Re: Binding votes (Was: [VOTE] Accept Device Access contribution)

2012-04-26 Thread Alexander Broekhuis
*ping* Can someone please take a look at this? [1] doesn't give me any clear answer.. Should we see this as a code modification or not? I'd like to finish the code donation and import the code into the Celix archive. Thanks! [1]: http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html 2012/4/24

Re: Binding votes (Was: [VOTE] Accept Device Access contribution)

2012-04-26 Thread Ross Gardler
Looks fine by me. You have no objections to the code. As long as the donation is handled properly from an IP perspective accepting this is fine. In general there is no need to Vote on this. Decisions need not be made through time consuming votes (unless the issue is contentious), consensus

Re: Binding votes (Was: [VOTE] Accept Device Access contribution)

2012-04-26 Thread Alexander Broekhuis
Hi Ross 2012/4/26 Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com Looks fine by me. You have no objections to the code. As long as the donation is handled properly from an IP perspective accepting this is fine. Thanks for your opinion, I have closed the vote as successful and will continue with the

Re: Binding votes (Was: [VOTE] Accept Device Access contribution)

2012-04-26 Thread Ross Gardler
On 26 April 2012 09:59, Alexander Broekhuis a.broekh...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Ross 2012/4/26 Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com ... In general there is no need to Vote on this. Decisions need not be made through time consuming votes (unless the issue is contentious), consensus through

Re: Binding votes (Was: [VOTE] Accept Device Access contribution)

2012-04-26 Thread Craig L Russell
Hi, I understand that the author of this patch is Pepijn Noltes, who has an ICLA on file. If the podling wants the code, import it. Craig On Apr 26, 2012, at 12:14 AM, Alexander Broekhuis wrote: *ping* Can someone please take a look at this? [1] doesn't give me any clear answer.. Should

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenOffice 3.4 (incubating) RC1

2012-04-26 Thread Marvin Humphrey
2012/4/25 Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@googlemail.com:   [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache OpenOffice 3.4 (incubating)   [ ]  0 Don't care   [ ] -1 Do not release this package because... +1 IPMC * Signatures and sums look good. * RAT report at

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenOffice 3.4 (incubating) RC1

2012-04-26 Thread Dave Fisher
I already voted +1 IPMC in the ooo-dev voting thread. Just noting that here. AOO 3.4 (incubating) Vote is now at 2 +1 IPMC votes. Regards, Dave On Apr 26, 2012, at 8:28 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: 2012/4/25 Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@googlemail.com: [ ] +1 Release this package as

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Mesos 0.9.0-incubating (RC5)

2012-04-26 Thread Tom White
+1 checked checksums and signatures; license, notice, disclaimer and svn tag all look correct. Tom On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 12:53 PM, Benjamin Hindman b...@berkeley.edu wrote: Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Mesos (incubating) version 0.9.0. This will be the first

Re: [VOTE] Release MRUnit version 0.9.0-incubating-rc2

2012-04-26 Thread Tom White
+1 checked checksums, signatures, license/notice/disclaimer, svn tag. Tom On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 1:22 PM, Brock Noland br...@cloudera.com wrote: This is an incubator release for Apache MRUnit, version 0.9.0-incubating. It fixes the following issues:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Mesos 0.9.0-incubating (RC5)

2012-04-26 Thread Matei Zaharia
Thanks for taking a look, Tom! Is there anyone else from the IPMC who could take a bit of time to check this over and vote? Matei On Apr 26, 2012, at 5:22 PM, Tom White wrote: +1 checked checksums and signatures; license, notice, disclaimer and svn tag all look correct. Tom On Thu,