[VOTE] Release Apache Empire-db 2.0.5-incubating (rc6)

2009-09-17 Thread Francis De Brabandere
Here we go again :-) Hi, We just created an other release candidate for 2.0.5-incubating (rc6). Our community approved the release so we now have a second binding voting round for IPMC Members/Mentors. fixes since previous rc5: - examples not uploaded to the maven repository any more - tutorial

Re: [VOTE] Release PhotArk M1-incubating (RC4a)

2009-09-17 Thread Luciano Resende
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 10:06 AM, Luciano Resende luckbr1...@gmail.com wrote: The PhotArk community has completed a vote on it's first milestone release (PhotArk M1-Incubating) and  is now looking for IPMC approval to publish the release. Please review and vote on approving the M1-incubating

Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Release OpenWebBeans M3

2009-09-17 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 3:01 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi Niall; The usual process is to allow 72hrs for a vote and not just declare it when 3 votes are received. Also Sebb raised an issue and IMO its good etiquette to allow discussions to run their course before

Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Release OpenWebBeans M3

2009-09-17 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 10:25 AM, Niall Pemberton niall.pember...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 3:01 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi Niall; The usual process is to allow 72hrs for a vote and not just declare it when 3 votes are received. Also Sebb raised an

Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Release OpenWebBeans M3

2009-09-17 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 4:01 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi Niall; The usual process is to allow 72hrs for a vote and not just declare it when 3 votes are received. Also Sebb raised an issue and IMO its good etiquette to allow discussions to run their course before

Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Release OpenWebBeans M3

2009-09-17 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 10:25 AM, Niall Pemberton niall.pember...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 3:01 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi Niall; The usual process is to allow 72hrs for a vote and not just declare it when 3 votes are received. Also Sebb raised an

[VOTE] Relese OpenWebBeans M3- (Second Try)

2009-09-17 Thread Gurkan Erdogdu
Hi; This is the second try of releasing the OpenWebBeans M3. I have corrected Sebb's concerns. OpenWebBeans is an ASL-licensed implementation of the JSR-299: Contexts and Dependency Injection for the Java EE platform which is defined as JSR-299. OpenWebBeans entered the incubator in October

Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Release OpenWebBeans M3

2009-09-17 Thread Gurkan Erdogdu
Then I'm surprised you chose to do something different and IMO impatience isn't a good enough reason. Yes, my fault. Sebb indicated that he thought that one of the points he raised was a blocker and although you responded you didn't allow time to see if he agreed with you. Giving a response is

Re: [VOTE] Release PhotArk M1-incubating (RC4a)

2009-09-17 Thread Angela Cymbalak
+1 (non-binding, I believe) Angie At 02:46 AM 9/17/2009, Luciano Resende wrote: On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 10:06 AM, Luciano Resende luckbr1...@gmail.com wrote: The PhotArk community has completed a vote on it's first milestone release (PhotArk M1-Incubating) and is now looking for IPMC

Re: [VOTE] Release Pivot 1.3 RC3

2009-09-17 Thread Todd Volkert
Voting has expired, and we're two votes shy of the 3 required. Can someone please take a look? -- it should be pretty quick, as the issues brought up in the rc2 candidate have all been resolved. Thanks! -T On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 8:30 AM, Todd Volkert tvolk...@gmail.com wrote: I've received

Re: [VOTE] Release Pivot 1.3 RC3

2009-09-17 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi, On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 4:13 PM, Todd Volkert tvolk...@gmail.com wrote: Voting has expired, and we're two votes shy of the 3 required.  Can someone please take a look? -- it should be pretty quick, as the issues brought up in the rc2 candidate have all been resolved. Where are your

Re: [VOTE] Release Pivot 1.3 RC3

2009-09-17 Thread Todd Volkert
Where are your mentors? Niclas voted +1. Martijn is presumably dealing with his 2-month-old ;-)

