable for what they are trying to do. Just as
many social networks, they don't want somebody to suck up their (users')
content,
Hi,
Sign offs are due 9th April.
The following podlings are still don’t have any sign offs:
- Annotator
- BatchEE
- Gobblin
- Spot
Thanks,
Justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional
Hi,
Draft report is up here [1] and it will be submitted on Wednesday April 10th.
A lot happened in March so I may of missing something and it may need a little
more detail in places, if you think thins is the case please go ahead and make
changes. As always any if you have any feedback
Hi,.
The projects Milagro and MXNet failed to report and will be asked to report
next month.
Given the low level of activity and lack of PPMC oversight is t’s probably time
to ask Milagro to consider retirement (again).
Thanks,
Justin
16 matches
Mail list logo
