+1: accept CloudStack into Incubator
(binding)
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubato
+1 (non-binding)
>>
>> 2012/4/10 Kevin Kluge:
>>>
>>> Hi All. I'd like to call for a VOTE for CloudStack to enter the
>>> Incubator. The proposal is available at [1] and I have also included it
>>> below. Please vote with:
>>> +1: accept CloudStack into Incubator
>>> +0: don't care
>>> -1: do
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On 04/10/2012 08:45 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
+1 ( binding)
2012/4/10 Kevin Kluge:
Hi All. I'd like to call for a VOTE for CloudStack to enter the Incubator.
The proposal is available at [1] and I have also included it below. Please
vote with:
+1: accept CloudStack
+1 ( binding)
2012/4/10 Kevin Kluge :
> Hi All. I'd like to call for a VOTE for CloudStack to enter the Incubator.
> The proposal is available at [1] and I have also included it below. Please
> vote with:
> +1: accept CloudStack into Incubator
> +0: don't care
> -1: do not accept CloudStack
+1 (binding).
Thanks,
Raymond
On Apr 9, 2012, at 6:32 PM, Kevin Kluge wrote:
> Hi All. I'd like to call for a VOTE for CloudStack to enter the Incubator.
> The proposal is available at [1] and I have also included it below. Please
> vote with:
> +1: accept CloudStack into Incubator
> +0: d
+1 non-binding
Cheers,
Andreas
On 10.04.2012 03:32, Kevin Kluge wrote:
> Hi All. I'd like to call for a VOTE for CloudStack to enter the Incubator.
> The proposal is available at [1] and I have also included it below. Please
> vote with:
> +1: accept CloudStack into Incubator
> +0: don't ca
On 4/9/12 9:38 PM, "David Crossley" wrote:
>Shane Curcuru wrote:
>> Tips on building the main incubator.a.o site appreciated.
>
>There is some doc at [1] http://incubator.apache.org/guides/website.html
>but since moving to use the Apache Content Management System (CMS)
>that page might need some
Shane Curcuru wrote:
> Tips on building the main incubator.a.o site appreciated.
There is some doc at [1] http://incubator.apache.org/guides/website.html
but since moving to use the Apache Content Management System (CMS)
that page might need some revision.
Here is how i do it:
* Local checkout of
Hi All. I'd like to call for a VOTE for CloudStack to enter the Incubator.
The proposal is available at [1] and I have also included it below. Please
vote with:
+1: accept CloudStack into Incubator
+0: don't care
-1: do not accept CloudStack into Incubator (please explain the objection)
The
There was actually some confusion because the manifoldcf directory
never existed. The site has been under its original name of
"connectors" which was never changed when the project's name changed.
What happened today was that I added the "content" directory to the
path in our update script, and at
So you're saying that somehow the content/manifoldcf dir was wiped out.
Were any other podlings affected?
Karl Wright wrote on Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 18:06:46 -0400:
> Thanks for the help. We may migrate to svnpubsub in the not-distant
> future, especially if that is the standard for TLP's. But th
Thanks for the help. We may migrate to svnpubsub in the not-distant
future, especially if that is the standard for TLP's. But this would
not be the right time to do that, I'm afraid.
Karl
On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 5:44 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> Done, but this is likely the LAST TIME we will accom
Done, but this is likely the LAST TIME we will accommodate ANY
sitesthat aren't using at least svnpubsub.
- Original Message -
> From: Karl Wright
> To: Daniel Shahaf
> Cc: general@incubator.apache.org; infrastruct...@apache.org
> Sent: Monday, April 9, 2012 5:37 PM
> Subject: Re: What
Sorry to be thick - but (to Jukka) just adding "content" to the path
does not work (because the root directory
"/www/incubator.apache.org/content/manifoldcf" still needs to be
created by someone with privs greater than I've got), and (to Daniel)
your instructions are too incomplete to follow. The
Fiar enough. That being the case, I would like to join as a committer
(there are enough great mentors already).
Cheers,
Hadrian
On 04/09/2012 12:15 AM, Kevin Kluge wrote:
Hi Hadrian, yes, we have been discussing this. There are a number of options
today that make the system easier to develo
+1
Hadrian
On 04/02/2012 05:10 AM, Andy Seaborne wrote:
This is a call for vote to graduate the Apache Jena podling from Apache
Incubator to be a top level project.
Jena entered incubation in November 2010. The project has added two new
committers and PPMC members, made several releases and has
Tips on building the main incubator.a.o site appreciated. I'm hoping to
cleanup some links and better describe the PMC things, along with
figuring where to include the branding requirements for graduation.
Using two different versions of IBM Java (tried a 1.6 and a 1.7) I get
errors trying to
P.S. Jena looks fairly good, although missing (TM) after the first use
of name, and needs to tweak homepage text a little. I like their logo!
Thanks for that - what are those tweaks (either email or JIRA) and we'll
get them fixed.
Andy
Karl Wright wrote on Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 04:01:21 -0400:
> I happened to notice that a site publish I'd done a week ago did not
> actually update our podling site. Publishing is done in accordance
> with [1]. The problem seems to be that someone has wiped out
> /www/incubator.apache.org/ except
How can we best add the requirement that all podlings must comply with
the PMC branding requirements [1] before graduation?
Looking over the recent Jena thread and especially incubator status
page, there's no specific bullet point or checkoff that lists the PMC
branding requirements. In parti
Hi Sebb,
Thanks so much for taking a look! Responses inline.
On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 2:22 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 7 April 2012 02:59, Benjamin Hindman wrote:
> > Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Mesos
> > (incubating) version 0.9.0. This will be the first incubator releas
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 10:01 AM, Karl Wright wrote:
> I happened to notice that a site publish I'd done a week ago did not
> actually update our podling site. Publishing is done in accordance
> with [1].
See http://markmail.org/message/qwsxbemalubrqhft for the update
notification and relate
I happened to notice that a site publish I'd done a week ago did not
actually update our podling site. Publishing is done in accordance
with [1]. The problem seems to be that someone has wiped out
/www/incubator.apache.org/ except for the content directory, which is
meant solely for the incubator
23 matches
Mail list logo