Re: [VOTE] Accept Aries proposal for incubation

2009-09-17 Thread Robert Burrell Donkin
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 7:25 PM, Leo Simons m...@leosimons.com wrote: On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 1:09 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote: On Sep 16, 2009, at 4:32 AM, Niall Pemberton wrote: On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 11:43 PM, Niclas Hedhman nic...@hedhman.org wrote: On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at

Re: [VOTE] Accept Aries proposal for incubation

2009-09-17 Thread Bill Stoddard
Jeremy Hughes wrote: 2009/9/16 Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com: On Sep 16, 2009, at 4:32 AM, Niall Pemberton wrote: ... IMO this is more a graduation issue, rather than something that should prevent entry to the incubator - since thats when destination is decided. There are many

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Empire-db 2.0.5-incubating (rc6)

2009-09-17 Thread Thomas Fischer
+1 (binding) Thomas [VOTE] Release Apache Empire-db 2.0.5-incubating (rc6) Here we go again :-) Hi, We just created an other release candidate for 2.0.5-incubating (rc6). Our community approved the release so we now have a second binding voting round for IPMC Members/Mentors.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Empire-db 2.0.5-incubating (rc6)

2009-09-17 Thread Martijn Dashorst
+1 (binding) On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 7:48 PM, Thomas Fischer fisc...@seitenbau.net wrote: +1 (binding)      Thomas [VOTE] Release Apache Empire-db 2.0.5-incubating (rc6) Here we go again :-) Hi, We just created an other release candidate for 2.0.5-incubating (rc6). Our community

Re: [VOTE] Relese OpenWebBeans M3- (Second Try)

2009-09-17 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 10:47 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi; This is the second try of releasing the OpenWebBeans M3. I have corrected Sebb's concerns. OpenWebBeans is an ASL-licensed implementation of the JSR-299: Contexts and Dependency Injection for the Java EE

Re: [VOTE] Relese OpenWebBeans M3- (Second Try)

2009-09-17 Thread sebb
On 17/09/2009, Niall Pemberton niall.pember...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 10:47 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi; This is the second try of releasing the OpenWebBeans M3. I have corrected Sebb's concerns. OpenWebBeans is an ASL-licensed

Re: [VOTE] Release Pivot 1.3 RC3

2009-09-17 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi, On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 3:00 PM, Todd Volkert tvolk...@gmail.com wrote: The Pivot community has voted on and approved a proposal to release Apache Pivot 1.3 Release Candidate 3. We would now like to request the permission of the Incubator PMC to publish the artifacts on the Pivot download

Re: [VOTE] Relese OpenWebBeans M3- (Second Try)

2009-09-17 Thread sebb
On 17/09/2009, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi; This is the second try of releasing the OpenWebBeans M3. I have corrected Sebb's concerns. OpenWebBeans is an ASL-licensed implementation of the JSR-299: Contexts and Dependency Injection for the Java EE platform which is

Re: [VOTE] Relese OpenWebBeans M3- (Second Try)

2009-09-17 Thread Gurkan Erdogdu
Hi Sebb, The several (all?) of the war files in the samples directory tree contain jsf-facelets-1.1.14.jar. This does not appear to be ASF software, but is not mentioned in NOTICE or LICENSE. IMO this is a blocker. I removed it from the NOTICE file because it appears that JSF Facelet is

Re: [VOTE] Relese OpenWebBeans M3- (Second Try)

2009-09-17 Thread Gurkan Erdogdu
IMO a second RC requires another vote on openwebbeans-...@. Votes don't carry over (well mine never does) IMO. Ok. I will create a second round VOTE on dev. Thanks; --Gurkan From: Niall Pemberton niall.pember...@gmail.com To: general@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Relese OpenWebBeans M3- (Second Try)

2009-09-17 Thread David Crossley
Gurkan Erdogdu wrote: OpenWebBeans is an ASL-licensed implementation of the JSR-299: Contexts and Dependency Injection for the Java EE platform which is defined as JSR-299. OpenWebBeans entered the incubator in October 26, 2008. (This issue is not a release blocker.) The phrase