On 01.10.2007, at 18:43, Roland Weber wrote:
Erik Abele wrote:
Sure, am happy to help (as a satisfied user of both,
HttpComponents and
JMeter); just let me know where you'd like to see me subscribed... (I
assume [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED])
That's great! Yes, those will be the
i'm thinking more of a benevolent educator than traffic warden
style reviewer role.
When it comes to legal issues related to a release, the warden role is the
more appropriate. It benefits neither the project nor the ASF if we are lax
in that regard.
Some of the things that they need to do
On 10/1/07, Bertrand Delacretaz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/30/07, Bill Stoddard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...Nominated Mentors
-Bill Stoddard([EMAIL PROTECTED])...
Are we willing to accept a podling with just one mentor?
Although [1] doesn't set a minimum number, we usually
On Oct 2, 2007, at 9:50 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
On 10/1/07, Bertrand Delacretaz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/30/07, Bill Stoddard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...Nominated Mentors
-Bill Stoddard([EMAIL PROTECTED])...
Are we willing to accept a podling with just one mentor?
On 9/30/07, Bill Stoddard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Greetings from North Carolina on a bright, beautiful, sunny fall day!
Thank You to all those who gave comments on the proposal. I made one small
tweak; Tomcat, rather than Geronimo, should be one of the first bindings.
Please vote on
On 9/28/07, Niclas Hedhman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 28 September 2007 17:12, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
On 9/28/07, Bertrand Delacretaz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What we care about is that podlings get the legal stuff right, and
letting releases out without this being ok is not an
On 10/2/07, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i'm thinking more of a benevolent educator than traffic warden
style reviewer role.
When it comes to legal issues related to a release, the warden role is the
more appropriate. It benefits neither the project nor the ASF if we are lax
Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
the responsibility for the release rests with those IPMCers who vote in favour
Correction, the responsibility rests with the Foundation once three
IPMC'ers have voted in favor and the release vote passed.
On 10/2/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
the responsibility for the release rests with those IPMCers who vote in
favour
Correction, the responsibility rests with the Foundation once three
IPMC'ers have voted in favor and the release vote
Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
On 10/2/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
the responsibility for the release rests with those IPMCers who vote in
favour
Correction, the responsibility rests with the Foundation once three
IPMC'ers have voted in favor
Doug Cutting wrote:
I would like to call the Incubator PMC to vote to incubate the proposed
Pig project. Discussion on this list evidenced broad interest in this
project, which bodes well for its ability to build a diverse developer
community.
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/PigProposal
Hi,
This probably belongs on a different list, but incubator seems to be
a good place to get the answer.
The software grant form http://www.apache.org/licenses/software-
grant.txt does not have a fax number or address built in, unlike the
ICLA form http://www.apache.org/licenses/icla.txt
CC'ing secretary, that's under their purvue and shouldn't be changed
arbitrarily by us.
Bill
Craig L Russell wrote:
Hi,
This probably belongs on a different list, but incubator seems to be a
good place to get the answer.
The software grant form
Craig Russell wrote:
having only one mentor is likely to cause process issues for the
podling: there will be no binding quorum
Not necessarily. The initial committers plus the Mentor would form
the PPMC, and in this case five members should be able to muster
three votes.
Unless they are
On Oct 2, 2007, at 5:33 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
On 9/28/07, Niclas Hedhman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 28 September 2007 17:12, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
On 9/28/07, Bertrand Delacretaz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What we care about is that podlings get the legal stuff right,
and
On Oct 2, 2007, at 3:48 PM, Bill Stoddard wrote:
Anyone care to join me mentoring the Imperius project?
I'd be interested in helping out. However, IIUC, mentors must be
members of the Incubator PMC. So I couldn't act in an official
capacity...
--kevan
Kevan Miller wrote:
On Oct 2, 2007, at 3:48 PM, Bill Stoddard wrote:
Anyone care to join me mentoring the Imperius project?
I'd be interested in helping out. However, IIUC, mentors must be members
of the Incubator PMC. So I couldn't act in an official capacity...
I'm sure Imperius is
+1 from me
Paul
On 9/28/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 from me.
I can't see any issues that haven't already been mentioned here or over on
tuscany-dev.
...ant
On 9/27/07, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Apache Tuscany project request IPMC permission to
18 matches
Mail list logo
